Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Subfascial Transaxillary Breast Augmentation Without Endoscopic Assistance: Technical Aspects and Outcome

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) is a well-studied procedure, few previous reports exist concerning the subfascial technique, especially without endoscopic assistance. This study aimed to analyze the feasibility of the technique after breast augmentation in terms of its indication, surgical technique, limitations, and clinical outcome.

Methods

For this study, 42 patients underwent TBA without endoscopic assistance. The technique was indicated for patients with breasts of small or moderate volume without ptosis, patients who wanted no breast scars, and patients who had a poorly defined inframammary fold. The mean follow-up period was 16 months. Implant and incision approach complications were evaluated. Information on patient satisfaction was collected.

Results

A total of 14 complications occurred in 42 patients, all of them minor. Axillary incision–related complications occurred in 26% of the patients, as represented by a late axillary subcutaneous band (119%), sensory loss in the inner aspect of the arm (71%), and a hypertrophic scar and small wound dehiscence (71%). No patient presented with capsular contracture, visible rippling, or infection. Most of the patients (93%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their result, and none regretted the surgery.

Conclusion

The TBA procedure without endoscopic assistance is a simple and reliable technique for breast augmentation. Most of the complications in this study were minor and predictable. They did not interfere with the aesthetic outcome nor the normal postoperative recovery. With TBA, success depends on patient selection as well as careful intra- and postoperative management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benito-Ruiz J: Subfascial breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1088, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosworth JL, Chossein NA: Limited surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of localized breast cancer: An overview. Surg Clin North Am 64:1115, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dowden RV: Dispelling the myths and misconceptions about transumbilical breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:190, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dowden RV: Subcutaneous fibrous banding after transaxillary subpectoral endoscopic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:257, 1997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghaderl B, Hoenig JM, Dado D, Angelats J, Vandevender D: Incidence of intercostobrachial nerve injury after transaxillary breast augmentation. Aesth Surg J 22:26, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goes JC, Landecker A: Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: Seven years of experience with the subfascial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 27:178, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Auersvald A, Damasio RC: Subfascial endoscopic transaxillary augmentation mammaplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 24:216, 2000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R, Araujo LR, Damasio RC, Auersvald A: Subfascial breast implant: A new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:904, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray RJ, Forstner-Barthell AW, Pockaj BA, Schild SE, Halyard MY: Breast-conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy are feasible in cancer patients with previous implant breast augmentation. Am J Surg 188:122, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hidalgo DA: Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:2202, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoehler H: Breast augmentation: The axillary approach. Br J Plast Surg 26:373, 1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang GJ, Hardesty RA, Mills D: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the augmented breast: Role of the transaxillary subpectoral approach. Aesth Surg J 23:184, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Klimberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P: The sentinel node in breast cancer: A multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 339:941, 1998

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Laufer E: Fibrous bands following subpectoral endoscopic breast augmentation. Plast Recons Surg 99:257, 1997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maximovich SP: Fibrous bands following subpectoral endoscopic breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:1304, 1996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McMasters KM, Tuttle TM, Carlson DJ, Brown CM, Noyes RD, Glaser RL, Vennekotter DJ, Turk PS, Tate PS, Sardi A, Cerrito PB, Edwards MJ: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer: A suitable alternative to routine axillary dissection in multi-institutional practice when optimal technique is used. J Clin Oncol 18:2560, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Buschpiegel C, Ono C, Montag E, Fells K, Arruda E, Sturtz G, Kovac P, Filassi JR, Gemperli R, Ferreira MC: The feasibility of sentinel lymph node detection in patients with previous transaxillary implant breast augmentation: Preliminary results. Aesth Plast Surg 29:163, 2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Serra-Renom J, Garrido MF, Yoon T: Augmentation mammaplasty with anatomic soft, cohesive silicone implant using the transaxillary approach at a subfascial level with endoscopic assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:640, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith JW, Shaw LW, Friedland JA: Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: A comparative analysis of endoscopic versus nonendoscopic transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty using smooth saline implants. Plast Surg Forum 21:127, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon JA, Barton FE: Augmentation mammaplasty. Selected Read Plast Surg 8:1, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  21. Solz H: Transaxillary breast augmentation without endoscopic assistance. Personal communication, 2005

  22. Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML: Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:73, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stoff-Khalili MA, Scholze R, Morgan WR, Metcalf JD: Subfascial periareolar augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1280, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tebbetts JB: Does fascia provide additional meaningful coverage over a breast implant? Plast Reconstr Surg 113:777, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tebbetts JB: Dual-plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant–soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tebbetts JB: Transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: Long-term follow-up and refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:636, 1984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Temple WJ, Ketcham AS: Preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve during axillary dissection for breast cancer. Am Surg 150:585, 1985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, Viale G, Zurrida S, Bedoni M, Costa A, de Cicco C, Geraghty JG, Luini A, Sacchini V, Veronesi P: Sentinel node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative nodes. Lancet 349:1864, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Delvecchio M: Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of breast. N Engl J Med 305:6, 1981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wright JH, Bevin AG: Augmentation mammaplasty by the transaxillary approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:429, 1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Young RV, Bindrup JR: Transaxillary submuscular augmentation and subcutaneous fibrous bands. Plast Recons Surg 99:257, 1997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Teresa Curi for English revision. No financial benefit was received by the authors for this study. The Silimed implants were donated by the manufacturers for the patients submitted to the surgery at the Hospital das Clínicas-University of São Paulo Medical School (HC-FMUSP) as a branch of a prospective protocol. The McGhan implants were purchased by the hospital and patients and not donated by the manufacturers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Plastic Surgery, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua da Consolação 3605 ap 91, 01416-001, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Alexandre M. Munhoz M.D., Klaus Fells M.D., Eduardo Arruda M.D., Eduardo Montag M.D., Alberto Okada M.D., Claudia Aldrighi M.D., José M. Aldrighi M.D., Ph.D, Rolf Gemperli M.D., Ph.D. & Marcus C. Ferreira M.D., Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Alexandre M. Munhoz M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Klaus Fells M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eduardo Arruda M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eduardo Montag M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alberto Okada M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claudia Aldrighi M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. José M. Aldrighi M.D., Ph.D
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rolf Gemperli M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Marcus C. Ferreira M.D., Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre M. Munhoz M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munhoz, A.M., Fells, K., Arruda, E. et al. Subfascial Transaxillary Breast Augmentation Without Endoscopic Assistance: Technical Aspects and Outcome. Aesth Plast Surg 30, 503–512 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation