Abstract
Social insects frequently make important collective decisions, such as selecting the best food sources. Many collective decisions are achieved via communication, for example by differential recruitment depending on resource quality. However, even species which only rarely recruit can respond to a changing environment on a collective level by tracking food source quality. We hypothesised that an apparent collective decision to focus on the highest quality food source can be explained by differential learning of food qualities. Overall, ants may learn the location of higher quality food faster, with most ants finally congregating at the best food source. To test the effect of reward quality and motivation on learning in Lasius niger, we trained individual ants to find sucrose molarities of varying concentrations on one arm of a T-maze in spring and in autumn after 1 or 4 days of food deprivation. As predicted, ants learned fastest in spring and lowest in autumn, with reduced food deprivation leading to slower learning. Surprisingly, the effect of food quality and motivation on the learning speed was small. However, persistence rates varied dramatically: All ants in spring made all (6) return visits to all food qualities, in contrast to only 33% of ants in autumn after 1 day of food deprivation. Fitting the empirical findings into an agent-based model revealed that even a weak tendency of ants to memorise routes to high-quality food sources faster can result in ecologically sensible colony-level behaviour. This collective-seeming decision is non-interactive, and thus resembles an annealing process.
Significance statement
Collective decisions of insects are often achieved via communication and/or other interactions between individuals. However, animals can also make collective decisions in the absence of communication. We show that foraging motivation and food quality can affect both route memory formation speed and the likelihood to return to the food source and thus mediate selective food exploitation. An agent-based model, implemented with our empirical findings, demonstrates that at the collective level even small differences in learning lead to ecologically sensible behaviour: mildly food-deprived colonies are selective for high-quality food while highly food-deprived colonies exploit all food sources equally. We therefore suggest that non-interactive factors such as individual learning and the foraging motivation of a colony can mediate or even drive group-level behaviour in a process resembling annealing. Instead of accounting collective behaviour exclusively to social interactions, a possible contribution of individual processes should also be considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al Toufailia H, Grüter C, Ratnieks FLW, Herberstein M (2013) Persistence to unrewarding feeding locations by honeybee foragers (Apis mellifera): the effects of experience, resource profitability and season. Ethology 119:1096–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12170
Amé J-M, Halloy J, Rivault C, Detrain C, Deneubourg JL (2006) Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:5835–5840. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507877103
Aron S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1988) Visual cues and trail-following idiosyncrasy in Leptothorax unifasciatus: an orientation process during foraging. Insect Soc 35:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02225811
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft 67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insect Soc 37:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224053
Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992a) Trails and U-turns in the selection of a path by the ant Lasius niger. J Theor Biol 159:397–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80686-1
Beckers R, Deneubourg J-L, Goss S (1992b) Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L.). Insect Soc 39:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240531
Beckers R, Deneubourg J-L, Goss S (1993) Modulation of trail laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. J Insect Behav 6:751–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201674
Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2000) Long-range foraging by the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L. Funct Ecol 14:490–496. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00443.x
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:289–300
Bhatkar A, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53:229. https://doi.org/10.2307/3493193
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
Černý V (1985) Thermodynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm. J Optim Theory Appl 45:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940812
Cohen JD, McClure SM, Yu AJ (2007) Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362:933–942. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
Collett TS, Graham P, Durier V (2003) Route learning by insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 13:718–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2003.10.004
Cook SC, Eubanks MD, Gold RE, Behmer ST (2011) Seasonality directs contrasting food collection behavior and nutrient regulation strategies in ants. PLoS One 6:e25407. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025407
Cosens D, Toussaint N (1986) The dynamic nature of the activities of the wood ant Formica aquilonia foraging to static food resources within a laboratory habitat. Physiol Entomol 11:383–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1986.tb00429.x
Couzin ID, Krause J (2003) Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv Stud Behav 32:1–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01001-5
Czaczkes TJ, Ratnieks FLW (2012) Pheromone trails in the Brazilian ant Pheidole oxyops: extreme properties and dual recruitment action. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1367-7
Czaczkes TJ, Grüter C, Ellis L, Wood E, Ratnieks FLW (2013) Ant foraging on complex trails: route learning and the role of trail pheromones in Lasius niger. J Exp Biol 216:188–197. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.076570
Czaczkes TJ, Schlosser L, Heinze J, Witte V (2014) Ants use directionless odour cues to recall odour-associated locations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:981–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1710-2
Czaczkes TJ, Czaczkes B, Iglhaut C, Heinze J (2015a) Composite collective decision-making. Proc Biol Sci 282:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2723
Czaczkes TJ, Grüter C, Ratnieks FLW (2015b) Trail pheromones: an integrative view of their role in social insect colony organization. Annu Rev Entomol 60:581–599. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020627
Czaczkes TJ, Salmane AK, Klampfleuthner FAM, Heinze J (2016) Private information alone can trigger trapping of ant colonies in local feeding optima. J Exp Biol 219:744–751. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.131847
Czaczkes TJ, Beckwith JJ (2018) Information synergy: adding unambiguous quality information rescues social information use in ants. bioRxiv:219980. https://doi.org/10.1101/219980
Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM, Verhaeghe JC (1983) Probabilistic behaviour in ants: a strategy of errors? J Theor Biol 105:259–271
Devigne C, Detrain C (2002) Collective exploration and area marking in the ant Lasius niger. Insect Soc 49:357–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012659
Devigne C, Detrain C (2005) Foraging responses of the aphid tending ant Lasius niger to spatio-temporal changes in aphid colonies Cinara cedri. Acta Zool Sin 51:161–166
Dussutour A, Nicolis SC (2013) Flexibility in collective decision-making by ant colonies: tracking food across space and time. Chaos Soliton Fract 50:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2013.02.004
Dussutour A, Fourcassie V, Helbing D, Deneubourg J-L (2004) Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions. Nature 428:70–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02345
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H (2011) Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5
Friedrich A, Thomas U, Müller U (2004) Learning at different satiation levels reveals parallel functions for the cAMP-protein kinase A cascade in formation of long-term memory. J Neurosci 24:4460–4468. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0669-04.2004
Galef BG Jr, Giraldeau L-A (2001) Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim Behav 61:3–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1557
Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V, Giske J, Goss-Custard J, Grand T, Heinz SK, Huse G, Huth A, Jepsen JU, Jørgensen C, Mooij WM, Müller B, Pe’er G, Piou C, Railsback SF, Robbins AM, Robbins MM, Rossmanith E, Rüger N, Strand E, Souissi S, Stillman RA, Vabø R, Visser U, DeAngelis DL (2006) A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Model 198:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023
Grimm V, Berger U, DeAngelis DL, Polhill JG, Giske J, Railsback SF (2010) The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol Model 221:2760–2768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.019
Grüter C, Czaczkes TJ, Ratnieks FLW (2011) Decision making in ant foragers (Lasius niger) facing conflicting private and social information. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1020-2
Hartig F (2016) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.1.5. http://cran.r-project.org/package=DHARMa
Hunt ER, O’Shea-Wheller T, Albery GF, Bridger TH, Gumn M, Franks NR (2014) Ants show a leftward turning bias when exploring unknown nest sites. Biol Lett 10:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.0945
Kipyatkov VE (1993) Annual cycles of development in ants: diversity, evolution, regulation. Proc Colloq Soc Insects 2:25–48
Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671
Lihoreau M, Deneubourg J-L, Rivault C (2010) Collective foraging decision in a gregarious insect. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1577–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0971-7
Lindauer M (1948) Über die Einwirkung von Duft- und Geschmacksstoffen sowie anderer Faktoren auf die Tänze der Bienen. Z Vgl Physiol 31:348–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297951
MacKay WP (1985) A comparison of the energy budgets of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Oecologia 66:484–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379338
Mailleux A-C, Detrain C, Deneubourg J-L (2006) Starvation drives a threshold triggering communication. J Exp Biol 209:4224–4229. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.02461
Mallon E, Pratt S, Franks N (2001) Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650100377
Mehlhorn K, Newell BR, Todd PM, Lee MD, Morgan K, Braithwaite VA, Hausmann D, Fiedler K, Gonzalez C (2015) Unpacking the exploration–exploitation tradeoff: a synthesis of human and animal literatures. Decision 2:191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000033
Menzel R (1999) Memory dynamics in the honeybee. J Comp Physiol A 185:323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050392
Morgan DE (2009) Trail pheromones of ants. Physiol Entomol 34:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00658.x
Pamir E, Chakroborty NK, Stollhoff N, Gehring KB, Antemann V, Morgenstern L, Felsenberg J, Eisenhardt D, Menzel R, Nawrot MP (2011) Average group behavior does not represent individual behavior in classical conditioning of the honeybee. Learn Mem 18:733–741. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.2232711
Pamir E, Szyszka P, Scheiner R, Nawrot MP (2014) Rapid learning dynamics in individual honeybees during classical conditioning. Front Behav Neurosci 8:1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00313
Patrick SC, Pinaud D, Weimerskirch H (2017) Boldness predicts an individual’s position along an exploration-exploitation foraging trade-off. J Anim Ecol 86:1257–1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12724
Popp S, Buckham-Bonnett P, Evison SEF, Robinson EJH, Czaczkes TJ (2017) No evidence for tactile communication of direction in foraging Lasius ants. Insect Soc 65:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-017-0583-6
Pruitt JN, DiRienzo N, Kralj-Fišer S, Johnson JC, Sih A (2011) Individual- and condition-dependent effects on habitat choice and choosiness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1987–1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1208-0
Quinet Y, de Biseau J-C, Pasteels JM (1997) Food recruitment as a component of the trunk-trail foraging behaviour of Lasius fuliginosus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Process 40:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00773-0
R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Ratnieks FLW, Reeve HK (1992) Conflict in single-queen hymenopteran societies: the structure of conflict and processes that reduce conflict in advanced eusocial species. J Theor Biol 158:33–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80647-2
Ray S, Ferneyhough B (1997) Seasonal variation of proboscis extension reflex conditioning in the honey bee (Apis Mellifera). J Apic Res 36:108–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1997.11100936
Reid CR, Sumpter DJT, Beekman M (2011) Optimisation in a natural system: argentine ants solve the Towers of Hanoi. J Exp Biol 214:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.048173
Reinhard J, Srinivasan MV, Zhang S (2006) Complex memories in honeybees: can there be more than two? J Comp Physiol A 192:409–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-005-0079-0
Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF (eds) Classical conditioning II: current research and theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 64–99
Salo O, Rosengren R (2001) Memory of location and site recognition in the ant Formica uralensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 107:737–752. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00702.x
Scheiner R, Erber J, Page RE Jr (1999) Tactile learning and the individual evaluation of the reward in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Comp Physiol A 185:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050360
Scheiner R, Barnert M, Erber J (2003) Variation in water and sucrose responsiveness during the foraging season affects proboscis extension learning in honey bees. Apidologie 34:67–72. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2002050
Scheiner R, Page RE, Erber J (2004) Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie 35:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004001
Scheiner R, Kuritz-Kaiser A, Menzel R, Erber J (2005) Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees. Learn Mem 12:626–635. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.98105
Seeley T, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00175101
Seeley TD (1986) Social foraging by honeybees: how colonies allocate foragers among patches of flowers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00295707
Seeley TD, Buhrman SC (2001) Nest-site selection in honey bees: how well do swarms implement the “best-of-N” decision rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:416–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650000299
Sueur C, King AJ, Conradt L, Kerth G, Lusseau D, Mettke-Hofmann C, Schaffner CM, Williams L, Zinner D, Aureli F (2011) Collective decision-making and fission-fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework. Oikos 120:1608–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19685.x
Wilensky U (1999) NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
Wilson EO (1962) Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 1. The organization of mass-foraging. Anim Behav 10:134–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(62)90141-0
Acknowledgments
We thank Benedict Grüneberg for collecting part of the data and Florian Hartig for fruitful discussions about statistical methods.
Funding
F.B.O. and T.J.C. were funded by a DFG Emmy Noether grant to T.J.C. (grant no. CZ 237/1-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Communicated by W. Hughes
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oberhauser, F.B., Koch, A. & Czaczkes, T.J. Small differences in learning speed for different food qualities can drive efficient collective foraging in ant colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2583-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2583-6