Abstract
Kamath and Losos (Kamath A, Losos J (2017) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:89) appropriately pointed out that researchers studying Anolis lizards have persisted for years in erroneously assuming that females only mate with the territorial male with whom they share space. However, Bush and Simberloff (Bush JM, Simberloff D (2018) Behav Ecol Sociobiol, in press) correctly suggested that this error did not arise because male anoles are not territorial. Instead, I suggest that, as was the case for other vertebrate taxa, researchers studying Anolis mating systems implicitly assumed that females could be viewed as “resources” defended by males, and that each female passively mated with the male who won the territory that overlapped her home range. This assumption was maintained in spite of behavioral observations indicating that female anoles might have access to sperm from males other than the current territory owner, until it was explicitly refuted by genetic data indicating that some females mate with more than one male. However, we still don’t know the extent to which male anoles increase their paternity by defending territories that overlap with female ranges, or the extent to which female anoles increase their control over the paternity of their hatchlings by actively mating with or utilizing the sperm of different males.
References
Bush JM, Simberloff D (2018) A case for anole territoriality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, in press
Calsbeek R, Bonneaud C, Prabhu S, Manoukis N, Smith TB (2007) Multiple paternity and sperm storage lead to increased genetic diversity in Anolis lizards. Evol Ecol Res 9:495–503
Double M, Cockburn A (2000) Pre-dawn infidelity: females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy-wrens. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:465–470. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1023
Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327542
Kamath A, Losos J (2017) The erratic and contingent progression of research on territoriality: a case study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2319-z
Ostfeld RS (1990) The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends Ecol Evol 5:411–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(90)90026-a
Smith SM (1988) Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees-the role of the female. Behaviour 107:15–23. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853988x00160
Stamps JA (1977) Relationship between resource competition, risk, and aggression in a tropical territorial lizard. Ecology 58:349–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935609
Stamps JA (1997) The role of females in extra pair copulations in socially monogamous territorial animals. In: Gowaty PA (ed) Feminism and Evolutionary Biology. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 294–319
Tokarz RR (1998) Mating pattern in the lizard Anolis sagrei: implications for mate choice and sperm competition. Herpetologica 54:388–394
Trivers RL (1976) Sexual selection and resource-accruing abilities in Anolis garmani. Evolution 30:253–269. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407700
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by P. M. Kappeler
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stamps, J.A. Polygynandrous anoles and the myth of the passive female. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 107 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2523-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2523-5