Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Local mating markets in humans and non-human animals

  • Review
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In biology, the term ‘mating market’ has been fashionable for a few decades only, but sexual selection theory was implicitly based on economic principles from the start. I regard mating individuals explicitly as traders on markets and distinguish ‘global mating markets’, consisting of all reproducing members of a population, from ‘local mating markets’ (LMMs) that are disconnected in space and/or time. I focus on ways in which individuals make the best of variation among LMMs by adapting their mating strategy to each local market they enter. The ‘operational sex ratio’ (OSR; Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Science 197:215–223) gives a first approximation of the balance of power between the two trader classes: males and females ready to reproduce. The parameter I use is the local OSR (LOSR), the OSR of a single LMM. The balance of power is dependent not only on the LOSR, however, but also on the production costs and exchange values of ‘crucial commodities’, which often vary locally and over time. Distinguishing LMMs is most useful for species with strong variation in the LOSR. Human mating markets distorted by war, selective abortion and sex-biased migration are among the best-documented local markets with aberrant OSRs. Traders on LMMs may strategically adjust to supply and demand ratios and changes in their own market value but also attempt to change local market conditions or transfer to another local market with better conditions. Fine-tuning can result not only from conditional strategies, evolved under natural and sexual selection, but also from learning processes as far as species-specific cognitive constraints allow.

Significance statement

Biological market theory (BMT), which deals with cooperation among unrelated agents in general, is combined with sexual selection theory (SST), which deals with reproductive cooperation, to focus on an aspect that received little attention in the vast SST literature: adaptations that improve mating success when the market value of an individual varies considerably from one local mating market (LMM) to the next. An individual’s market value on an LMM is determined not only by the local operational sex ratio (LOSR) but also by the value of the goods and services that both sexes invest in their mates and/or the communal offspring. Case studies of both humans and non-human animals are used to illustrate the difference between global and local markets and to evaluate predictions based on the LMM-hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Taylor EM, Khan MR, Schwartz RJ, Miller WC (2013) Sex ratio, poverty, and concurrent partnerships among men and women in the United States: a multilevel analysis. Ann Epidemiol 23:716–719

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (2013) Animal behavior. An evolutionary approach, 10th edn. Sinauer, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen KR, Hauber ME (2013) Self-referencing and mate choice among college students: epiphenomenon or consistent patterns of preference across populations? J Soc Evol Cult Psychol 7:163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S (2007) Why the marriage squeeze cannot cause dowry inflation. J Econ Theory 137:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews TM, Lukaszewski AW, Simmons ZL, Bleske-Rechek A (2017) Cue-based estimates of reproductive value explain women’s body attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 38:461–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angrist J (2002) How do sex ratios affect marriage and labor markets? Evidence from America’s second generation. Q J Econ 117:997–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auge A-C, Auld HL, Sherratt TN, Godin J-GJ (2016) Do males form social associations based on sexual attractiveness in a fission-fusion fish society? PLoS One 11:e0151243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay P (2017) Attractiveness biases are the tip of the iceberg in biological markets. Behav Brain Sci 40:17–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson M, Healy SD (2005) Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 20:659–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1978) The economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (2009) A treatise on the family, Enlarged edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

  • Bereczkei T, Voros S, Gal A, Bernath L (1997) Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology 103:681–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid E, Dion K, Walster E, Walster GW (1971) Physical attractiveness and dating choice: a test of the matching hypothesis. J Exp Soc Psychol 7:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid E, Walster E (1974) Physical attractiveness. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 7:157–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar V (2015) The demographic transition and the position of women: a marriage market perspective. CEPR discussion paper no DP10619, London

  • Bhat PNM, Halli SS (1999) Demography of brideprice and dowry: causes and consequences of the Indian marriage squeeze. Pop Stud 53:129–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbach D, Girndt A, Hamfler S et al (2011) Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice. Biol Lett 7:349–351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Billig MS (1992) The marriage squeeze and the rise of groomprice in India’s Kerala state. J Comp Fam Stud 23:197–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GR, Laland KN, Borgerhoff Mulder M (2009) Bateman’s principles and human sex roles. Trends Ecol Evol 24:297–304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Muntz GA, Ladowski AJ (2012) Low mate encounter rate increases male risk taking in a sexually cannibalistic praying mantis. PLoS One 7:e35377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary R, Noë R (2003) Biological markets: the ubiquitous influence of partner choice on the dynamics of cleaner fish-client reef fish interactions. In: Hammerstein P (ed) Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 167–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley NT, Foster VS (2006) Variation in female choice of mates: condition influences selectivity. Anim Behav 72:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM (1989) Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav Brain Sci 12:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM, Schmitt DP (1993) Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol Rev 100:204–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss DM, Shackelford TK (2008) Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evol Psychol 6:134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buston PM, Emlen ST (2003) Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: the relationship between self-perception and mate preference in western society. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8805–8810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Callander S, Hayes CL, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (2013) Experimental evidence that immediate neighbors affect male attractiveness. Behav Ecol 24:730–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1987) Self definition by rejection: the case of gang girls. Soc Probl 34:451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1995) A few good men: evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethol Sociobiol 16:99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1999) Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behav Brain Sci 22:203–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (2004) Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts. J Sex Res 41:16–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (2013) The evolutionary psychology of women’s aggression. Philos T Roy Soc B 368:20130078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona-Isunza MC, Ancona S, Székely T, Ramallo-González AP, Cruz-López M, Serrano-Meneses MA, Küpper C (2017) Adult sex ratio and operational sex ratio exhibit different temporal dynamics in the wild. Behav Ecol 28:523–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash TF, Cash DW, Butters JW (1983) “Mirror, mirror, on the wall...?”: contrast effects and self-evaluations of physical attractiveness. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 9:351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro FN, Hattori WT, Yamamoto ME, Lopes FA (2013) Romantic partners in a market perspective: expectations about what ensures a highly desirable partner. Psychol Rep 113:605–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cestari C, Loiselle BA, Pizo MA (2016) Trade-offs in male display activity with lek size. PLoS One 11:e0162943

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapais B (2013) Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure. Evol Anthropol 22:52–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chu S, Farr D, Munoz LC, Lycett JE (2011) Interpersonal trust and market value moderates the bias in women’s preferences away from attractive high-status men. Personal Individ Differ 51:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent ACJ (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4:386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogan E, Parker S, Zellner DA (2013) Beauty beyond compare: effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast. J Exp Psychol Human 39:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy-Beam D, Goetz CD, Buss DM (2016) What predicts romantic relationship satisfaction and mate retention intensity: mate preference fulfillment or mate value discrepancies? Evol Hum Behav 37:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway JR, Noë N, Stulp G, Pollet TV (2015) Finding your soulmate: homosexual and heterosexual age preferences in online dating. Pers Relat 22:666–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtiol A, Picq S, Godelle B, Raymond M, Ferdy J-B (2010) From preferred to actual mate characteristics: the case of human body shape. PLoS One 5:e13010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Krebs JR, West S (2012) An introduction to behavioural ecology, 4th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1980) Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In: Barlow GW, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: beyond nature/nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, pp 331–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson BJW, Sulikowski D, Gouda-Vossos A, Rantala MJ, Brooks RC (2016) The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women’s ratings of men’s facial attractiveness. J Evol Biol 29:2311–2320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn MJ, Brinton S, Clark L (2010) Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evol Hum Behav 31:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzieweczynski TL, Lyman S, Poor EA (2009) Male Siamese fighting fish, Betta splendens, increase rather than conceal courtship behavior when a rival is present. Ethology 115:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson S, Laumann EO, Paik A, Mahay J (2004) The theory of sex markets. In: Laumann EO, Ellingson S, Mahay J, Paik A, Youm Y (eds) The sexual organization of the city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engels S, Sauer KP (2006) Resource-dependent nuptial feeding in Panorpa vulgaris: an honest signal for male quality. Behav Ecol 17:628–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L (2007) Sex, food and conflicts: nutrition dependent nuptial feeding and pre-mating struggles in scorpionflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe M, Zellner D, Cogan E, Parker S (2014) Attractiveness difference magnitude affected by context, range, and categorization. Perception 43:59–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fossett MA, Kiecolt KJ (1991) A methodological review of the sex ratio: alternatives for comparative research. J Marriage Fam 53:941–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furl N (2016) Facial-attractiveness choices are predicted by divisive normalization. Psychol Sci 27:1379–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D, Shapely LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad SW, Simpson JA (2000) The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behav Brain Sci 23:573–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman RE, Haight NA, Kimata LG (1984) Context effects on the perceived physical attractiveness of faces. J Exp Soc Psychol 20:409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R (2003) Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev 78:385–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Manage J 17:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griggio M, Hoi H (2010) Only females in poor condition display a clear preference and prefer males with an average badge. BMC Evol Biol 10:261

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard-Shechtman SA (1993) On the economics of marriage: a theory of marriage, labor, and divorce. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto CZ (2008) Economic, social and spatial dimensions of India’s excess child masculinity. Population-E 63:91–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilmoto CZ (2012) Skewed sex ratios at birth and future marriage squeeze in China and India, 2005–2100. Demography 49:77–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gumert MD (2007) Payment for sex in a macaque mating market. Anim Behav 74:1655–1667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven M, Winking J, Kaplan H, von Rueden C, McAllister L (2009) A bioeconomic approach to marriage and the sexual division of labor. Hum Nat 20:151–183

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierres SE, Kenrick DT, Partch JJ (1999) Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: contrast effects in self-assessment reflect gender differences in mate selection. Pers Soc Psychol B 25:1126–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttentag M, Secord PF (1983) Too many women? The sex ratio question. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein P (1981) The role of asymmetries in animal contests. Anim Behav 29:193–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein P, Noë R (2016) Biological trade and markets. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes K, Smith KR (2010) Do women stop early? Similarities in fertility decline in humans and chimpanzees. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1204:43–53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J, Boyd R, Richerson PJ (2012) The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:657–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henshaw JM, Kahn AT, Fritzsche K (2016) A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E300–E308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hill SE, Delpriore DJ, Rodeheffer CD, Butterfield ME (2014) The effect of ecological harshness on perceptions of the ideal female body size: an experimental life history approach. Evol Hum Behav 35:148–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoi H, Griggio M (2012) Bearded reedlings adjust their pair-bond behaviour in relation to the sex and attractiveness of unpaired conspecifics. PLoS One 7:e32806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holveck M-J, Riebel K (2010) Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard RD (1978) The evolution of mating strategies in bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana Evolution:850–871

  • Howard RD (1984) Alternative mating behaviors of young male bullfrogs. Am Zool 24:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang K (2014) Marriage squeeze in China past, present, and future. J Fam Issues 35:1642–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber J, Payne JW, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consum Res 9:90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I (2004) Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1213–1217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Q, Feldman MW, Li S (2014) Marriage squeeze, never-married proportion, and mean age at first marriage in China. Popul Res Policy Rev 33:189–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Bolnick DI, Kirkpatrick M (2013) Assortative mating in animals. Am Nat 181:E125–E138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JH, Ferguson B (2006) The marriage squeeze in Colombia, 1973–2005: the role of excess male death. Soc Biol 53:140–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandrik M, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2015) Scarcity of female mates predicts regional variation in men’s and women’s sociosexual orientation across US states. Evol Hum Behav 36:206–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler PM (2017) Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsnelson E, Motro U, Feldman MW, Lotem A (2012) Evolution of learned strategy choice in a frequency-dependent game. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1176–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B (1994) Polygyny in the blue tit: unbalanced sex ratio and female aggression restrict mate choice. Anim Behav 47:943–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Lanctot RB, Gill VA, Hatch SA, Valcu M (2007) Do females trade copulations for food? An experimental study on kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla). Behav Ecol 18:345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick DT, Gutierres SE (1980) Contrast effects and judgments of physical attractiveness: when beauty becomes a social problem. J Pers Soc Psychol 38:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1987) The evolutionary forces acting on female mating preferences in polygynous animals. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Klug H, Jennions MD (2012) Unifying cornerstones of sexual selection: operational sex ratio, Bateman gradient and the scope for competitive investment. Ecol Lett 15:1340–1351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer KL, Schacht R, Bell A (2017) Adult sex ratios and partner scarcity among hunter–gatherers: implications for dispersal patterns and the evolution of human sociality. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:20160316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger DJ, Schlemmer E (2009) Male scarcity is differentially related to male marital likelihood across the life course. Evol Psychol 7:280–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küpper C, Stocks M, Risse JE et al (2016) A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff. Nat Genet 48:79–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laland KN, Sterelny K, Odling-Smee J, Hoppitt W, Uller T (2011) Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334:1512–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lank DB, Smith CM, Hanotte O, Burke T, Cooke F (1995) Genetic polymorphism for alternative mating behaviour in lekking male ruff Philomachus pugnax. Nature 378:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lappan S, Morino L (2014) Mating in the presence of a competitor: audience effects may promote male social tolerance in polyandrous siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus) groups. Behaviour 151:1067–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann EO, Ellingson S, Mahay J, Paik A, Youm Y (2005) The sexual organization of the city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea AM, Ryan MJ (2015) Irrationality in mate choice revealed by túngara frogs. Science 349:964–966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton AP, Francesconi M (2011) Too much of a good thing? Variety is confusing in mate choice. Biol Lett 7:528–531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SM, South A (2012) The evolution of animal nuptial gifts. Adv Stud Behav 44:53–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SM, Vahed K, Koene JM, Engqvist L, Bussière LF, Perry JC, Gwynne D, Lehmann GUC (2014) Emerging issues in the evolution of animal nuptial gifts. Biol Lett 10:20140336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li S (2007) Imbalanced sex ratio at birth and comprehensive intervention in China. In: Proceedings of 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Reproductive and Sexual Health and Rights, Hyderabad, pp 1–16

  • Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2013) The evolution of sex roles in birds is related to adult sex ratio. Nat Commun 4:1587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2014) Divorce and infidelity are associated with skewed adult sex ratios in birds. Curr Biol 24:880–884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lipatov M, Li S, Feldman MW (2008) Economics, cultural transmission, and the dynamics of the sex ratio at birth in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:19171–19176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI (2001) Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:39–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Cohen DL, Jones BC, Belsky J (2007a) Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:967–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Connely J, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Roberts SC (2011) Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behav Ecol 22:862–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2007b) Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biol Psychol 76:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2002) Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1095–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Mannion H (2006) Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Anim Behav 72:981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg S, Pollak RA (1993) Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. J Polit Econ 101:988–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden JR (2002) Bower decorations attract females but provoke other male spotted bowerbirds: bower owners resolve this trade-off. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1347–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe FW, Berbesque JC (2012) The human operational sex ratio: effects of marriage, concealed ovulation, and menopause on mate competition. J Hum Evol 63:834–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Parker GA (1976) The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim Behav 24:159–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1961) Cause and effect in biology. Science 134:1501–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metz M, Klump GM, Friedl TWP (2007) Temporal changes in demand for and supply of nests in red bishops (Euplectes orix): dynamics of a biological market. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1369–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz M, Klump GM, Friedl TWP (2009) Male nest-building behaviour and mating success in the red bishop (Euplectes orix). Behaviour 146:771–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani JC, Gros-Louis J, Richards AF (1996) Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex-ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. Am Nat 147:966–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore FR, Coetzee V, Contreras-Garduño J et al (2013) Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the male face. Biol Lett 9:20130050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neelakantan U, Tertilt M (2008) A note on marriage market clearing. Econ Lett 101:103–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R (2001) Biological markets: partner choice as the driving force behind the evolution of cooperation. In: Noë R, van Hooff JARAM, Hammerstein P (eds) Economics in nature: social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 93–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R (2016) How do biological markets compare to the markets of economics? Munich Personal RePEc Archive, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72509

  • Noë R, Hammerstein P (1994) Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R, Hammerstein P (1995) Biological markets. Trends Ecol Evol 10:336–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R, Sluijter AA (1990) Reproductive tactics of male savanna baboons. Behaviour 113:117–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R, van Schaik CP, van Hooff JARAM (1991) The market effect: an explanation for pay-off asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology 87:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh KP, Badyaev AV (2010) Structure of social networks in a passerine bird: consequences for sexual selection and the evolution of mating strategies. Am Nat 176:E80–E89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek G, Nelemans SA, Karremans J, Engels RCME (2013) The malleability of mate selection in speed-dating events. Arch Sex Behav 42:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overduin-de Vries AM, Massen JJM, Spruijt BM, Sterck EHM (2012) Sneaky monkeys: an audience effect of male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on sexual behavior. Am J Primatol 74:217–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patricelli GL, Krakauer AH, McElreath R (2011) Assets and tactics in a mating market: economic models of negotiation offer insights into animal courtship dynamics on the lek. Curr Zool 57:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowski B, Dunbar RIM (1999) Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:281–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawłowski B, Dunbar RIM (2001) Human mate choice strategies. In: Noë R, van Hooff JARAM, Hammerstein P (eds) Economics in nature: social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–202

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen FA (1991) Secular trends in human sex ratios: their influence on individual and family behavior. Hum Nat 2:271–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penke L, Todd P, Lenton AP, Fasolo B (2007) How self-assessments can guide human mating decisions. In: Geher G, Miller GF (eds) Mating intelligence: new insights into intimate relationships, human sexuality, and the mind’s reproductive system. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 37–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, Henzi SP, Castles DL, Akamatsu S (1998) Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394:884–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peters M, Simmons LW, Rhodes G (2009) Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PLoS One 4:e4138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pigllucci M (1996) How organisms respond to environmental changes: from phenotypes to molecules (and vice versa). Trends Ecol Evol 11:168–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pillsworth EG (2008) Mate preferences among the Shuar of Ecuador: trait rankings and peer evaluations. Evol Hum Behav 29:256–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Blum D, Schlupp I, Tiedemann R (2008) Audience effect alters mating preferences in a livebearing fish, the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana. Anim Behav 75:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Kromuszczynski K, Tiedemann R (2009) Audience effect alters male but not female mating preferences. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:381–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet TV, Nettle D (2008) Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population. Biol Lett 4:31–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet TV, Nettle D (2009) Market forces affect patterns of polygyny in Uganda. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:2114–2117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (2014) How do sex ratios in China influence marriage decisions and intra-household resource allocation? Rev Econ Househ 14:337–371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pouget ER, Kershaw TS, Niccolai LM, Ickovics JR, Blankenship KM (2010) Associations of sex ratios and male incarceration rates with multiple opposite-sex partners: potential social determinants of HIV/STI transmission. Public Health Rep 125:70–80

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rao V (1993) The rising price of husbands: a hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. J Polit Econ 101:666–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson PJ, Boyd R (2005) Not by genes alone. How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Risley HH (1915) The people of India. Thacker, Spink & Co., Calcutta

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodway P, Schepman A, Lambert J (2013) The influence of position and context on facial attractiveness. Acta Psychol 144:522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp H, Librach G, Feipel N, Ketterson E, Sengelaub D, Heiman J (2009) Partner status influences women’s interest in the opposite sex. Hum Nat 20:93–104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht R, Bell AV (2016) The evolution of monogamy in response to partner scarcity. Sci Rep 6:32472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht R, Borgerhoff Mulder M (2015) Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans. R Soc Open Sci 2:140402

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht R, Grote M (2015) Partner choice decision making and the integration of multiple cues. Evol Hum Behav 36:456–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht R, Kramer KL (2016) Patterns of family formation in response to sex ratio variation. PLoS One 11:e0160320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht R, Tharp D, Smith KR (2016) Marriage markets and male mating effort: violence and crime are elevated where men are rare. Hum Nat 27:489–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt DP (2005) Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behav Brain Sci 28:247–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL (2014) Partner switching can favour cooperation in a biological market. J Evol Biol 27:1765–1774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides C, Ariely D, Olsen N (1999) Contextual and procedural determinants of partner selection: of asymmetric dominance and prominence. Soc Cogn 17:118–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw Taylor L, Fiore AT, Mendelsohn GA, Cheshire C (2011) “Out of my league”: a real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Pers Soc Psychol B 37:942–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelly TE, Bailey WJ (1992) Experimental manipulation of mate choice by male katydids: the effect of female encounter rate. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorter E (1973) Female emancipation, birth control, and fertility in European history. Am Hist Rev 78:605–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Teale RJ, Maier M, Standish RJ, Bailey WJ, Withers PC (1992) Some costs of reproduction for male bushcrickets, Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae): allocating resources to mate attraction and nuptial feeding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Dixson BJ, Jessop TS, Morgan B, Dixson AF (2010) Cross-cultural consensus for waist-hip ratio and women’s attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 31:176–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Luis S (1995) Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgment of women’s attractiveness. Hum Nat 6:51–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder TD, de Brey C, Dillow SA (2016) Digest of Education Statistics 2014 (NCES 2016-006). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • South SJ, Lloyd KM (1991) Marriage opportunities and family formation: further implications of imbalanced sex ratios. J Marriage Fam 54:440–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South SJ, Trent K (2010) Imbalanced sex ratios, men’s sexual behavior, and risk of sexually transmitted infection in China. J Health Soc Behav 51:376–390

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Székely T, Weissing FJ, Komdeur J (2014) Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution. J Evol Biol 27:1500–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taubert J, Van der Burg E, Alais D (2016) Love at second sight: sequential dependence of facial attractiveness in an on-line dating paradigm. Sci Rep 6:22740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LD (2013) Male partner selectivity, romantic confidence, and media depictions of partner scarcity. Evol Psychol 11:36–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor LD (2015) Men’s sexual selectivity, romantic confidence, and gender ratios in the media. J Mens Stud 23:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierry B (2005) Integrating proximate and ultimate causation: just one more go! Curr Sci 89:1180–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Am Nat 110:529–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1984) Alternative female choice tactics in the scorpionfly Hylobittacus apicalis (Mecoptera) and their implications. Am Zool 24:367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton B, Moore S (1993) Physical attractiveness contrast effect: implications for self-esteem and evaluations of the social self. Pers Soc Psychol B 19:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1963) On the aims and methods of ethology. Z Tierpsychol 20:410–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trail PW, Adams ES (1989) Active mate choice at cock-of-the-rock leks: tactics of sampling and comparison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trent K, South SJ (2012) Mate availability and women’s sexual experiences in China. J Marriage Fam 74:201–214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trent K, South SJ, Bose S (2015) The consequences of India’s male surplus for women’s partnering and sexual experiences. J Fam Issues 36:1062–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar S, Li N, Feldman MW (1995) High sex ratios in China’s future. Science 267:874–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uecker JE, Regnerus MD (2010) BARE MARKET: campus sex ratios, romantic relationships, and sexual behavior. Sociol Quart 51:408–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United-Nations (2013) World fertility report 2012. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rhijn JG (1973) Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs, Philomachus pugnax (L). Behaviour 47:153–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rhijn JG (1985) A scenario for the evolution of social organization in ruffs, Philomachus pugnax, and other charadriiform species. Ardea 73:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rhijn JG (1991) The ruff. Individuality in a gregarious wading bird. T. & A. D. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, de Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, van Tienderen PH (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 10:212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39:505–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vignal C, Mathevon N, Mottin S (2004) Audience drives male songbird response to partner’s voice. Nature 430:448–451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vinicius L, Migliano AB (2016) Reproductive market values explain post-reproductive lifespans in men. Trends Ecol Evol 31:172–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voland E (1998) Evolutionary ecology of human reproduction. Annu Rev Anthropol 27:347–374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voland E, Engel C (1990) Female choice in humans: a conditional mate selection strategy of the Krummhörn women (Germany, 1720-1874). Ethology 84:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukovic J, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Welling LLM, Little AC, Smith FG (2008) Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine men’s voices. Pers Ind Diff 45:451–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker D, Vul E (2014) Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive. Psychol Sci 25:230–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D, Kempenaers N, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W (2017) Male zebra finches have limited ability to identify high-fecundity females. Behav Ecol 28:784–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins CD, Jones BC, Little AC, DeBruine LM, Feinberg DR (2012) Cues to the sex ratio of the local population influence women’s preferences for facial symmetry. Anim Behav 83:545–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth D, Dunbar RIM (1995) Conditional mate choice strategies in humans—evidence from ‘lonely hearts’ advertisements. Behaviour 132:755–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell DH, Parducci A, Geiselman RE (1987) A formal analysis of ratings of physical attractiveness: successive contrast and simultaneous assimilation. J Exp Soc Psychol 23:230–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei S-J, Zhang X (2011) The competitive saving motive: evidence from rising sex ratios and savings rates in China. J Polit Econ 119:511–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman DW, Agrawal AA (2009) What is phenotypic plasticity and why is it important? In: Whitman DW, Ananthakrishnan TN (eds) Phenotypic plasticity of insects: mechanisms and consequences. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 1–63

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DM, Sherratt TN (2001) Horizontally acquired mutualisms, an unsolved problem in ecology? Oikos 92:377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JO, Macdonald DW (2004) Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends Ecol Evol 19:127–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Cheng S, Zhou X (2015) Assortative mating without assortative preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5974–5978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yu DW, Shepard GH (1998) Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature 396:321–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Theo Bakker and Peter Kappeler for inviting me to contribute this review and Michael Jennions and Ryan Schacht for constructive reviews that helped me to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculté de Psychologie, Université de Strasbourg, 12 Rue Goethe, 67000, Strasbourg, France

    Ronald Noë

Authors
  1. Ronald Noë
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Noë.

Additional information

Communicated by P. M. Kappeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noë, R. Local mating markets in humans and non-human animals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 71, 148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2376-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2376-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation