Skip to main content
Log in

Offspring sex in mountain goat varies with adult sex ratio but only for mothers in good condition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of mammals have often produced results inconsistent with theories predicting adaptive sex-ratio manipulation. Some apparently strong trends weaken or disappear over time, suggesting that multiple variables affect sex ratio and that their relative importance may change over time. Mountain goats are sexually dimorphic ungulates that satisfy all the assumptions of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis. Therefore, females able to provide high levels of maternal care are expected to produce an excess of sons. An earlier study found that older females, that are larger and dominant, produced more sons than did younger females, which are smaller and subordinate. Here, we show that, as sample size tripled, that trend disappeared. A large-scale climate index, reproductive status at conception, and population density had no consistent effects on offspring sex ratio. A composite measure of female condition at conception revealed that offspring sex ratio varied with adult sex ratio, as predicted by the homeostatic hypothesis, but only for mothers in good condition at conception. These females were dominant, heavier, and older. Their probability of producing a son decreased from about 80 to 20 % as the adult sex ratio became more male-biased. For mothers with a low condition index, however, adult sex ratio had no effect on offspring sex ratio. Our research suggests that offspring sex ratio is affected by complex interactions between individual condition and other variables, whose importance may vary over time and can only be elucidated by long-term studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baeta R, Bélisle M, Garant D (2012) Importance of breeding season and maternal investment in studies of sex-ratio adjustment: a case study using tree swallows. Biol Lett 8:401–404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bassano B, von Hardenberg A, Pelletier F, Gobbi G (2003) A method to weigh free-ranging ungulates without handling. Wildlife Soc B 31:1205–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

  • Bérubé CH, Festa-Bianchet M, Jorgenson JT (1996) Reproductive costs of sons and daughters in Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep. Behav Ecol 7:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw CJA, Harcourt RG, Davis LS (2003) Male-biased sex ratios in New Zealand fur seal pups relative to environmental variation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown GR, Silk JB (2002) Reconsidering the null hypothesis: is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11252–11255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron EZ (2004) Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: evidence for a mechanism. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1723–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron EZ, Lemons PR, Bateman PW, Bennett NC (2008) Experimental alteration of litter sex ratios in a mammal. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:323–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell RB (1966) The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature 308:358–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1985) Parental investment and sex differences in juvenile mortality in birds and mammals. Nature 313:131–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Green D, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Albon SD (1988) Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:281–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Sheldon BC (2010) Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. Trends Ecol Evol 25:562–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD (2000) Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour 137:1541–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001a) Offspring sex ratio in relation to maternal age and social rank in mountain goats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:260–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001b) Reproductive success in female mountain goats: the influence of maternal age and social rank. Anim Behav 62:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2001c) Birthdate, mass and survival in mountain goat kids: effects of maternal characteristics and forage quality. Oecologia 127:230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Fournier F (1998) Life-history effects of chemical immobilization and radiocollars on mountain goats. J Wildlife Manage 62:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham JA, Hamlin KL, Lemke TO (2009) Fetal sex ratios in Southwestern Montana elk. J Wildlife Manage 75:639–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H (1998) Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. Anim Behav 55:827–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards AM, Cameron EZ (2014) Forgotten fathers: paternal influences on mammalian sex allocation. Trends Ecol Evol 29:158–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M (1996) Offspring sex ratio studies of mammals: does publication depend upon the quality of the data or the direction of the results? Écoscience 3:42–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2008) Mountain goats: ecology, behavior and conservation of a mountain ungulate. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gedir JV, Michener GR (2014) Litter sex ratios in Richardson’s ground squirrels: long-term data support random sex allocation and homeostasis. Oecologia 174:1225–1239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med 27:2865–2873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio M, Malo AF, Soler AJ, Fernandez-Santos MR, Esteso MC, Garcia AJ, Roldan ERS, Garde J (2006) Male fertility and sex ratio at birth in red deer. Science 314:1445–1447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (2010) Maternal characteristics and environment affect the costs of reproduction in female mountain goats. Ecology 91:2034–2043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S, Côté SD, Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M (2009a) Individual variation in reproductive costs of reproduction: high-quality females always do better. J Anim Ecol 78:143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel S, Gaillard J-M, Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2009b) Individual quality, early-life conditions, and reproductive success in contrasted populations of large herbivores. Ecology 90:1981–1995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haviernick M, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M (1998) Immobilization of mountain goats with xylazine and reversal with idazoxan. J Wildlife Dis 34:342–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Angibault JM, Boutin J, Bideau E, Vincent JP, Sempéré A (1976) Annual variation in body composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in moderate environmental conditions. Can J Zool 74:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Gaillard J-M (1999) Successful sons or advantaged daughters? The Trivers-Willard model and sex-biased maternal investment in ungulates. Trends Ecol Evol 14:229–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg JT, Forbes SH (1997) Mating in bighorn sheep: frequent male reproduction via a high-risk "unconventional" tactic. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husson F, Josse J (2014) missMDA: handling missing values with/in multivariate data analysis (principal component methods). R package version 1.7.3, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=missMDA

  • Kruuk LEB, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Pemberton JM, Guinness FE (1999) Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature 399:459–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leimar O (1996) Life-history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem. Behav Ecol 7:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund RJ (2002) SAS for linear models, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainguy J (2008) Variabilité génétique et reproduction des mâles chez la chèvre de montagne. Université Laval, Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainguy J, Côté SD (2008) Age- and state-dependent reproductive effort in male mountain goats, Oreamnos americanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:935–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainguy J, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Coltman DW (2009) Father–offspring phenotypic correlations suggest intralocus sexual conflict for a fitness-linked trait in a wild sexually dimorphic mammal. Proc R Soc Lond B 276:4067–4075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JGA, Festa-Bianchet M (2011) Sex ratio bias and reproductive strategies: what sex to produce when? Ecology 92:441–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) Testing and adjusting for publication bias. Trends Ecol Evol 16:580–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noldus Information Technology (1998) Matman, Reference Manual. Wageningen, The Netherlands, http://www.noldus.com/knowledge-base/matman

  • Røed KH, Holand Ø, Mysterud A, Tverdal A, Kumpula J, Nieminen M (2007) Male phenotypic quality influences offspring sex ratio in a polygynous ungulate. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:727–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Method Ecol Evol 1:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanz LE, Robert KA (2014) Proximate and ultimate explanations of mammalian sex allocation in a marsupial model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:1085–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, West SA (2004) Maternal dominance, maternal condition, and offspring sex ratio in ungulate mammals. Am Nat 163:40–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens V, Houston DB (1989) Reliability of age determination of mountain goats. Wildlife Soc B 17:72–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Taillon J, Brodeur V, Festa-Bianchet M, Côté SD (2011) Variation in body condition of migratory caribou at calving and weaning: which measures should we use? Ecoscience 18:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Théoret-Gosselin R, Hamel S, Côté SD (2015) The role of maternal behavior and offspring development in the survival of mountain goat kids. Oecologia 178:175–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Hurrell JW (1994) Decadal atmosphere–ocean variations in the Pacific. Clim Dynam 9:303–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weladji RB, Holand Ø, Steinheim G, Lenvik D (2003) Sex-specific preweaning maternal care in reindeer (Rangifer tarandus t.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:308–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Werren JH, Charnov EL (1978) Facultative sex ratios and population dynamics. Nature 272:349–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1979) The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:567–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our long-term research is primarily financed by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We also obtained support from the Alberta Fish and Wildlife Division, the Rocky Mountain Goat Foundation, the Alberta Conservation Association, the Alberta Sport, Recreation, Parks and Wildlife Foundation, the Alberta Wildlife Enhancement Fund, Université de Sherbrooke and Université Laval. We are indebted to the many people who helped with fieldwork at Caw Ridge over the years, and to K. G. Smith for his role in the initiation of the study. We thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on a previous version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Hamel.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Additional information

Communicated by K. E. Ruckstuhl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamel, S., Festa-Bianchet, M. & Côté, S.D. Offspring sex in mountain goat varies with adult sex ratio but only for mothers in good condition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70, 123–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2031-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-2031-9

Keywords

Navigation