Skip to main content
Log in

Hairy kisses: tactile cheliceral courtship affects female mating decisions in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual selection is thought to be an important force driving the evolution of sexually dimorphic morphology and behavior, but direct experimental tests of the functions of species-specific details of morphology are rare and usually incomplete. The males of most species of the large spider family Tetragnathidae possess large sexually dimorphic chelicerae that are used when the sexes lock together before and during mating. In Leucauge mariana, the female’s chelicerae clasp those of the male; mating does not begin until the female’s chelicerae seize the male and does not end until they release him. In addition, females contribute material to form genital plugs in the female’s genitalia. Male chelicerae have sexually dimorphic and species-specific setae and ledges in areas that contact the female during cheliceral clasps. We tested the hypothesis that stimuli from these structures trigger mating processes that are controlled by the female which could increase male reproductive success. We reduced or eliminated possible stimulation of the female in two ways: removing male cheliceral setae that contact the female, and removing setae on the female’s chelicerae and endites that are contacted by and could thus be stimulated by the male’s chelicerae and their setae. Both male and female modifications had similar effects that likely reduced the male’s chances of paternity: female receptivity to re-mating increased, copulatory plug formation decreased, and interruptions during copulation became more frequent. As expected under the stimulation hypothesis, blocking female sensory abilities generally had greater effects on these responses than modifying male stimulatory structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aisenberg A (2009) Male performance and body size affect female remating occurrence in the orb-web spider Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Ethology 115:1127–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aisenberg A, Barrantes G (2011) Sexual behavior, cannibalism and mating plugs as sticky traps in the orb weaver spider Leucauge argyra (Tetragnathidae). Naturwissenschaften 98:605–613

  • Aisenberg A, Eberhard WG (2009) Female cooperation in plug formation in a spider: effects of male copulatory courtship. Behav Ecol 20(6):1236–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Padilla F, Hormiga G (2011) Morphological and phylogenetic atlas of the orb-weaving spider family Tetragnathidae (Araneae: Araneoidea). Zool J Linnean Soc 162:713–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1982) Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Basolo A (1990) Female preference predates the evolution of the sword in swordtail fish. Science 250:808–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Evans CS, Daniel JC (2000) JWatcher. Available from: http://galliform.psy.mq.edu.au/jwatcher/

  • Briceño RD, Eberhard WG (2009a) Experimental modifications imply a stimulatory function for male tsetse fly genitalia, supporting cryptic female choice theory. J Evol Biol 22:1516–1525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briceño RD, Eberhard WG (2009b) Experimental demonstration of possible cryptic female choice on male tsetse fly genitalia. J Insect Physiol 55:989–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A (1999) Male copulatory sensory stimulation induces female ejection of rival sperm in a damselfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:779–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A (2002) Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in a damselfly genitalic trait (Insecta: Calopterygidae). Am Nat 160:594–601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A (2005) Possible coevolution of male and female genital form and function in a calopterygid damselfly. J Evol Biol 18:132–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danielson-François AM, Bukowski TC (2005) Female mating history influences copulation behavior but not sperm release in the orb-weaving spider Tetragnatha versicolor (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Insect Behav 18:131–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1985) Animal genitalia and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2001) The functional morphology of species-specific clasping structures on the front legs of male Archisepsis and Palaeosepsis flies (Diptera, Sepsidae). Zool J Linnean Soc 133:335–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2002) Physical restraint or stimulation? The function(s) of the modified front legs of male Archisepsis diversiformis (Diptera, Sepsidae). J Insect Behav 15:831–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2009) Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin’s omission and its consequences. Proc Nat Sci 106(Suppl 1):10025–10032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2011) Experiments with genitalia: a commentary. Trends Ecol Evol 26(1):17–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Huber BA (1998) Courtship, copulation and sperm transfer in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae) with implications for higher classification. J Arachnol 26:342–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Guzmán‐Gómez S, Catley KM (1993) Correlation between spermathecal morphology and mating systems in spiders. Biol J Linn Soc 50(3):197–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Huber BA, Rodríguez SRL, Briceño RD, Salas I, Rodriguez V (1998) One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52(2):415–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foelix RF (2011) Biology of spiders. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foellmer MW, Fairbarin DJ (2005) Competing dwarf males: sexual selection in an orb-weaving spider. J Evol Biol 18:629–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram KK, Laamanen T, Puniamoorthy N, Meier R (2008) Lack of morphological coevolution between male forelegs and female wings in Themira (Sepsidae: Diptera: Insecta). Biol J Linn Soc 93:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus O (1984) Male spider genitalia: evolutionary changes in structure and function. Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg 27:373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard J, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2010) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi HW (1981) The American orb-weaver genera Dolichognatha and Tetragnatha North of Mexico (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathinae). Bull Mus Comp Zool 149:271–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez V (2004) Comportamiento sexual y dinámica de población en Leucauge mariana (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). MSc thesis, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José

  • Méndez V, Eberhard WG, in press. Removal of genital plugs and insemination by males with normal and experimentally modified palps in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Arachnol

  • Møller AP (1994) Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Laraño J, Cabeza M (2003) Bimodality in the body size distribution of Mediterranean tarantula juveniles: Humphreys’ Russian roulette revisited. Rev Ibér Aracnol 7:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick NP (2013) The world spider catalog, version 13.5. 621 http://research.amnh.org/iz/spiders/catalog/INTRO3.html

  • Polak M, Rashed A (2009) Microscale laser surgery reveals adaptive function of male intromittent genitalia. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:1372–1376

    Google Scholar 

  • R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Rubenstein DR, Hauber ME (2008) Dynamic feedback between phenotype and physiology in sexually selected traits. Trends Ecol Evol 23:655–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ, Adelman JS, McGraw KJ, Hau M (2008) Sexual signal exaggeration affects physiological state in male barn swallows. Curr Biol 18:R461–R462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, McClintock WJ, Miller D, Smith EI, Cook KK (1996) Limb regeneration and subsequent asymmetry in a male secondary sexual character influences sexual selection in wolf spiders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:253–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (Agencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovación) and Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas (AA), the Vicerrectoría de Investigación of the Universidad de Costa Rica (GB, WGE), and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (WGE) for financial support. The editor and two anonymous reviewers improved the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Aisenberg.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Gwynne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aisenberg, A., Barrantes, G. & Eberhard, W.G. Hairy kisses: tactile cheliceral courtship affects female mating decisions in Leucauge mariana (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 313–323 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1844-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1844-2

Keywords

Navigation