Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Carry-over effects of male extra-pair copulation opportunity on biparental effort in zebra finches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether parental effort can be negotiated between partners over ecological time and adjusted across different contexts is not well understood. We manipulated male extra-pair copulation (EPC) opportunity in captive zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, to test whether males adjust incubation effort to the mating context and to examine how females respond to their partner’s effort. Birds without previous breeding experience were paired randomly and bred with the same partner twice. In the first breeding attempt, half the males received EPC opportunities with ‘extra-pair females’ during incubation, while the other half did not. Males that received EPC opportunities in the first breeding attempt did not in the second breeding attempt and vice versa. We recorded incubation effort on days when EPC opportunities were not presented. In their first breeding attempt, males with EPC opportunities incubated less than those without. Females compensated fully for the deficit in male care so that a pair’s combined incubation effort was unchanged. In the second attempt, when a male’s opportunity for EPCs was switched, individuals showed the same level of incubation effort that they had previously, irrespective of the current availability of extra-pair females. This suggests that division of effort was negotiated in the first breeding attempt and maintained without significant adjustments in the second attempt. The effects of male EPC opportunity in the first breeding attempt on subsequent incubation effort suggests that individual parental decisions can be shaped by previous experience and this may partly explain conflicting results in studies where individuals’ histories were not known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baayen RH (2009) languageR: data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package, 0.955. Available at http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/languageR/

  • Bates D, Maechler M (2009) Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package, 0.999375-32. Available at http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/

  • Becker WA (1984) A manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman

    Google Scholar 

  • Biebach H (1981) Energetic costs of incubation on different clutch sizes in starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Ardea 69:141–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR (2010) How stupid not to have thought of that: post-copulatory sexual selection. J Zool 281:78–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Biggins JD (1987) Reproductive synchrony and extra-pair copulation in birds. Ethology 74:320–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Clarkson K, Zann R (1988) Extra-pair courtship, copulation, and mate guarding in wild zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 36:1853–1855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase ID (1980) Cooperative and noncooperative behavior in animals. Am Nat 115:827–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Heij ME, van der Graaf AJ, Hafner D, Tinbergen JM (2007) Metabolic rate of nocturnal incubation in female great tits, Parus major, in relation to clutch size measured in a natural environment. J Expt Bio 210:2006–2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at http://www.R-project.org

  • Gorman HE, Nager RG (2004) Prenatal developmental conditions have long-term effects on offspring fecundity. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1923–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman HE, Arnold KE, Nager RG (2005a) Incubation effort in relation to male attractiveness in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. J Avian Biol 36:413–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman HE, Orr KJ, Adam A, Nager RG (2005b) Effects of incubation conditions and offspring sex on embryonic development and survival in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Auk 122:1239–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haftorn S, Reinertsen RE (1985) The effect of temperature and clutch size on the energetic cost of incubation in a free-living blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Auk 102:470–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison F, Barta Z, Cuthill I, Székely T (2009) How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta-analysis. J Evol Biol 22:1800–1812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hegner RE, Wingfield JC (1987) Effects of experimental manipulation of testosterone levels on parental investment and breeding success in male house sparrows. Auk 104:462–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill DL (2009) Sexual conflict and division of labour during incubation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow

  • Hinde CA (2006) Negotiation over offspring care? A positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits. Behav Ecol 17:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Davies NB (1985) The evolution of cooperation and life history in the dunnock, Prunella modularis. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 471–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, McNamara JM (1999) Models of adaptive behaviour: an approach based on state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, Székely T, McNamara JM (2005) Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol Evol 20:33–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones KM, Ruxton GD, Monaghan P (2002) Model parents: is full compensation for reduced partner nest attendance compatible with stable biparental care? Behav Ecol 13:838–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Wiersma P, Magrath M (2002) Paternal care and male mate-attraction effort in the European starling is adjusted to clutch size. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1253–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemon WC (1993) The energetics of lifetime reproductive success in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Physiol Zool 66:946–963

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities—a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Elgar MA (1997) Paternal care declines with increased opportunity for extra-pair matings in fairy martins. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1731–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2003) Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity? Trends Ecol Evol 18:424–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman S, Yomtov Y, Wright J (1995) Male parental care in the orange-tufted sunbird—behavioral-adjustments in provisioning and nest guarding effort. Anim Behav 50:655–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1977) Parental investment—a prospective analysis. Anim Behav 25:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Gasson CE, Houston AI (1999) Incorporating rules for responding into evolutionary games. Nature 401:368–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Ockendon N, Gillespie DOS, Hatchwell BJ, Burke T (2007) Does the badge of status influence parental care and investment in house sparrows? An experimental test. Oecologia 153:749–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes R, Jones IL, Boness DJ (2005) Reduced parental care, compensatory behaviour and reproductive costs of thick-billed murres equipped with data loggers. Anim Behav 69:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Royle NJ, Hartley IR (2002) Intrafamilial conflict and parental investment: a synthesis. Phil Tran R Soc Lond B 357:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid JM, Monaghan P, Nager RG (2002) Incubation and the costs of reproduction. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation: behaviour, environment and evolution, vol 13. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 314–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutstein AN, Gilbert L, Slater PJB, Graves JA (2004) Mate attractiveness and primary resource allocation in the zebra finch. Anim Behav 68:1087–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanz JJ, Kranenbarg S, Tinbergen JM (2000) Differential response by males and females to manipulation of partner contribution in the great tit (Parus major). J Anim Ecol 69:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiegg K, Pasinelli G, Walters JR, Daniels SJ (2002) Inbreeding and experience affect response to climate change by endangered woodpeckers. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW, Parker GA (2002) Biparental care in house sparrows: negotiation or sealed bid? Behav Ecol 13:713–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Schwabl HG, Mock DW (2005) Dynamics of biparental care in house sparrows: hormonal manipulations of paternal contributions. Anim Behav 69:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HG, Sandell MI, Bruun M (1995) Paternal care in the European starling, Sturnus vulgaris—incubation. Anim Behav 50:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiver KA, Alonzo SH (2009) Parental and mating effort: is there necessarily a trade-off? Ethology 115:1101–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Atherton, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Vleck CM (1981) Energetic cost of incubation in the zebra finch. Condor 83:229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW, Morton ML (1990) The ecology and evolution of extra-pair copulations in birds. In: Power DM (ed) Current ornithology, vol 7. Plenium, New York, pp 331–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham LA, Dunn PO, Robertson RJ (1994) Female response to reduced male parental care in birds—an experiment in tree swallows. Ethology 96:260–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe KL (2010) Negotiation of parental care when the stakes are high: experimental handicapping of one partner during incubation leads to short-term generosity. J Anim Ecol 79:63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Cuthill I (1989) Manipulation of sex differences in parental care. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright J, Cuthill I (1990) Biparental care: short-term manipulation of partner contribution and brood size in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Behav Ecol 1:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zann RA (1996) The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zann R, Rossetto M (1991) Zebra finch incubation—brood patch, egg temperature and thermal-properties of the nest. Emu 91:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ben Sheldon, Kate Arnold, Wolfgang Forstmeier and two anonymous reviewers for the comments on earlier drafts. We thank Graham Law, John Laurie, Alistair Kirk, Pat McLaughlin, Graham Adam, Dorothy Armstrong and Phang Wai San for taking care of the birds and Tam Wallace and Nosrat Mirzai for the technical assistance. This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant NER/S/A/2005/13322). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK

    Davina L. Hill, Jan Lindström & Ruedi G. Nager

  2. Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Davina L. Hill

Authors
  1. Davina L. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Lindström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruedi G. Nager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davina L. Hill.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Pruett-Jones

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, D.L., Lindström, J. & Nager, R.G. Carry-over effects of male extra-pair copulation opportunity on biparental effort in zebra finches. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65, 2049–2059 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1214-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1214-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation