Abstract
Male butterflies compete over mating territories via aerial interactions. It has often been suggested that flight performance, and thus flight-related traits, would play an important role in butterflies’ contest resolution; however, most studies have not demonstrated a clear relationship between these traits and territory ownership in butterflies. Males of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana compete over territories via linear chases, a behavior that is uncommon among butterflies: rather, contests of most butterfly species consist of circling flights. In the present study, some morphological and physiological traits of L. diana were compared between territory owners and intruders to search for traits correlated with resource holding power (RHP). Territory owners had higher flight-muscle ratio (FMR) and were heavier than intruders, indicating that flight performance plays a key role in their contest resolution. Contest duration was not affected by the owners’ FMR or body mass, and thus I obtained no evidence supporting the hypothesis that contestants assess their relative RHP before making a decision to retreat. I speculate that the fact that these traits had an effect on territorial status in L. diana was a result of the characteristics of the contest behavior of this butterfly. During their contests, males L. diana fly faster in their linear flights than males of most other butterflies, which engage in slower circling flights. Therefore, males of L. diana probably need higher flight performance capabilities in order to win their contests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almbro M, Kullberg C (2009) The downfall of mating: the effect of mate-carrying and flight muscle ratio on the escape ability of a pierid butterfly. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:413–420
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2008) Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim Behav 76:529–542
Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004
Bergman M, Olofsson M, Wiklund C (2010) Contest outcome in a territorial butterfly: the role of motivation. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:3027–3033
Berwaerts K, Van Dyck H, Aerts P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Func Ecol 16:484–491
Bonte D, Van Dyck H (2009) Mate-locating behaviour, habitat-use, and flight morphology relative to rainforest disturbance in an Afrotropical butterfly. Biol J Linn Soc 96:830–839
Briffa M, Elwood RW (2009) Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:759–762
Chapman RF (1998) The insects: Structure and function, 4th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Convey P (1989) Influences on the choice between territorial and satellite behaviour in male Libellula quadrimaculata Linn (Odonata: Libellulidae). Behaviour 109:125–141
Davies NB (1978) Territorial defence in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): the resident always wins. Anim Behav 26:138–147
De Block M, Stoks R (2007) Flight-related body morphology shapes mating success in a damselfly. Anim Behav 74:1093–1098
Galeotti P, Sacchi R, Vicario V (2005) Fluctuating asymmetry in body traits increases predation risks: tawny owl selection against asymmetric woodmice. Evol Ecol 19:405–418
Grafen A (1987) The logic of divisively asymmetric contests: respect for ownership and the desperado effect. Anim Behav 35:462–467
Hammerstein P, Parker GA (1982) The asymmetric war of attrition. J Theor Biol 96:647–682
Hernández MIM, Benson WW (1998) Small-male advantage in the territorial tropical butterfly Heliconius sara (Nymphalidae): a paradoxical strategy? Anim Behav 56:533–540
Ide JY (2002) Mating behaviour and light conditions cause seasonal changes in the dispersal pattern of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana. Ecol Entomol 27:33–40
Ide JY (2004) Diurnal and seasonal changes in the mate-locating behavior of the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana. Ecol Res 19:189–196
Imafuku M, Ohtani T (2006) Analysis of coordinated circling and linear flights of a lycaenid butterfly species. Naturwissenschaften 93:131–135
Jaffé R, Moritz RFA (2010) Mating flights select for symmetry in honeybee drones (Apis mellifera). Naturwissenschaften 97:337–343
Karlsson B, Johansson A (2008) Seasonal polyphenism and developmental trade-offs between flight ability and egg laying in a pierid butterfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:2131–2136
Kemp DJ (2002) Butterfly contests and flight physiology: why do older males fight harder? Behav Ecol 13:456–461
Kemp DJ (2003) Twilight fighting in the evening brown butterfly, Melanitis leda (L.) (Nymphalidae): age and residency effects. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:7–13
Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2001) Fighting without weaponry: a review of male-male contest competition in butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:429–442
Kemp DJ, Alcock J (2003) Lifetime resource utilization, flight physiology, and the evolution of contest competition in territorial insects. Am Nat 162:290–301
Kemp DJ, Wiklund C (2004) Residency effects in animal contests. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1707–1711
Kemp DJ, Wiklund C, Van Dyck H (2006) Contest behaviour in the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria): seasonal phenotypic plasticity and the functional significance of flight performance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:403–411
Kokko H, López-Sepulcre A, Morrell LJ (2006) From hawks and doves to self-consistent games of territorial behavior. Am Nat 167:901–912
Koshio C, Muraji M, Tatsuta H, Kudo S (2007) Sexual selection in a moth: effect of symmetry on male mating success in the wild. Behav Ecol 18:571–578
Koskimäki J, Rantala MJ, Taskinen J, Tynkkynen K, Suhonen J (2004) Immunocompetence and resource holding potential in the damselfly, Calopteryx virgo L. Behav Ecol 15:169–173
Lederhouse RC (1982) Territorial defense and lek behavior of the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:109–118
Marden JH (1987) Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals. J Exp Biol 130:235–258
Marden JH (1989) Bodybuilding dragonflies: costs and benefits of maximizing flight muscle. Physiol Zool 62:505–521
Marden JH (2000) Variability in the size, composition, and function of insect flight muscles. Annu Rev Physiol 62:157–178
Marden JH, Waage JK (1990) Escalated damselfly territorial contests are energetic wars of attrition. Anim Behav 39:954–959
Marden JH, Rollins RA (1994) Assessment of energy reserves by damselflies engaged in aerial contests for mating territories. Anim Behav 48:1023–1030
Martínez-Lendech N, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Serrano-Meneses MA (2007) Body size and fat reserves as possible predictors of male territorial status and contest outcome in the butterfly Eumaeus toxea Godart (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). J Ethol 25:195–199
Maynard Smith J (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McLachlan A, Cant M (1995) Small males are more symmetrical: mating success in the midge Chironomus plumosus L. (Diptera: Chironomidae). Anim Behav 50:841–846
Palmer AR, Strobeck C (1986) Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 17:391–421
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243
Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Anim Behav 29:221–240
Peixoto PEC, Benson WW (2008) Body mass and not wing length predicts territorial success in a tropical satyrine butterfly. Ethology 114:1069–1077
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 25 November 2008
Rosenberg RH, Enquist M (1991) Contest behaviour in Weidemeyer’s admiral butterfly Limenitis weidemeyerii (Nymphalidae): the effect of size and residency. Anim Behav 42:805–811
Srygley RB, Chai P (1990) Flight morphology of Neotropical butterflies: palatability and distribution of mass to the thorax and abdomen. Oecologia 84:491–499
Strohm E, Lechner K (2000) Male size does not affect territorial behaviour and life history traits in a sphecid wasp. Anim Behav 59:183–191
Stutt AD, Willmer P (1998) Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: do the hottest males always win? Anim Behav 55:1341–1347
Swaddle JP (1997) Within-individual changes in developmental stability affect flight performance. Behav Ecol 8:601–604
Takeuchi T (2006a) The effect of morphology and physiology on butterfly territoriality. Behaviour 143:393–403
Takeuchi T (2006b) Matter of size or matter of residency experience? Territorial contest in a green hairstreak, Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ethology 112:293–299
Takeuchi T (2009) Daily dynamics of contest behaviour in the territorial butterfly Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus (Bremer) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Trans Lepid Soc Jpn 60:161–166
Takeuchi T (2010) Mate-locating behavior of the butterfly Lethe diana (Lepidoptera: Satyridae): do males diurnally or seasonally change their mating strategy? Zool Sci 27:821–825
Takeuchi T, Honda K (2009) Early comers become owners: effect of residency experience on territorial contest dynamics in a lycaenid butterfly. Ethology 115:767–773
Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202
Thomas ALR (1993) The aerodynamic costs of asymmetry in the wings and tail of birds: asymmetric birds can’t fly round tight corners. Proc R Soc Lond B 254:181–189
Tsubaki Y, Matsumoto K (1998) Fluctuating asymmetry and male mating success in a sphragis-bearing butterfly Luehdorfia japonica (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J Insect Behav 11:571–582
Van Dyck H, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1997) Mate-locating strategies are related to relative body length and wing colour in the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. Ecol Entomol 22:116–120
Wickman PO (1992) Sexual selection and butterfly design—a comparative study. Evolution 46:1525–1536
Windig JJ, Nylin S (1999) Adaptive wing asymmetry in males of the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria)? Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1413–1418
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Y. Tsubaki and M. Bergman for valuable comments on the manuscript, and to T. Kura for discussions. This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Research Fellowship for Young Scientists, and Global COE program A06 of Kyoto University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Kemp
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeuchi, T. Body morphologies shape territorial dominance in the satyrine butterfly Lethe diana . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65, 1559–1566 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1165-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1165-7