Skip to main content
Log in

Mating strategies of queens in Lasius niger ants—is environment type important?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High relatedness among society members is believed important for the evolution of highly cooperative behaviours, yet queens of many social insects mate with multiple males which reduces nestmate relatedness and imposes also direct costs on queens. While theoretical models have suggested explanations for this puzzling queen behaviour, empirical studies fail to provide consistent answers especially for species with moderate levels of multiple mating. This may result from multiple mating only conferring benefits in some environments, as suggested by recent genetic variance theory and considerations on types of traits, direct costs and benefits. All concur in an expectation of higher levels of multiple mating in more complex or milder environments, and we perform a first, broad test of this idea by comparing mating strategies of queens in Lasius niger ants from northern (harsh, cold stressed) and southern populations (milder, greater bio-complexity). First, we collected new genetic data from Ireland and Southern France and then compared these to data on Swiss and Swedish populations. Queens from northern populations were near exclusively single mated and even at times inbred (in Ireland), whereas southern queens showed high levels of multiple mating, leading to more genetically diverse colonies in the south. Equally, paternity skew was greater in the north, as expected if northern queens only remate when their first mate transfers few sperm. Our findings are consistent with the idea that environment type may affect mating strategies in social insects and calls for an exploration of such effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron S, Passera L, Keller L (1999) Evolution of social parasitism in ants: size of sexuals, sex ratio and mechanisms of caste determination. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer B, Armitage SAO, Boomsma JJ (2006) Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants. Nature 441:872–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Kronauer DJC, Pedersen JS (2009) The evolution of social insect mating systems. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies—from genomes to socio-complexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, pp 3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Ratnieks FLW (1996) Paternity in eusocial Hymenoptera. Proc R Soc Lond B 351:947–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Van Der Have TA (1998) Queen mating and paternity variation in the ant Lasius niger. Mol Ecol 7:1709–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, van der Lee GA, van der Have TA (1982) On the production ecology of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in successive coastal dune valleys. J Anim Ecol 51:975–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castella G, Christe P, Chapuisat M (2009) Mating triggers dynamic immune regulations in wood ant queens. J Evol Biol 22:564–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ (1983) Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole BJ, Wiernasz DC (1999) The selective advantage of low relatedness. Science 285:891–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Fjerdingstad EJ (2001) Polyandry in social Hymenoptera—disunity in diversity? Ann Zool Fennici 38:267–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Page RE (1985) On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH, Pamilo P (1996) Evolution of social insect colonies: sex allocation and kin selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad EF (2004) Multiple paternity and colony homeostasis in Lasius niger ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad EF, Boomsma JJ, Thorén P (1998) Multiple paternity in the leafcutter ant Atta colombica—a microsatellite DNA study. Heredity 80:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad EJ, Crozier RH (2006) The evolution of worker caste diversity in social insects. Am Nat 167:390–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad EF, Gertsch EP, Keller L (2002) Why do some social insect queens mate with several males? Testing the sex-ratio manipulation hypothesis in Lasius niger. Evolution 56:553–562

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fjerdingstad EJ, Gertsch PJ, Keller L (2003) The relationship between multiple mating by queens, within-colony genetic variability and fitness in the ant Lasius niger. J Evol Biol 16:844–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:20–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gove R, Hayworth M, Chhetri M, Rüppell O (2009) Division of labour and social insect colony performance in relation to task and mating number under two alternative response threshold models. Insect Soc 56:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: a computer program to calculate Fstatistics. J Hered 86:485–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetic evolution of social behavior. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Boomsma JJ (2004) Genetic diversity and disease resistance in leaf-cutting ant societies. Evolution 58:1251–1260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Sumner S, van Borm S, Boomsma JJ (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 10016:9394–9397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213–1216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe R, Kronauer DJC, Kraus FB, Boomsma JJ, Moritz RFA (2007) Worker caste determination in the army ant Eciton burchellii. Biol Lett 3:513–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JC, Myerscough MR, Graham S, Oldroyd BP (2004) Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Science 305:402–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Reeve HK (1994) Genetic variability, queen number, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. Evolution 48:694–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipyatkov VE, Lopatina EB, Imamgaliev AA, Shirokova LA (2004) Effect of temperature on rearing of the first brood by the founder females of the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): Latitude-dependent variability of the response norm. J Evol Biochem Physiol 40:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus B, Page RE (1998) Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in social insects. Am Nat 151:383–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus FB, Neumann P, van Praagh J, Moritz RFA (2004) Sperm limitation and the evolution of extreme polyandry in honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronauer DJC, Johnson RA, Boomsma JJ (2007) The evolution of multiple mating in army ants. Evolution 61:413–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila HR, Seeley TD (2007) Genetic diversity in honeybee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science 317:362–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Sundström L, Pedersen J-S (2004) MATESOFT: a program for deducing parental genotypes and estimating mating system statistics in haplodiploid species. Mol Ecol Notes 4:795–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moret Y, Schmid-Hempel P (2004) Social life-history response to individual immune challenge of workers of Bombus terrestris L.: a possible new cooperative phenomenon. Ecol Lett 7:146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen R, Tarpy DR, Reeve HK (2003) Estimating effective paternity number in social insects and the effective number of alleles in a population. Mol Ecol 12:3157–3164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (2000) Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. Am Nat 156:577–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (2003). Skew Calculator. http://www.eeb.ucla.edu/Faculty/Nonacs/shareware.htm, University of California at Los Angeles. Accessed Apr 2010

  • Oldroyd BP, Fewell JH (2007) Genetic diversity promotes homeostasis in insect colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 22:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Page RE (1986) Sperm utilization in social insects. Ann Rev Entomol 31:297–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1993) Polyandry and allele frequency difference between the sexes in the ant Formica aquilonia. Heredity 70:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy M, Timmermans I, Allard D, Aron S (2009) Multiple mating in the ant Cataglyphis cursor: testing the sperm limitation and the diploid male load hypotheses. Insect Soc 56:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen JS, Boomsma JJ (1999) Positive association of queen number and queen-mating frequency in Myrmica ants: a challenge to the genetic-variability hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Boomsma JJ (1995) Facultative sex allocation by workers and the evolution of polyandry by queens in social Hymenoptera. Am Nat 145:969–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP. 1.2: A population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüppell O, Johnson N, Rychtár J (2008) Variance-based selection may explain general mating patterns in social insects. Biol Lett 4:270–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel P (1998) Parasites in social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD, Tarpy DR (2007) Queen promiscuity lowers disease within honeybee colonies. Proc R Soc B 274:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert B (1992) A taxonomic revision of the Palaearctic members of the ant subgenus Lasius s. str. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Abh Ber Naturkundemus Görlitz 66:1–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Seeley TD, Reeve HK (1988) Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera. Am Nat 131:602–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundström L, Ratnieks FLW (1998) Sex ratio conflicts, mating frequency, and queen fitness in the ant Formica truncorum. Behav Ecol 9:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarpy DR (2003) Genetic diversity within honeybee colonies prevents severe infections and promotes colony growth. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trontii K, Thurin N, Sundström L, Aron S (2007) Mating for convenience or genetic diversity? Mating patterns in the polygynous ant Plagiolepis pygmaea. Behav Ecol 18:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Osterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 31:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM (2005) Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108:643–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenseleers T, Ratnieks FLW, Billen J (2003) Caste fate conflict in swarm-founding social Hymenoptera: an inclusive fitness analysis. J Evol Biol 16:647–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiernasz DC, Hines J, Parker DG, Cole BJ (2008) Mating for variety increases foraging activity in the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Mol Ecol 17:1137–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our work was funded by a start up grant to E.J.F. from Queens College of the City University of New York (CUNY), a Professional Staff Congress of CUNY Research Award to E.J.F. (grant #61208-00 39) and a Queens College Research Enhancement Award to E.J.F. (grant #90927-08-08). Part of our work was carried out using equipment at the core facility of the Biology Department at Queens College, CUNY. We would like to thank A. Tsiola for storing samples, G.W. Jackman for help with the DNA extractions, P. Nonacs for assistance with the Skew Calculator, and W.O.H. Hughes, D.C. Kronauer, M. Baker, D. Lohman and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Ethical standards

The experiments described here complied with current laws of the European Union and the United States of America.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Else J. Fjerdingstad.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Rueppell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corley, M., Fjerdingstad, E.J. Mating strategies of queens in Lasius niger ants—is environment type important?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65, 889–897 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1089-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1089-7

Keywords

Navigation