Abstract
Studies of animal acoustic communication have found that the frequency and temporal structure of acoustic signals can be shaped by selection for efficient communication. The directionality of acoustic radiation may also be adapted for communication, but we know relatively little about how directionality varies with signal function, sender morphology, and the environment in which the sound is transmitted. We tested the hypothesis that the directionality of a vocalization is adapted to its function in communication. This hypothesis predicts that vocalizations that are directed to multiple conspecifics (e.g., advertisements and alarms) will be relatively omnidirectional because this will maximize the number of neighbors and mates that receive the signal, and that vocalizations directed to particular individuals will be relatively directional because this will maximize detection of the signal by the targeted receiver and minimize eavesdropping. To test these predictions, we measured the directionality and amplitude of red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) vocalizations in the field by recording vocalizations simultaneously on eight calibrated microphones encircling the bird. We found significant variation in directionality among vocalizations. Supporting our predictions, we found that the most omnidirectional vocalizations were those used to alert conspecifics to danger, and the most directional vocalizations are those used during courtship and solicitation of copulation, when the costs of eavesdropping are likely to be high. These results suggest that the directionality of red-winged blackbird vocalizations is shaped by selection for effective communication. This study is the first to provide statistical support for the hypothesis that directionality is related to the function of a signal in communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arak A (1983) Sexual selection by male–male competition in natterjack toad choruses. Nature 306:261–262
Arthur BJ (2004) Sensitivity to spectral interaural intensity difference cues in space-specific neurons of the barn owl. J Comp Physiol, A Sens Neural Behav Physiol V190:91
Au WW, Pawloski JL, Nachtigall PE, Blonz M, Gisner RC (1995) Echolocation signals and transmission beam patterns of the false killer whale (Pseudorca crassidens). J Acoust Soc Am 98:51–59
Beletsky LD, Higgins BJ, Orians GH (1986) Communication by changing signals: call switching in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:221–229
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Breitwisch R, Whitesides GH (1987) Directionality of singing and non-singing behaviour of mated and unmated northern mockingbirds, Mimus polyglottos. Anim Behav 35:311–339
Brenowitz EA (1982) The active space of red-winged blackbird song. J Comp Physiol 147:511–522
Brumm H (2002) Sound radiation patterns in Nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) songs. J Ornithol 143:468–471
Brumm H, Todt D (2003) Facing the rival: directional singing behaviour in nightingales. Behaviour 140:43–53
Burton N, Yasukawa K (2001) The “predator early warning system” of red-winged blackbirds. J Field Ornithol 72:106–112
Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology Bioacoustics Research Program (2002) Raven. Version 1, Ithaca, NY
Dabelsteen T (2005) Public, private or anonymous? Facilitating and countering eavesdropping. In: McGregor PK (ed) Animal communication networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 38–62
Dantzker MS, Deane GB, Bradbury JW (1999) Directional acoustic radiation in the strut display of male sage grouse Centrocercus urophasianus. J Exp Biol 202:2893–2909
Flanagan JL (1972) Speech analysis: synthesis and perception. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Forrest TG (1991) Power output and efficiency of sound output by crickets. Behav Ecol 2:327–338
Frommolt K-H, Gebler A (2004) Directionality of dog vocalizations. J Acoust Soc Am 116:561–565
Gerhardt HC (1975) Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads. J Comp Physiol 102:1–12
Gerhardt HC (1998) Acoustic signals of animals: recording, field measurements, analysis and description. In: Hopp SL, Owren MJ, Evans CS (eds) Animal acoustic communication: sound analysis and research methods. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–25
Gill D, Troyansky L, Nelken I (2000) Auditory localization using direction-dependent spectral information. Neurocomputing 32:767–773
Gold JI, Knudsen EI (1999) Hearing impairment induces frequency-specific adjustments in auditory spatial tuning in the optic tectum of young owls. J Neurophysiol 82:2197–2209
Gold JI, Knudsen EI (2000) Abnormal auditory experience induces frequency-specific adjustments in unit tuning for binaural localization cues in the optic tectum of juvenile owls. J Neurosci 20:862–877
Hartley RS, Suthers RA (1987) The sound emission pattern and the acoustical role of the noseleaf in the echolocating bat, Carolia perspicillata. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1892–1900
Hoese WJ, Podos J, Boetticher NC, Nowicki S (2000) Vocal tract function in bird song production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. J Exp Biol 203:1845–1855
Hunter ML Jr, Kacelnik A, Roberts J, Vuillermoz M (1986) Directionality of avian vocalizations: a laboratory study. Condor 88:371–375
Larsen ON, Dabelsteen T (1990) Directionality of blackbird vocalization. Implications for vocal communication and its further study. Ornis Scand 21:37–45
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS© system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
Marler P (1955) Characteristics of some animal calls. Nature 176:6–8
Marler P (2004) Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication. In: Marler P, Slabbekoorn H (eds) Nature’s music. Elsevier, London, pp 132–176
Mathworks (1998) MATLAB. In: Mathworks, Natick, MA
Miller P (2002) Mixed-directionality of killer whale stereotyped calls: a direction of movement cue? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:262–270
Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405
Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17–34
Morton ES (1982) Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour 99:65–86
Nakagawa S (2004) A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol 15:1044–1045
Nelson BS (2000) Avian dependence on sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue. Anim Behav 59:57–67
Nelson BS, Suthers RA (2004) Sound localization in a small passerine bird: discrimination of azimuth as a function of head orientation and sound frequency. J Exp Biol 207:4121–4133
Nelson BS, Beckers GJL, Suthers RA (2005) Vocal tract filtering and sound radiation in a songbird. J Exp Biol 208:297–308
Nowicki S (1987) Vocal-tract resonances in oscine bird sound production—evidence from bird songs in a helium atmosphere. Nature 325:53–55
Peek FW (1972) An experimental study of the territorial function of vocal and visual display in the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus). Anim Behav 20:112–118
Podos J (1997) A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51:537–551
Podos J (2001) Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signature in Darwin’s finches. Nature 409:185–188
Richards DG, Wiley RH (1980) Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381–399
Searcy WA (1989) Function of courtship vocalizations in red-winged blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:325–331
Searcy WA, Brenowitz EA (1988) Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 332:152–154
Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1995) Polygyny and sexual selection in red-winged blackbirds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Spiesberger JL, Fristrup KM (1990) Passive localization of calling animals and sensing of their acoustic environment using acoustic tomography. Am Nat 135:107–153
Westneat MW, Long JH, Hoese WJ, Nowicki S (1993) Kinematics of birdsong: functional correlation of cranial movements and acoustic features in sparrows. J Exp Biol 182:147–171
Wiley RH, Richards DG (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma D, Miller EH, Ouellet H (eds) Acoustic communication in birds. Academic, New York, pp 131–181
Witkin SR (1977) The importance of directional sound radiation in avian vocalization. Condor 79:490–493
Yasukawa K, Searcy WA (1995) Red-winged blackbird. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds Of North America, vol 184. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia
Acknowledgements
We thank Anne B. Clark, David Winkler, Paulo Llambias, Bob Johnson, Thorsten Balsby, and Sandra Vehrencamp for advice and logistical support in the field. We thank our reviewers for helpful comments in improving this manuscript. We thank David Winkler for providing weather data from his weather station. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship in Biological Informatics to G.L.P (grant no. DBI-0104291). The methods and experiments described herein comply with current U.S. laws.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Podos
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patricelli, G.L., Dantzker, M.S. & Bradbury, J.W. Differences in acoustic directionality among vocalizations of the male red-winged blackbird (Agelaius pheoniceus) are related to function in communication. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1099–1110 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0343-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0343-5