Skip to main content
Log in

Resource supplements cause a change in colony sex-ratio specialization in the mound-building ant, Formica exsecta

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine the role of food resources on split sex ratios in Formica exsecta. Models of resource-based sex allocation predict that greater resources will cause an increase in the production of reproductive females (gynes) and an increase in overall size of offspring. We experimentally increased food resources for a subset of colonies in a polygynous population with a very male-biased sex ratio. This increase in food availability caused colonies that were male specialists the prior year to switch to female production. Overall, a significantly greater proportion of food-supplemented colonies produced gynes, compared to control colonies. Moreover, food-supplemented colonies produced significantly larger workers and males (but not gynes), compared to those produced by control colonies. There was, however, no significant difference in the numerical productivity of food-supplemented and control colonies. We also measured the natural association between colony sex specialization and proximity to conifers, which typically harbor honeydew-bearing aphids (an important natural food source). In line with the view that resources play an important role for determining sex ratios in social insects, we found that female-producing colonies were significantly closer to conifers than were male-producing colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell AJ, Cole BJ, Reyes R, Wiernasz DC (1999) Sexual selection on body size and shape in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis Cresson. Evolution 53:535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agosti D, Hauschteck-Jungen E (1987) Polymorphism of males in Formica exsecta Nyl. (Hym. Formicidae). Insectes Soc 34:280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron S, Campan E, Boomsma JJ, Passera L (1999) Social structure and split sex ratios in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Ethol Ecol Evol 11:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron S, Keller L, Passera L (2001) Role of resource availability on sex, caste and reproductive allocation ratios in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. J Anim Ecol 70:831–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus VL, Herbers JM (1992) Sexual allocation ratios in forest ants: food limitation does not explain observed patterns. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:249–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono JM, Herbers JM (2003) Proximate and ultimate control of sex ratios in Myrmica brevispinosa colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:811–817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (1991) Adaptive colony sex ratios in primitively eusocial bees. Trends Ecol Evol 6:92–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ (1993) Sex ratio variation in polygynous ants. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 86–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1990) Intraspecific variation in ant sex ratios and the Trivers–Hare hypothesis. Evolution 44:1026–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1991) Colony-level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 3:383–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG, Chan GL (1994) Split sex ratios in ants with multiple mating. Trends Ecol Evol 9:120–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Keller L (2000) Colony sex ratios vary with queen number but not relatedness asymmetry in the ant Formica exsecta. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1751–1757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Keller L (2002) Queen recruitment and split sex ratios in polygynous colonies of the ant Formica exsecta. Ecol Lett 2:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Keller L, Sundström L (2002) Sex allocation in mound-building ants: the roles resources and queen replenishment. Ecology 83:1945–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Liautard C, Keller L (2003) Sex-ratio dependent execution of queens in the ant, Formica exsecta. Oecologia 134:12–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1978) Evolution of eusocial behavior: offspring choice or parental parasitism. J Theor Biol 75:451–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Menten L, Fournier D, Brent C, Passera L, Vargo EL, Aron S (2005) Dual mechanism of queen influence over sex ratio in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deslippe RJ, Savolainen R (1995) Sex investment in a social insect: the proximate role of food. Ecology 76:375–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foitzik S, Strätz M, Heinze J (2003) Ecology, life history and resource allocation in the ant, Leptothorax nylanderi. J Evol Biol 16:670–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fortelius W, Pamilo P, Sundström L (1987) Male size dimorphism and alternative tactics in Formica exsecta ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann Zool Fenn 24:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier D, Keller L, Passera L, Aron S (2003) Colony sex ratios vary with breeding system but not relatedness asymmetry in the facultatively polygynous ant Pheidole pallidula. Evolution 57:1336–1342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa S, Nonacs P (2006) Testing models of parental investment strategy and offspring size in ants. Oecologia 146:667–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helms KR (1999) Colony sex ratios, conflict between queens and workers, and apparent queen control in the ant Pheidole desertorum. Evolution 53:1470–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms KR, Fournier D, Keller L, Passera L, Aron S (2004) Colony sex ratios in the facultatively polygynous ant Pheidole pallidula: a reanalysis with new data. Evolution 58:1141–1142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helms KR, Reuter M, Keller L (2005) Sex-ratio conflict between queens and workers in eusocial Hymenoptera: mechanisms, costs, and the evolution of split colony sex ratios. Evolution 59:2626–2638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herbers JM, Banschbach VS (1998) Food supply and reproductive allocation in forest ants: repeated experiments give different results. Oikos 83:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Liautard C, Reuter M, Brown WD, Chapuisat M, Sundström L (2001) Sex ratio and Wolbachia infection in the ant Formica exsecta. Heredity 87:227–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kümmerli R, Helms KR, Keller L (2005) Experimental manipulation of queen number affects colony sex ratio investment in the highly polygynous ant Formica exsecta. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1789–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liautard C, Keller L (2001) Restricted effective queen dispersal at a microgeographic scale in polygynous populations of the ant Formica exsecta. Evolution 55:2484–2492

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liautard C, Brown WD, Helms KR , Keller L (2003) Temporal and spatial variations of gyne production in the ant Formica exsecta. Oecologia 136:558–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morales MA, Heithaus ER (1998) Food from seed-dispersal mutualism shifts sex ratios in colonies of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Ecology 79:734–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1986a) Ant reproductive strategies and sex allocation theory. Quart Rev Biol 61:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (1986b) Sex ratio determination within colonies of ants. Evolution 40:199–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ode PJ, Rissing SW (2002) Resource abundance and sex allocation by queen and workers in the harvester ant, Messor pergandei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:548–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P (1991) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. 1. Sex allocation. Amer Natur 137:83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamilo P, Rosengren R (1983) Sex ratio strategies in Formica ants. Oikos 40:24–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passera L, Aron S, Vargo EL, Keller L (2001) Queen control of sex ratio in fire ants. Science 293:1308–1310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW (1991) Facultative sex allocation biasing by workers in social Hymenoptera. Evolution 45:281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratnieks FLW, Boomsma JJ (1997) On the robustness of split sex ratio predictions in social Hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 185:423–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren R, Sundström L (1987) The foraging system of a red wood ant colony (Formica s.str.). In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Experientia (Suppl 54):117–138

  • Rosengren R, Sundström L (1991) The interaction between red wood ants Cinara aphids and pines—a ghost of a mutualism past? In: Cutler DF, Huxley CR (eds) Interaction between ants and plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim JA, Nonacs P, Mangel M (1996) Sex ratios and multifaceted parental investment. Amer Natur 148:501–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström L (1995) Sex allocation and colony maintenance in monogyne and polygyne colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): the impact of kinship and mating structure. Amer Natur 146:182–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström L, Chapuisat M, Keller L (1996) Conditional manipulation of sex ratios by ant workers: a test of kin selection theory. Science 274:993–994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiernasz DC, Cole BJ (2003) Queen size mediates queen survival and colony fitness in harvester ants. Evolution 57:2179–2183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiernasz DC, Sate AK, Abell AJ, Cole BJ (2001) Male size, sperm transfer, and colony fitness in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Evolution 55:324–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our numerous helpers for their efforts in the field and the Swiss NSF for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William D. Brown.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Heinze

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, W.D., Keller, L. Resource supplements cause a change in colony sex-ratio specialization in the mound-building ant, Formica exsecta . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 612–618 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0204-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0204-2

Keywords

Navigation