Abstract
We examine the role of food resources on split sex ratios in Formica exsecta. Models of resource-based sex allocation predict that greater resources will cause an increase in the production of reproductive females (gynes) and an increase in overall size of offspring. We experimentally increased food resources for a subset of colonies in a polygynous population with a very male-biased sex ratio. This increase in food availability caused colonies that were male specialists the prior year to switch to female production. Overall, a significantly greater proportion of food-supplemented colonies produced gynes, compared to control colonies. Moreover, food-supplemented colonies produced significantly larger workers and males (but not gynes), compared to those produced by control colonies. There was, however, no significant difference in the numerical productivity of food-supplemented and control colonies. We also measured the natural association between colony sex specialization and proximity to conifers, which typically harbor honeydew-bearing aphids (an important natural food source). In line with the view that resources play an important role for determining sex ratios in social insects, we found that female-producing colonies were significantly closer to conifers than were male-producing colonies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell AJ, Cole BJ, Reyes R, Wiernasz DC (1999) Sexual selection on body size and shape in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis Cresson. Evolution 53:535–545
Agosti D, Hauschteck-Jungen E (1987) Polymorphism of males in Formica exsecta Nyl. (Hym. Formicidae). Insectes Soc 34:280–290
Aron S, Campan E, Boomsma JJ, Passera L (1999) Social structure and split sex ratios in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Ethol Ecol Evol 11:209–227
Aron S, Keller L, Passera L (2001) Role of resource availability on sex, caste and reproductive allocation ratios in the Argentine ant Linepithema humile. J Anim Ecol 70:831–839
Backus VL, Herbers JM (1992) Sexual allocation ratios in forest ants: food limitation does not explain observed patterns. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30:249–425
Bono JM, Herbers JM (2003) Proximate and ultimate control of sex ratios in Myrmica brevispinosa colonies. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:811–817
Boomsma JJ (1991) Adaptive colony sex ratios in primitively eusocial bees. Trends Ecol Evol 6:92–95
Boomsma JJ (1993) Sex ratio variation in polygynous ants. In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 86–109
Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1990) Intraspecific variation in ant sex ratios and the Trivers–Hare hypothesis. Evolution 44:1026–1034
Boomsma JJ, Grafen A (1991) Colony-level sex ratio selection in the eusocial Hymenoptera. J Evol Biol 3:383–407
Bourke AFG, Chan GL (1994) Split sex ratios in ants with multiple mating. Trends Ecol Evol 9:120–122
Brown WD, Keller L (2000) Colony sex ratios vary with queen number but not relatedness asymmetry in the ant Formica exsecta. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1751–1757
Brown WD, Keller L (2002) Queen recruitment and split sex ratios in polygynous colonies of the ant Formica exsecta. Ecol Lett 2:102–109
Brown WD, Keller L, Sundström L (2002) Sex allocation in mound-building ants: the roles resources and queen replenishment. Ecology 83:1945–1952
Brown WD, Liautard C, Keller L (2003) Sex-ratio dependent execution of queens in the ant, Formica exsecta. Oecologia 134:12–17
Charnov EL (1978) Evolution of eusocial behavior: offspring choice or parental parasitism. J Theor Biol 75:451–465
de Menten L, Fournier D, Brent C, Passera L, Vargo EL, Aron S (2005) Dual mechanism of queen influence over sex ratio in the ant Pheidole pallidula. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:527–533
Deslippe RJ, Savolainen R (1995) Sex investment in a social insect: the proximate role of food. Ecology 76:375–382
Foitzik S, Strätz M, Heinze J (2003) Ecology, life history and resource allocation in the ant, Leptothorax nylanderi. J Evol Biol 16:670–680
Fortelius W, Pamilo P, Sundström L (1987) Male size dimorphism and alternative tactics in Formica exsecta ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann Zool Fenn 24:45–54
Fournier D, Keller L, Passera L, Aron S (2003) Colony sex ratios vary with breeding system but not relatedness asymmetry in the facultatively polygynous ant Pheidole pallidula. Evolution 57:1336–1342
Gilboa S, Nonacs P (2006) Testing models of parental investment strategy and offspring size in ants. Oecologia 146:667–674
Helms KR (1999) Colony sex ratios, conflict between queens and workers, and apparent queen control in the ant Pheidole desertorum. Evolution 53:1470–1478
Helms KR, Fournier D, Keller L, Passera L, Aron S (2004) Colony sex ratios in the facultatively polygynous ant Pheidole pallidula: a reanalysis with new data. Evolution 58:1141–1142
Helms KR, Reuter M, Keller L (2005) Sex-ratio conflict between queens and workers in eusocial Hymenoptera: mechanisms, costs, and the evolution of split colony sex ratios. Evolution 59:2626–2638
Herbers JM, Banschbach VS (1998) Food supply and reproductive allocation in forest ants: repeated experiments give different results. Oikos 83:145–151
Keller L, Liautard C, Reuter M, Brown WD, Chapuisat M, Sundström L (2001) Sex ratio and Wolbachia infection in the ant Formica exsecta. Heredity 87:227–233
Kümmerli R, Helms KR, Keller L (2005) Experimental manipulation of queen number affects colony sex ratio investment in the highly polygynous ant Formica exsecta. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1789–1794
Liautard C, Keller L (2001) Restricted effective queen dispersal at a microgeographic scale in polygynous populations of the ant Formica exsecta. Evolution 55:2484–2492
Liautard C, Brown WD, Helms KR , Keller L (2003) Temporal and spatial variations of gyne production in the ant Formica exsecta. Oecologia 136:558–564
Morales MA, Heithaus ER (1998) Food from seed-dispersal mutualism shifts sex ratios in colonies of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Ecology 79:734–739
Nonacs P (1986a) Ant reproductive strategies and sex allocation theory. Quart Rev Biol 61:1–21
Nonacs P (1986b) Sex ratio determination within colonies of ants. Evolution 40:199–204
Ode PJ, Rissing SW (2002) Resource abundance and sex allocation by queen and workers in the harvester ant, Messor pergandei. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:548–556
Pamilo P (1991) Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. 1. Sex allocation. Amer Natur 137:83–107
Pamilo P, Rosengren R (1983) Sex ratio strategies in Formica ants. Oikos 40:24–35
Passera L, Aron S, Vargo EL, Keller L (2001) Queen control of sex ratio in fire ants. Science 293:1308–1310
Ratnieks FLW (1991) Facultative sex allocation biasing by workers in social Hymenoptera. Evolution 45:281–292
Ratnieks FLW, Boomsma JJ (1997) On the robustness of split sex ratio predictions in social Hymenoptera. J Theor Biol 185:423–439
Rosengren R, Sundström L (1987) The foraging system of a red wood ant colony (Formica s.str.). In: Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Experientia (Suppl 54):117–138
Rosengren R, Sundström L (1991) The interaction between red wood ants Cinara aphids and pines—a ghost of a mutualism past? In: Cutler DF, Huxley CR (eds) Interaction between ants and plants. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–92
Rosenheim JA, Nonacs P, Mangel M (1996) Sex ratios and multifaceted parental investment. Amer Natur 148:501–535
Sundström L (1995) Sex allocation and colony maintenance in monogyne and polygyne colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): the impact of kinship and mating structure. Amer Natur 146:182–201
Sundström L, Chapuisat M, Keller L (1996) Conditional manipulation of sex ratios by ant workers: a test of kin selection theory. Science 274:993–994
Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191:249–263
Wiernasz DC, Cole BJ (2003) Queen size mediates queen survival and colony fitness in harvester ants. Evolution 57:2179–2183
Wiernasz DC, Sate AK, Abell AJ, Cole BJ (2001) Male size, sperm transfer, and colony fitness in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis. Evolution 55:324–329
Acknowledgements
We thank our numerous helpers for their efforts in the field and the Swiss NSF for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Heinze
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, W.D., Keller, L. Resource supplements cause a change in colony sex-ratio specialization in the mound-building ant, Formica exsecta . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 612–618 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0204-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0204-2