Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of predation risk in small wintering birds: the hawk’s perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The small-bird-in-winter paradigm is prominent in the field of behavioral ecology. However, our conceptual understanding of this paradigm is limited by our lack of knowledge about Accipiter hawks. Although Accipiters are the major predators of small wintering birds, we know little about their behavior during the winter. In this paper, we present the first description of the predatory behavior of wintering sharp-shinned hawks (Accipiter striatus), focusing on their selection of prey and attack strategies. We also relate basic prey behavior to the risk of death during an attack. During the winters of 2000–2004, we observed 255 attacks and recovered 112 prey items from 21 intensively radio-tracked hawks. The diet of sharp-shinned hawks in the study was composed primarily of sparrow-sized prey, intermediate-sized starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), American robins (Turdus migratorius), and the occasional larger prey such as mourning doves (Zenaida macroura). Both sexes killed all sizes of prey, although female hawks took significantly more large prey than did males. Small preys under 20 g, such as parids, were largely ignored. This lack of very small prey in the diet of sharp-shinned hawks suggests that we might focus the small-bird-in-winter paradigm on sparrows and intermediate-sized prey, such as robins, as the main prey base of Accipiters at least in North America. In addition, solitary and feeding prey were significantly more likely to be captured during an attack than prey in groups and those not feeding. Our hawk-driven observations provide rare empirical support for the concept that flocking birds are safer than solitary birds and alert birds experience less risk than those preoccupied with feeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp G (2003) Group-size effects on vigilance: a search for mechanisms. Behav Processes 63:111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA (1997) Mutualism among safe, selfish sentinels: a dynamic game. Am Nat 150:373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger DD, Mueller HC (1959) The bal-chatri: a trap for the birds of prey. Bird Band 30:18–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram BCR (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 279–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby C J, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1992) Bird census techniques. Academic, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildstein KL, Meyer K (2000) Sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus). In: Poole A, Gill F. The Birds of North America No. 482. The Academy of Natural Sciences and the American Ornithologists’ Union Philadelphia PA and Washington DC

  • Cresswell W (1994a) Flocking as an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanus. Anim Behav 47:433–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1994b) Age-dependent choice of redshank (Tringa totanus) feeding location—profitability or risk. J Anim Ecol 63:589–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W (1996) Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, peregrines Falco peregrinus, and merlins, F. columbarius. Ibis 138:684–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Whitfield P (1994) The effects of raptor predation on wintering wader populations at the Tyninghame estuary, southeast Scotland. Ibis 136:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell W, Lind J, Kaby U, Quinn JL, Jakobsson S (2003) Does an opportunistic predator preferentially attack nonvigilant prey? Anim Behav 66:643–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Houston AI (1997) Managing time and energy. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolby AS, Grubb TC (1998) Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Anim Behav 56:501–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolby AS, Grubb TC (2000) Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group. Behav Ecol 11:110–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn EH, Tessaglia DL (1994) Predation of birds at feeders in winter. J Field Ornithol 65:8–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB (1993) CRC handbook of avian body masses. CRC, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1989) Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 64:13–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau L-A, Caraco T (2000) Social foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotmark F, Post P (1996) Prey selection by sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: relative predation risk for breeding passerine birds in relation to their size, ecology, and behaviour. Royal Soc Lond B 351:1559–1577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R (2000) Birds of many feathers: the formation and structure of mixed-species flocks of forest birds. In: Boinski S, Garber PS (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 521–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton GM, Cresswell W, Ruxton GD (1999) Intraflock variation in the speed of escape–flight response on attack by an avian predator. Behav Ecol 10:391–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston A, McNamara J (1999) Models of adaptive behavior. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaby U, Lind J (2003) What limits predator detection in blue tits (Parus caeruleus): posture, task, or orientation? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:534–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Godin JGJ (1996) Influence of prey foraging posture on flight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey. Behav Ecol 7:264–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1985) Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee. Oecologia 66:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Zollner PA, Bednekoff PA (1999) Predation, scramble competition, and the vigilance group size effect in the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:110–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom A (1989) Finch flock size and risk of hawk predation at a migratory stopover site. Auk 106:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Clark CW (1988) Dynamic modeling in behavioral ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI, Lima SL (1994) Foraging routines of small birds in winter—a theoretical investigation. J Avian Biol 25:287–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WA, Lima SL (2002) Predator–prey shell games: large-scale movement and its implications for decision-making by prey. Oikos 99:249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller HC, Berger DD (1970) Prey preferences in the sharp-shinned hawk: the roles of sex, experience, and motivation. Auk 87:452–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller HC, Mueller NS, Berger DD, Allez G, Robichaud WG, Kaspar JL (2000) Age and sex differences in the size of prey of the sharp-shinned hawk. J Field Ornithol 71:399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I (1986) The sparrowhawk. T & AD, Poyser, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pravosudov VV, Grubb TC (1997) Management of fat resources and food caches in tufted titmice (Parus bicolor) in relation to unpredictable food supply. Behav Ecol 8:332–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 127–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappole JH, Tipton AR (1994) New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters to small passerines. J Field Ornithol 62:335–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield RN, Bielefeldt J (1993) Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii). In: Poole A, Gill F. The Birds of North America No. 75 The Academy of Natural Sciences and the American Ornithologists’ Union Philadelphia PA and Washington DC

  • Roth TC, Lima SL (2003) Hunting behavior and diet of Cooper’s hawks: an urban view of the small-bird-in-winter paradigm. Condor 105:474–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth TC, Lima SL, Vetter WE (2005) Survival and causes of mortality in wintering sharp-shinned and Cooper’s hawks. Wilson Bull 117 (3):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selas V (1993) Selection of avian prey by breeding sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus, in southern Norway—the importance of size and foraging behavior of prey. Ornis Fenn 70:144–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM (1991) The black-capped chickadee: behavioral ecology and natural history. Comstock, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc (1998) SYSTAT 9.0 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago, IL

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan KA (1984) The advantages of social foraging in downy woodpeckers. Anim Behav 32:16–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP (1985) Raptor predation on wintering waders in southeast Scotland. Ibis 127:544–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield DP, Cresswell W, Ashmole NP, Clark NA, Evans AD (1999) No evidence for sparrowhawk selecting redshanks according to size or condition. J Avian Biol 30:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JD, Weir AG (1989) Hunting behavior and attack success of a female sparrowhawk between October 1987 and April 1988. Scott Birds 15:126–130

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our many field technicians for their assistance in tracking hawks. T. Dailey provided expert assistance with point count surveys. We would also like to thank local landowners (especially M. Evrard, J. Irwin, C. Martin, and C. Miller) for their cooperation. W. Cresswell, R. Gibson, J. Lesku, and P. Scott provided helpful comments on drafts of this manuscript. This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (Grant IBN-0130758 to SLL), the Indiana Academy of Sciences, and the Department of Ecology and Organismal Biology and School of Graduate Studies at Indiana State University. This research conformed to the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Indiana State University (protocols OO-19:TR/SL and 08-21-2003:TR/SL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy C. Roth II.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Gibson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, T.C., Lima, S.L. & Vetter, W.E. Determinants of predation risk in small wintering birds: the hawk’s perspective. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 195–204 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0156-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0156-y

Keywords

Navigation