Abstract
Division of labour among workers is central to the organisation and ecological success of insect societies. If there is a genetic component to worker size, morphology or task preference, an increase in colony genetic diversity arising from the presence of multiple breeders per colony might improve division of labour. We studied the genetic basis of worker size and task preference in Formica selysi, an ant species that shows natural variation in the number of mates per queen and the number of queens per colony. Worker size had a heritable component in colonies headed by a doubly mated queen (h 2=0.26) and differed significantly among matrilines in multiple-queen colonies. However, higher levels of genetic diversity did not result in more polymorphic workers across single- or multiple-queen colonies. In addition, workers from multiple-queen colonies were consistently smaller and less polymorphic than workers from single-queen colonies. The relationship between task, body size and genetic lineage appeared to be complex. Foragers were significantly larger than brood-tenders, which may provide energetic or ergonomic advantages to the colony. Task specialisation was also often associated with genetic lineage. However, genetic lineage and body size were often correlated with task independently of each other, suggesting that the allocation of workers to tasks is modulated by multiple factors. Overall, these results indicate that an increase in colony genetic diversity does not increase worker size polymorphism but might improve colony homeostasis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bargum K, Boomsma JJ, Sundström L (2004) A genetic component to size in queens of the ant, Formica truncorum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:9–16
Becker WA (1992) Manual of quantitative genetics., 5th edn. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA
Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440
Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Bürger R, Gimelfarb A (2002) Fluctuating environments and the role of mutation in maintaining quantitative genetic variation. Genet Res 80:31–46
Chapuisat M (1996) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Formica lugubris B and their variability in other ant species. Mol Ecol 5:599–601
Chapuisat M, Bocherens S, Rosset H (2004) Variable queen number in ant colonies: no impact on queen turnover, inbreeding, and population genetic differentiation in the ant Formica selysi. Evolution 58:1064–1072
Costa JT, Ross KG (2003) Fitness effects of group merging in a social insect. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1697–1702
Crozier RH, Page RE (1985) On being the right size: male contributions and multiple mating in social Hymenoptera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:105–115
Franks NR (1985) Reproduction, foraging efficiency and worker polymorphism in army ants. In: Lindauer M, Hölldobler B (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 91–107
Fraser VS, Kaufmann B, Oldroyd BP, Crozier RH (2000) Genetic influence on caste in the ant Camponotus consobrinus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47:188–194
Goodisman M, Ross KG (1996) Relationship of queen number and worker size in polygyne colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Ins Soc 43:303–307
Goodisman MAD, Crozier RH (2003) Association between caste and genotype in the termite Mastotermes darwiniensis Froggatt (Isoptera : Mastotermitidae). Aust J Entomol 42:1–5
Greenberg L, Fletcher DJC, Vinson SB (1985) Differences in worker size and mound distribution in monogynous and polygynous colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. J Kans Entomol Soc 58:9–18
Gyllenstrand N, Gertsch PJ, Pamilo P (2002) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the ant Formica exsecta. Mol Ecol Notes 2:67–69
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Hughes WOH, Sumner S, van Borm S, Boomsma JJ (2003) Worker caste polymorphism has a genetic basis in Acromyrmex leaf-cutting ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9394–9397
Jones JC, Myerscough MR, Graham S, Oldroyd BP (2004) Honey bee nest thermoregulation: diversity promotes stability. Science 305:402–404
Julian GE, Fewell JH (2004) Genetic variation and task specialisation in the desert leaf-cutter ant, Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim Behav 68:1–8
Liu FH, Smith SM (2000) Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in haplodiploid organisms. Heredity 85:373–382
Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London
Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Page RE, Erber J (2002) Levels of behavioral organization and the evolution of division of labor. Naturwissenschaften 89:91–106
Page RE, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK, Nasr ME (1995) Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:387–396
Pisarski B (1981) Intraspecific variations in ants of the genus Formica. In: Howse PE, Clement J-L (eds) Biosystematics of social insects. Academic Press, London and New York, pp 17–25
Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1985a) Fire ant polymorphism (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): factors affecting worker size. Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:381–386
Porter SD, Tschinkel WR (1985b) Fire ant polymorphism: the ergonomics of brood production. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:323–336
Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637–665
Rüppell O, Heinze J, Holldobler B (2001) Complex determination of queen body size in the queen size dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus (Formicidae : Hymenoptera). Heredity 87:33–40
Snyder LE (1992) The genetics of social behavior in a polygynous ant. Naturwissenschaften 79:525–527
Sokal RR, Braumann CA (1980) Significance tests for coefficients of variation and variability profiles. Syst Zool 29:50–66
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York
Stuart RJ, Page RE (1991) Genetic component to division of labor among workers of a leptothoracine ant. Naturwissenschaften 78:375–377
Sundström L (1995) Sex allocation and colony maintenance in monogyne and polygyne colonies of Formica truncorum (Hymenoptera, Formicidae): the impact of kinship and mating structure. Am Nat 146:182–201
Turelli M, Barton NH (2004) Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and GxE interactions. Genetics 166:1053–1079
Wang JL (2004) Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors. Genetics 166:1963–1979
Waser NM (1998) Task-matching and short-term size shifts in foragers of the harvester ant, Messor pergandei (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Insect Behav 11:451–462
Wetterer JK (1999) The ecology and evolution of worker size-distribution in leaf-cutting ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 34:119–144
Wheeler DE (1991) The developmental basis of worker caste polymorphism in ants. Am Nat 138:1218–1238
Wilson EO (1968) The ergonomics of caste in the social insects. Am Nat 102:41–66
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:141–154
Wilson EO (1980) Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). II. The ergonomic optimization of leaf cutting Atta sexdens. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7:157–165
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Peter for help in the lab, S. Helms-Cahan for discussions and P. Christe, R. H. Crozier, S. Helms Cahan, L. Keller and two anonymous referees for comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. This study was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31-61934.00 to MC)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Heinze
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwander, T., Rosset, H. & Chapuisat, M. Division of labour and worker size polymorphism in ant colonies: the impact of social and genetic factors. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59, 215–221 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0027-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0027-6