Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis manipulates imprinting among offspring through egg placement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A crucial question with respect to imprinting is how animals ensure that kin imprint on kin but not on non-kin. Imprinting takes place in a sensitive ontogenetic phase, usually in an early period of life or when offspring are produced, at which time the recipient imprints on the first referents met. In the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis, imprinting among immature individuals happens in the larval stage immediately after hatching. I tested the hypothesis that adult P. persimilis females manipulate offspring imprinting by influencing the likelihood of encounters among recipients and referents via egg placement and egg aggregation. I conducted two experiments, one of which addressed imprinting and cannibalism, and the other addressed egg placement and egg aggregation. The imprinting experiment suggests that larvae imprint on any conspecific individual met in a sensitive ontogenetic phase and later on treat this individual as kin, irrespective of relatedness. After molting to protonymphs, imprinted individuals preferentially cannibalized unfamiliar to familiar larvae. Irrespective of familiarity, kin were cannibalized earlier than non-kin, suggesting the involvement of self-referent phenotype matching. The egg-placement experiment provides evidence that females adjust the aggregation level of their own eggs according to the degree of relatedness to present eggs from a previously ovipositing female. Both experiments in concert suggest that egg placement is a maternal strategy influencing imprinting among immature individuals. Apart from avoiding kin cannibalism, egg placement and imprinting by larvae may have relevance to other behaviors influenced by kin recognition, such as mate choice, prey-patch choice and dispersal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphen van JJM, Nell HW (1982) Superparasitism and host discrimination by Asobara tabida Nees (Braconidae: Alysiinae), a larval parasitoid of Drosophilidae. Neth J Zool 32:232–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K, Alphen JJM van, Batenburg FHD van, Hoeven N van der, Nell HW, Strien-van Limpt WTFH, Turlings TCJ (1985) The function of host discrimination and superparasitization in parasitoids. Oecologia 67:572–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Porter RH (1996) The ubiquitous concept of recognition with special reference to kin. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Readings in animal cognition. MIT, Cambridge, Mass, pp 169–184

  • Bolhuis JJ (1991) Mechanisms of avian imprinting: a review. Biol Rev 66:303–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittenden AR, Saito Y (2001) Why are there feeding and non-feeding larvae in phytoseiid mites (Acari, Phytoseiidae). J Ethol 19:55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1984) The evolution of egg clustering in butterflies and other insects. Am Nat 123:276–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA, Crespi BJ (1992) Cannibalism: ecology and evolution among diverse taxa. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Enigl M, Schausberger P (2004) Mate choice in the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching? Entomol Exp Appl 112:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F, Janssen A, Rijn PCJ van, Sabelis MW (2000) Kin recognition by the predatory mite Iphiseius degenerans: discrimination among own, conspecific and heterospecific eggs. Ecol Entomol 25:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2001) Predatory mites avoid ovipositing near counterattacking prey. Exp Appl Acarol 25:613–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraji F, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2002) The benefits of clustering eggs: the role of egg predation and larval cannibalism in a predatory mite. Oecologia 131:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths SW, Magurran AE (1999) Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci 24:609–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helle W, Sabelis MW (1985) Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerik L, Hoeven N van der, Alphen JM van (2002) Egg distributions and the information a solitary parasitoid has and uses for its oviposition decisions. Acta Biotheor 50:167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepper PG, Cleland J (1999) Developmental aspects of kin recognition. Genetica 104:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heth G, Todrank J, Johnston RE (1998) Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for phenotype matching. Anim Behav 56:409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes HB (1972) Genetic evidence for fewer progeny and a higher percent males when Nasonia vitripennis oviposits in previously parasitized hosts. Entomophaga 17:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes HB, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Am Zool 22:491–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR (1989) The optimal clutch size of insects when many females oviposit per patch. Am Nat 133:671–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeugd HP van der, Veen IT van der, Larsson K (2002) Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype matching. Behav Ecol 13:786–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J, Richardson DS, Burke T (2004) Experimental evidence that kin discrimination in the Seychelles warbler is based on association and not genetic relatedness. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:963–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeb MLG, Diener LM, Pfennig DW (2000) Egg-dumping lace bugs preferentially oviposit with kin. Anim Behav 59:379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Sepulcre H, Kokko H (2002) The role of kin recognition in the evolution of conspecific brood parasitism. Anim Behav 64:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM (2003) Kin recognition in ground squirrels and other rodents. J Mammal 84:1163–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure M, Quiring DT, Turgeon JT (1998) Proximate and ultimate factors influencing oviposition site selection by endoparasites on conifer seed cones: two sympatric dipteran species on larch. Entomol Exp Appl 87:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry JA, Croft BA (1997) Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annu Rev Entomol 42:291–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messina FJ, Renwick JAA (1985) Ability of ovipositing seed beetles to discriminate between seeds with differing egg loads. Ecol Entomol 10:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke CJ (1994) Simultaneous optimization of egg distribution and sex allocation in a patch-structured population. Am Nat 144:262–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke CJ, Sabelis MW (1996) Hierarchical levels of spatial structure and their consequences for the evolution of sex allocation in mites and other arthropods. Am Nat 148:16–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke CJ, Baalen M van, Sabelis MW (1996) When should a female avoid adding eggs to the clutch of another female? A simultaneous oviposition and sex allocation game. Evol Ecol 10:475–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Osawa N (2003) The influence of female oviposition strategy on sibling cannibalism in the ladybird beetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Eur J Entomol 100:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels B, Sabelis MW (1999) Local dynamics, overexploitation and predator dispersal. Oikos 86:573–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopy RJ (1981) Epideictic pheromones that influence spacing patterns of phytophagous insects. In: Nordlund DA, Jones WJ (eds) Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. Wiley, New York, pp 181–213

  • Rausher MD (1979) Egg recognition: its advantage to a butterfly. Anim Behav 27:1034–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M, Schoonhoven LM (1977) Assessment of egg load by Pieris brassicae (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Nature 266:352–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis MW (1981) Biological control of two-spotted spider mites using phytoseiid predators. I. Modelling the predator-prey interaction at the individual level. Agricultural Research Reports, no. 910. Pudoc, Wageningen

  • Sabelis MW (1985) Sex allocation. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW (eds) Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, vol 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 83–94

  • Sabelis MW, Janssen A (1994) Evolution of life-history patterns in the family Phytoseiidae. In: Houck MA (ed) Mites ecological and evolutionary analyses of life history patterns. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 70–98

  • Schausberger P (2003) Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: a review. Exp Appl Acarol 29:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (2004) Ontogenetic isolation favors sibling cannibalism in mites. Anim Behav 67:1031–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Croft BA (1999) Activity, feeding and development among larvae of specialist and generalist phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ Entomol 28:322–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Croft BA (2000) Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization? Exp Appl Acarol 24:709–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P, Croft BA (2001) Kin recognition and larval cannibalism by adult females in specialist predaceous mites. Anim Behav 61:459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Holmes WG (1985) Kin recognition: issues and evidence. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass, pp 437–460

  • Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JB, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology, an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 69–96

  • Singer MC, Mandracchia J (1982) On the failure of two butterfly species to respond to the presence of conspecific eggs prior to oviposition. Ecol Entomol 7:327–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE (1980) Egg deposition patterns in butterflies: why do some species cluster their eggs rather than deposit them singly? Am Nat 115:367–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink AG (2000) The evolution of intraspecific brood parasitism in birds and insects. Am Nat 155:395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zink AG (2003) Intraspecific brood parasitism as a conditional reproductive tactic in the treehopper Publilia concava. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:406–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Austrian Academy of Sciences (APART fellowship). I thank Maurice Sabelis for discussion and Monika Enigl, Andreas Walzer and two anonymous referees for comments on a previous version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Plant Sciences and Plant Biotechnology, Institute of Plant Protection, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Peter Jordanstrasse 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria

    Peter Schausberger

Authors
  1. Peter Schausberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Schausberger.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Simmons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schausberger, P. The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis manipulates imprinting among offspring through egg placement. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58, 53–59 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0898-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0898-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation