Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal maternal investment in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal investment theory is based on the assumption that the proximate constraint acting on parental investment is resource based. A trade-off between per offspring investment and total investment seems intuitive. Consequently, a parent’s investment strategy is expected to represent a trade-off between the benefits of investment for current offspring and the costs to future reproduction for parents. In this study, we provide clear evidence that the costs and benefits of maternal provisioning in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus influence the amount of provisions provided by the mother. Horse dung is typically of a higher nutritional value than cow dung and females were shown to provide 20% less dung to offspring when provisioning with horse dung. By reducing their investment per offspring and exhibiting a clear preference to provision offspring with horse dung, females were able to produce significantly more offspring. Females provisioning with horse dung received greater fitness returns per unit of investment and experienced lower provisioning costs, in terms of the minimum amount of dung required to produce a surviving offspring, than females provisioning with cow dung. Females provisioning in soil of low moisture content were found to have higher tunneling costs than those provisioning in soil of high moisture content, while the fitness returns per unit of investment did not differ. We adopted a marginal value theorem (MVT) approach to calculate the theoretical optimal level of investment for each dung type and for each soil moisture. Predicted levels of provisioning were lower for horse dung than for cow dung and for moist soil than for dry soil. Therefore, the results of this study are in qualitative agreement with MVT predictions and provide empirical support for the proposal that females can adaptively adjust their level of investment in response to resource and/or habitat quality. However, the theoretically predicted optimal investment yielded a poor quantitative fit with our observed levels of investment, with females providing over twice the investment predicted by the MVT approach. We suggest that this difference may reflect either our inability in directly quantifying all the necessary costs and benefits of investment in O. taurus and/or the applicability of the underlying assumptions of MVT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A, B
Fig. 2 A
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai B, Mackauer M (1992) Influence of superparasitism on the developmental rate and adult size in a solitary wasp Aphidius ervi. Funct Ecol 6:302–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkhouse J, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (1986) Effect of soil moisture on brood ball production by Onthophagus binodis Thunberg and Euoniticellus intermedius (Reiche) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). J Entomol Soc Aust 25:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J (1996) The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size: patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. Am Zool 36:216–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman WY (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am Nat 109:677–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody MS, Lawlor LR (1984) Adaptive variation in offspring size in the terrestrial isopod Armadillium vulgare. Oecologia 61:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull JJ (1987) Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41:303–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Capinera JL (1979) Qualitative variation in plants and insects: effect of propagule size on ecological plasticity. Am Nat 114:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrière Y, Roff DA (1995) The evolution of offspring size and number: a test of the Smith–Fretwell model in three species of crickets. Oecologia 102:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrière Y, Masaki S, Roff DA (1997) The coadaptation of female morphology and offspring size: a comparative analysis in crickets. Oecologia 110:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Skinner SW (1984) Evolution of host selection and clutch size in parasitoid wasps. Flor Entomol 67:5–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Skinner SW (1985) Complementary approaches to the understanding of parasitoid oviposition decisions. Environ Entomol 14:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

  • Crump ML (1981) Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for tree frogs. Am Nat 117:724–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump ML (1984) Intraclutch egg size variability in Hyla crucifer (Anura: Hylidae). Copeia 1984:302–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra LJ (1986) Optimal selection and exploitation of hosts in the parasitic wasp Colpoclypeus florus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Neth J Zool 36:177–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Gutiérrez EE (1991) Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:18–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox CW, Thakar MS, Mousseau TA (1997) Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am Nat 149:149–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Dorado A (1990) Some evolutionary properties of parental investment per offspring in a heterogeneous environment. J Theor Biol 147:101–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

  • Halffter G, Edmonds WG (1982) The nesting behaviour of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae): an ecological and evolutive approach. Instituto de Ecologia, Mexico

  • Hardy ICW, Griffiths NT, Godfray HCJ (1992) Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: a manipulation experiment. J Anim Ecol 61:121–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL, Lovell PH, Moore KG (1970) The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:327–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (1997) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: an experimental examination of the honest signal hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998a) Patterns of parental provisioning covary with male morphology in a horned beetle (Onthophagus taurus) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:447–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998b) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: no evidence for reliable signalling. Behav Ecol 9:465–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2000) Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution 54:936–941

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2001) Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2409–2414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW (2002) Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Anim Behav 64:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL (1999) Dung pad residence time covaries with male morphology in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Ecol Entomol 24:274–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Simmons LW, Kotiaho JS (2002) A cost of maternal care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. J Evol Biol 15:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwao K, Ohsaki N (1996) Inter- and intraspecific interactions among larvae of specialist and generalist parasitoids. Res Popul Ecol 38:265–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Suzuki Y, Matsuda H (1984) Theory of oviposition strategy of parasitoids. I. Effect of mortality and limited egg number. Theor Popul Biol 26:205–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1977) Variation in seed size within a crop of a Costa Rican Micuna andreana (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 64:347–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RH (1980) The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders. Evolution 34:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the “adaptive coin-flipping” principle. Am Nat 123:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot WC (1973) Egg size cycle of a cladoceran. Ecology 55:1259–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolding S, Fenchel TM (1981) Patterns of reproduction in different populations of five species of the amphipod genus Gammarus. Oikos 37:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1987) Selection for offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies. Am Nat 129:800–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masurier AD le (1987) A comparative study of the relationship between host size and brood size in Apanteles spp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Ecol Entomol 12:383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Hoekstra R (1980) Polymorphism in a varied environment: how robust are the models? Genet Res 35:45–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley MA, Charnov EL (1988) Multiple resources and the optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Evol Ecol 3:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinley MA, Temme DH, Geber MA (1987) Parental investment in offspring in variable environments: theoretical and empirical considerations. Am Nat 130:370–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczek AP (1998) Horn polyphenism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus: larval diet quality and plasticity in parental investment determine adult body size and male horn morphology. Behav Ecol 9:636–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moczek A, Emlen DJ (2000) Male horn dimorphisms in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favor alternative phenotypes. Anim Behav 59:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs P (2001) State dependent behavior and the marginal value theorem. Behav Ecol 12:71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Begon M (1986) Optimal egg size and clutch size: effects of environment and maternal phenotype. Am Nat 128:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Courtney SP (1984) Models of clutch size in insect oviposition. Theor Popul Biol 26:27–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (1994) Evolution of phenotypic optima and copula duration in dungflies. Nature 370:53–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (2000) Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: ejaculatory duct dimensions and size-dependent sperm displacement. Evolution 54:924–935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Stuart RA (1976) Animal behaviour as a strategy optimizer: evolution of resource assessment strategies and optimal emmigration thresholds. Am Nat 110:1055–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW, Ward PI (1993) Optimal copula duration in dung flies: effects of frequency dependence and female mating status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW, Stockley P, McChristie DM, Charnov EL (1999) Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content. Anim Behav 57:795–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L (1992) Measuring reproductive costs. Trends Evol Ecol 7:99–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznick D (1992) Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends Evol Ecol 7:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1994) Optimality modeling and quantitative genetics: a comparison of the two approaches. In: Boake CRB (ed) Quantitative genetic studies of behavioural evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 49–67

  • Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowig P (1996) Brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): the effect of soil moisture on time budget, nest structure, and reproductive success. Ecography 19:254–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp NE, Lucas JR (1983) Ecological correlates of explosive seed dispersal. Oecologia 59:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Stephens DW, Dunbar SR (1993) Dimensional analysis in behavioural ecology. Behav Ecol 4:172–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi M (1986) The reproductive strategy of the gregarious parasitoid, Pteromalus puparum (Hymenoptera; Pteromalidae). I. Optimal number of eggs in a single host. Oecologia 68:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AD (1988) Host effects on larval competition in the gregarious parasitoid Bracon hebetor. J Anim Ecol 57:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1984) Variation among individual seed masses in Lomatium grayi (Umbelliferae) under controlled conditions: magnitude and partitioning of the variance. Ecology 65:626–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser ME (1994) The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Anim Ecol 63:963–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK, Godfray HCJ (1985) Reproductive strategies and population ecology of insect parasitoids. In: Sibley R, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology. British Ecological Society Symposium 25. Blackwell, Oxford

  • Waage JK, Ng SM (1984) The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp. I. Optimal progeny and sex allocation in Trichogramma evanescens. J Anim Ecol 53:401–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler DW, Wallin K (1987) Offspring size and number: a life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat 129:708–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton RJ (1979) Energy costs of egg production and environmental determinants of fecundity in teleost fishes. Symp Zool Soc Lond 44:133–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Ian Dadour and the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia for the use of equipment during this experiment. Susan Page and the Byrne family allowed us access to their land for the collection of dung and beetles, respectively. We thank Geoff Parker, Hanna Kokko, Luc Bussiére, Rob Brooks and Michael Jennions for valuable discussions and comments that greatly improved this manuscript. J.H. was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Research Award and L.W.S. by the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Hunt.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Gwynne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hunt, J., Simmons, L.W. Optimal maternal investment in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55, 302–312 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0705-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0705-1

Keywords

Navigation