Abstract
Optimal investment theory is based on the assumption that the proximate constraint acting on parental investment is resource based. A trade-off between per offspring investment and total investment seems intuitive. Consequently, a parent’s investment strategy is expected to represent a trade-off between the benefits of investment for current offspring and the costs to future reproduction for parents. In this study, we provide clear evidence that the costs and benefits of maternal provisioning in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus influence the amount of provisions provided by the mother. Horse dung is typically of a higher nutritional value than cow dung and females were shown to provide 20% less dung to offspring when provisioning with horse dung. By reducing their investment per offspring and exhibiting a clear preference to provision offspring with horse dung, females were able to produce significantly more offspring. Females provisioning with horse dung received greater fitness returns per unit of investment and experienced lower provisioning costs, in terms of the minimum amount of dung required to produce a surviving offspring, than females provisioning with cow dung. Females provisioning in soil of low moisture content were found to have higher tunneling costs than those provisioning in soil of high moisture content, while the fitness returns per unit of investment did not differ. We adopted a marginal value theorem (MVT) approach to calculate the theoretical optimal level of investment for each dung type and for each soil moisture. Predicted levels of provisioning were lower for horse dung than for cow dung and for moist soil than for dry soil. Therefore, the results of this study are in qualitative agreement with MVT predictions and provide empirical support for the proposal that females can adaptively adjust their level of investment in response to resource and/or habitat quality. However, the theoretically predicted optimal investment yielded a poor quantitative fit with our observed levels of investment, with females providing over twice the investment predicted by the MVT approach. We suggest that this difference may reflect either our inability in directly quantifying all the necessary costs and benefits of investment in O. taurus and/or the applicability of the underlying assumptions of MVT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai B, Mackauer M (1992) Influence of superparasitism on the developmental rate and adult size in a solitary wasp Aphidius ervi. Funct Ecol 6:302–307
Barkhouse J, Ridsdill-Smith TJ (1986) Effect of soil moisture on brood ball production by Onthophagus binodis Thunberg and Euoniticellus intermedius (Reiche) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae). J Entomol Soc Aust 25:75–78
Bernardo J (1996) The particular maternal effect of propagule size, especially egg size: patterns, models, quality of evidence and interpretations. Am Zool 36:216–236
Brockelman WY (1975) Competition, the fitness of offspring, and optimal clutch size. Am Nat 109:677–699
Brody MS, Lawlor LR (1984) Adaptive variation in offspring size in the terrestrial isopod Armadillium vulgare. Oecologia 61:55–59
Bull JJ (1987) Evolution of phenotypic variance. Evolution 41:303–315
Capinera JL (1979) Qualitative variation in plants and insects: effect of propagule size on ecological plasticity. Am Nat 114:350–361
Carrière Y, Roff DA (1995) The evolution of offspring size and number: a test of the Smith–Fretwell model in three species of crickets. Oecologia 102:389–396
Carrière Y, Masaki S, Roff DA (1997) The coadaptation of female morphology and offspring size: a comparative analysis in crickets. Oecologia 110:197–204
Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136
Charnov EL, Skinner SW (1984) Evolution of host selection and clutch size in parasitoid wasps. Flor Entomol 67:5–21
Charnov EL, Skinner SW (1985) Complementary approaches to the understanding of parasitoid oviposition decisions. Environ Entomol 14:383–391
Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Crump ML (1981) Variation in propagule size as a function of environmental uncertainty for tree frogs. Am Nat 117:724–737
Crump ML (1984) Intraclutch egg size variability in Hyla crucifer (Anura: Hylidae). Copeia 1984:302–308
Dijkstra LJ (1986) Optimal selection and exploitation of hosts in the parasitic wasp Colpoclypeus florus (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Neth J Zool 36:177–301
Eberhard WG, Gutiérrez EE (1991) Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:18–28
Fox CW, Thakar MS, Mousseau TA (1997) Egg size plasticity in a seed beetle: an adaptive maternal effect. Am Nat 149:149–63
García Dorado A (1990) Some evolutionary properties of parental investment per offspring in a heterogeneous environment. J Theor Biol 147:101–114
Godfray HCJ (1994) Parasitoids: behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Halffter G, Edmonds WG (1982) The nesting behaviour of dung beetles (Scarabaeidae): an ecological and evolutive approach. Instituto de Ecologia, Mexico
Hardy ICW, Griffiths NT, Godfray HCJ (1992) Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: a manipulation experiment. J Anim Ecol 61:121–129
Harper JL, Lovell PH, Moore KG (1970) The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:327–356
Hunt J, Simmons LW (1997) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: an experimental examination of the honest signal hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:109–114
Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998a) Patterns of parental provisioning covary with male morphology in a horned beetle (Onthophagus taurus) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:447–451
Hunt J, Simmons LW (1998b) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: no evidence for reliable signalling. Behav Ecol 9:465–470
Hunt J, Simmons LW (2000) Maternal and paternal effects on offspring phenotype in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Evolution 54:936–941
Hunt J, Simmons LW (2001) Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2409–2414
Hunt J, Simmons LW (2002) Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Anim Behav 64:65–75
Hunt J, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL (1999) Dung pad residence time covaries with male morphology in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. Ecol Entomol 24:274–180
Hunt J, Simmons LW, Kotiaho JS (2002) A cost of maternal care in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. J Evol Biol 15:57–64
Iwao K, Ohsaki N (1996) Inter- and intraspecific interactions among larvae of specialist and generalist parasitoids. Res Popul Ecol 38:265–273
Iwasa Y, Suzuki Y, Matsuda H (1984) Theory of oviposition strategy of parasitoids. I. Effect of mortality and limited egg number. Theor Popul Biol 26:205–227
Janzen DH (1977) Variation in seed size within a crop of a Costa Rican Micuna andreana (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 64:347–349
Kaplan RH (1980) The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders. Evolution 34:51–64
Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the “adaptive coin-flipping” principle. Am Nat 123:393–410
Kerfoot WC (1973) Egg size cycle of a cladoceran. Ecology 55:1259–1270
Kolding S, Fenchel TM (1981) Patterns of reproduction in different populations of five species of the amphipod genus Gammarus. Oikos 37:167–172
Lloyd DG (1987) Selection for offspring size at independence and other size-versus-number strategies. Am Nat 129:800–817
Masurier AD le (1987) A comparative study of the relationship between host size and brood size in Apanteles spp. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Ecol Entomol 12:383–393
Maynard Smith J, Hoekstra R (1980) Polymorphism in a varied environment: how robust are the models? Genet Res 35:45–57
McGinley MA, Charnov EL (1988) Multiple resources and the optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Evol Ecol 3:150–156
McGinley MA, Temme DH, Geber MA (1987) Parental investment in offspring in variable environments: theoretical and empirical considerations. Am Nat 130:370–398
Moczek AP (1998) Horn polyphenism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus: larval diet quality and plasticity in parental investment determine adult body size and male horn morphology. Behav Ecol 9:636–641
Moczek A, Emlen DJ (2000) Male horn dimorphisms in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favor alternative phenotypes. Anim Behav 59:459–466
Nonacs P (2001) State dependent behavior and the marginal value theorem. Behav Ecol 12:71–83
Parker GA, Begon M (1986) Optimal egg size and clutch size: effects of environment and maternal phenotype. Am Nat 128:573–592
Parker GA, Courtney SP (1984) Models of clutch size in insect oviposition. Theor Popul Biol 26:27–48
Parker GA, Simmons LW (1994) Evolution of phenotypic optima and copula duration in dungflies. Nature 370:53–56
Parker GA, Simmons LW (2000) Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: ejaculatory duct dimensions and size-dependent sperm displacement. Evolution 54:924–935
Parker GA, Stuart RA (1976) Animal behaviour as a strategy optimizer: evolution of resource assessment strategies and optimal emmigration thresholds. Am Nat 110:1055–1076
Parker GA, Simmons LW, Ward PI (1993) Optimal copula duration in dung flies: effects of frequency dependence and female mating status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:157–166
Parker GA, Simmons LW, Stockley P, McChristie DM, Charnov EL (1999) Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content. Anim Behav 57:795–805
Partridge L (1992) Measuring reproductive costs. Trends Evol Ecol 7:99–100
Reznick D (1985) Costs of reproduction: an evaluation of the empirical evidence. Oikos 44:257–267
Reznick D (1992) Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends Evol Ecol 7:42–49
Reznick D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177
Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York
Roff DA (1994) Optimality modeling and quantitative genetics: a comparison of the two approaches. In: Boake CRB (ed) Quantitative genetic studies of behavioural evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 49–67
Smith CC, Fretwell SD (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506
Sowig P (1996) Brood care in the dung beetle Onthophagus vacca (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): the effect of soil moisture on time budget, nest structure, and reproductive success. Ecography 19:254–258
Stamp NE, Lucas JR (1983) Ecological correlates of explosive seed dispersal. Oecologia 59:272–278
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Stephens DW, Dunbar SR (1993) Dimensional analysis in behavioural ecology. Behav Ecol 4:172–183
Takagi M (1986) The reproductive strategy of the gregarious parasitoid, Pteromalus puparum (Hymenoptera; Pteromalidae). I. Optimal number of eggs in a single host. Oecologia 68:1–6
Taylor AD (1988) Host effects on larval competition in the gregarious parasitoid Bracon hebetor. J Anim Ecol 57:163–172
Thompson JN (1984) Variation among individual seed masses in Lomatium grayi (Umbelliferae) under controlled conditions: magnitude and partitioning of the variance. Ecology 65:626–631
Visser ME (1994) The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J Anim Ecol 63:963–978
Waage JK, Godfray HCJ (1985) Reproductive strategies and population ecology of insect parasitoids. In: Sibley R, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology. British Ecological Society Symposium 25. Blackwell, Oxford
Waage JK, Ng SM (1984) The reproductive strategy of a parasitic wasp. I. Optimal progeny and sex allocation in Trichogramma evanescens. J Anim Ecol 53:401–416
Winkler DW, Wallin K (1987) Offspring size and number: a life history model linking effort per offspring and total effort. Am Nat 129:708–720
Wootton RJ (1979) Energy costs of egg production and environmental determinants of fecundity in teleost fishes. Symp Zool Soc Lond 44:133–159
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Ian Dadour and the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia for the use of equipment during this experiment. Susan Page and the Byrne family allowed us access to their land for the collection of dung and beetles, respectively. We thank Geoff Parker, Hanna Kokko, Luc Bussiére, Rob Brooks and Michael Jennions for valuable discussions and comments that greatly improved this manuscript. J.H. was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Research Award and L.W.S. by the Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Gwynne
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunt, J., Simmons, L.W. Optimal maternal investment in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55, 302–312 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0705-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0705-1