Skip to main content
Log in

A field test of the intraspecific brood parasitism hypothesis in the golden egg bug ( Phyllomorpha laciniata)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In natural populations of golden egg bugs ( Phyllomorpha laciniata), females lay eggs on plants where they develop unattended, or on conspecifics, where they remain firmly glued until the nymphs hatch and start an independent life. Mortality rates among eggs laid on plants are higher than among eggs carried by adults. Because females cannot lay eggs on themselves, in order to improve offspring survival, they have to lay eggs on other individuals. Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain egg carrying: (1) the mating pair intraspecific brood parasitism hypothesis suggests that females dump eggs on copulating pairs, and (2) the paternal care hypothesis suggests that the system is driven mainly by males accepting eggs to improve the survival rates of their own offspring. Our data from the field show that 77% of the eggs are carried by males, because more males than females carry eggs, and because males carry a greater number of eggs. In addition, we show that mating males carry more recently laid eggs than single males. These results support the view that egg carrying is performed predominantly by males and that eggs are laid on males by their current mating partner, probably between repeated copulations. Males are likely to accept eggs, despite intermediate levels of paternity, because they cannot discriminate in favour of their own eggs, because rejected eggs will face 97% mortality rates on plants, and because they do not suffer mating costs when they carry eggs. However, females carry 23% of the eggs, but no differences in egg carrying have been found between mating and single females, suggesting that this is not the result of egg dumping while females are copulating. Egg carrying by females could reflect low levels of intraspecific parasitism, which is likely to reflect the low rate of successful attempts by egg-laying females who try to oviposit on other conspecifics rather indiscriminately, in an effort to improve the survival of their offspring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åhlund M, Andersson M (2001) Female ducks can double their reproduction. Nature 414:600–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Pellatt J, Hunter FM (1988) Extra-pair copulation and sperm competition in the zebra finch. Nature 334:60–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brockman HJ (1993) Parasitizing conspecifics: comparisons between Hymenoptera and birds. Trends Ecol Evol 8:2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR (1984) Laying eggs in a neighbor's nest: benefit and cost of colonial nesting in swallows. Science 224:518–519

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR, Brown MB (1998) Fitness components associated with alternative reproductive tactics in cliff swallows. Behav Ecol 9:158–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke T, Davies NB, Bruford MW, Hatchwell BJ (1989) Parental care and mating behaviour of polyandrous dunnocks Prunella modularis related to paternity by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 338:249–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

  • Dickinson JL (1986) Prolongued mating in the milkeweed leaf beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the "sperm-loading" hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon A, Ross D, O'Malley SLC, Burke T (1994) Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1975) The ecology and behavior of a subsocial pentatomid bug and two scelionid wasps: strategy and counterstrategy in a host and its parasites. Smithson Contrib Zool 205:1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Field J (1992) Intraspecific parasitism as an alternative reproductive tactic in nest-building wasps and bees. Biol Rev 67:79–126

    Google Scholar 

  • García-González F (2002) La evolución del transporte de huevos en Phyllomorpha laciniata (Het., Coreidae): una aproximación comportamental, fisiológica y molecular para explicar su significado adaptativo en machos y hembras. PhD Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

  • García-González F, Núñez Y, Ponz F, Roldán ERS, Gomendio M (2003) Sperm competition mechanisms, confidence of paternity, and the evolution of paternal care in the golden egg bug Phyllomorpha laciniata. Evolution (in press)

  • Gomendio M, Reguera P (2001) Egg carrying in the golden egg bug ( Phyllomorpha laciniata): parental care, parasitism, or both? Reply to Kaitala et al. Behav Ecol 12:369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin MR, Tallamy DW (1992) Effect of predators and host phenology on the maternal and reproductive behaviors of Gargaphia lace bugs (Hemiptera: Tingidae). J Insect Behav 5:117–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston AI, McNamara JM (2002) A self-consistent approach to paternity and parental effort. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C (1998) Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecology 79:383–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (1997) Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev 72:283–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala A (1996) Oviposition on the back of conspecifics: an unusual reproductive tactic in a coreid bug. Oikos 77:381–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala A (1998) Is egg carrying attractive? Mate choice in the golden egg bug (Coreidae, Heteroptera). Proc R Soc Lond B 265:779–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala A, Miettinen M (1997) Female egg dumping and the effect of sex ratio on male egg carrying in a coreid bug. Behav Ecol 8:429–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaitala A, Härdling R, Katvala M, Macías Ordóñez R, Miettinen M (2001) Is nonparental egg carrying parental care? Behav Ecol 12:367–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraak SBM, Weissing FJ (1996) Female preference for nests with many eggs: a cost-benefit analysis of female choice in fish with paternal care. Behav Ecol 7:353–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen M, Kaitala A (2000) Copulation is not a prerequisite to male reception of eggs in the golden egg bug Phyllomorpha laciniata (Coreidae; Heteroptera). J Insect Behav 13:731–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineo G (1984) Notizie biologiche su Phyllomorpha laciniata (Vill.) (Rhynchota, Het., Coreidae). Phytophaga 2:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1993) Cuckoldry and sociality: a comparative study of birds. Am Nat 142:118–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK, Eggert A-K (1989) Paternity assurance by "helpful" males: adaptations to sperm competition in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK, Eggert A-K, Dressel J (1990) Intraspecific brood parasitism in the burying beetle, Necrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Anim Behav 40:491–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Møller AP (1991) Laying eggs in others' nests: intraspecific brood parasitism in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 6:315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Reguera P (1999) Cuidado parental en Phyllomorpha laciniata (Het.: Coreidae): implicaciones para la evolución del cuidado por parte de machos y hembras. PhD Thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

  • Reguera P, Gomendio M (1999) Predation costs associated with parental care in the golden egg bug Phyllomorpha laciniata (Heteroptera: Coreidae). Behav Ecol 10:541–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reguera P, Gomendio M (2002) Flexible oviposition behavior in the golden egg bug ( Phyllomorpha laciniata) and its implications for offspring survival. Behav Ecol 13:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1978) Paternal care. Anim Behav 26:904–932

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M, Rechten C (1981) Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76:152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2002) Relating paternity to paternal care. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357:341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Simmons LW, Siva-Jothy MT (1998) Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 341–434

  • Smith RL (1979a) Paternity assurance and altered roles in the mating behaviour of a giant water bug, Abedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). Anim Behav 27:716–725

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1979b) Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: paternity assurance for a male brooding water bug. Science 205:1029–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1980) Evolution of exclusive postcopulatory paternal care in the insects. Fla Entomol 63:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1997) Evolution of paternal care in the giant water bugs (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). In: Choe JS, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 116–149

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, New York

  • Tallamy DW, Denno RF (1981) Maternal care in Gargaphia solani (Hemiptera: Tingidae). Anim Behav 29:771–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, Wood TK (1986) Convergence patterns in subsocial insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31:369–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell R (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Heinemann, London, pp 136–179

  • Westneat DF, Sargent RC (1996) Sex and parenting: the effects of sexual conflict and parentage on parental strategies. Trends Ecol Evol 11:87–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Sherman PW (1993) Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior. Behav Ecol 4:66–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittingham LA, Taylor PD, Robertson RJ (1992) Confidence of paternity and male parental care. Am Nat 139:1115–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams GC (1966) Natural selection, the cost of reproduction, and a refinement of lack's principle. Am Nat 100:678–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap, Cambridge, Mass

  • Wright J (1998) Paternity and paternal care. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 117–145

  • Yom-Tov Y (1980) Intraspecific nest parasitism in birds. Biol Rev 55:93–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh DW, Smith RL (1985) Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. Am Zool 25:785–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Zink AG (2000) The evolution of intraspecific brood parasitism in birds and insects. Am Nat 155:395–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

For helpful assistance with field work, we thank Francisco Cabrero, Jose Antonio Blanco, Eva Banda and Beatriz Sanz. Thanks also to Piedad Reguera for comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We are grateful to the constructive comments made by the referees. While working on this project, F.G.-G. enjoyed a PhD Fellowship from the Ministry of Science and Technology (FP97-7234207). The research project was funded by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (PB96-0880 and REN2000-1470). The experiments were carried out according to the legal and ethical standards of Spanish regulations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Montserrat Gomendio.

Additional information

Communicated by L. Simmons

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-González, F., Gomendio, M. A field test of the intraspecific brood parasitism hypothesis in the golden egg bug ( Phyllomorpha laciniata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53, 332–339 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0566-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-002-0566-z

Keywords

Navigation