Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical management of neck of femur fractures in patients younger than sixty-five years: a comparative study of three fixation methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Several surgical implants have been used for the treatment of neck of femur fracture (NOF) in younger patients such as dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated compression screw. However, the superiority of one or another osteosynthesis device remains a matter of debate. The aim of this work is to evaluate and compare three fixation modalities: Cannulated Hip Screws (CHS), DHS and DHS associated to anti-rotating screw for surgical treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults.

Methods

It is a retrospective comparative study of three series of NOF fractures treated surgically over a period of ten years; including young adult patients (age > 18 years and < 65 years) treated conservatively using closed or open reduction and internal fixation. All types of NOF fractures according to Garden classification were included. Pathological, basi-cervical fractures and fractures on previously operated hips were excluded. The minimum follow-up recommended was two years. Clinical evaluation was based on the Postel Merle d'Aubigné score (PMA), the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Parker score, and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS score). Reduction quality was assessed on X-rays.

Results

Our series included 72 patients that were divided in three groups: Group A: Fixation using cannulated hip screws (33 patients). Group B: Fixation using DHS only (21 patients). Group C: Fixation using DHS associated to anti-rotation screw (18 patients). The patients of group A had better PMA and VAS scores, but there was no statistically significant difference. However, a significant difference (p=0.001) was found for the HOOS score. The fractures treated with DHS associated with anti-rotating screws, had the highest loss of reduction in the vertical axis (Yp) with the highest femoral head collapse (Zp) values. Group A had the lowest loss of reduction in the horizontal axis (Xp). There was no significant difference between the three methods of osteosynthesis in terms of loss of correction though.

Conclusion

We found comparable results in terms of healing and complication rates and loss of reduction for the three groups with no significant difference. However, the HOOS score was significantly better in the cannulated hip screw group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duckworth AD, Bennet SJ, Aderinto J, Keating JF (2011) Fixation of intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in young patients: risk factors for failure. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(6):811–816. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B6.26432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haidukewych GJ, Rothwell WS, Jacofsky DJ, Torchia ME, Berry DJ (2004) Operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients between the ages of fifteen and fifty years. J Bone Jt Surg-Am 86(8):1711–1716. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200408000-00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Masson E. EM-Consulte. [cité 18 juill 2023]. Traitement des fractures récentes du col fémoral de l’adulte. Techniques opératoires. Disponible sur: https://www.em-consulte.com/article/1019045/traitement-des-fractures-recentes-du-col-femoral

  4. Parker MJ (2000) The management of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 82(7):937–941. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.82b7.11595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shivji FS, Green VL, Forward DP (2015) Anatomy, classification and treatment of intracapsular hip fractures. Br J Hosp Med Lond 76(5):290–295. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2015.76.5.290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iorio R, Healy WL, Lemos DW, Appleby D, Lucchesi CA, Saleh KJ (2001) Displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: outcomes and cost effectiveness. Clin Orthop 383:229–242. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200102000-00027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erivan R, Villatte G, Ollivier M, Paprosky WG (2019) Painful hip arthroplasty: what should we find? Diagnostic approach and results. J Arthroplast 34(8):1802–1807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang T, Sun JY, Zha GC, Jiang T, You ZJ, Yuan DJ (2014) Analysis of risk factors for femoral head necrosis after internal fixation in femoral neck fractures. Orthopedics 37(12):e1117–e1123. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141124-60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Damany DS, Parker MJ, Chojnowski A (2005) Complications after intracapsular hip fractures in young adults. A meta-analysis of 18 published studies involving 564 fractures. Injury 36(1):131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frangakis EK (1966) Intracapsular fractures of the neck of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 48(1):17–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Estrada LS, Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE (2002) Fixation failure in femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop 399:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200206000-00013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kazley JM, Banerjee S, Abousayed MM, Rosenbaum AJ (2018) Classifications in brief: Garden classification of femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop 476(2):441–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker MJ, Dynan Y (1998) Is Pauwels classification still valid? Injury 29(7):521–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00118-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamare JP, Lesourd G (1968) Anatomo-radiologic study of the upper extremity of the femur. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar 54(8):725–735

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Keel M, Hanson BP, Schemitsch E (2005) Perception of Garden’s classification for femoral neck fractures: an international survey of 298 orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(7):503–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-005-0022-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. d’Aubigné RM, Postel M (2009) The classic: functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. Clin Orthop 467(1):7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0572-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Voeten SC, Nijmeijer WS, Vermeer M, Schipper IB, Hegeman JH (2020) DHFA Taskforce study group. Validation of the Fracture Mobility Score against the Parker Mobility Score in hip fracture patients. Injury 51(2):395–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 30(4):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weil YA, Khoury A, Zuaiter I, Safran O, Liebergall M, Mosheiff R (2012) Femoral neck shortening and varus collapse after navigated fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Trauma 26(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318214f321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Walter SD, Heels-Ansdell D, Sanders D, Schemitsch E et al (2009) Interobserver reliability of classification systems to rate the quality of femoral neck fracture reduction. J Orthop Trauma 23(6):408. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815ea017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karaeminogullari O, Demirors H, Atabek M, Tuncay C, Tandogan R, Ozalay M (2004) Avascular necrosis and nonunion after osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures: effect of fracture displacement and time to surgery. Adv Ther 21(5):335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rupprecht M, Grossterlinden L, Ruecker AH, de Oliveira AN, Sellenschloh K, Nüchtern J et al (2011) A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw. J Trauma 71(3):625–634. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820e86e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khoo C, Haseeb A, Ajit SV (2014) Cannulated screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a 5-year experience in a single institution. Malays Orthop J 8(2):14–21. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1407.010

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Selvan VT, Oakley MJ, Rangan A, Al-Lami MK (2004) Optimum configuration of cannulated hip screws for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: a biomechanical study. Injury 35(2):136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(03)00059-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hawks MA, Kim H, Strauss JE, Oliphant BW, Golden RD, Hsieh AH et al (2013) Does a trochanteric lag screw improve fixation of vertically oriented femoral neck fractures? A biomechanical analysis in cadaveric bone. Clin Biomech Bristol Avon 28(8):886–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen C, Yu L, Tang X, Liu MZ, Sun LZ, Liu C et al (2017) Dynamic hip system blade versus cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 51(5):381–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.07.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, Haidukewych GJ (2008) Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(8):1654–1659. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoshino CM, Christian MW, O’Toole RV, Manson TT (2016) Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults: fixed-angle devices or Pauwel screws? Injury 47(8):1676–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.03.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stockton DJ, Dua K, O’Brien PJ, Pollak AN, Hoshino CM, Slobogean GP (2019) Failure patterns of femoral neck fracture fixation in young patients. Orthopedics 42(4):e376–e380. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20190321-03

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gardner S, Weaver MJ, Jerabek S, Rodriguez E, Vrahas M, Harris M (2015) Predictors of early failure in young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. J Orthop 12(2):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2014.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoshino CM, O’Toole RV (2015) Fixed angle devices versus multiple cancellous screws: what does the evidence tell us? Injury 46(3):474–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bhandari M, Tornetta P, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2009) Optimal internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: multiple screws or sliding hip screws? J Orthop Trauma 23(6):403–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318176191f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR (2007) Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 21(8):544–548. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31814b822e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors participated in the design, performance, analysis, and drafting of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Jlidi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted from the ethics committee of the institution.

Consent

A written consent was taken from all participants prior to the surgical procedure as per department protocol. A signed written consent was obtained from all participants for the use and publication of all personal data including personal X-rays.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bouaicha, W., Jlidi, M., Elarbi, M. et al. Surgical management of neck of femur fractures in patients younger than sixty-five years: a comparative study of three fixation methods. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 3099–3106 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05997-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05997-2

Keywords

Navigation