Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proximal ulna non-union: treatment concept and postoperative outcome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Non-union of the proximal ulna is a serious complication after surgical treatment of olecranon and complex elbow fractures, frequently leading to poor functional outcome. To date, there is a lack of data regarding optimal treatment strategies and functional outcome parameters after surgical revision.

Methods

From 02/2010 to 12/2018, 31 patients undergoing surgical treatment of proximal ulna non-union could be included. Follow-up period was seven years (SD 2.5 years). All patients were clinically assessed using a clinical assessment tool set and standard elbow scores (MEPS, OES, DASH score). All complications and unplanned revision surgeries were recorded and all radiographic material was analyzed.

Results

Initial non-union procedures were performed at an average of 6.6 months (SD 3 months) after the index procedures. Those included the use of autologous spongiosa graft in all patients and concomitant compression re-osteosynthesis in 28 patients. Radiological consolidation was achieved in all patients. Overall, patients achieved a good to fair functional outcome with Mayo elbow performance score measuring 78.5 (SD 9.1), DASH score 34.7 (SD 14.4), and Oxford elbow score 31.2 (SD 6.6) points. Initial malreduction/implant-malposition could be identified as a main reason for the occurrence of the non-union. Furthermore, inferior postoperative outcome was detected in patients > 60 years and BMI > 30 kg/m2.

Conclusion

Using a standardized protocol, bony union and acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved in proximal ulna non-unions. However, surgeons should be aware of potential risk factors and proper initial fracture reduction as key to achieve sufficient bone healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd H, Lipinski SW, Wiley JH (1961) Observations on non-union of the shafts of the long bones, with a statistical analysis of 842 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 43(2):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V (2018) Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 42(2):247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3734-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholson JA, Makaram N, Simpson A, Keating JF (2021) Fracture nonunion in long bones: a literature review of risk factors and surgical management. Injury 52(2):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Papagelopoulos PJ, Morrey BF (1994) Treatment of nonunion of olecranon fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(4):627–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tian R, Zheng F, Zhao W, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Zhang B, Li L (2020) Prevalence and influencing factors of nonunion in patients with tibial fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01904-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Lu Y, Sun L, Song L, Ma T, Wang Q, Zhang K, Li Z (2021) Do the successful revision surgery for humeral nonunion solve all the effects on health-related quality of life? A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):414. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04283-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kloen P, Wiggers JK, Buijze GA (2010) Treatment of diaphyseal non-unions of the ulna and radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(12):1439–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1071-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lapcin O, Arıkan Y, Yavuz U, Akman YE, Çetinkaya E, Gür V, Demir B (2016) Evaluation of outcomes in aseptic non-unions of the forearm bones in adults treated with LCP and autograft. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 22(3):283–289. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.73780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ring D, Jupiter JB, Gulotta L (2003) Atrophic nonunions of the proximal ulna. Clin Orthop Relat Res 409:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000052936.71325.eb

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rotini R, Antonioli D, Marinelli A, Katusić D (2008) Surgical treatment of proximal ulna nonunion. Chir Organi Mov 91(2):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-007-0011-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wittauer M, Burch MA, McNally M, Vandendriessche T, Clauss M, Della Rocca GJ, Giannoudis PV, Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M (2021) Definition of long-bone nonunion: a scoping review of prospective clinical trials to evaluate current practice. Injury 52(11):3200–3205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Calori GM, Mazza EL, Mazzola S, Colombo A, Giardina F, Romanò F, Colombo M (2017) Non-unions. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 14(2):186–188. https://doi.org/10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Everding J, Roßlenbroich S, Raschke MJ (2018) Pseudarthroses of the long bones. Chirurg 89(1):73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-017-0547-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrey B, Sanchez Sotelo J, Morrey M (2017) Morrey’s the elbow and its disorders -, 5th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I, Fitzpatrick R, Little C, Rees J, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ (2008) The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(4):466–473. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Santolini E, West R, Giannoudis PV (2015) Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence. Injury 46(8):8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30049-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bell A, Templeman D, Weinlein JC (2016) Nonunion of the femur and tibia: an update. Orthop Clin North Am 47(2):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mechrefe AP, Koh EY, Trafton PG, DiGiovanni CW (2006) Tibial nonunion. Foot Ankle Clin 11(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2005.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smolle MA, Leitner L, Böhler N, Seibert FJ, Glehr M, Leithner A (2021) Fracture, nonunion and postoperative infection risk in the smoking orthopaedic patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev 6(11):1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun KF, Hanschen M, Biberthaler P (2019) Definition. Risikofaktoren und Klassifikationsmodelle von Pseudarthrosen OP-J L (German) 35(03):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0889-1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mustonen AO, Koivikko MP, Kiuru MJ, Salo J, Koskinen SK (2009) Postoperative MDCT of tibial plateau fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1354–1360. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Palmanovich E, Brin YS, Kish B, Nyska M, Hetsroni I (2016) Value of early postoperative computed tomography assessment in ankle fractures defining joint congruity and criticizing the need for early revision surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(3):465–469. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Foulke BA, Kendal AR, Murray DW, Pandit H (2016) Fracture healing in the elderly: a review. Maturitas 92:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.07.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, Della Rocca GJ, Mehta S, McKinley T, Wang Z, Steen RG (2016) Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg 151(11):e162775. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zura R, Mehta S, Della Rocca GJ, Steen RG (2016) Biological risk factors for nonunion of bone fracture. JBJS Rev 4(1):e5. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cao JJ (2011) Effects of obesity on bone metabolism. J Orthop Surg Res 15(6):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tim Jakobi: Conceptualized and designed the study, Examined the patients, Analyzed and interpreted the data, Performed the statistical analysis, Wrote and revised the manuscript.

Yves Gramlich: Proofread the manuscript, Analyzed the data.

Matthias Sauter: Proofread the manuscript, Analyzed the data.

Sebastian Fischer: Proofread the manuscript, Analyzed the data.

Reinhard Hoffmann: Proofread the manuscript, Conceived and designed the study, Provided administrative, technical, and material support.

Alexander Klug: Proofread the manuscript, Reviewed the literature, Analyzed the data, Provided administrative, technical, and material support.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Jakobi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Regional Medical board of Hessen, Germany (under study ID 2020–1906-evBO). All investigations were conducted in conformity with the principles of good clinical practice and the ethical principles of research.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

There is no individual participant data in our manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakobi, T., Gramlich, Y., Sauter, M. et al. Proximal ulna non-union: treatment concept and postoperative outcome. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 2859–2868 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05577-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05577-w

Keywords

Navigation