Abstract
Purpose
Non-union of the proximal ulna is a serious complication after surgical treatment of olecranon and complex elbow fractures, frequently leading to poor functional outcome. To date, there is a lack of data regarding optimal treatment strategies and functional outcome parameters after surgical revision.
Methods
From 02/2010 to 12/2018, 31 patients undergoing surgical treatment of proximal ulna non-union could be included. Follow-up period was seven years (SD 2.5 years). All patients were clinically assessed using a clinical assessment tool set and standard elbow scores (MEPS, OES, DASH score). All complications and unplanned revision surgeries were recorded and all radiographic material was analyzed.
Results
Initial non-union procedures were performed at an average of 6.6 months (SD 3 months) after the index procedures. Those included the use of autologous spongiosa graft in all patients and concomitant compression re-osteosynthesis in 28 patients. Radiological consolidation was achieved in all patients. Overall, patients achieved a good to fair functional outcome with Mayo elbow performance score measuring 78.5 (SD 9.1), DASH score 34.7 (SD 14.4), and Oxford elbow score 31.2 (SD 6.6) points. Initial malreduction/implant-malposition could be identified as a main reason for the occurrence of the non-union. Furthermore, inferior postoperative outcome was detected in patients > 60 years and BMI > 30 kg/m2.
Conclusion
Using a standardized protocol, bony union and acceptable functional outcomes can be achieved in proximal ulna non-unions. However, surgeons should be aware of potential risk factors and proper initial fracture reduction as key to achieve sufficient bone healing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd H, Lipinski SW, Wiley JH (1961) Observations on non-union of the shafts of the long bones, with a statistical analysis of 842 patients. J Bone Joint Surg 43(2):159–168
Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V (2018) Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop 42(2):247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3734-5
Nicholson JA, Makaram N, Simpson A, Keating JF (2021) Fracture nonunion in long bones: a literature review of risk factors and surgical management. Injury 52(2):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.11.029
Papagelopoulos PJ, Morrey BF (1994) Treatment of nonunion of olecranon fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(4):627–635
Tian R, Zheng F, Zhao W, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Zhang B, Li L (2020) Prevalence and influencing factors of nonunion in patients with tibial fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):377. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01904-2
Wang Z, Lu Y, Sun L, Song L, Ma T, Wang Q, Zhang K, Li Z (2021) Do the successful revision surgery for humeral nonunion solve all the effects on health-related quality of life? A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):414. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04283-9
Kloen P, Wiggers JK, Buijze GA (2010) Treatment of diaphyseal non-unions of the ulna and radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(12):1439–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1071-x
Lapcin O, Arıkan Y, Yavuz U, Akman YE, Çetinkaya E, Gür V, Demir B (2016) Evaluation of outcomes in aseptic non-unions of the forearm bones in adults treated with LCP and autograft. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 22(3):283–289. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.73780
Ring D, Jupiter JB, Gulotta L (2003) Atrophic nonunions of the proximal ulna. Clin Orthop Relat Res 409:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000052936.71325.eb
Rotini R, Antonioli D, Marinelli A, Katusić D (2008) Surgical treatment of proximal ulna nonunion. Chir Organi Mov 91(2):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-007-0011-6
Wittauer M, Burch MA, McNally M, Vandendriessche T, Clauss M, Della Rocca GJ, Giannoudis PV, Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M (2021) Definition of long-bone nonunion: a scoping review of prospective clinical trials to evaluate current practice. Injury 52(11):3200–3205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.09.008
Calori GM, Mazza EL, Mazzola S, Colombo A, Giardina F, Romanò F, Colombo M (2017) Non-unions. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 14(2):186–188. https://doi.org/10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.186
Everding J, Roßlenbroich S, Raschke MJ (2018) Pseudarthroses of the long bones. Chirurg 89(1):73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-017-0547-4
Morrey B, Sanchez Sotelo J, Morrey M (2017) Morrey’s the elbow and its disorders -, 5th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I, Fitzpatrick R, Little C, Rees J, Jenkinson C, Carr AJ (2008) The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(4):466–473. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290
Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C (2003) The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-11
Santolini E, West R, Giannoudis PV (2015) Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence. Injury 46(8):8–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30049-8
Bell A, Templeman D, Weinlein JC (2016) Nonunion of the femur and tibia: an update. Orthop Clin North Am 47(2):365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2015.09.010
Mechrefe AP, Koh EY, Trafton PG, DiGiovanni CW (2006) Tibial nonunion. Foot Ankle Clin 11(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2005.12.003
Smolle MA, Leitner L, Böhler N, Seibert FJ, Glehr M, Leithner A (2021) Fracture, nonunion and postoperative infection risk in the smoking orthopaedic patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev 6(11):1006–1019. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210058
Braun KF, Hanschen M, Biberthaler P (2019) Definition. Risikofaktoren und Klassifikationsmodelle von Pseudarthrosen OP-J L (German) 35(03):217–224. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0889-1013
Mustonen AO, Koivikko MP, Kiuru MJ, Salo J, Koskinen SK (2009) Postoperative MDCT of tibial plateau fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1354–1360. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2260
Palmanovich E, Brin YS, Kish B, Nyska M, Hetsroni I (2016) Value of early postoperative computed tomography assessment in ankle fractures defining joint congruity and criticizing the need for early revision surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(3):465–469. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.013
Foulke BA, Kendal AR, Murray DW, Pandit H (2016) Fracture healing in the elderly: a review. Maturitas 92:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.07.014
Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, Della Rocca GJ, Mehta S, McKinley T, Wang Z, Steen RG (2016) Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg 151(11):e162775. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775
Zura R, Mehta S, Della Rocca GJ, Steen RG (2016) Biological risk factors for nonunion of bone fracture. JBJS Rev 4(1):e5. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00008
Cao JJ (2011) Effects of obesity on bone metabolism. J Orthop Surg Res 15(6):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Tim Jakobi: Conceptualized and designed the study, Examined the patients, Analyzed and interpreted the data, Performed the statistical analysis, Wrote and revised the manuscript.
Yves Gramlich: Proofread the manuscript, Analyzed the data.
Matthias Sauter: Proofread the manuscript, Analyzed the data.
Sebastian Fischer: Proofread the manuscript, Analyzed the data.
Reinhard Hoffmann: Proofread the manuscript, Conceived and designed the study, Provided administrative, technical, and material support.
Alexander Klug: Proofread the manuscript, Reviewed the literature, Analyzed the data, Provided administrative, technical, and material support.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Regional Medical board of Hessen, Germany (under study ID 2020–1906-evBO). All investigations were conducted in conformity with the principles of good clinical practice and the ethical principles of research.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
There is no individual participant data in our manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jakobi, T., Gramlich, Y., Sauter, M. et al. Proximal ulna non-union: treatment concept and postoperative outcome. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 2859–2868 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05577-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05577-w