Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-articular gold induced cytokine (GOLDIC®) injection therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of knee joint: a clinical study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel technique of preconditioning autologous blood with gold particles (GOLDIC®) and injection in patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

During this phase 2a, proof-of-concept (PoC) open label study, 83 consecutive patients that 64 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age: 64.8 years; 89 knees) with radiographically proven KOA, received four ultrasound guided intra-articular knee injections of GOLDIC® at three to six day intervals. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were evaluated at baseline, four weeks, three, six months, one, two and four years (T1–T6). The incidence of treatment related severe adverse events (SAEs) recorded. Intra-articular gelsolin level in patients with effusion was determined.

Results

KOOS and WOMAC scores improved for the full duration of the study (P < 0.05), minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was observed at all time points in all KOOS subscores, with no reported SAEs. Intra-articular gelsolin level increased after treatment with reduction of effusion. No statistically significant evidence of an association between patient demographics and outcome were identified. Nine patients failed treatment, with 32 months mean time to failure and underwent total knee arthroplasty.

Conclusion

PoC study of GOLDIC® as a novel device for conservative management of moderate to severe KOA was confirmed. GOLDIC® produces rapid and sustained improvements in all indices after treatment, with no SAEs.

Trial registration

§ 13 Abs.2b AMG Bavaria (Protokol Reg OBB 5-16) (Ref 53.2-2677.Ph_3-67-2)—Date 3/20/2010 retrospectively registered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Underlying data from this manuscript may be requested by qualified researchers upon request. Investigators may request access to deidentified patient data and redacted study documents which may include raw datasets, analysis-ready data sets, and blank data forms. Prior to the use of data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudyrequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. Some documents are available in German and others English.

References

  1. Garner M, Alshameeri Z, Khanduja V (2013) Osteoarthritis: genes, nature-nuture interaction and the role of leptin. Int Orthop 37:2499–2505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hootman JM, Helmick CG (2006) Projections of us prevalence of arthritis and associated activity limitations. Arthritis Rheum 54:226–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alford JW, Cole BJ (2005) Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med 33:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckwalter JA, Brown TD (2004) Joint injury, repair, and remodeling: roles in post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trzeciak T, Richter M, Suchorska W et al (2016) Application of cell and biomaterial-based tissue engineering methods in the treatment of cartilage, menisci and ligament injuries. Int Orthop 40:615–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Healy WL, Della Valle DJ, Lorio R et al (2013) Complications of total knee arthroplasty: Standardized list and definitions of the Knee Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:215–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD et al (1995) Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee: American College of Rheumatology. Arthritis Rheum 38:1541–1546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Navarro-Sarabia F, Coronel P, Collantes E et al (2011) A 40-month multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and carry-over effect of repeated intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis: the AMELIA project. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1957–1962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Creamer P (1997) Intra-articular corticosteroid injections in osteoarthritis: do they work and if so, how? Ann Rheum Dis 56:634–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Filardo G, Di Matteo B, Di Martino A et al (2015) Platelet-rich plasma intra-articular knee injections show no superiority versus viscosupplementation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 43:1575–1582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Betancourt JP, Murrell WD (2016) Leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma to treat degenerative meniscal tear: a case report. J Clin Orthop Trauma 7:106–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baltzer AW, Moser C, Jansen SA et al (2012) Autologous conditioned serum (Orthokine) is an effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:152–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andia I, Maffulli N (2019) New biotechnologies for musculoskeletal injuries. Surgeon 17:244–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anz AW, Bapat A, Murrell WD (2016) Concepts in regenerative medicine: Past, present, and future in articular cartilage treatment. J Clin Orthop Trauma 7:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vuolteenaho K, Kujala P, Moilanen T et al (2005) Aurothiomalate and hydroxychloroquine inhibit nitric oxide production chondrocytes and in human arthritic cartilage. Scand J Rheumatol 34:475–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Silacci P, Mazzolai L, Gauci C et al (2004) Gelsolin superfamily proteins: key regulators of cellular functions. Cell Mol Life Sci 61:2614–2623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Suhler E, Lin W, Yin HL et al (1997) Decreased plasma gelsolin concentrations in acute liver failure, myocardial infarction, septic shock, and myonecrosis. Crit Care Med 25:594–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li GH, Arora PD, Chen Y et al (2012) Multifunctional roles of gelsolin in health and disease. Med Res Rev 32:999–1025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Okano T, Mera H, Itokazu M et al (2014) Systemic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for osteochondral defect repair in a rat experimental model. Cartilage 5:107–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Piktel E, Levental I, Durnaś B et al (2018) Plasma gelsolin: indicator of inflammation and its potential as a diagnostic tool and therapeutic target. Int J Mol Sci 19:E2516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kopecki Z, Cowin AJ The role of actin remodeling proteins in wound healing and tissue regeneration. In: Alexandrescu VA (ed) Wound Healing - New insights into Ancient Challenges. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/64673 (date assessed Apr 2020) from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/wound-healing-new-insights-into-ancient-challenges/the-role-of-actin-remodelling-proteins-in-wound-healing-and-tissue-regeneration

  23. DiNubile MJ (2008) Plasma gelsolin as a biomarker of inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther 10:124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee PS, Waxman AB, Cotich KL et al (2007) Plasma gelsolin is a marker and therapeutic agent in animal sepsis. Crit Care Med 35:849–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider U, Veith G (2013) First results on the outcome of gold-induced, autologous-conditioned serum (GOLDIC) in the treatment of different lameness-associated equine diseases. J Cell Sci Ther 5:151

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schneider U, Wallich R, Felmet G et al (2017) Gold-induced autologous cytokine treatment in Achilles tendinopathy. In: Canata G, d’Hooghe P, Hunt K (eds) Muscle and Tendon Injuries. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg: ISAKOS, pp 411–420

  27. Ulasli AM, Ozcakar L, Murrell WD (2019) Ultrasound imaging and guidance in the management of knee osteoarthritis in regenerative medicine field. J Clin Orthop Trauma 10:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH et al (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kraus VB, Huebner JL, Fink C et al (2002) Urea as a passive transport marker for arthritis biomarker studies. Arthritis Rheum 46:420–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith PA (2016) Intra-articular autologous conditioned plasma injections provide safe and efficacious treatment for knee osteoarthritis: an FDA-sanctioned, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 44:884–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anitua E, Andia I, Ardanza B et al (2004) Autologous platelets as a source of proteins for healing and tissue regeneration. Thromb Haemost 91:4–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Eduard Collier, Nico Nagelkerk PhD, Pam Jackson PhD, Lisa Jackson PhD for their contributions to this scientific work. Contributors US was the coordinating investigator, WDM contributed to the study conduct and/or data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors analyzed and/or interpreted data. All authors collaborated in the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and vouch for the accuracy of the analysis and the fidelity of the study to the protocol.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Murrell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Competent authority of Bavaria authorized the study.

Consent to participate

All patients were approved for treatment by written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

Supplementary Data A. Mean KOOS and WOMAC scores at baseline data for all study participants K-L grades 2 and 3, and follow-up at 4 weeks, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, and 4 years. Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test shows no significant deviation compared to a normal distribution; red indicates significant mean differences (α < 0.05). Supplementary Data B. Mean KOOS and WOMAC scores at baseline data for all study participants K-L grade 4, and follow-up at 4 weeks, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, and 4 years. Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test shows no significant deviation compared to a normal distribution; red indicates significant mean differences (α < 0.05). (XLS 32 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, U., Kumar, A., Murrell, W. et al. Intra-articular gold induced cytokine (GOLDIC®) injection therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of knee joint: a clinical study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 45, 497–507 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04870-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04870-w

Keywords

Navigation