Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Orthopaedic surgeons’ opinions surrounding the management of proximal humerus fractures: an international survey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons’ preferences surrounding the management and evaluation of proximal humerus fractures internationally.

Methods

A questionnaire was developed using previous literature and input from practicing orthopaedic surgeon opinion leaders. Between November 13, 2014 and December 31, 2014, the questionnaire was posted on the membership section of three major orthopaedic and shoulder surgery association websites. Survey responses were anonymous.

Results

The survey was completed by 134 unique practicing orthopaedic surgeons. The majority of respondents (72%) practiced in North America while 28% practiced internationally. For displaced two-part fractures, a preference for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates was identified (75%). No consensus was reached for preferred treatment of three- and four- part fractures: 37% chose ORIF with locking plates, 26% chose hemi-arthroplasty (HA), and 29% chose reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Preferred treatment types for three- and four-part fractures were marginally significantly different depending on place of practice (North America vs. international, p = 0.058). A significantly larger proportion of surgeons who had completed an upper extremity fellowship (35%) chose RSA for the treatment of three and four-part fractures, compared to those who had not (9%, p = 0.002). No consensus was observed regarding what outcome measure is best to assess function following proximal humerus fractures.

Conclusions

The management of more complex, displaced proximal humerus fractures remains controversial. Additionally, there are conflicting opinions on what outcome measure is best to assess function following the treatment of proximal humerus fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Handoll HH, Brorson S (2015) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD000434. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clement ND, Duckworth AD, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM (2014) The outcome of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly: predictors of mortality and function. Bone Joint J 96-B(7):970–977. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang AL, Schairer WW, Feeley BT (2014) Hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: is arthroplasty safer than open reduction internal fixation? Clin Orthopaed Relat Res 472(8):2317–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guy P, Slobogean GP, McCormack RG (2010) Treatment preferences for displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(4):250–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell JE, Leung BC, Spratt KF, Koval KJ, Weinstein JD, Goodman DC, Tosteson AN (2011) Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(2):121–131

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Maravic M, Briot K, Roux C (2014) Burden of proximal humerus fractures in the French National Hospital Database. Orthop Traumatol 100(8):931–934. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.017

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(4):365–371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tepass A, Blumenstock G, Weise K, Rolauffs B, Bahrs C (2013) Current strategies for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: an analysis of a survey carried out at 348 hospitals in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(1):e8–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gradl G, Knobe M, Pape HC, Neuhaus PV, Ring D, Guitton T (2015) Decision making in displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: fracture or surgeon based? Int Orthop 39(2):329–334. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2630-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hageman MG, Jayakumar P, King JD, Guitton TG, Doornberg JN, Ring D (2015) The factors influencing the decision making of operative treatment for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(1):e21–e26. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rangan A, Handoll H, Brealey S, Jefferson L, Keding A, Martin BC, Goodchild L, Chuang LH, Hewitt C, Torgerson D (2015) Surgical vs nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313(10):1037–1047

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(7):1025–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20(5):747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fjalestad T, Hole MO, Hovden IA, Blucher J, Stromsoe K (2012) Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 26(2):98–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hodgson SA, Mawson SJ, Saxton JM, Stanley D (2007) Rehabilitation of two-part fractures of the neck of the humerus (two-year follow-up). J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(2):143–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Agorastides I, Sinopidis C, El Meligy M, Yin Q, Brownson P, Frostick SP (2007) Early versus late mobilization after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(3 SUPPL):S33–S38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sukthankar AV, Leonello DT, Hertel RW, Ding GS, Sandow MJ (2013) A comprehensive classification of proximal humeral fractures: HGLS system. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22(7):e1–e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramappa AJ, Patel V, Goswami K, Zurakowski D, Yablon C, Rodriguez EK, Appleton P, DeAngelis JP (2014) Using computed tomography to assess proximal humerus fractures. Am J Orthop 43(3):E43–E47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Foroohar A, Tosti R, Richmond JM, Gaughan JP, Ilyas AM (2011) Classification and treatment of proximal humerus fractures: inter-observer reliability and agreement across imaging modalities and experience. J Orthop Surg Res 6:38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brorson S, Eckardt H, Audige L, Rolauffs B, Bahrs C (2013) Translation between the Neer- and the AO/OTA-classification for proximal humeral fractures: do we need to be bilingual to interpret the scientific literature? BMC Res Notes 6:69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Neuhaus V, Swellengrebel CH, Bossen JK, Ring D (2013) What are the factors influencing outcome among patients admitted to a hospital with a proximal humeral fracture? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(5):1698–1706. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-2876-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (2015) Schedule of Benefits - Physician Services Under the Health Insurance Act. Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Ontario, Canada

  23. Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillen V (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23 (10):1419-1426

  24. van de Water AT, Shields N, Taylor NF (2011) Outcome measures in the management of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of their use and psychometric properties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20 (2):333-343. doi:http://dx.Doi.Org/10.1016/j.Jse.2010.10.028

  25. Slobogean GP, Noonan VK, O’Brien PJ (2010) The reliability and validity of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand, EuroQol-5D, health utilities index, and short form-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(3):342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van de Water AT, Shields N, Davidson M, Evans M, Taylor NF (2014) Reliability and validity of shoulder function outcome measures in people with a proximal humeral fracture. Disabil Rehabil 36(13):1072–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Siebenbürger G, Van Delden D, Helfen T, Haasters F, Böcker W, Ockert B (2015) Timing of surgery for open reduction and internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures. Injury 46(supplement 4):S58–S62. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30019-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, St. Michael’s Hospital, 55 Queen St. East, STE 800, Toronto, ON, M5C 1R6, Canada

    Lauren L. Nowak, Milena R. Vicente, Michael D. McKee, Jeremy A. Hall, Aaron Nauth & Emil. H. Schemitsch

  2. Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Lauren L. Nowak & Emil. H. Schemitsch

  3. Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Michael D. McKee, Jeremy A. Hall, Aaron Nauth & Emil. H. Schemitsch

  4. London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada

    Emil. H. Schemitsch

  5. Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Emil. H. Schemitsch

Authors
  1. Lauren L. Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Milena R. Vicente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael D. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeremy A. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aaron Nauth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Emil. H. Schemitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren L. Nowak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nowak, L.L., Vicente, M.R., McKee, M.D. et al. Orthopaedic surgeons’ opinions surrounding the management of proximal humerus fractures: an international survey. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 1749–1755 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3569-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3569-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation