Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bousquet dual mobility socket for patient under fifty years old. More than twenty year follow-up of one hundred and thirty one hips

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze dual mobility cup survival rate on young patients under 50 years old at more than 20 years of follow up.

Methods

One hundred thirty seven hips with a first generation of dual mobility Bousquet cup (Serf) were included. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 41 years and the mean follow-up was 21.9 years.

Results

Twenty year follow-up cup survival rate was 77%. No dislocation occurred, 44 hips were revised (including 21 cup aseptic loosenings isolated, 15 Intra Prosthetic Dislocations), seven hips were lost to follow-up, 11 patients died, and 75 hips were still in situ.

Conclusion

First generation dual mobility cup survival on young patient was comparable with literature results. The main complications, cup aseptic loosening and intra prosthetic dislocation, were wear-related. With improvements of the defects of first generation dual mobility, we might expect an even better survival rate with contemporary DM cups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Archibeck MJ, Surdam JW, Schultz SC et al (2006) Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 21:476–483. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.08.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Quigley LR et al (1997) Primary cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients younger than 50 years old. 7- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop 344:216–226

  3. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Sporer SM et al (1997) Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop 344:257–262

  4. Duffy GP, Prpa B, Rowland CM, Berry DJ (2004) Primary uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular components in patients 50 years old or younger: results at 10 to 12 years. Clin Orthop 427:157–161

  5. Greiner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Bedard NA et al (2015) Fixation and wear with contemporary acetabular components and cross-linked polyethylene at 10-years in patients aged 50 and under. J Arthroplasty 30:1577–1585. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang K-T, Kim Y-H, Kim Y-S, Choi I-Y (2011) Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal bearing in patients younger than 50 years. J Arthroplasty 26:1481–1487. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim S-Y, Kyung H-S, Ihn J-C et al (2004) Cementless metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86–A:2475–2481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Park J-S (2014) The 27 to 29-year outcomes of the PCA total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years old. J Arthroplasty 29:2256–2261. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kronick JL, Barba ML, Paprosky WG (1997) Extensively coated femoral components in young patients. Clin Orthop 344:263–274

  10. Moyer JA, Metz CM, Callaghan JJ et al (2010) Durability of second-generation extensively porous-coated stems in patients age 50 and younger. Clin Orthop 468:448–453. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1062-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murphy SB, Ecker TM, Tannast M (2006) Two- to 9-year clinical results of alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA. Clin Orthop 453:97–102. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000246532.59876.73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith SE, Estok DM, Harris WH (2000) 20-year experience with cemented primary and conversion total hip arthroplasty using so-called second-generation cementing techniques in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 15:263–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP et al (1998) Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: a five- to ten-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 13:485–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stambough JB, Pashos G, Bohnenkamp FC et al (2016) Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty with 28-millimeter cobalt-chromium femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene in patients 50 years and less. J Arthroplasty 31:162–167. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sullivan PM, MacKenzie JR, Callaghan JJ, Johnston RC (1994) Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who are less than fifty years old. A sixteen to twenty-two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:863–869

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B et al (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33:927–932. doi:10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F (2012) Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop 36:511–518. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1289-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prudhon JL, Steffann F, Ferreira A et al (2014) Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. Int Orthop 38:2463–2468. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121:20–32

  20. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17–27

  21. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lecuire F, Benareau I, Rubini J, Basso M (2004) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of the Bousquet dual mobility socket. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 90:249–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Netter JD, Hermida JC, Chen PC et al (2014) Effect of microseparation and third-body particles on dual-mobility crosslinked hip liner wear. J Arthroplasty 29:1849–1853. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schmolders J, Amvrazis G, Pennekamp PH et al (2016) Thirteen year follow-up of a cementless femoral stem and a threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than fifty years of age. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-016-3226-z

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Kim J-S (2016) Alumina delta-on-highly crosslinked-remelted polyethylene bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.020

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vermersch T, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2015) Prospective longitudinal study of one hundred patients with total hip arthroplasty using a second-generation cementless dual-mobility cup. Int Orthop 39:2097–2101. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-2985-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Philippot R, Boyer B, Farizon F (2013) Intraprosthetic dislocation: a specific complication of the dual-mobility system. Clin Orthop 471:965–970. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2639-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Noyer D (2003) La troisième articulation des prothèses de hanche à double mobilité. Maîtrise Orthopédique 121:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lautridou C, Lebel B, Burdin G, Vielpeau C (2008) Survival of the cementless Bousquet dual mobility cup: minimum 15-year follow-up of 437 total hip arthroplasties. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 94:731–739. doi:10.1016/j.rco.2008.06.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fabry C, Langlois J, Hamadouche M, Bader R (2016) Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual-mobility cups after total hip arthroplasty: potential causes from a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Int Orthop 40:901–906. doi:10.1007/s00264-015-3000-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Kim J-S (2016) Alumina delta-on-alumina delta bearing in cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients aged <50 years. J Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.016

    Google Scholar 

  32. Matsen Ko LJ, Pollag KE, Yoo JY, Sharkey PF (2016) Serum metal ion levels following total hip arthroplasty with modular dual mobility components. J Arthroplasty 31:186–189. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kerboull L, Hamadouche M, Courpied JP, Kerboull M (2004) Long-term results of Charnley-Kerboull hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years. Clin Orthop 418:112–118

  34. Caton J, Prudhon JL (2011) Over 25 years survival after Charnley’s total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35:185–188. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1197-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Neri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Philippot, R., Neri, T., Boyer, B. et al. Bousquet dual mobility socket for patient under fifty years old. More than twenty year follow-up of one hundred and thirty one hips. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 41, 589–594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3385-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3385-y

Keywords

Navigation