Skip to main content
Log in

Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dislocation is a frequent complication in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision. Cup fixation is the second concern. In order to know outcomes at two years, we prospectively followed a continuous series of 78 patients to demonstrate that cementless dual-mobility cup (DMC) used in revision THA is safe as regards dislocation risk and bone fixation.

Method

We enrolled 78 consecutive patients (79 cases) in a prospective study. Mean interval between index surgery and revision was 12.9 years. Mean age at revision was 75.5 years. Two types of cementless DMC were used: a standard DMC in 68 cases with low-grade bone defect (Paprosky grade 1 and 2), and a specific design reconstruction DMC in 11 cases with severe bone loss (Paprosky grade 3).

Results

At two years of follow-up, 68 patients were reviewed; four were lost to follow-up., and six patients were deceased. We identified three types of situations at risk:standard risk (33 cases), Paprosky grade 1 or 2; medium risk (37 cases), revision for recurrent instability (21), periprosthetic fractures (14) or severe loosening Paprosky grade 3 without femorotomy (2); high risk (nine cases), revision for severe loosening with a femorotomy. One (1.3 %) patient dislocated her hip at one month without recurrence. Revision rate for dislocation was 0 %; two (2.7 %) early mechanical failures occurred.

Conclusion

Considering outcomes of this series, cementless DMC can be suggested in THA revision surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springer BD, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Odum SM, Masonis JL (2009) Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:166–173

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wetters NG, Murray TG, Moric M, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, la Valle CJ (2013) Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:410–416

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Vail TP, Berry DJ (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1788–1792

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 2013. The New Zealand Joint Registry. Fourteen year report. January 1999 to December (2012) In New Zealand Joint Registry.

  6. Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O (2008) Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:389–395

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mertl P, Combes A, Leiber-Wackenheim F, Fessy MH, Girard J, Migaud H (2012) Recurrence of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty revision using dual mobility cups was rare in 180 hips followed over 7 years. HSS J 8:251–256

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Philippot R, Adam P, Reckhaus M, Delangle F, Verdot FX, Curvale G, Farizon F (2009) Prevention of dislocation in total hip revision surgery using a dual mobility design. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:407–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delaunay C, Hamadouche M, Girard J, Duhamel A (2013) What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in france? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3863–3869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasukutty NL, Middleton RG, Matthews EC, Young PS, Uzoigwe CE, Minhas TH (2012) The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: The United Kingdom experience. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94:603–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wegrzyn J, Pibarot V, Jacquel A, Carret JP, Bejui-Hugues J, Guyen O (2014) Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull Cross-Plate, Structural Allograft and Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup in Revision THA at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up. J Arthroplasty 29:432–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pulido L, Rachala SR, Cabanela ME (2011) Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants. Int Orthop 35:289–298

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martell JM, Pierson RH III, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Maley M, Galante JO (1993) Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:554–571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi HR, Anderson D, Foster S, Beal M, Lee JA, Barr C, Malchau H, McCarthy J, Kwon YM (2013) Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis. Int Orthop 37:1905–1910

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM (1994) Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Desbonnet P, Connes H, Escaré P, Tricoire JL, Trouillas J (2012) Total hip revision using a cup design with a peg to treat severe pelvic bone defects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98:346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sakai T, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Takao M, Miki H, Nakamura N, Sugano N (2013) Modular acetabular reconstructive cup in acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty at a minimum 10 year follow-up. Int Orthop 37:605–610

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vargas B, Caton J (2009) Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases. Int Orthop 33:35–39

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hernigou P, Pariat J, Queinnec S, Homma Y, Lachaniette CH, Chevallier N, Rouard H (2014) Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2285-2

    Google Scholar 

  20. Helwig P, Konstantinidis L, Hirschmuller A, Bernstein A, Hauschild O, Sudkamp NP, Ochs BG (2013) Modular sleeves with ceramic heads in isolated acetabular cup revision in younger patients-laboratory and experimental analysis of suitability and clinical outcomes. Int Orthop 37:15–19

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prudhon JL, Ferreira A, Verdier R (2013) Dual mobility cup: dislocation rate and survivorship at 10 years of follow-up. Int Orthop 37:2345–2350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Beaulé PE (2004) Prevention and Treatment of Dislocation after Total Hip Replacement Using Large Diameter Balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:108–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Skeels MD, Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr (2009) The dislocator, early and late: the role of large heads. Orthopedics 32

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean Louis Prudhon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prudhon, J.L., Steffann, F., Ferreira, A. et al. Cementless dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty revision. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 2463–2468 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2448-1

Keywords

Navigation