Skip to main content
Log in

Late surgery for acetabular fractures in a Chinese level I trauma centre: surgical experience and outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Delayed surgical management of acetabular fractures, often necessary due to life-threatening concomitant injuries, is a great challenge because delays may potentially increase complications and decrease outcomes. We report clinical outcomes of 61 acetabular fractures treated by delayed open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with an injury-to-surgery interval (ISI) of 22–399 days.

Methods

Operations were performed between April 2001 and December 2008. There were 61 cases (42 men 19 women), with an average age of 38 years. All patients were followed for an average of 82 months. Demographic data, fracture pattern, ISI, concomitant injuries, surgical approach, complications and clinical outcomes were recorded and analysed. There were 16 simple fractures (26.2 %) and 45 associated fractures (73.8 %). Matta criteria were used to evaluate reduction quality. The Merle d’Aubigné and Postel scoring system was employed to assess post-operative functionality.

Results

Anatomical reduction was achieved in 45 cases (73.8 %). The clinical result was excellent in 38 cases, good in 13, fair in six and poor in four. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head was observed in three cases, and heterotopic ossification was found in 28 cases. Four patients had transient palsy of the sciatic nerve.

Conclusions

ORIF for fresh acetabular fractures might yield a better prognosis; however, for delayed acetabular fractures, clinical outcomes are also predictable when sophisticated surgical techniques are employed. Our results indicate that delayed ORIF could yield satisfactory clinical outcomes in the majority of patients with acetabular fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM (2013) Factors affecting revenue from the management of pelvis and acetabulum fractures. J Orthop Trauma 27:267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM (2012) Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1559–1567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lunsjo K, Tadros A, Hauggaard A, Blomgren R, Kopke J, Abu-Zidan FM (2007) Associated injuries and not fracture instability predict mortality in pelvic fractures: a prospective study of 100 patients. J Trauma 62:687–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giannoudis PV, Bircher M, Pohlemann T (2007) Advances in pelvic and acetabular surgery. Injury 38:395–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson EE, Matta JM, Mast JW, Letournel E (1994) Delayed reconstruction of acetabular fractures 21-120 days following surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 305:20–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu S, Sun X, Yang M, Li Y, Zhao C, Wu H, Cao Q, Wu X, Wang M (2013) Long-term outcome of operative management of delayed acetabular fractures. Chin Med J 126:2699–2704

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lichte P, Sellei RM, Kobbe P, Dombroski DG, Gänsslen A, Pape HC (2013) Predictors of poor outcome after both column acetabular fractures: a 30-year retrospective cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 7:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brueton RN (1993) A review of 40 acetabular fractures: the importance of early surgery. Injury 24:171–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zha GC, Sun JY, Dong SJ (2013) Predictors of clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly. J Orthop Res 31:588–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Madhu R, Kotnis R, Al-Mousawi A, Barlow N, Deo S, Worlock P, Willett K (2006) Outcome of surgery for reconstruction of fractures of the acetabulum. The time dependent effect of delay. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:1197–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Letournel E (1980) Acetabulum fractures: classification andmanagement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:81–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1675

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1632–1645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P (1986) Fractures of the acetabulum. A retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:230–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. d’Aubigne RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36:451–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M (2011) Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93:229–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Magill P, McGarry J, Queally JM, Morris SF, McElwain JP (2012) Minimum ten-year follow-up of acetabular fracture fixation from the Irish tertiary referral centre. Injury 43:500–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Uchida K, Kokubo Y, Yayama T, Nakajima H, Miyazaki T, Negoro K, Takeno K, Sawaguchi T, Watanabe S, Sugita D, Takeura N, Yoshida A, Baba H (2013) Fracture of the acetabulum: a retrospective review of ninety-one patients treated at a single institution. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23:155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mears DC, Velyvis JH, Chang CP (2003) Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators and outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:173–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsoulis E, Giannoudis PV (2006) Impact of timing of pelvic fixation on functional outcome. Injury 37:1133–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brueton RN (1993) A review of 40 acetabular fractures: the importance of early surgery. Injury 24:171–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prevezas N (2007) Evolution of pelvic and acetabular surgery from ancient to modern times. Injury 38:397–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bishop JA, Routt ML (2012) Osseous fixation pathways in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery: osteology, radiology, and clinical applications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:1502–1509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Issack PS, Helfet DL (2009) Sciatic nerve injury associated with acetabular fractures. HSS J 5:12–18

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87:2–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Prasartritha T, Chaivanichsiri P (2013) The study of broken quadrilateral surface in fractures of the acetabulum. Int Orthop 37:1127–1134

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Qiang Sun.

Additional information

You-Shui Gao and Zu-Bin Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, YS., Zhou, ZB., Tang, MJ. et al. Late surgery for acetabular fractures in a Chinese level I trauma centre: surgical experience and outcomes. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1865–1871 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2932-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2932-2

Keywords

Navigation