Abstract
Purpose
The head-neck offset described by Eijer et al. (eHNO), which is used to diagnose anterior femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI), can be difficult to measure. The aim of this study was to verify if a modified head-neck offset (mHNO) provides more accurate and reproducible values than those of the eHNO.
Methods
The eHNO, mHNO, cephalic radius and alpha angle were measured on frog-leg radiographs of a group of patients with FAI and a control group (T); three independent reviewers measured the 50 hips in each group twice. The comparison of the two HNOs focused on reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient), validity (correlation with alpha angle), practical utility (difference between means in the FAI and control groups) and accuracy of the diagnostic thresholds.
Results
The mHNO had better reproducibility (p < 0.05) within and between observers in all study subjects than that of the eHNO (0.938 and 0.979 vs 0.881 and 0.904). The correlation with the alpha angle was also better (p < 0.05) for the mHNO than that for the eHNO. The diagnostic performances of the mHNO and mAOR thresholds were higher than those of the eHNO, eAOR and alpha angle.
Conclusions
The new HNO is easier to measure, more reproducible and more accurate. A modified HNO <5 mm and a modified AOR <0.100 on the frog-leg view argued in favour of a pathological cam-type head-neck junction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed M (2001) Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabulat impingement. Hip Int 11:37–41
Cavaignac E, Chiron P, Espié A, Reina N, Lepage B, Laffosse JM (2012) Experimental study of an original radiographic view for diagnosis of cam-type anterior femoro-acetabular impingement. Int Orthop 36(9):1783–1788
Chiron P, Laffosse J (2009) Les lésions du labrum de la hanche: signes, imagerie, traitement. Rev Rhum 76(2):202–207
Espié A, Chaput B, Murgier J, Bayle-Iniguez X, Elia F, Chiron P (2014) 45°-45°-30° frog-leg radiograph for diagnosing cam-type anterior femoro-acetabular femoro-acetabular impingement: reproducibility and thresholds. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(8):843–848
Chiron P, Espié A, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Molinier F, Laffosse JM (2012) Surgery for femoro-acetabular impingement using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach: analysis of 118 cases at 2.2-year follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(1):30–38
Notzli H, Wyss T, Stoecklin C, Schmid M, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(B):556–560
CLSI (2008) Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 3rd edn. CLSI document C28-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne
Siebenrock KA, Wahab KH, Werlen S, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R (2004) Abnormal extension of the femoral head epiphysis as a cause of cam impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 418:54–60
Bixby S, Kienle K, Nasreddine A, Zurakowski D, Kim Y, Yen Y (2013) Reference values for proximal femoral anatomy in adolescents based on sex, physis, and imaging plane. Am J Sports Med 41(9):2074–2082
Lerch S, Kasperczyk A, Berndt T, Ruhmann O (2015) Ultrasonography can quantify the extent of osteochondroplasty after treatment of Cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement. Int Orthop 39(5):853–858
Nepple J, Martell J, Kim Y, Zaltz I, Millis M, Podeszwa D, Sucato D, Sink E, Clohisy J, ANCHOR Study Group (2014) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the radiographic analysis of femoro-acetabular impingement and dysplasia using computer-assisted measurements. Am J Sports Med 42(10):2393-2401
Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Otto RJ, Schoenecker PL (2007) The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:115–121
Beaule PE, Harvey N, Zaragoza E, Le Duff MJ, Dorey FJ (2007) The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89(1):9–15
Fraitzl CR, Kappe T, Pennekamp F, Reichel H, Billich C (2013) Femoral head-neck offset measurements in 339 subjects: distribution and implications for femoro-acetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5):1212–1217
Wensaas A, Gunderson RB, Svenningsen S, Terjesen T (2012) Femoro-acetabular impingement after slipped upper femoral epiphysis: the radiological diagnosis and clinical outcome at long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94(11):1487–1493
Carlisle J, Zebala L, Shia D, Hunt D, Morgan P, Prather H, Wright R, Steger-May K, Clohisy J (2011) Reliability of various observers in determining common radiographic parameters oh adult hip structural anatomy. Iowa Ortho J 31:52–58
Murgier J, Chiron P, Cavaignac E, Espié A, Bayle-Iniguez X, Lepage B (2013) The lateral view head-neck index (LVHNI): a diagnostic tool for the sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(5):501–508
Murgier J, Espie A, Bayle-Iniguez X, Cavaignac E, Chiron P (2013) Frequency of radiographic signs of slipped capital femoral epiphysiolysis sequelae in hip arthroplasty candidates for coxarthrosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(7):791–797
Murgier J, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Espie A, Bayle-Iniguez X, Chiron P (2014) The frequency of sequelae of slipped upper femoral epiphysis in cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement. Bone Joint J 96-B(6):724–729
Clohisy J, Carlisle J, Beaule P (2008) A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):47-66
Harris MD, Kapron AL, Peters CL, Anderson AE (2014) Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoro-acetabular impingement. Eur J Radiol 83(5):788–796
Audenaert EA, Mahieu P, Pattyn C (2010) Three-dimensional assessment of cam engagement in femoro-acetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 27(2):167–171
Bedi A, Dolan M, Magennis E, Lipman J, Buly R, Kelly BT (2012) Computer-assisted modeling of osseous impingement and resection in femoro-acetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 28(2):204–210
Domayer SE, Ziebarth K, Chan J, Bixby S, Mamisch TC, Kim YJ (2011) Femoro-acetabular cam-type impingement: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI. Eur J Radiol 80:805–810
Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch TC, Werlen S, Beck M (2009) Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):651–659
Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE (2010) Prevalence of cam-type femoro-acetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(14):2436–2444
Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE (2009) Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoro-acetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):660–665
Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, Kim YJ, Beaule PE, Morgan P, Steger-May K, Schoenecker PL, Millis M (2009) Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(3):666–675
Malhotra R, Kannan A, Kancherla R, Khatri D, Kumar V (2012) Femoral head-neck offset in the Indian population: a CT based study. Indian J Orthop 46(2):212–215
Kang AC, Gooding AJ, Coates MH, Goh TD, Armour P, Rietveld J (2010) Computed tomography assessment of hip joints in asymptomatic individuals in relation to femoro-acetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1160–1165
Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Simpson DJ, Murray DW, Carr AJ (2010) Femoro-acetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop 81(1):134–141
Conflict of interest
P. Chiron is a consultant for Zimmer, Sanofi and Smith & Nephew, and has received royalties from Zimmer and Integra. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related or unrelated to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
Head-neck offset (red arrow) as Eijer et al. [1]. Line A neck axis, line B parallel to A and tangent to the cortex of the femoral neck, line C parallel to A and tangent to the head. (GIF 91 kb)
ESM 2
Example of a radiograph with an Eijer’s offset difficult to measure: Eijer’s HNO = 8.6 mm; modified HNO = 0.8 mm.h (GIF 108 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Espié, A., Elia, F., Murgier, J. et al. Modified head-neck offset for diagnosing anterior femoro-acetabular impingement. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 40, 687–695 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2834-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2834-3