Abstract
Objective
The purpose of the study was to investigate the correlation of two different alpha angle (a-angle) measurements (“anatomical method and “three-point method”) with the anterior offset ratio (AOR), femoral head ratio (FHR), and lateral femoral head ratio (LFHR) in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).
Materials and methods
We included 39 hips of 26 patients. The a-angles were measured on the frog-leg lateral view (Lat) and anteroposterior (Ap) view, FHR was measured on the Ap view, and LFHR and AOR were measured on the Lat view. A t test was performed to analyze the means of the alpha angles measured using the three-point method and the anatomical method, and also, a correlation was conducted to assess the association of the a-angles among the FHR, LFHR, and AOR.
Results
The mean a-angles in the Ap plane in the three-point method and anatomical method were 76° ± 15° and 64° ± 10° respectively (p < 0.001). The mean a-angles in the Lat plane in the three-point method and anatomical method were 67° ± 13° and 56° ± 11° respectively (p < 0.001). The AOR showed a significant correlation only with the anatomical method a-angle values in the Lat plane (p = 0.026). The a-angles in the three-point method in the Lat plane did not show any significant correlation with the AOR, FHR, and LFHR. Both the FHR and LFHR values correlated significantly with the Ap plane a-angles in the three-point method and anatomical method. However, none of these correlations was strong.
Conclusions
The a-angle measurement methods described in patients without femoral head–neck axis disruption may not be valid in patients with a disorder such as SCFE.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):556–60.
Bouma H, Slot N-J, Toogood P, Pollard T, Van KP, Hogervorst T. Where is the neck? Acta Orthop. 2014;85(2):147–51.
Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed MN, Ganz R. Cross-table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 2001;11:37–41.
Wensaas A, Gunderson RB, Svenningsen S, Terjesen T. Femoroacetabular impingement after slipped upper femoral epiphysis: the radiological diagnosis and clinical outcome at long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94-B(11):1487–93.
Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol. 1965;38(455):810–24.
Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Otto RJ, Schoenecker PL. The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;462(462):115–21.
Sangeux M, Passmore E, Gomez G, Balakumar J, Graham HK. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis, fixation by single screw in situ: a kinematic and radiographic study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29(5):523–30.
Westhoff B, Schröder K, Weimann-Stahlschmidt K, Zilkens C, Willers R, Krauspe R. Radiological outcome and gait function of SCFE patients after growth arrest. J Child Orthop. 2013;7(6):507–12.
Cooper AP, Salih S, Geddis C, Foster P, Fernandes JA, Madan SS. The oblique plane deformity in slipped capital femoral epiphysis. J Child Orthop. 2014;8(2):121–7.
Ito K, M a M, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(2):171–6.
Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M. Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:181–5.
Beall DP, Sweet CF, Martin HD, Lastine CL, Grayson DE, Ly JQ, et al. Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(11):691–701.
Kienle KP, Keck J, Werlen S, Kim YJ, Siebenrock KA, Mamisch TC. Femoral morphology and epiphyseal growth plate changes of the hip during maturation: MR assessments in a 1-year follow-up on a cross-sectional asymptomatic cohort in the age range of 9–17 years. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(11):1381–90.
Barton C, Salineros MJ, Rakhra KS, Beaulé PE. Validity of the alpha angle measurement on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):464–9.
Espié A, Chaput B, Murgier J, Bayle-Iniguez X, Elia F, Chiron P. 45°-45°-30°frog-leg radiograph for diagnosing cam-type anterior femoroacetabular impingement: reproducibility and thresholds. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(8):843–8.
Hipfl C, Titz M, Chiari C, Schöpf V, Kainberger F, Windhager R, et al. Detecting cam-type deformities on plain radiographs: what is the optimal lateral view? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(12):1699–705.
Funding
No funding support was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None of the authors has any conflicts of interest and nothing to disclose.
Informed consent
Informed consent was not obtained from the patients included in this study given the retrospective design of the study.
Ethical review committee statement
This study has been approved by the ethical review committee and institutional review board of Baltalimani Bone and Joint Diseases Education and Research Hospital.
Location where the work was performed
This study was conducted in Baltalimani Bone and Joint Diseases Education and Research Hospital (also the previous workplace of all authors) where all the patients underwent surgery.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ucpunar, H., Mert, M., Camurcu, Y. et al. Validity of the alpha angle measurements on plain radiographs in the evaluation of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Skeletal Radiol 48, 1787–1794 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03224-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03224-x