Skip to main content
Log in

The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report on a prospective series of 201 primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties with a Bicontact prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 12.9 years. The mean Harris hip score improved from 41 before surgery to 89 at final follow-up. Two femoral stems, one each for infection and fracture, and 12 cups were revised. The mean number of years to revision post-primary surgery was 8.7 years (six months to 16 years). The cumulative survival of the prosthesis was 95.42% for any cause at ten years and 93.57% at 12 years. Survivorship for aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 100%. In our series, the Bicontact uncemented total hip arthroplasty stem without hydroxyapatite coating showed excellent survival and the cup survival was comparable to other leading series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zwartele R, Peters A, Brouwers J, Olsthoorn P, Brand R, Doets C (2008) Long-term results of cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with a threaded cup and a tapered, rectangular titanium stem in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Int Orthop 32(5):581–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maheshwari AV, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS (2008) The use of hydroxyapatite on press-fit tapered femoral stems. Orthopedics 31(9):882–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaughlin JR, Lee KR (2008) Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(6):1290–1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Badhe NP, Quinnell RC, Howard PW (2002) The uncemented Bi-Contact total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(7):896–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Badhe S, Livesley P (2006) Early polyethylene wear and osteolysis with ABG acetabular cups (7- to 12-year follow-up). Int Orthop 30(1):31–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarius M, Jung AW, Raiss P, Streit MR, Merle C, Aldinger PR (2009) Long-term results of the threaded Weill cup in primary total hip arthroplasty: a 15-20-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 2009 Jul 24. [Epub ahead of print]

  7. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gruen T, McNeice M, Amstutz H (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engh CA Sr, Fenwick JA (2008) Extensively porous-coated stems: avoiding modularity. Orthopedics 31(9):911–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Civinini R, D’Arienzo M, Innocenti M (2008) A ten-year follow-up of the Reflection cementless acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(5):570–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabbar A, Rajan RA, Londhe S, Hyde ID (2008) Ten- to twelve-year follow-up of the Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem and threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than 65 years. J Arthroplasty 23(3):413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Slack R, Tindall A, Shetty A, James KD, Rand C (2006) 15-year follow-up results of the hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stem. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14(2):151–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH (1999) Primary total hip arthroplasty with the AML total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 360:147–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cruz-Pardos H, Garcia-Cimbreto E (2001) The Harris-Galante total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 16(5):586–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F (2009) The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop 33(4):927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parvizi J, Keisu KS, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH (2004) Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long-term study of the Taperloc stem. J Arthroplasty 19(2):151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bulow JU, Scheller G, Arnold P, Synatschke M, Jani L (1996) Follow-up (6-9 years) results of the uncemented CLS Spotorno stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115(3–4):190–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tonino AJ, van der Wal BC, Heyligers IC, Grimm B (2009) Bone remodeling and hydroxyapatite resorption in coated primary hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(2):478–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lettich T, Tierney MG, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH (2007) Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: two- to seven-year results. J Arthroplasty 22(7 Suppl 3):43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorey F, Lerch M, Kiel H, von Lewinski G, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Windhagen H (2007) The uncemented primary Bicontact stem in revision total hip arthroplasty in young patients. Z Orthop Unfall 145(Suppl 1):S40–S43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nercessian OA, Wu WH, Sarkissian H (2001) Clinical and radiographic results of cementless AML total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty 16(3):312–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim WY, Muddu BN (2006) Eleven-year results of the ABG I hip replacement. Int Orthop 30(3):182–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hallan G, Lie SA, Furnes O et al (2007) Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1574–1580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No sponsorship was required for this research. The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girish Swamy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swamy, G., Pace, A., Quah, C. et al. The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 915–920 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1123-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1123-4

Keywords

Navigation