Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Paediatric forearm and distal radius fractures: risk factors and re-displacement—role of casting indices

  • Review
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forearm fractures represent one of the most common fractures in children aside from clavicle fractures, and the distal radius is the most common fracture site accounting for 20–30% of these fractures. Maintaining acceptable reduction is not always possible, and re-displacement or re-angulation is the most commonly reported complication. Factors leading to this complication can be broadly divided into three groups: fracture-, surgeon- and patient-related. The quality of casting has been historically measured subjectively. The description of several casting indices by different authors has been a major undertaking, attempting to address objective assessment of this factor. The following have been described: cast index, padding index, gap index, three point index and second metacarpal-radius angle. For distal radius fractures we think that the three point index is the most valuable measurement for predicting re-displacement among surgeon related factors; this index has not been used in forearm fractures in which the rest of the indices seem to be useful in predicting re-displacement. The casting indices should not be interpreted as a separate issue but in conjunction with fracture characteristics and patient factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zamzam MM, Khoshhal KI (2005) Displaced fracture of the distal radius in children: factors responsible for re-displacement after closed reduction. J Bone Joint Surg 87(6):841–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bochang C, Jie Y, Zhigang W, Weigl D, Bar-On KK (2005) Immobilisation of forearm fractures in children: extended versus flexed elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B:994–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hove LM, Brudvik C (2008) Displaced paediatric fractures of the distal radius. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:55–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rodriguez-Merchán EC (2005) Pediatric fractures of the forearm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmittenbecher PP (2005) State-of-the-art treatment of forearm shaft fractures. Injury 36:S-A25–34

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alemdaroglu KB, Iltar S, Çimen O, Uysal M (2008) Risk factors in redisplacement of distal radial fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg 90:1224–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bae DS (2008) Pediatric distal radius and forearm fractures. J Hand Surg 33A:1911–1923

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmermann R, Gschwenter M, Kralinger F, Arora R, Gabl M, Pechlaner S (2004) Long-term results following pediatric forearm fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:179–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyer BA, Overton B, Schrader W, Riley P, Fleissner P (2002) Position of immobilization for pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 22:185–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Proctor MT, Moore DJ, Paterson JMH (1993) Re-displacement after manipulation of distal radial fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-b:453–454

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haddad FS, Williams RL (1995) Forearm fractures in children: avoiding re-displacement. Injury 26(10):691–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bhatia M, Housden PH (2006) Re-displacement of paediatric forearm fractures: role of plaster molding and padding. Injury Int J Care Injured 37:259–268

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chess DG, Hyndman JC, Leahey JL, Brown DCS, Sinclair AM (1994) Short arm plaster cast for distal pediatric forearm fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 14:211–213

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Celebi I, Muratli HH, Dogan O, Yagmurlu MF, Aksahin E, Bicimoglu A (2007) The results of intramedullary nailing in children who developed re-displacement during cast treatment of both-bone forearm fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 41(3):175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg NK, Ballal MS, Malek IA, Webster RA, Bruce CE (2008) Use of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for treating unstable forearm fractures in children. J Trauma 65:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reichmann W (1978) Distal radial fracture in childhood. Handchirurgie 10(4):179–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Noonan KJ, Price CT (1998) Forearm and distal radius fractures in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6(3):146–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Malviya A, Tsintzas D, Mahawar K, Bache CE, Glithero PR (2007) Gap index: a good predictor of failure of plaster cast in distal third radius fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 16(1):48–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Edmonds EW, Capelo RM, Stearns P, Bastrom TP, Wallace CD, Newton PO (2009) Predicting initial treatment failure of fiberglass casts in pediatric distal radius fractures: utility of the second metacarpal–radius angle. J Child Orthop 3:375–381

    Google Scholar 

  20. Webb GR, Galpin RD, Armstrong DG (2006) Comparison of short and long plaster casts for displaced fractures in the distal third of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg 88A:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh S, Bhatia M, Housden P (2008) Cast and padding indices used for clinical decision making in forearm fractures in children. Acta Orthop 79(3):386–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Pretell Mazzini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pretell Mazzini, J., Rodriguez Martin, J. Paediatric forearm and distal radius fractures: risk factors and re-displacement—role of casting indices. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 407–412 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0904-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0904-0

Keywords

Navigation