Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the frequency and extent of clinical and radiological late sequelae and to identify predicting factors.
Materials and methods
A total of 220 patients of growing age with 232 closed, conservatively treated fractures were re-examined clinically and radiologically at a median follow-up time of 10 years (range 5–16 years). Clinical and radiological findings were summarised as an overall result.
Results
Of the total of patients, 19% reported pain in the injured wrist, and wrist mobility was limited in 5% of patients. Forearm rotation was decreased in 16%, primarily in epiphyseal separation of the ulna (p=0.0033). Radial inclination was different in 6% of patients, palmar tilt in 2%, and ulnar variance in 37%, compared with the contralateral side. Ulnocarpal impaction syndrome was present in 75% of the patients with positive ulnar variance. Overall outcome was excellent in 72%, good in 19%, moderate in 6%, and poor in 3% of patients. The younger the children were at the time of injury, the more favourable the results were (p=0.009). Children who were older than 10 years when they suffered a severe fracture dislocation had the poorest results (p=0.008). Further factors having a negative influence on outcome were repeated reduction maneuvers and an additional fracture of the ulna.
Conclusion
Our follow-up examinations showed that the majority of patients achieved good results, especially in children under 10 years old. Large dislocations at the time of fracture healing do not influence long-term results in this age group and thus can be tolerated. Patients over 10 years old, whose fractures healed with an angular deformity of more than 20° and/or fragment dislocation over half the breadth of the shaft showed the poorest results. Thus, such dislocations should not be tolerated, and reduction should be attempted in this age group by only one reduction maneuver.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abram LJ, Thompson GH (1987) Deformity after premature closure of the distal radial physis following a torus fracture with a physeal compression injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1450–1453
Aitken AP (1935) The end results of the fractured distal radial epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg 17:302–308
Aminian A, Schoenecker PL (1995) Premature closure of the distal radial physis after fracture of the distal radial metaphysis. J Pediatr Orthop 15:495–498
Armstrong PF, Joughlin VE, Clarke HM (1993) Pediatric fractures of the forearm, wrist and hand. In: Green NE, Swiontkowski MF (eds) Skeletal trauma in children. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 127–211
Bley L, Seitz WH (1998) Injuries about the distal ulna in children. Hand Clin 14:231–237
Bragdon RA (1965) Fractures of the distal radial epiphysis. Clin Orthop 41:59–63
Chambers H, De La Garza JF, O’Brien E, Price CT, Stanley E, Wilkins KE (1996) Fractures of the radius and ulna. In: Rockwood CA, Wilkins KE, Beaty JH (eds) Fractures in children, Vol 3, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 449–651
Cheng JCY, Shen WY (1993) Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: A study of 3350 children. J Orthop Trauma 7:15–22
Davis DR, Green DP (1976) Forearm fractures in children. Pitfalls and complications. Clin Orthop 120:172–184
De Courtivron B (1995) Spontaneous correction of the distal forearm fractures in children. Scientific presentation. European Pediatric Orthopaedic Society annual meeting, Brussels, Belgium
Durawalla JS (1979) A study of radioulnar movements following fractures of the forearm in children. Clin Orthop 139:114–120
Evans EM (1951) Fractures of the radius and ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Br 33:556–561
Friberg KSI (1979) Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. I. The effect of residual angulation on the spatial orientation of the epiphyseal plates. Acta Orthop Scand 50:537–546
Friberg KSI (1979) Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. II. The final orientation of the distal and proximal epiphyseal plates of the radius. Acta Orthop Scand 50:731–739
Friberg KSI (1979) Remodelling after distal forearm fractures in children. III. Correction of residual angulation in fractures of the radius. Acta Orthop Scand 50:741–749
Fuller DJ, McCullough CJ (1982) Malunited fractures of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:364–367
Gandhi RK, Wilson P, Mason Brown JJ, MacLeod W (1962) Spontaneous correction of deformity following fractures of the forearm in children. Br J Surg 50:5-10
Golz RJ, Grogan DP, Greene TL, Belsole RJ, Ogden JA (1991) Distal ulnar physeal injury. J Pediatr Orthop 11:318–326
Hagart CG (1992) The distal radioulnar joint in relation to the whole forearm. Clin Orthop 275:57–64
Hughston JC (1962) Fractures of the forearm in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44:1678–1693
Koncz M (1973) Spätergebnisse bei Unterarmfrakturen im Kindesalter. Arch Orthop Unfall Chir 76:300–315
Laer L von (1991) Frakturen und Luxationen im Wachstumsalter, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart
Larsen E, Vittas D, Torp-Pedersen S (1988) Remodeling of angulated distal forearm fractures in children. Clin Orthop 237:190–195
Lee BS, Esterhai JL, Das M (1984) Fractures of the distal radial epiphysis. Characteristics and surgical treatment of premature, post-traumatic epiphyseal closure. Clin Orthop 185:90–96
Nilsson BE, Obrant K (1977) The range of motion following fracture of the shaft of the forearm in children. Acta Orthop Scand 48:600–602
Ogden JA (1990) Skeletal injury in the child. WB Saunders, Philadelphia
Ogden JA, Ganey TM, Ogden DA (1996) The biological aspects of children’s fractures. In: Rockwood CA, Wilkins KE, Beaty JH (eds) Fractures in children, Vol 3, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 19–52
Önne L, Sandblom PH (1949) Late results in fractures of the forearm in children. Acta Chir Scand 98:549–567
Palmer AK (1993) Fractures of the distal radius. In: Green DP (ed) Operative hand surgery, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 929–971
Pechlaner S (1999) Handchirurgie I: Die Hyperextensionsverletzung des Handgelenkes. Experimentelle Untersuchungen und klinische Aspekte. Einhorn Presse Verlag, Reinbek
Peterson HA (1994) Physeal fractures: part 2, two previously unclassified types. J Pediatr Orthop 14:431–438
Peterson HA (1996) Physeal and apophyseal injuries. In: Rockwood CA, Wilkins KE, Beaty JH (eds) Fractures in children, Vol 3, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 103–165
Roberts JA (1986) Angulation of the radius in children’s fractures. J Bone Joint SurgBr 68:751–754
Salter RB, Harris WR (1963) Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:587–622
Stühmer KG (1978) Distale Vorderarmfrakturen. In: Weber BG, Brunner C, Freuler F (eds) Die Frakturenbehandlung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 206–220
Thomas EM, Tuson KWR, Browne PSH (1975) Fractures of the radius and ulna in children. Injury 7:120–124
Zehntner MK, Jakob RP, McGanity PLJ (1990) Growth disturbance of the distal radial epiphysis after trauma: operative treatment by corrective radial osteotomy. Case report. J Pediatr Orthop 10:411–415
Zimmermann R, Gabl M, Angermann P, Lutz M, Reinhart C, Kralinger F, Pechlaner S (2000) Spätfolgen nach Frakturen im distalen Unterarmdrittel im Wachstumsalter. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 32:1–8
Zimmermann R, Gschwentner M, Lutz M, Pechlaner S, Gabl M (2003) Remodeling capacity and functional outcome of palmarly versus dorsally displaced pediatric radius fractures in the distal one-third. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (in press)
Acknowledgement
We express our thanks to Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York, for providing and granting permission to print Figs. 1 and 5, which were originally published in Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie 2000; 32 (4): 242–249.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmermann, R., Gschwentner, M., Kralinger, F. et al. Long-term results following pediatric distal forearm fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124, 179–186 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0619-4
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0619-4