Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been advocated as a safe approach to humeral shaft fracture management. We evaluated the reproducibility of this technique in a regional hospital. Thirty-five patients underwent MIPO of humerus shaft fractures. Fifteen patients had an open fracture, six a preoperative radial nerve palsy, and nine a concomitant thoracic, musculoskeletal or vascular injury. At an average 12-month follow-up, 91% of fractures healed after a mean of 12 weeks (range, 8–16). Two infections occurred. Final alignment averaged 4° of varus (range, 5° of valgus to 20° of varus). Active elbow ROM averaged 114° (range, 60–135°) and was less than 100° in nine elbows. Five of six preoperative radial nerve injuries recovered spontaneously. Healing and infection rates in this study are consistent with those reported in the literature. Lower elbow ROM and higher fracture angulation at healing were nevertheless found. MIPO is technically demanding and requires adequate intraoperative imaging and surgical experience in order to obtain adequate fracture alignment. Brachialis muscle scarring and inadequate postoperative rehabilitation may be involved in limited elbow range of motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarmiento A, Zagorski JB, Zych GA, Latta LL, Capps CA (2000) Functional bracing for the treatment of fractures of the humeral diaphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:478–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Green A, Reid JP, DuWayne AC (2005) Fractures of the humerus. In: Baumgaertner MR, Tornetta P (eds) Orthopeadic knowledge update: trauma 3. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, pp 163–180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH (2006) Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures—a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 77:279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH (2000) Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:336–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ (2000) Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma 14:162–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Apivatthakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S (2005) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury 36:530–538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. An Z, Zeng B, He X, Chen Q, Hu S (2009) Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0753-x

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF, Mei GH (2007) Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:531–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livani B, Belangero WD (2004) Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. Injury 35:587–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Livani B, Belangero WD, Castro de Medeiros R (2006) Fractures of the distal third of the humerus with palsy of the radial nerve: management using minimally-invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1625–1628

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Numbela BX, Aceves LH, Gonzalez AB, Castro CT (2007) Minimally invasive surgery in diaphyseal humeral fractures with helicoidal plate. One year result in seven patients. Acta Ortop Mex 21:239–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pospula W, Abu Noor T (2006) Percutaneous fixation of comminuted fractures of the humerus: initial experience at Al Razi hospital, Kuwait. Med Princ Pract 15:423–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ziran BH, Belangero W, Livani B, Pesantez R (2007) Percutaneous plating of the humerus with locked plating: technique and case report. J Trauma 63:205–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Dines JS, Briggs SM, Weiland AJ, Lorich DG (2005) The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278, quiz 279-280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paris H, Tropiano P, Clouet D'orval B, Chaudet H, Poitout DG (2000) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: systematic plate fixation. Anatomic and functional results in 156 cases and a review of the literature. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 86:346–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singisetti K, Ambedkar M (2009) Nailing versus plating in humerus shaft fractures: a prospective comparative study. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0813-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T (2007) Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 31:391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ (2005) Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop 29:88–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiu FY, Chen CM, Lin CF, Lo WH, Huang YL, Chen TH (1997) Closed humeral shaft fractures: a prospective evaluation of surgical treatment. J Trauma 43:947–951

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dabezies EJ, Banta CJ 2nd, Murphy CP, d'Ambrosia RD (1992) Plate fixation of the humeral shaft for acute fractures, with and without radial nerve injuries. J Orthop Trauma 6:10–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heim D, Herkert F, Hess P, Regazzoni P (1993) Surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures—the Basel experience. J Trauma 35:226–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin J (1998) Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with humeral locked nail and comparison with plate fixation. J Trauma 44:859–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Niall DM, O'Mahony J, McElwain JP (2004) Plating of humeral shaft fractures—has the pendulum swung back? Injury 35:580–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodriguez-Merchan EC (1995) Compression plating versus Hackethal nailing in closed humeral shaft fractures failing nonoperative reduction. J Orthop Trauma 9:194–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY (1981) A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:872–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klenerman L (1966) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 48:105–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Melissa Wilhelmi for reviewing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Ciencias Quirúrgicas, Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Cauca, Carrera 6, No. 10N-142 Piso 3, Popayán, Colombia

    Juan M. Concha

  2. Departamento de Ciencias Quirúrgicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Cauca, Carrera 6, No. 10N-142, Piso 3, Popayán, Colombia

    Alejandro Sandoval

  3. AO Clinical Investigation and Documentation, Dübendorf, Switzerland

    Philipp N. Streubel

  4. Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes, Calle 116, No. 9-33, Bogotá, Colombia

    Philipp N. Streubel

Authors
  1. Juan M. Concha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alejandro Sandoval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Philipp N. Streubel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp N. Streubel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Concha, J.M., Sandoval, A. & Streubel, P.N. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 1297–1305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0893-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0893-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation