Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revision surgery: intraoperative frozen section analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we validated intraoperatively the analysis of polymorphonuclear leucocyte frozen sections for diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revisions. Between 1996 and 2002 we examined sections and cultured periprosthetic tissues in prosthetic revision in 170 cases, including 146 cases (83 hips and 63 knees). We assessed sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), Youden index, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR). We compared intraoperative findings and paraffin-embedded samples. The results in the knee group were SE=66.7%, SP=89.7% [95% confidence interval (CI)], PPV=81% (95% CI), NPV=81.4% (95% CI), Youden index=0.56, PLR=6.5 (95% CI) and NLR=0.4 (95% CI). In the paraffin-embedded samples the results were SE=91%, SP=87% (95% CI), PPV=81% (95% CI), NPV=94% (95% CI), PLR=7 (95% CI) and NLR=8.7 (95% CI). We found a significant difference. The results in the hip group were SE=50%, SP=100% (95% CI), PPV=100% (95% CI), NPV=94.9% (95% CI), Youden index=0.5 and PLR=0.5 (95% CI). In hip and knee prosthetic revision surgery the presence of polymorphonuclear cells correlates with infection, but their absence does not exclude it. It is a quick and inexpensive test that should be included in the diagnostic protocol in revision surgery. Level of evidence: diagnostic Study (investigating a diagnostic test), level I. See instructions to authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Résumé

Nous avons analysé des coupes de leucocytes polymorphonucléaires, prélevés per-opératoirement pour le diagnostic des infections de hanche et de genou lors des révisions prothétiques. Entre 1996 et 2002, nous avons examiné les coupes et les cultures des tissus périoprothétiques prélevés lors des révisions de prothèses (170 cas), 146 cas ont été inclus dans cette étude (83 hanches et 63 genoux). Nous avons évalué la sensibilité (SE), la spécificité (SP), la valeur prédictive positive (PPV), la valeur prédictive négative (NPV), l’index de Youden, le ratio positif de probabilité (PLR) et le ratio négatif de probabilité (NLR). Nous avons comparé les prélèvements per-opératoires et les échantillons inclus dans la paraffine. Résultats : Dans le groupe des genoux : SE=66,7%; SP=89,7% (CI 95%); PPV=81% (CI 95%); NPV=81,4% (CI 95%). L’index de Youden=0,56; PLR=6,5 (CI 95%); NLR=0,4 (CI 95%). Paraffine: SE=91%; SP=87% (CI 95%); PPV=81% (CI 95%); NPV=94% (CI 95%); PLR=7 (CI 95%); NLR=8,7 (CI 95%). Nous avons trouvé une différence significative. Dans le groupe de la hanche SE=50%; SP=100% (CI 95%); PPV=100% (CI 95%); NPV=94,9%) (CI 95%); l’index de Youden=0,5; PLR=0,5 (CI 95%). Conclusions: Dans la chirurgie de révision des prothèses de hanches et des prothèses de genoux, la présence de cellules polymorphonucléaires est bien corrélée avec l’infection, mais, son absence n’exclue pas celle-ci. Il s’agit là d’un test rapide, peu invasif qui peut être pratiqué systématiquement dans le protocole de ce diagnostic dans la chirurgie de révision articulaire.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aalto K, Osterman K, Peltola H, Rasanen J (1984) Changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 184:118–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdul-Karim FW, McGinnis MG, Kraay M, Emancipator SN, Gold V (1998) Frozen section biopsy assessment for the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in patients undergoing revision of arthroplasties. Mod Pathol 11:427–431

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Athanasou NA, Pandey R, De Steiger R, Crook D, Smith PM (1995) Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:28–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bullough PG (1973) Tissue reaction to wear debris generated from total hip replacements. In the hip. Proceedings of the First Open Scientific Meeting of The Hip Society. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, pp 80–91

  5. Charosky CB, Bullough PG, Wilson PD Jr (1973) Total hip replacement failures. A histological evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:49–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cherney DL, Amstutz HC (1983) Total hip replacement in the previously septic hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1256–1265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Della Valle CJ, Zuckerman JD, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic sepsis. Clin Orthop 420:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Banit DM, Kaufer H, M Hartford JM (2002) Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 401:230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Della Valle CJ, Bogner E, Desai P, Lonner JH et al (1999) Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:684–689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fehring TK, McAlister JA (1994) Frozen histologic section as a guide to sepsis in revision joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 304:229–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman DS, Lonner JH, Desai P, Zuckerman JD (1995) The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1807–1813

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grobbelaar CJ (1975) Proceedings: Hip replacement: frozen section as an additional method of detecting latent infection. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57(2):259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hugues PW, Salvati EA, Wilson PD, Blumenfeld EL (1979) Treatment of subacute sepsis of the hip by antibiotics and joint replacement: criteria for diagnosis with evaluation of twenty-six cases. Clin Orthop 141:143–157

    Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson JA, Christie MJ, Sandler MP (1988) Detection of occult infection following total joint arthroplasty using sequential technetium bone scintigraphy and indium-111 WBC imaging. J Nucl Med 29:1347–1353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kataoka M, Torisu T, Tsumura H, Yoshida S, Takashita M (2002) An assessment of histopathological criteria for infection in joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid synovium. Clin Rheumatol 21:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Levitsky KA, Hozack WJ, Balderston RA et al (1991) Evaluation of a painful prosthetic joint: relative value of bone scan, sedimentation rate and joint aspiration. J Arthroplasty 6:237–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Steiner G, Zuckerman JD (1996) The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1553–1558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maale G (2004) Aseptic versus septic failures in total hip arthroplasties- difficulty in detection of bacterial biofilm. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:7

    Google Scholar 

  19. McDonald DJ, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Ilstrup DM (1989) Two-stage reconstruction of a total hip arthroplasty because of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:828–834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Merkel KD, Brown ML, Dewangee MK, Fitzgerald RH Jr (1985) Comparison of indium-labeled-imaging with sequential technetium-galium scanning in the diagnosis of low-grade musculoskeletal sepsis. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:465–476

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mirra JM, Amstutz HC, Matos M, Gold R (1976) The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop 117:221–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Musso AD, Mohanty K, Spencer-Jones R (2003) Role of frozen section histology in diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasty. Postgrad Med J 79:590–593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Neill DA, Harris WH (1984) Failed total hip replacement: assessment by plain radiographs, arthrograms, and aspiration of hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:540–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pace TB, Jeray KJ, Latham JT Jr (1997) Synovial tissue examination by frozen section as an indicator of infection in hip and knee arthroplasty in community hospitals. J Arthroplasty 12:64–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pandey R, Drakoulakis E, Athanasou NA (1999) An assessment of the histological criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues. J Clin Pathol 52:118–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Francés Borrego.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francés Borrego, A., Martínez, F.M., Cebrian Parra, J.L. et al. Diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revision surgery: intraoperative frozen section analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 33–37 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0069-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0069-4

Keywords

Navigation