Abstract
There is a lack of effective programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)‐targeted immunotherapy with good tolerability in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and severely compromised liver function. We assessed patient outcomes after combined camrelizumab and molecular targeted therapy in a multicenter cohort study in China. The study included 99 patients with advanced HCC (58 Child-Pugh A and 41 Child-Pugh B), 84 of them received camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy from January 10, 2019, to March 31, 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. The median follow-up was 12.1 months. For patients with Child-Pugh B, the OS probability at 12-months, ORR and DCR were 49.7%, 31.7% and 65.9%, respectively, and the median PFS was 5.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.0–7.1], which were comparable with Child-Pugh A patients, although median OS was shorter in Child‐Pugh B patients (20.5 vs.13.4 months, P = 0.12). In multivariate analysis, macrovascular infiltration (MVI), but not sex, age, hepatitis B virus etiology, extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh B, or AFP > 400 ng/ml, was associated with 12-months OS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.970, 95% CI 1.276–6.917, P = 0.012] and ORR (HR 2.906, 95% CI 1.18–7.16, P = 0.020). Grade 3/4 immune-related AEs occurred in 26.8% of Child-Pugh B patients, including one potentially treatment-related death. In both groups, the most common AEs were immune thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity. Camrelizumab combined with targeted therapy showed favorable effectiveness and tolerability with manageable toxicities in Chinese HCC patients, regardless of Child-Pugh A/B liver function. MVI was associated with suboptimal immunotherapy response and poor prognosis.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1, 2]. In China, HCC is the first and second most common cause of cancer-related death in males and females younger than 65 years of age, respectively [3, 4]. Patients with advanced HCC are generally not candidates for curative surgical treatment or even local treatment [5], making novel systemic therapies one of the main treatment options for this population.
Recent therapeutic advances with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-targeted immunotherapy (e.g., pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and camrelizumab) have shown promising results in phase II and/or phase III studies of advanced HCC [6,7,8,9,10]. However, the vast majority patients enrolled in clinical trials have Child-Pugh A disease, whereas many real-world patients with advanced HCC also have poor hepatic function with more advanced Child-Pugh class. Therefore, real-world effectiveness and tolerability data with PD-1 immunotherapy for patients with advanced HCC seen in routine practice are needed. An international multicenter real-world cohort study of 33 Child-Pugh B/C patients who received treatment with nivolumab or pembrolizumab reported comparable effectiveness and tolerability to Child-Pugh A patients [11]. Subgroup analysis of CheckMate 040 cohort 5 including 49 nivolumab-treated patients with a Child-Pugh score of 7–8 also showed similar efficacy and safety compared to Child-Pugh A patients [12]. However, no study has exclusively evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of the PD-1 immunotherapy camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, and apatinib in patients with advanced HCC with Child-Pugh B liver function in the real world.
Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy for unresectable or advanced HCC, focusing on patients with Child-Pugh B liver function in a multicenter retrospective real-world cohort study from China.
Materials and methods
Study subjects
We included adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) with unresectable or advanced HCC [defined as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B/C or BCLC A, and had inadequate liver function to tolerate surgery including recurrent tumor after prior surgical resection] and Child-Pugh A or B who received at least one cycle of camrelizumab with or without combined molecular targeted therapy (lenvatinib, apatinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, or anlotinib) as part of their routine care at six medical centers in China between January 10, 2019, and March 31, 2021. Patients were followed up until death, loss to follow-up, or October 31, 2021, whichever came first. HCC was defined either by histology or radiology criteria [13]. Eligible patients had active HCC and tumor response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1. Other inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2, a predicted life expectancy of greater than 12 weeks, and Child-Pugh A or B liver function. The exclusion criteria were prior treatment with other immunotherapeutic agents; severe organ system complications such as severe cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, brain or leptomeningeal metastasis or uncontrolled non-liver comorbidities; pregnant or breast feeding; presence of non-HCC malignant liver tumors; Child Pugh C; or incomplete imaging or Child-Pugh data.
Treatment procedure
Eight-four patients received camrelizumab administered intravenously at a fixed dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks combined with targeted therapy including lenvatinib, apatinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, or anlotinib everyday. Fifteen patients received camrelizumab monotherapy. Dose delays were made based on tolerability and toxicity. Treatment was continued until disease progression, presence of unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. Patients who had radiological disease progression were permitted to continue camrelizumab if the clinician determined that they would benefit from and could tolerate continued treatment.
Assessments
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline, 6–12 weeks after treatment initiation, and about every 3 months thereafter. Tumor response was assessed according to mRECIST v1.1 [14]. Primary endpoints were tolerability and 12-month OS rate. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) classified as complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Those with CR, PR, or stable disease (those without CR or PR but without increase in tumor burden by 20% or more for at least 4 weeks) were considered to have reasonable disease control. PFS was defined as the time from treatment allocation to the first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. OS was defined as the time from the first dose of study medication to death from any cause. ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed in participants who underwent at least two efficacy evaluations after the first dose of study medication. Tolerability was recorded at every visit and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.
Statistical analyses
Data on baseline characteristics, tumor response, and side effects were summarized using descriptive statistics. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare nominal data. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences in the survival curves were analyzed with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for OS and tumor response. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CI) were also calculated. All variables with P < 0.10 in univariate analyses were included in the Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analyses. To assess the association between primary or second endpoints and baseline variables, prespecified subgroup analyses were done based on the following factors: macrovascular invasion (MVI) (yes vs. no), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (< 400 ng/mL vs. ≥ 400 ng/mL), extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs. no), BCLC stage (A/B vs. C), and Child-Pugh class (A vs. B, A/B7 vs. B8-9, A vs. B7 vs. B8-9). Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 software (BM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and GraphPad Prism (version 8.0; GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).
Results
Patients’ baseline clinical characteristics
Between January 10, 2019, and March 31, 2021, 127 patients with HCC received camrelizumab with or without molecular targeted therapy; 99 patients were included in our study, including 41 Child-Pugh B and 58 Child-Pugh A patients (Fig. 1). The main baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Among the enrolled patients, 17 (17/99, 17.2%) received PD-1 inhibitors at the initial diagnosis of HCC and 82 patients had at least one previous HCC treatment including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection, or radiotherapy. Eighty four patients (84.8%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy for median 8.9 months (interquartile range 5.3–14.0 months), at the initial stage of immunotherapy including 48 (82.8%) and 36 (87.8%) Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively. In all, 82 patients (82.8%) had advanced stage HCC, and 48 of 58 (82.8%) and 34 of 41(82.9%) were Child-Pugh stage A and B, respectively. The majority of patients (79.8%) had hepatitis B virus (HBV), and 43 patients (43.4%) had an AFP level ≥ 400 ng/mL. A total of 40 patients (40.4%) developed MVI, and 40 patients (40.4%) had extrahepatic metastasis including pulmonary metastasis (n = 21), osseous metastasis (n = 11), lymphatic metastasis (n = 13), and adrenal metastases (n = 3). The median duration of follow-up was 12.1 months (95% CI 9.9–14.0). In all, 42 patients (42.4%) died during follow-up including 21 Child-Pugh A (36.2%) and 21 Child-Pugh B (51.2%). The median number of cycles of camrelizumab treatment was six (95% CI 5–7). At data cutoff, 17 (29.3%) and 13 (31.7%) patients were still being treated with camrelizumab with or without TKIs.
Effectiveness in the overall cohort and by Child-Pugh stage
The tumor response results are shown in Table 2. Seven patients had CR and twenty-nine (29.3%) had PR, resulting in an ORR of 36.4%. Thirty-one (31.3%) patients showed stable disease, and 32 (32.3%) subjects had progressive disease at the first radiological evaluation. The overall DCR was 67.7%. The ORR and DCR in Child-Pugh A and B were similar (Table 2). The median OS time was 18.9 months (95% CI 12.9–20.5) for the whole cohort (Fig. 2a), with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.12), although the median OS was shorter in Child-Pugh B patients (20.5 vs.13.4 months) (Fig. 2c). The 12-month OS rates were 61.3% for the whole cohort and 49.7% in the Child-Pugh B group, which were comparable to Child-Pugh A patients (Fig. 2c, Table 2). The median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI 4.3–6.9) for the whole group (Fig. 2b), and 5.5 (95% CI 4.1–8.8) and 5.1 (95% CI 2.6–7.1) months for Child-Pugh A and B patients, respectively (Fig. 2d, Table 2). The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 45.5% and 20.7%, respectively, for the whole cohort and were comparable in both groups (Fig. 2d).
To further clarify the effect of liver function on patient survival, we evaluated it in subgroups (Supplementary Fig. 1). There was no difference in median OS in Child-Pugh A/B7 and Child-Pugh B8-9 patients (p = 0.374), as well as in Child-Pugh A, Child-Pugh B7, and Child-Pugh B8-9 patients (p = 0.298). Considering the poor prognosis in BCLC stage C patients, we stratified the effects of different liver functions on the survival of BCLC stage C patients. There was only a lower trend in survival in Child-Pugh B patients, and there was no difference in OS in Child-Pugh A/B7 versus B8-9 patients (p = 0.846), and Child-Pugh A versus B7 versus B8-9 patients (p = 0.223).
The median OS was 7.5 months (95% CI 5.3–19.0) in patients with MVI, which was lower than the 20.5 months in patients without MVI (95% CI 18.9–20.5; p = 0.021) (Fig. 3a). The median PFS was 2.6 (95% CI 2.2–5.5) and 7.1 (95% CI 4.9–11.6) months for patients with or without MVI (p = 0.0003) (Fig. 3b). Patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL showed a trend of poor survival compared to patients with AFP < 400 ng/mL (median OS: 12.9 vs. 14.1 months; p = 0.055) (Fig. 3c). The median PFS was 3.0 (95% CI 1.7–5.5) and 7.5 (95% CI 4.9–9.0) months for patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL or < 400 ng/mL (p = 0.022) (Fig. 3d). However, there was no difference in median OS and PFS between patients with or without extrahepatic metastasis (both p > 0.05) (Fig. 3e, f).
There were no difference in OS or PFS between camrelizumab monotherapy and camrelizumab plus TKIs combination therapy groups (Supplementary Fig. 2) among the overall cohort. By Child-Pugh stage, among Child A patients (Supplementary Fig. 3a and b), there were also no significant differences in either OS or PFS between the ICI vs. the ICI + TKI groups. However, among Child B patients (Supplementary Fig. 3c and d), OS was higher in the ICI + TKI group compared with the ICI monotherapy group, whereas there was no significant difference between the two study groups for PFS. Of the 7 patients who had CR, 6 received ICI + TKIs combination therapy, and 1 patient received ICI monotherapy (Table S1).
Prognostic factor analysis
Prognostic risk factors for 12-month OS and ORR were analyzed. In univariate analysis, BCLC stage C (p = 0.008), MVI (p = 0.01), and Child-Pugh B status (p = 0.049) were associated with failure to achieve 12-month OS; and age ≥ 60 (p = 0.031) and lack of MVI (p = 0.018) were associated with achieving ORR (Table S2). In multivariate analysis, MVI but not sex, age, HBV etiology, distant metastasis, lack of targeted therapy, Child-Pugh B status, or AFP > 400 ng/mL was associated with 12-month OS (HR 2.970, 95% CI 1.276–6.917; p = 0.012) and ORR (HR 2.906, 95% CI 1.18–7.16; p = 0.020) (Table S3).
Tolerability in the overall cohort and by Child-Pugh stage
Fifty-two (52.5%) patients experienced at least one immune-related adverse event (irAE) (Table 3). The most common AEs were immune thrombocytopenia (n = 28, 28.3%), hepatotoxicity (n = 16, 16.2%), pruritus (n = 15, 15.2%), diarrhea (n = 15, 15.2%), hypothyroidism (n = 15, 15.2%), maculopapule (n = 13, 13.1%), cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (CCEP) (n = 11, 11.1%), hyperglycemia (n = 7, 7.1%), and cardiotoxicity (n = 7, 7.1%). About one-quarter of patients (24.2%) developed AEs of higher grade (grade ≥ 3). Hepatotoxicity (n = 13, 13.1%) and immune thrombocytopenia (n = 9, 9.1%) were the most common severe AEs, followed by hypophysitis (n = 4, 4.0%) and primary adrenal hypofunction (n = 4, 4.0%). One Child-Pugh B patient experienced severe immune thrombocytopenia, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, primary adrenal hypofunction, and death from multiple organ failure, despite receiving 80 mg methylprednisolone and 5 mg/kg immunoglobulin based on body weight intravenously for 5 days, as well as platelet infusion; the death was determined to be potentially treatment-related. Severe AEs led to discontinuation of camrelizumab treatment in all 24 patients; camrelizumab was re-initiated in 6 of them based on the clinician determining that the patients would benefit from continued treatment. In terms of tolerability, any grade and grade 3/4 irAEs occurred in 61% and 26.8% patients with Child-Pugh B, respectively, and there was no difference in patients who developed any grade or grade 3/4 between Child-Pugh stage B and A status. AEs according to Child-Pugh stage are shown in Table 3.
Discussion
Our study demonstrated that camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy showed favorable effectiveness and tolerability with manageable toxicities in a real-world Chinese cohort of patients with unresectable or advanced stage HCC. Effectiveness and tolerability were comparable between Child-Pugh A and B patients, even though the median OS was shorter in Child-Pugh B patients (20.5 vs.13.4 months). For Child-Pugh B patients, the ORR and DCR were 31.7% and 65.9%, respectively, and the median PFS was 5.1 months, which were comparable to Child-Pugh A patients. MVI at initial admission was independently associated with 12-month OS and ORR in patients who received anti-PD-1 combined therapy. The OS of patients with disease stabilization was significantly longer than that of patients with progressive disease (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab or pembrolizumab in aHCC patients with Child-Pugh B liver function [11, 12]. In the study by Scheiner et al. [11], of the 33 patients with Child-Pugh stage B/C disease, the ORR and DCR were 14% and 46%, respectively, and the median PFS and OS were 4.6 and 8.6 months, respectively [11]. In a phase I/II study of nivolumab in patients with advanced HCC, Kudo et al. [12]. reported 49 sorafenib-naive or sorafenib-treated Child-Pugh B patients with cirrhosis (76% and 24% patients had a Child-Pugh score of B7 and B8, respectively); the ORR and DCR were 12% and 55%, respectively, and the median OS was 7.6 months [12]. All of these indicators including ORR, DCR, and OS were comparable to Child-Pugh A patients in these studies [11, 12]. However, both studies included a small number of patients with HBV infection.
Treatment with camrelizumab every 2 or 3 weeks in a large Chinese cohort of previously treated Child-Pugh A patients with aHCC, including 83% patients with HBV infection, led to an ORR of 14.7% and median OS of 13.8 months (11.5–16.6) [10]. Furthermore, camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in treatment-naive and pretreated patients with aHCC led to a substantial number of objective responses (22.5–34.3%), prolonged median PFS (5.5–5.7 months), and a 12-month OS rate of 68.2–74.7% [9]. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapies can induce hypoxia and promote an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by upregulating immune checkpoint molecules [15, 16]; thus, the combination of anti-angiogenic agents with immunotherapy is particularly attractive. Indeed, substantial improvement in tumor response rate also was reported in two Chinese studies that employed anti-PD-1 plus targeted therapy with lenvatinib or anlotinib [17, 18]. However, those studies only included Child-Pugh A patients or a few Child-Pugh B7 patients; thus, the tolerability and effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with targeted therapy for advanced HCC in patients with severe liver insufficiency remain a substantial unmet clinical need, especially in this population that has a poor prognosis. The high tumor response rate in our study may be because the majority of patients (84.8%) received TKIs combination therapy.
HCC patients with HBV infection are thought to have poorer prognoses than patients with HCV infection [19, 20]. The effect of etiology on efficacy in HCC patients receiving anti-PD-1 treatment remains unclear, despite the fact that the efficacy of nivolumab and pembrolizumab was not affected by HBV or HCV infection in sorafenib-treated patients in phase 1/2 trials [8, 21, 22]. The majority of patients in our study had HBV infection and a good tumor response, suggesting that HCC etiology does not have a significant impact on camrelizumab survival outcomes. These data provide important new information on advanced HCC patients with Child-Pugh B status, who are often excluded from receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy in clinical practice. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report anti-PD-1 plus targeted therapy for unresectable or advanced HCC patients with Child-Pugh B liver function in real-world clinical practice, which will provide an alternative treatment option for this population, especially in China and Southeast Asia, where HBV is highly prevalent.
Tolerability was important concerns in our study. Overall, camrelizumab therapy for advanced HCC in Child-Pugh B patients led to 61% immune-related any grade AEs and 26.8% AEs of grade 3 or 4, consistent with those in Child-Pugh A patients, and no new safety concerns were observed. Severe AEs led to treatment interruption in 11 Child-Pugh A patients (19.0%) and 7 Child-Pugh B patients (17.1%), including one treatment-related death in the latter group. The spectrum of AEs was similar to that of other PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, except for the occurrence of reactive CCEP. In a recent study, 145 of the 217 patients (66.8%) treated with camrelizumab monotherapy experienced grade 1/2 CCEP, which was associated with a higher tumor response [10, 23]. The risk of CCEP significantly decreased to 14.3–29.5% when camrelizumab was combined with lenvatinib or apatinib [9, 17]. Eleven patients (11.1%, most received camrelizumab monotherapy) experienced CCEP (grade 1 or 2) mainly on the face, hand, trunk, and skin. The low incidence of CCEP may be related to targeted therapy against capillary endothelial proliferation. The CCEP was clinically controllable and self-limiting, and usually present in the first 4 weeks and alleviated at 10–12 weeks; the underlying mechanisms need to be further clarified. No patients discontinued camrelizumab due to CCEP.
Another important safety concern was immunotherapy-related liver injury, which has been reported in up to 20% of patients depending on the agent(s) used and underlying factors [24]. In particular, Child-Pugh B patients are more vulnerable to liver function impairment. Six Child-Pugh B patients (14.6%) experienced grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, suggesting that closely monitoring liver function is mandatory in this population. The underlying mechanisms of hepatotoxicity are not fully understood. Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 axis may lead to the destruction of hepatocytes due to HBV reactivation [25]; however, it remains unknown whether HBV reactivation contributes to hepatotoxicity, as we had insufficient data to assess the relationship between HBV viral load and dysfunction, although all HBsAg-positive patients received nucleoside (acid) drugs therapy.
This study had some limitations. First, the study design was retrospective and included a relatively small sample size and short-term follow-up. Second, the majority of patients were treated with very different modalities including surgery, targeted therapies, RFA and TACE, and in different time intervals, thus negatively impacting comparisons of the primary endpoints between Child-Pugh B and A groups. Third, we did not establish uniform guidelines to assess irAEs. Moreover, the mild AEs may not have been recorded, which could have led to an underestimation of AE frequency in our cohort. Fourth, although all HBV patients had baseline HBV DNA load, we had insufficient data to evaluate HBV reactivation, in particular, our cohort contained a high proportion of patients with HBV etiology. Finally, hyperprogressive disease has been reported in 8–12.7% advance HCC patients received anti-PD-1 therapy [11, 26], but there were insufficient data to evaluate HCC hyperprogression in this study, although seven patients had rapid disease progression after the first cycle of anti-PD-1 therapy. Despite these limitations, we were still able to generate strong conclusions after careful analysis of the data.
In conclusion, camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy showed clinical activity and favorable safety with manageable toxicities in Chinese patients with advanced HCC, regardless of Child-Pugh A/B liver function, suggesting that it could be suitable for this population, even with a high proportion of patients with HBV infection. Significantly improved survival in Child-Pugh B patients who achieved disease stabilization support that immunotherapy should be attempted in this population. The tumor responses should be assessed early and AEs should be closely monitored to help confirm individuals who can benefit from immunotherapy. MVI is associated with a suboptimal immunotherapy response and poor prognosis.
Abbreviations
- AEs:
-
Adverse events
- AFP:
-
Alpha-fetoprotein
- aHCC:
-
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
- BCLC stage:
-
Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage
- CCEP:
-
Cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation
- CI:
-
Confidence intervals
- DCR:
-
Disease control rate
- ECOG:
-
Eastern cooperative oncology group
- HBV:
-
Hepatitis B virus
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- HCV:
-
Hepatitis C virus
- HRs:
-
Hazard ratios
- irAE:
-
Immune-related adverse event
- mRECIST:
-
Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors
- MVI:
-
Macrovascular infiltration
- ORR:
-
Objective response rate
- OS:
-
Overall survival
- PD-1:
-
Programmed cell death protein 1
- PFS:
-
Progression-free survival
- RFA:
-
Radiofrequency ablation
- TACE:
-
Transarterial chemoembolization
References
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424
Yang JD, Hainaut P, Gores GJ, Amadou A, Plymoth A, Roberts LR (2019) A global view of hepatocellular carcinoma: trends, risk, prevention and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:589–604
Jiang D, Zhang L, Liu W et al (2021) Trends in cancer mortality in China from 2004 to 2018: a nationwide longitudinal study. Cancer Commun (Lond) 41:1024–1036
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD et al (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66:115–132
Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H et al (2015) Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 385:977–1010
Yau T, Kang YK, Kim TY et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib: the CheckMate 040 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 6:e204564
Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P et al (2020) Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 38:193–202
Yau T, Hsu C, Kim TY et al (2019) Nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib-experienced Asian cohort analysis. J Hepatol 71:543–552
Xu J, Shen J, Gu S et al (2021) Camrelizumab in combination with apatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (RESCUE): a nonrandomized, open-label, phase II trial. Clin Cancer Res 27:1003–1011
Qin S, Ren Z, Meng Z et al (2020) Camrelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 21:571–580
Scheiner B, Kirstein MM, Hucke F et al (2019) Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-targeted immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: efficacy and safety data from an international multicentre real-world cohort. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 49:1323–1333
Kudo M, Matilla A, Santoro A et al (2021) CheckMate 040 cohort 5: a phase I/II study of nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and child-pugh B cirrhosis. J Hepatol 75:600–609
Omata M, Cheng A-L, Kokudo N et al (2017) Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int 11:317–370
Llovet JM, Lencioni R (2020) mRECIST for HCC: performance and novel refinements. J Hepatol 72:288–306
Pinter M, Jain RK (2017) Targeting the renin-angiotensin system to improve cancer treatment: implications for immunotherapy. Sci Transl Med 9:eaan5616
Jain RK (2014) Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. Cancer Cell 26:605–622
Wei F, Huang Q, He J, Luo L, Zeng Y (2021) Lenvatinib plus camrelizumab versus lenvatinib monotherapy as post-progression treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a short-term prognostic study. Cancer Manag Res 13:4233–4240
Han C, Ye S, Hu C et al (2021) Clinical activity and safety of penpulimab (anti-PD-1) with anlotinib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an open-Label, multicenter, phase Ib/II trial (AK105-203). Front Oncol 11:684867
Cantarini MC, Trevisani F, Morselli-Labate AM et al (2006) Effect of the etiology of viral cirrhosis on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 101:91–98
Sinn DH, Gwak GY, Cho J, Paik SW, Yoo BC (2014) Comparison of clinical manifestations and outcomes between hepatitis B virus- and hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of a nationwide cohort. PLoS ONE 9:e112184
Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J et al (2018) Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:940–952
El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T et al (2017) Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet 389:2492–2502
Wang F, Qin S, Sun X et al (2020) Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with camrelizumab: data derived from a multicenter phase 2 trial. J Hematol Oncol 13:47
Shojaie L, Ali M, Iorga A, Dara L (2021) Mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated liver injury. Acta Pharm Sin B 11:3727–3739
Zhang X, Zhou Y, Chen C et al (2019) Hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients with positive hepatitis B surface antigen undergoing PD-1 inhibition. J Immunother Cancer 7:322
Kim CG, Kim C, Yoon SE et al (2021) Hyperprogressive disease during PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 74:350–359
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82170626), Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (No.2022SF-451, 2021SF-228).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TL, YZ, MHN and FJ initiated the study concept, coordinated the entire study, and wrote the manuscript. JG,YL, ZD, ZG, YF, LC, YZ, XG, YZ, XH, WW, NG, YW, JL, YZ, WK, ZC, WW, and XL collected and helped interpret clinical data. All authors approved the final version of the article, including the authorship list.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author’s declaration of personal interests: Mindie H. Nguyen: Grants: Gilead, Pfizer, Enanta, Vir, Glycotest, National Cancer Institute, B. K. Kee Foundation, Exact Sciences; Helio Health; Consulting or advisory board: Intercept, Gilead, Exact Sciences, Laboratory of Advanced Medicine, Bayer, Eisai, GSK, Novartis. Fanpu Ji: Speaker: Gilead Sciences, MSD and Ascletis. Consulting or advisory board: Gilead Sciences and MSD. All other authors do not have conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This study was carried out in accordance with the International Conference on Good Clinical Practice Standards and the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committees of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University (2018059; Shaanxi, China). Institutional ethics review was waived at other participating centers.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Availability of data and material
All data and materials of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, T., Guo, J., Liu, Y. et al. Effectiveness and tolerability of camrelizumab combined with molecular targeted therapy for patients with unresectable or advanced HCC. Cancer Immunol Immunother 72, 2137–2149 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03404-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03404-8