Abstract
Immunotherapies targeting truly tumor-specific targets focus on the expansion and activation of T cells against neoantigens or oncogenic viruses. One target is the human papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16), responsible for several anogenital cancers and oropharyngeal carcinomas. Spontaneous and vaccine-induced HPV-specific T cells have been associated with better clinical outcome. However, the epitopes and restriction elements to which these T cells respond remained elusive. To identify CD8+ T cell epitopes in cultures of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, we here used multimers and/or a functional screening platform exploiting single HLA class I allele-engineered antigen presenting cells. This resulted in the detection of 20 CD8+ T cell responses to 11 different endogenously processed HLA-peptide combinations within 12 HPV16-induced tumors. Specific HLA-peptide combinations dominated the response in patients expressing these HLA alleles. T cell receptors (TCRs) reactive to seven different HLA class I-restricted peptides could be isolated and analysis revealed tumor reactivity for five of the six TCRs analyzed. The tumor reactive TCRs to these dominant HLA class I peptide combinations can potentially be used to engineer tumor-specific T cells for adoptive cell transfer approaches to treat HPV16-induced cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
Human papilloma virus (HPV)-induced cancers of the cervix, penis, anus, vulva, vagina and oropharynx represent 4.8% of all cancers worldwide [1]. HPV16 is the most dominant HPV type detected in cancers at all anatomical sites [2, 3]. These tumors express the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7, which serve as target antigens for both CD4+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells (TILs) [4,5,6]. Several lines of evidence make a strong case for their role in cancer control. Regression of vulvar lesions [7, 8] or superior clinical benefit in oropharyngeal cancer [5] has been related to a strong spontaneous presence of HPV16-specific type 1 T cells. Furthermore, therapeutic vaccines that significantly reinforced the E6- and E7-specific T cell response induced partial and complete regressions of HPV-induced high-grade precursor lesions of the cervix and vulva [9, 10] and, in combination with PD-1 blockade, showed clinical efficacy in incurable HPV16-induced oropharyngeal cancer [11]. In addition, protocols that use HPV-specific T cells obtained from TILs [12], tumor-draining lymph nodes [13] or after in vitro TCR engineering [14] are currently being explored for adoptive T cell therapy.
The clinical evidence of the antitumor effects of HPV-specific T cells has renewed the interest in the identification of clinically relevant CD8+ T cell epitopes and their HLA-restriction elements. Clinically relevant epitopes are defined as those that are recognized by CD8+ TILs when presented on tumor cells. However, proper tumor recognition does not always occur since HPV-induced cervical and oropharyngeal cancer cells can evade recognition due to low expression of the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP), the proteasome subunits and/or low cell surface HLA class I expression [15, 16]. Despite extensive HLA class I-restricted epitope identification studies in the past, the evidence that these epitopes are recognized on tumor cells is limited. To our knowledge, only six of such epitopes have been identified since 1997 [6, 14, 17, 18], one for which the presentation has also been confirmed by mass spectrometry [19].
We previously described that part of the HPV16-induced cervical carcinomas (CxCa) and the majority of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) are infiltrated by both CD4+ and CD8+ HPV16-specific T cells [4, 5]. In OPSCC their presence is strongly related to better overall survival [5, 20]. Here, we used multimers and/or a functional screening platform exploiting antigen presenting cells engineered to express a single defined common HLA class I allele to identify CD8+ T cell epitopes in TIL cultures obtained from 16 patients with HPV16-induced cancer. A total of 20 CD8+ T cells responses were detected within 12 patients, which were directed against 11 different endogenously processed HLA-peptide combinations. T cell receptors (TCRs) reactive to seven different HLA class I-restricted peptides could be isolated and tumor reactivity was confirmed for five of the six TCRs analyzed. The isolated tumor reactive TCRs to these dominant HLA class I peptide combinations potentially can be used to engineer tumor-specific T cells for adoptive cell transfer approaches in patients with HPV16-induced cancers.
Materials and methods
Sample
Patients
Patients included in this study were part of two larger observational studies on CxCa and OPSCC. Women with histologically proven CxCa (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1a2, 1b1/2) were included in the CIRCLE study (P08–197) investigating cellular immunity against anogenital lesions [4]. Patients with histology-confirmed OPSCC were included in the P07–112 study investigating the circulating and local immune response in patients with head and neck cancer [5]. Patients were included after signing informed consent. Both studies were conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local medical ethical committee of the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) and in agreement with the Dutch law. HPV typing and p16ink4a immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor sections at the LUMC Department of Pathology as described [5]. HLA class I type of the patients was determined by PCR using sequence-specific oligonucleotides as described previously [21].
TIL culturing
CxCa and OPSCC tumors were obtained and handled as described previously [5, 20]. In brief, tumor material was cut into small pieces and the pieces were incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM, Lonza, Verviers, Belgium) with 10% human AB serum (Capricorn Scientific, Esdorfergrund, Germany) and supplemented with high dose of antibiotics (50 µg/ml Gentamycin (Gibco/Thermo Fisher Scientific (TFS), Bleiswijk, the Netherlands), 25 µg/ml Fungizone (Invitrogen/TFS), 100 IU/ml penicillin (pen; Gibco/TFS) and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (strep; Gibco/TFS)). Next, the tumor pieces were put in culture in IMDM supplemented with 10% human AB serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamin (Lonza, Breda, Netherlands; hereafter referred to as IMDM complete) and 1000 IU/ml human recombinant IL-2 (Aldesleukin, Novartis, Arnhem, the Netherlands). Cultures were replenished every 2–3 days with fresh IMDM complete and IL-2 to a final concentration of 1000 IU/ml and when sufficient T cells were obtained after 2–4 weeks the cells were harvested, cryopreserved and stored in liquid nitrogen until use.
HPV16-specific T cell reactivity analysis
To determine the specificity of T cells infiltrating the tumor, TIL batches from HPV16+ CxCa and OPSCC tumors were analyzed for the presence of HPV16-specific T cells using the 5 days [3H]-thymidine-based proliferation assay as described [5, 20]. In brief, T cells were tested in triplicate against autologous HPV16 E6/E7 synthetic long peptide (SLP; 22-mers with 14 amino acids overlap) loaded autologous monocytes. PHA (0.5 µg/ml; HA16 Remel; ThermoFischer Scientific) was taken along as positive control, while unloaded monocytes served as negative control. At day 1.5 and 4 supernatant (50 µl/well) was harvested to determine cytokine production. During the last 16 h of culture, 0.5 μCi/well of [3H]thymidine was added to measure proliferation. The stimulation index was calculated as the average of test wells divided by the average of the medium control wells. A positive response was defined as a stimulation index of at least 3. Antigen-specific cytokine production was determined by cytometric bead array (CBA, Th1/Th2 kit, BD Bioscience, Breda, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cutoff value for cytokine production was 20 pg/ml, except for IFNγ for which it was 100 pg/ml. Positive cytokine production was defined as at least twice above that of the unstimulated cells.
CD8+ T cell identification platform
In order to identify and develop TCRs for HPV16 E6 and E7 epitopes that are restricted to common HLA-class I alleles, TIL batches of HPV16+ T cell reactive tumors were screened for the presence of HPV16 E6 and E7-specific CD8+ T cells using a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) toolbox based on either the peptide-MHC (pMHC) multimer technology or an HLA class I functional screening platform (Fig. 1).
Detection of HLA class I restricted TCR through pMHC multimer staining
Putative HPV16 E6 and E7 epitopes of 9, 10 or 11 amino acids were either published and validated epitopes or identified by affinity-based algorithmic prediction using NetMHC3.4 for the highly prevalent HLA class I alleles (see Supplemental Table 1) [22]. pMHC class I multimers were generated using conditional MHC class I ligands and peptide exchange technology and used for combinatorial-encoded multimer staining as described [23]. In brief, to enable the simultaneous detection of two-color combinations of multiple epitopes in one sample, each MHC class I multimer was labelled with two different streptavidin conjugated fluorochromes. TIL batches were stained with 7AAD (Invitrogen) or LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR dead cell stain kit (Thermofisher) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Next, cells were stained by 1 μl of PE-labelled multimers, 2 μl of allophycocyanin (APC)-, BB515- or BV650-labelled multimers or 3 μl of PeCy7- or BV421-labelled multimers in 50 μl of PBS + 5% HS for 15 min at 37 °C. Following washing, surface antibody staining was performed as normal by exposing cells to pre-determined concentrations of CD8 antibody for 30 min at 4 °C. T cells were washed twice with PBS + 5% HS, resuspended in 200 μl of PBS + 5% HS and acquired on an BD LSRII, and analyzed using FlowJo software. A list of the tested MHC/peptide combinations is given in Supplemental Table 2.
Detection of HLA class I restricted TCRs through the functional screening platform
In order to detect HPV16 E6 and E7-specific T cell responses restricted to less prevalent and/or less characterized HLA class I alleles, the TIL batches were also tested against engineered K562 antigen presenting cells (APC). To this end, K562 cells, which by itself do not express HLA class I and II antigens, were engineered to express single defined HLA class I alleles and target antigens E6 or E7 (shuffled E6 and or E7 (E6sh, E7sh)), and used for the detection and isolation of HPV-specific CD8+ T cells. The HLA class I alleles and the artificial (shuffled) HPV16 E6 or E7 genes [24] were inserted into a retroviral pMX vector and retrovirus production and subsequent transduction was done as described [22]. Screening for HPV16-specific T cells was done by 24 h co-culture of the TIL batches with K562 target cells (ratio 3:1) in triplo, after which supernatants were harvested and assessed for IFNγ production by cytometric bead array (CBA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Responses were considered positive when the amount of IFNγ produced by the K562-stimulated T cells was at least two times that of the unstimulated T cells (T cells alone).
Single cell sorting and paired TCRα/β amplification and sequencing of HPV16-reactive CD8+ T cells
Single cell sorting
Single cell sorting of HPV16 E6/E7-reactive CD8+ T cells for TCR isolation was performed as described [25]. The cells were identified by CD8/pMHC class I multimer staining as described above or by IFNγ production using the IFNγ Secretion Assay Detection Kit (Miltenyi biotec) according to manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, sorting of CD8+multimer+ T cells from TIL batches was done directly following CD8/pMHC multimer staining and CD8+IFNγ+ T cells after overnight co-culture with K562 cells expressing the appropriate HLA class I allele and the shuffled HPV16 E6 or E7 genes. Background signal was set on irrelevant multimer or unstimulated TIL to identify true positive cells. HPV16 E6/E7-reactive CD8+ T cells were sorted at 1 cell/well into PCR plates containing lysis buffer. Sorted cells were either lysed immediately after sorting by incubating PCR plates in thermocyclers at 70 °C for 90 min or immediately frozen at −80 °C for later processing. Subsequent paired TCRα and β amplification, TCRα/β sequencing and data analysis were performed as described [25].
Retroviral transduction and expression of T cell receptors
PCR products from the single-cell PCRs were cloned into the pMP71-TCR-flex retroviral vector and the retroviral particles were generated as described [25]. Generation of the retroviral particles was performed as described [22]. In brief, Phoenix Ampho cells were plated into 10 cm dishes at 1.2 × 10e6 cells per dish, and after 24 h cells were transfected with 10 µg retroviral vector DNA using Fugene 6 transfection reagent. Viral supernatant was harvested after 48 h, added to retro-virus-coated plates (Takara), centrifuged at 2000xg at 32 °C for 2 h, and subsequently used to transduce activated human T cells from buffy coats. To this end, PBMC were incubated with CD3/CD28 human T cell expander beads (Life Technologies) for 30 min at a 1:1 ratio, after which the bead-bound CD3+ T cells were cultured in the presence of 100 IU/ml rhIL-2 and 5 ng/ml rhIL-15 (Peprotech). After 48 h, the activated CD3+ T cells were added to retrovirus-coated plates, centrifuged for 5 min at 500×g and incubated at 37 °C. Next day, medium was refreshed and transduction efficiency was determined after 72 h by pMHC class I multimer and/or murine TCRβ constant domain antibody staining.
Functional assay with TCR-transduced CD8+ T cells
To test the functionality of the TCR-transduced (Td) CD8+ T cells, the cells were analyzed by intracellular cytokine staining using flow cytometry. To this end, TCR transduced CD3+ T cells were incubated with target cells in triplo at a E:T ratio of 1:1 for 6 h at 37 °C in the presence of Golgiplug, after which the cells were washed and stained with antibodies against CD4, CD8 and IFNγ. Intracellular IFNγ staining was done using the cytofix/cytoperm kit according to manufacturer’s instructions. Target cells used were T2 cells or K562 cells pulsed with the cognate peptide, K562 expressing the appropriate single HLA class I allele and shE6/E7 target antigen and/or various HPV16-expressing tumor cell lines expressing the appropriate HLA class I allele (naturally or after retroviral engineering). Peptide pulsing of T2 or class I-expressing K562 cells was done for 90 min at 37 °C. Tumor cells were pre-seeded 72 h prior to the TCR reactivity assay, of which the last 48 h in the presence of 200 U/ml IFNγ. PMA and ionomycin (5 ng/ml and 500 ng/ml, respectively) stimulation was taken along as positive control. Data were normalized by correction of percentage of CD8+IFNγ+ T cells with the frequency of TCR Td CD8+ T cells as measured by pMHC class I multimer or mouse TCRβ chain constant domain staining on the day of the assay.
Results
Detection of 11 different HLA class I-restricted epitopes in 20 different HPV16-specific CD8 + T cell responses
In order to identify novel HPV16 E6/E7-reactive CD8+ T cell epitopes, TIL batches of HPV16 E6/E7-reactive tumors (Supplemental Fig. 1a) were analyzed by our HLA class I functional screening platform (Fig. 1). To this end, K562 cells expressing one of the selected common HLA class I alleles HLA-A (n = 5), HLA-B (n = 9) or HLA-C (n = 6) (Supplemental Table 1) and the target antigen HPV16 E6 or E7 proteins were co-cultured overnight with the TIL batches, after which HPV16-specific CD8+ T cell responses were detected by measuring IFNγ production. To test the sensitivity of this functional assay, we generated TCR-transduced (Td) T cells specific for the previously described HLA-A*02:01-restricted HPV16 E711–19 epitope [4], which we isolated from a cervical cancer TIL culture with known specificity (Supplemental Figure 1b), spiked them into an healthy donor-derived CD8+ T cell fraction and tested them against K562 E7sh HLA-A*02:01 cells. Analysis showed that this allowed for the detection of HPV16-specific CD8+ T cells with a TCR that is able to recognize the endogenously processed epitope at frequencies above 0.01% (Supplemental Figure 2).
Functional screening of the HPV16 E6/E7-reactive TIL batches revealed that CD8+ T cell responses, able to recognize endogenously processed E6 and/or E7, could be detected among 10 of the 14 TIL tested. These responses were restricted by one or more alleles, with a total of 11 different HLA-allele:antigen combinations within the 16 responses detected (Fig. 2a, Table 1). Epitope screening using HLA-multimers (when available) resulted in the detection of 9 epitopes via HLA multimers, two which were detected in the 2 TIL populations with known HPV-reactivity and not tested in functional screen [4] and two which were found at low frequencies in TIL populations that were negative in the functional screen (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Figure 3, Table 1, Supplementary Table 3). In two patients, a response to three different HLA-allele:antigen combinations was detected, in four patients to two and in the other six patients only to one combination (Table 1). The fact that these endogenously processed HLA class I-restricted epitopes were recognized by CD8+ T cells present in the TIL population suggest that they all are involved in tumor control. In the end, a total of 20 CD8 T cell responses were detected in 16 HPV16-reactive T cell cultures, resulting in the identification of 11 different HLA-allele:epitope combinations.
Characterization of the identified HLA class I-restricted T cells
In order to further characterize the identified epitopes and test their clinical relevance, the TIL were either directly stained with the specific HLA multimer (Fig. 2b) or with an IFNγ capture antibody following stimulation with K562 cells expressing the appropriate HLA class I molecule and E6 or E7 antigen (Fig. 2c), after which multimer+ or IFNγ+ CD8+ T cells were single cell sorted for direct TCR isolation and T cell cloning [25]. For seven HLA-allele:antigen combinations, one or more specific TCRs could be isolated and their functionality could be tested. Among the seven TCR were the previously described HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes E629–38 and E711–19. Whereas the recognition of the naturally processed E711–19 epitope in tumors by its specific TCR was excellent (Supplementary Figure 4), recognition of the E629–38 epitope by its TCR was rather low, in spite of high peptide sensitivity of the TCR (Supplementary Figure 5), suggesting that this epitope may be poorly presented. The other five TCR, which were HLA-B*07:02, HLA-B*15:01, HLA-B*40:01 and HLA-C*07:02 restricted and recognize the E615–23, E743–52, E778–86 and E653–61 epitopes respectively, displayed clear recognition of endogenously processed E6 or E7 antigen after transduction into primary human T cells (Fig. 3) Interestingly, five of the six TCRs with good recognition of endogenous E6 or E7 antigen in K562 cells also targeted naturally processed antigen in tumor cells. Although the recognition of the B*07:02-engineered tumor cell lines was not very high, the SIHA-B*07:02 and Snu17-B*07:02 cell lines were recognized by the B*07:02/E615–23 TCR. These data indicate that these HLA class I restricted epitopes were processed and presented at a sufficient level (Fig. 4; Supplementary Figure 4) and thus are interesting candidates for adoptive cell transfer approaches to treat HPV16-induced cancers.
In order to understand whether the HLA class I-restricted CD8+ T cell epitopes clustered in a specific region of the HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins or were confined to certain HLA class I alleles, we also performed a literature search for those CD8+ T cell epitopes that were recognized either by TIL or from other sources but then showed to recognize endogenously processed protein. This resulted in a list of 24 epitopes, including ours, which were spread evenly over the amino acid sequences of both E6 and E7 and presented by the HLA-A, -B, and -C class I alleles (Table 2).
Discussion
Adoptive cell therapy is an attractive but highly personalized approach for the treatment of cancer and has been shown to work in patients with various forms of cancer [26,27,28,29]. The infused tumor-reactive T cells can respond to neoantigens [27, 30, 31], but in tumors of viral etiology they may also effectively target viral antigens [32, 33]. Here, a functional screening platform exploiting single HLA class I allele-engineered antigen presenting cells was applied to identify HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoprotein-derived epitopes that are recognized by CD8+ TIL and that were processed and presented in common HLA class I molecules. We identified six new epitopes and isolated TCRs to seven different HLA:epitope combinations, six of which displayed the capacity to recognize one or multiple HPV16+ tumor cell lines. The TCRs included one against the previously described clinically relevant HLA-A*02:01-restricted E711–19 epitope [34] and one against the HLA-A*02:01-restricted E629–38 epitope. For the latter epitope, the reactivity of the TCR to endogenous-processed peptide was rather low, but this may relate to the processing of this particular epitope as mass spectrometry data revealed good presentation of the E7 peptide but poor presentation of the E6 peptide [15, 19, 35]. Since HPV16 causes the majority of HPV-induced cancers and the identified epitopes are restricted by globally frequent HLA class I alleles [36, 37], the isolated TCRs may be a valuable tool for the treatment of many patients and thus function as an off-the-shelf product to produce tumor-specific T cells.
Although numerous HLA class I -restricted HPV16 E6 and E7 epitopes have been identified in the past decades by using various MHC-I immunogenicity prediction analysis and screening methodologies, there are only a few for which tumor presentation and T-cell recognition has been validated [6, 14, 17,18,19]. In most cases, the identification was based on the recognition of APC overexpressing the target antigens [6, 38,39,40,41,42,43]. Here we identified five new epitopes for which the isolated TCRs displayed recognition of endogenous E6 or E7 antigen when presented by tumor cells. The efficient detection of such novel tumor recognizing CD8+ T cells is most likely due to the use of the functional screening platform, which relies on the identification of T cells among TILs that respond to endogenously presented antigen on APC rather than on the identification of predicted epitopes. The latter is important as the accuracy of the computational models for HLA class I epitope prediction varies between the different alleles and is poor for rare or less-characterized MHC alleles [44, 45], while selection of putative epitopes relies on binding affinity decision thresholds [46]. This is also illustrated by our observation that only epitopes restricted to HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-B*07:02, alleles that are both well-characterized in terms of computational epitope screening methodologies, could be identified by the HLA class I multimer screening platform, whereas our functional screening platform identified epitopes restricted to the less well-characterized HLA-B*15:01, HLA-B*40:01 and HLA-C*07:02 alleles. For six cases we were unable to determine the epitope recognition because of a low sequence quality of the TCRs isolated.
In summary, we showed that our HLA class I functional screening platform could very efficiently identify novel HPV16 E6 and E7-restricted TCR that targeted naturally processed antigen in tumor cells in multiple MHC class I alleles. This opens possibilities to construct a broad HPV16 E6- and E7-specific TCR bank that could be used for off-the-shelf ACT treatment of patients with HPV16-induced cancers.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- CBA:
-
Cytometric bead array
- CxCa:
-
Cervical carcinomas
- FFPE:
-
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded
- HPV16:
-
Human papilloma virus type 16
- IHC:
-
Immunohistochemistry
- MHC:
-
Major histocompatibility complex
- OPSCC:
-
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas
- TAP:
-
Transporter associated with antigen processing
- TCR:
-
T cell receptor
- TIL:
-
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
References
Forman D, de Martel C, Lacey CJ, Soerjomataram I, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bruni L, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Plummer M, Franceschi S (2012) Global burden of human papillomavirus and related diseases. Vaccine 30(Suppl 5):F12-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.055
Serrano B, de Sanjosé S, Tous S, Quiros B, Muñoz N, Bosch X, Alemany L (2015) Human papillomavirus genotype attribution for HPVs 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58 in female anogenital lesions. Eur J Cancer 51:1732–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.001
Castellsagué X, Alemany L, Quer M, Halec G, Quirós B, Tous S, Clavero O, Alòs L, Biegner T, Szafarowski T, Alejo M, Holzinger D, Cadena E, Claros E, Hall G, Laco J, Poljak M, Benevolo M, Kasamatsu E, Mehanna H, Ndiaye C, Guimerà N, Lloveras B, León X, Ruiz-Cabezas JC, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Kang CS, Oh JK, Garcia-Rojo M, Iljazovic E, Ajayi OF, Duarte F, Nessa A, Tinoco L, Duran-Padilla MA, Pirog EC, Viarheichyk H, Morales H, Costes V, Félix A, Germar MJ, Mena M, Ruacan A, Jain A, Mehrotra R, Goodman MT, Lombardi LE, Ferrera A, Malami S, Albanesi EI, Dabed P, Molina C, López-Revilla R, Mandys V, González ME, Velasco J, Bravo IG, Quint W, Pawlita M, Muñoz N, de Sanjosé S, Xavier Bosch F (2016) HPV involvement in head and neck cancers: comprehensive assessment of biomarkers in 3680 patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv403
Piersma SJ, Welters MJ, van der Hulst JM, Kloth JN, Kwappenberg KM, Trimbos BJ, Melief CJ, Hellebrekers BW, Fleuren GJ, Kenter GG, Offringa R, van der Burg SH (2008) Human papilloma virus specific T cells infiltrating cervical cancer and draining lymph nodes show remarkably frequent use of HLA-DQ and -DP as a restriction element. Int J Cancer 122:486–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23162
Welters MJP, Ma W, Santegoets S, Goedemans R, Ehsan I, Jordanova ES, van Ham VJ, van Unen V, Koning F, van Egmond SI, Charoentong P, Trajanoski Z, van der Velden LA, van der Burg SH (2018) Intratumoral HPV16-specific T cells constitute a type I-oriented tumor microenvironment to improve survival in HPV16-driven oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 24:634–647. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2140
Evans EM, Man S, Evans AS, Borysiewicz LK (1997) Infiltration of cervical cancer tissue with human papillomavirus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes. Cancer Res 57:2943–2950
Bourgault Villada I, Moyal Barracco M, Ziol M, Chaboissier A, Barget N, Berville S, Paniel B, Jullian E, Clerici T, Maillere B, Guillet JG (2004) Spontaneous regression of grade 3 vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia associated with human papillomavirus-16-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses. Cancer Res 64:8761–8766. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2455
van Poelgeest MI, van Seters M, van Beurden M, Kwappenberg KM, Heijmans-Antonissen C, Drijfhout JW, Melief CJ, Kenter GG, Helmerhorst TJ, Offringa R, van der Burg SH (2005) Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) 16-specific CD4+ T-cell immunity in patients with persistent HPV16-induced vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia in relation to clinical impact of imiquimod treatment. Clin Cancer Res 11:5273–5280. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0616
Trimble CL, Morrow MP, Kraynyak KA, Shen X, Dallas M, Yan J, Edwards L, Parker RL, Denny L, Giffear M, Brown AS, Marcozzi-Pierce K, Shah D, Slager AM, Sylvester AJ, Khan A, Broderick KE, Juba RJ, Herring TA, Boyer J, Lee J, Sardesai NY, Weiner DB, Bagarazzi ML (2015) Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 386:2078–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00239-1
van Poelgeest MI, Welters MJ, Vermeij R, Stynenbosch LF, Loof NM, Berends-van der Meer DM, Lowik MJ, Hamming IL, van Esch EM, Hellebrekers BW, van Beurden M, Schreuder HW, Kagie MJ, Trimbos JB, Fathers LM, Daemen T, Hollema H, Valentijn AR, Oostendorp J, Oude Elberink JH, Fleuren GJ, Bosse T, Kenter GG, Stijnen T, Nijman HW, Melief CJ, van der Burg SH (2016) Vaccination against oncoproteins of HPV16 for noninvasive vulvar/vaginal lesions: lesion clearance is related to the strength of the T-cell response. Clin Cancer Res 22:2342–2350. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2594
Massarelli E, William W, Johnson F, Kies M, Ferrarotto R, Guo M, Feng L, Lee JJ, Tran H, Kim YU, Haymaker C, Bernatchez C, Curran M, Zecchini Barrese T, Rodriguez Canales J, Wistuba I, Li L, Wang J, van der Burg SH, Melief CJ, Glisson B (2018) Combining immune checkpoint blockade and tumor-specific vaccine for patients with incurable human papillomavirus 16-related cancer: a phase 2 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4051
Stevanovic S, Draper LM, Langhan MM, Campbell TE, Kwong ML, Wunderlich JR, Dudley ME, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Kammula US, Restifo NP, Rosenberg SA, Hinrichs CS (2015) Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Clin Oncol 33:1543–1550. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.9093
van Poelgeest MI, Visconti VV, Aghai Z, van Ham VJ, Heusinkveld M, Zandvliet ML, Valentijn AR, Goedemans R, van der Minne CE, Verdegaal EM, Trimbos JB, van der Burg SH, Welters MJ (2016) Potential use of lymph node-derived HPV-specific T cells for adoptive cell therapy of cervical cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 65:1451–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-016-1892-8
Draper LM, Kwong ML, Gros A, Stevanovic S, Tran E, Kerkar S, Raffeld M, Rosenberg SA, Hinrichs CS (2015) Targeting of HPV-16+ epithelial cancer cells by TCR gene engineered T cells directed against E6. Clin Cancer Res 21:4431–4439. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3341
Evans M, Borysiewicz LK, Evans AS, Rowe M, Jones M, Gileadi U, Cerundolo V, Man S (2001) Antigen processing defects in cervical carcinomas limit the presentation of a CTL epitope from human papillomavirus 16 E6. J Immunol 167:5420–5428
Cromme FV, Airey J, Heemels MT, Ploegh HL, Keating PJ, Stern PL, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM (1994) Loss of transporter protein, encoded by the TAP-1 gene, is highly correlated with loss of HLA expression in cervical carcinomas. J Exp Med 179:335–340
Jang S, Kim YT, Chung HW, Lee KR, Lim JB, Lee K (2012) Identification of novel immunogenic human leukocyte antigen-A 2402-binding epitopes of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 for immunotherapy against human cervical cancer. Cancer 118:2173–2183. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26468
Kim KH, Dishongh R, Santin AD, Cannon MJ, Bellone S, Nakagawa M (2006) Recognition of a cervical cancer derived tumor cell line by a human papillomavirus type 16 E6 52–61-specific CD8 T cell clone. Cancer Immun 6:9
Riemer AB, Keskin DB, Zhang G, Handley M, Anderson KS, Brusic V, Reinhold B, Reinherz EL (2010) A conserved E7-derived cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope expressed on human papillomavirus 16-transformed HLA-A2+ epithelial cancers. J Biol Chem 285:29608–29622. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.126722
Santegoets SJ, van Ham VJ, Ehsan I, Charoentong P, Duurland CL, van Unen V, Höllt T, van der Velden LA, van Egmond SL, Kortekaas KE, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, van Poelgeest MIE, Welters MJP, van der Burg SH (2019) The anatomical location shapes the immune infiltrate in tumors of same etiology and affects survival. Clin Cancer Res 25:240–252. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-18-1749
Heusinkveld M, Welters MJ, van Poelgeest MI, van der Hulst JM, Melief CJ, Fleuren GJ, Kenter GG, van der Burg SH (2011) The detection of circulating human papillomavirus-specific T cells is associated with improved survival of patients with deeply infiltrating tumors. Int J Cancer 128:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25361
Tubb VM, Schrikkema DS, Croft NP, Purcell AW, Linnemann C, Freriks MR, Chen F, Long HM, Lee SP, Bendle GM (2018) Isolation of T cell receptors targeting recurrent neoantigens in hematological malignancies. J Immunother Cancer 6:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0386-y
Andersen RS, Kvistborg P, Frøsig TM, Pedersen NW, Lyngaa R, Bakker AH, Shu CJ, Straten P, Schumacher TN, Hadrup SR (2012) Parallel detection of antigen-specific T cell responses by combinatorial encoding of MHC multimers. Nat Protoc 7:891–902. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.037
Oosterhuis K, Ohlschläger P, van den Berg JH, Toebes M, Gomez R, Schumacher TN, Haanen JB (2011) Preclinical development of highly effective and safe DNA vaccines directed against HPV 16 E6 and E7. Int J Cancer 129:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25894
Scheper W, Kelderman S, Fanchi LF, Linnemann C, Bendle G, de Rooij MAJ, Hirt C, Mezzadra R, Slagter M, Dijkstra K, Kluin RJC, Snaebjornsson P, Milne K, Nelson BH, Zijlmans H, Kenter G, Voest EE, Haanen J, Schumacher TN (2019) Low and variable tumor reactivity of the intratumoral TCR repertoire in human cancers. Nat Med 25:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0266-5
Stevanović S, Draper LM, Langhan MM, Campbell TE, Kwong ML, Wunderlich JR, Dudley ME, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Kammula US, Restifo NP, Rosenberg SA, Hinrichs CS (2015) Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Clin Oncol 33:1543–1550. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.58.9093
Zacharakis N, Chinnasamy H, Black M, Xu H, Lu YC, Zheng Z, Pasetto A, Langhan M, Shelton T, Prickett T, Gartner J, Jia L, Trebska-McGowan K, Somerville RP, Robbins PF, Rosenberg SA, Goff SL, Feldman SA (2018) Immune recognition of somatic mutations leading to complete durable regression in metastatic breast cancer. Nat Med 24:724–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0040-8
Andersen R, Donia M, Ellebaek E, Borch TH, Kongsted P, Iversen TZ, Hölmich LR, Hendel HW, Met Ö, Andersen MH, Thor Straten P, Svane IM (2016) Long-lasting complete responses in patients with metastatic melanoma after adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and an attenuated IL2 regimen. Clin Cancer Res 22:3734–3745. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-15-1879
Verdegaal E, van der Kooij MK, Visser M, van der Minne C, de Bruin L, Meij P, Terwisscha van Scheltinga A, Welters MJ, Santegoets S, de Miranda N, Roozen I, Liefers GJ, Kapiteijn E, van der Burg SH (2020) Low-dose interferon-alpha preconditioning and adoptive cell therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to standard (immune) therapies: a phase I/II study. J Immunother Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2019-000166
Verdegaal EM, de Miranda NF, Visser M, Harryvan T, van Buuren MM, Andersen RS, Hadrup SR, van der Minne CE, Schotte R, Spits H, Haanen JB, Kapiteijn EH, Schumacher TN, van der Burg SH (2016) Neoantigen landscape dynamics during human melanoma-T cell interactions. Nature 536:91–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18945
Cohen CJ, Gartner JJ, Horovitz-Fried M, Shamalov K, Trebska-McGowan K, Bliskovsky VV, Parkhurst MR, Ankri C, Prickett TD, Crystal JS, Li YF, El-Gamil M, Rosenberg SA, Robbins PF (2015) Isolation of neoantigen-specific T cells from tumor and peripheral lymphocytes. J Clin Invest 125:3981–3991. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci82416
Stevanović S, Pasetto A, Helman SR, Gartner JJ, Prickett TD, Howie B, Robins HS, Robbins PF, Klebanoff CA, Rosenberg SA, Hinrichs CS (2017) Landscape of immunogenic tumor antigens in successful immunotherapy of virally induced epithelial cancer. Science 356:200–205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aak9510
Chapuis AG, Afanasiev OK, Iyer JG, Paulson KG, Parvathaneni U, Hwang JH, Lai I, Roberts IM, Sloan HL, Bhatia S, Shibuya KC, Gooley T, Desmarais C, Koelle DM, Yee C, Nghiem P (2014) Regression of metastatic merkel cell carcinoma following transfer of polyomavirus-specific T cells and therapies capable of re-inducing HLA class-I. Cancer Immunol Res 2:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-13-0087
Nagarsheth NB, Norberg SM, Sinkoe AL, Adhikary S, Meyer TJ, Lack JB, Warner AC, Schweitzer C, Doran SL, Korrapati S, Stevanović S, Trimble CL, Kanakry JA, Bagheri MH, Ferraro E, Astrow SH, Bot A, Faquin WC, Stroncek D, Gkitsas N, Highfill S, Hinrichs CS (2021) TCR-engineered T cells targeting E7 for patients with metastatic HPV-associated epithelial cancers. Nat Med 27:419–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01225-1
Thomas KJ, Smith KL, Youde SJ, Evans M, Fiander AN, Borysiewicz LK, Man S (2008) HPV16 E629–38-specific T cells kill cervical carcinoma cells despite partial evasion of T-cell effector function. Int J Cancer 122:2791–2799. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23475
Krishna S, Ulrich P, Wilson E, Parikh F, Narang P, Yang S, Read AK, Kim-Schulze S, Park JG, Posner M, Wilson Sayres MA, Sikora A, Anderson KS (2018) Human papilloma virus specific immunogenicity and dysfunction of CD8(+) T cells in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 78:6159–6170. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-18-0163
Gonzalez-Galarza FF, McCabe A, Santos E, Jones J, Takeshita L, Ortega-Rivera ND, Cid-Pavon GMD, Ramsbottom K, Ghattaoraya G, Alfirevic A, Middleton D, Jones AR (2020) Allele frequency net database (AFND) 2020 update: gold-standard data classification, open access genotype data and new query tools. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D783–D788. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1029
Nakagawa M, Kim KH, Gillam TM, Moscicki AB (2007) HLA class I binding promiscuity of the CD8 T-cell epitopes of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 protein. J Virol 81:1412–1423. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01768-06
Nakagawa M, Kim KH, Moscicki AB (2004) Different methods of identifying new antigenic epitopes of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 proteins. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11:889–896. https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.11.5.889-896.2004
Wang X, Greenfield WW, Coleman HN, James LE, Nakagawa M (2012) Use of interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay to characterize novel T-cell epitopes of human papillomavirus. J Vis Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/3657
Wang X, Moscicki AB, Tsang L, Brockman A, Nakagawa M (2008) Memory T cells specific for novel human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6 epitopes in women whose HPV16 infection has become undetectable. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15:937–945. https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00404-07
Hoffmann TK, Arsov C, Schirlau K, Bas M, Friebe-Hoffmann U, Klussmann JP, Scheckenbach K, Balz V, Bier H, Whiteside TL (2006) T cells specific for HPV16 E7 epitopes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Int J Cancer 118:1984–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21565
Alexander M, Salgaller ML, Celis E, Sette A, Barnes WA, Rosenberg SA, Steller MA (1996) Generation of tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes from peripheral blood of cervical cancer patients by in vitro stimulation with a synthetic human papillomavirus type 16 E7 epitope. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70110-2
Gfeller D, Bassani-Sternberg M, Schmidt J, Luescher IF (2016) Current tools for predicting cancer-specific T cell immunity. Oncoimmunology 5:e1177691. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2016.1177691
Liu XS, Mardis ER (2017) Applications of immunogenomics to cancer. Cell 168:600–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.014
Bonsack M, Hoppe S, Winter J, Tichy D, Zeller C, Küpper MD, Schitter EC, Blatnik R, Riemer AB (2019) Performance evaluation of MHC class-I binding prediction tools based on an experimentally validated MHC-peptide binding data set. Cancer Immunol Res 7:719–736. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-18-0584
Funding
Oncode base fund to SHvdB
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: TNS, GB, SHvdB. Data acquisition and analysis: SJS, MJPW, DSS, MRF, HK, BW, AvdB, CL, GB. Supervision: CL, GB, SHvdB. Writing original draft: SJS, MJPW, SHvdB. Writing review and editing: SJS, MJPW, DSS, MRF, HK, BW, AvdB, CL, GB, TNS, SHvdB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
DSS, MFR, HK, BW, AvdB, CL and GB were full-time employees of KITE Pharmaceuticals at the time of data acquisition. SA is currently a full-time employee of KITE Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest for the submitted work.
Grant support
SHvdB has received base funding from the Oncode Institute.
Ethics statements
The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local medical ethical committee of the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC, P08-197 and P07-112) and in agreement with the Dutch law. Patients were included after signing informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Deborah S. Schrikkema, Manon R. Freriks, Hanna Kok, Bianca Weissbrich, Anouk van den Branden, Carsten Linnemann and Gavin Bendle: former employee of Kite.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Santegoets, S.J., Welters, M.J.P., Schrikkema, D.S. et al. The common HLA class I-restricted tumor-infiltrating T cell response in HPV16-induced cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 72, 1553–1565 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-022-03350-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-022-03350-x