Abstract
Purpose
(1) Assess the diagnostic performance of liver 3D magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) parameters (including stiffness, storage/loss modulus and damping ratio) compared to liver stiffness measured with 2D MRE for noninvasive detection of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) and cirrhosis (F4) in patients with chronic liver disease. (2) Assess the value of serum markers (FIB-4) in detecting advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in the same patients.
Methods
This was a single center, prospective IRB-approved cross-sectional study that included 49 patients (M/F: 23/26, mean age 50.8 y) with chronic liver disease and concomitant liver biopsy. MRE was acquired at 1.5T using a spin echo-EPI sequence. The following parameters were measured: liver stiffness using 2D MRE (LS-2D) and 3D MRE parameters (LS-3D, liver storage, loss modulus and damping ratio). The Mann-Whitney U test, ROC curve analysis, Spearman correlation and logistic regression were performed to evaluate diagnostic performance of MRE parameters and FIB-4.
Results
LS-2D and LS-3D had similar diagnostic performance for diagnosis of F3-F4, with AUCs of 0.87 and 0.88, sensitivity of 0.71 and 0.81, specificity of 0.89 for both. For diagnosis of F4, LS-2D and LS-3D had similar performance with AUCs of 0.81 for both, sensitivity of 0.75 and 0.83, and specificity of 0.84 and 0.73, respectively. Additional 3D parameters (storage modulus, loss modulus, damping ratio) had variable performance, with AUC range of 0.59-0.78 for F3-F4; and 0.52-0.70 for F4. FIB-4 had lower diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.66 for F3-F4, and 0.68 for F4.
Conclusion
Our study shows no added value of 3D MRE compared to 2D MRE for detection of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, while FIB-4 had lower diagnostic performance.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The main data that support this study are available within the paper. All other experimental data are available upon request, by contacting the corresponding author.
References
Kennedy P, Wagner M, Castéra L, Hong CW, Johnson CL, Sirlin CB, Taouli B. Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Radiology. 2018;286(3):738-63. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018170601. PubMed PMID: 29461949; PMCID: PMC5831316.
Castera L. Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(6):1293–302; PMCID: PubMed: 22537436.
Kennedy P, Stocker D, Carbonell G, Said D, Bane O, Hectors S, Abboud G, Cuevas J, Bolster BD, Jr., Friedman SL, Lewis S, Schiano T, Bhattacharya D, Fischman A, Thung S, Taouli B. MR elastography outperforms shear wave elastography for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension. Eur Radiol. 2022;32(12):8339-49. Epub 20220621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08935-9. PubMed PMID: 35727321.
Rustogi R, Horowitz J, Harmath C, Wang Y, Chalian H, Ganger DR, et al. Accuracy of MR elastography and anatomic MR imaging features in the diagnosis of severe hepatic fbrosis and cirrhosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(6):1356-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23585.
Singh S, Venkatesh SK, Wang Z, Miller FH, Motosugi U, Low RN, et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(3):440-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.046.
Srinivasa B, A, Wells ML, Teytelboym OM, et al. Elastography in Chronic Liver Disease: Modalities, Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions. Radiographics. 2016;36(7):1987-2006.
Lefebvre T, Wartelle-Bladou C, Wong P et al. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:6477– 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06331-4.
Hoodeshenas S YM, Venkatesh SK. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: current update. Top Magn Reson Imaging2018;27:319–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000177.
Venkatesh SK YM, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(3):544–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23731.
Yin M TJ, Glaser KJ et al. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(10):1207–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.012.
Zhan C, Kannengiesser S, Chandarana H, Fenchel M, Ream J, Shanbhogue KP. MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019;44:1825–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-01932-5.
Shi Y, Xia F, Li QJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis b and c by using both gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo planar imaging: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:823–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.56.
Kim YS, Jang YN, Song JS. Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo¬ planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(4):1709– 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5149-5.
Chang W, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. Liver fibrosis staging with MR elastography: comparison of diagnostic performance between patients with chronic hepatitis b and those with other etiologic causes. Radiology. 2016;280(1):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016150397.
Wang J, Glaser KJ, Zhang T et al. Assessment of advanced hepatic MR elastography methods for susceptibility artifact suppression in clinical patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(4):976– 87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25818.
Wagner M, Corcuera-Solano I, Lo G et al. Technical failure of MR elastography examinations of the liver: experience from a large Single-Center study. Radiology. 2017;284(2):401–12. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160863.
Felker ER, Choi KS, Sung K, et al Liver MR elastography at 3 T: agreement across pulse sequences and effect of liver R2* on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(3):588–94. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.17.19288.
Wagner M, Besa C, Bou AJ, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver: qualitative and quantitative comparison of gradient echo and spin echo echoplanar imaging sequences. Invest Radiol. 2016;51(9):575–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000269.
Mariappan YK, Dzyubak B, Glaser KJ, et al. Application of modified spin-echo-based sequences for hepatic MR elastography: evaluation, comparison with the conventional gradient-echo sequence, and preliminary clinical experience. Radiology. 2017;282(2):390–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160153.
Choi SL, Lee ES, Ko A, et al. Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(3):1730–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06496-y.
Kim D, W, Kim SY, Yoon HM, Kim KW, Byun JH. Comparison of technical failure of MR elastography for measuring liver stiffness between gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(4):1086–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26918.
Wagner M, Hectors S, Bane O, et al. Noninvasive prediction of portal pressure with MR elastography and DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48:1091-103.
Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Review of MR elastography applications and recent developments. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(4):757–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23597.
Allen AM, Shah VH, Therneau TM et al. The role of three-dimensional magnetic resonance elastography in the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Hepatology. 2020;71(2):510–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.30483.
Loomba R CJ, Wolfson T, et al. . Novel 3D Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Advanced Fibrosis in NAFLD: A Prospective Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(7):986-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.65.
Li M, Yang H, Liu Y, Zhang L, Chen J, Deng Y, et al Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2D and 3D MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(12):9468-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08053-y.
Forsgren MF, Norén B, Kihlberg J, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Kechagias S, Lundberg P. Comparing hepatic 2D and 3D magnetic resonance elastography methods in a clinical setting - Initial experiences. Eur J Radiol Open. 2015;2:66-70. Epub 20150428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.04.001. PubMed PMID: 26937438; PMCID: PMC4750624.
Morisaka H, Motosugi U, Glaser KJ, Ichikawa S, Ehman RL, Sano K, Ichikawa T, Onishi H. Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of two- and three-dimensional MR elastography of the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(4):1163-70. Epub 20160923. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25425. PubMed PMID: 27662640; PMCID: PMC5584543.
Qu Y, Middleton MS, Loomba R, Glaser KJ, Chen J, Hooker JC, Wolfson T, Covarrubias Y, Valasek MA, Fowler KJ, Zhang YN, Sy E, Gamst AC, Wang K, Mamidipalli A, Schwimmer JB, Song B, Reeder SB, Yin M, Ehman RL, Sirlin CB. Magnetic resonance elastography biomarkers for detection of histologic alterations in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the absence of fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(11):8408-19. Epub 20210426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07988-6. PubMed PMID: 33899143; PMCID: PMC8530863.
Shi Y, Xia F, Li QJ, Li JH, Yu B, Li Y, An H, Glaser KJ, Tao S, Ehman RL, Guo QY. Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(6):823-33. Epub 20160315. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.56. PubMed PMID: 26977760.
Shi Y QY, Lan GY, et al. . Three-dimensional MR Elastography Depicts Liver Inflammation, Fibrosis, and Portal Hypertension in Chronic Hepatitis B or C. . Radiology. 2021;301(1):154-62. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021202804.
Wang J, Shan Q, Liu Y, et al. 3D MR elastography of hepatocellular carcinomas as a potential biomarker for predicting tumor recurrence. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(3):719–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26250.
Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, Chen J, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Hepatic MR elastography: clinical performance in a series of 1377 consecutive examinations. Radiology. 2016;278(1):114–24. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142141.
Dzyubak B, Venkatesh SK, Manduca A, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL Automated liver elasticity calculation for MR elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(5):1055–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25072.
Yin M, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Mounajjed T, Malhi H, Simonetto DA, Wang R, Yang L, Mao SA, Glorioso JM, Elgilani FM, Ward CJ, Harris PC, Nyberg SL, Shah VH, Ehman RL. Distinguishing between Hepatic Inflammation and Fibrosis with MR Elastography. Radiology. 2017;284(3):694-705. Epub 20170127. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017160622. PubMed PMID: 28128707; PMCID: PMC5529282.
Bedossa P PT. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24(2):289–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240201.
Bedossa P, Poynard T An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24(2):289-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240201.
Puri P SAPSdc. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Definitions, risk factors, and workup. . Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2012;1(1):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.81.
Calvaruso V, Burroughs AK, Standish R, Manousou P, Grillo F, Leandro G, Maimone S, Pleguezuelo M, Xirouchakis I, Guerrini GP, Patch D, Yu D, O'Beirne J, Dhillon AP. Computer-assisted image analysis of liver collagen: relationship to Ishak scoring and hepatic venous pressure gradient. Hepatology. 2009;49(4):1236-44. Epub 2009/01/13. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22745. PubMed PMID: 19133646.
Kennedy P WM, Castéra L, Hong CW, Johnson CL, Sirlin CB, Taouli B. . Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions. . Radiology. 2018 286(3):738-63. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018170601.
Besa C, Wagner M, Lo G, Gordic S, Chatterji M, Kennedy P, Stueck A, Thung S, Babb J, Smith A, Taouli B. Detection of liver fibrosis using qualitative and quantitative MR elastography compared to liver surface nodularity measurement, gadoxetic acid uptake, and serum markers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(6):1552-61. Epub 20171128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25911. PubMed PMID: 29193508.
Li M YH, Liu Y, Zhang L, Chen J, Deng Y, et al. . Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2D and 3D MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(12):9468-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08053-y.
Wang Y, Ganger DR, Levitsky J, Sternick LA, McCarthy RJ, Chen ZE, Fasanati CW, Bolster B, Shah S, Zuehlsdorff S, Omary RA, Ehman RL, Miller FH. Assessment of chronic hepatitis and fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):553-61. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.10.4580. PubMed PMID: 21343496; PMCID: PMC3093963.
Serai SD, Yin M, Wang H, Ehman RL, Podberesky DJ. Cross-vendor validation of liver magnetic resonance elastography. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(4):789-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0282-y. PubMed PMID: 25476489; PMCID: PMC4523216.
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
This work was supported by NIDDK, Grant No. R01DK113272.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhuiyan, E.H., Ozkaya, E., Kennedy, P. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography for noninvasive detection of liver fibrosis: is there an added value of 3D acquisition?. Abdom Radiol 48, 3420–3429 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04036-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04036-3