Abstract
Abdominal wall and spinal soft tissue findings are frequently encountered on CT or MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. Many of these entities have specific imaging findings, for which a definitive diagnosis can be made without the need for further work up. These abdominal wall and spinal findings may be diagnostically challenging for sub-specialized abdominal radiologists who are unfamiliar with their appearance and appropriate management. This review article describes and illustrates pathognomonic or characteristic abdominal wall and spinal pathologies, which reside outside the abdominopelvic cavity. The cases selected all have findings that allow a confident diagnosis without further imaging or intervention. The cases presented include myonecrosis, intramuscular abscess, myositis, iliopsoas bursitis, Morel-Lavallée lesion, hydrocele of canal of Nuck, Klippel Trenaunay Weber syndrome, neurofibroma with target sign, perineural cysts, filum terminale lipoma, calvarial bone flap, transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap, liposuction, and hidradenitis suppurativa, among others. Although not all-encompassing, this paper will help abdominal radiologists to accurately diagnose a variety of abdominal and pelvic extra-cavitary soft tissue pathologies by identifying key radiologic findings.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Imaging of the abdomen and pelvis frequently reveals incidental skin, subcutaneous, muscular, and neurological abnormalities residing outside the abdominopelvic cavity. This can pose a diagnostic dilemma for the abdominal radiologist who may not be familiar with the appearance, differential considerations, and appropriate workup. There have been multiple recent articles to address this [1,2,3]; however, most articles focused primarily on osseous incidental findings in the abdomen and pelvis with little discussion of soft tissue findings. A recent paper [4] reviewed the imaging findings of many abdominal wall masses, but did not include spinal soft tissue lesions.
This article intends to help the abdominal radiologist become more comfortable in recognizing and diagnosing soft tissue entities occurring outside the abdominopelvic cavity, which may be encountered in abdominal and pelvic imaging. This is not meant to be a comprehensive essay, but rather a review of pathognomonic or characteristic entities, so-called “Aunt Minnies,” seen on abdominal CT and MRI in our practice. Cases were selected where abdominal radiologists could have arrived at a definitive diagnosis but failed to recognize key findings which initiated unnecessary additional imaging or tissue sampling. For example, the pectineus muscle myonecrosis case (Fig. 1) was initially misdiagnosed as intramuscular abscess and the ossified iliac subperiosteal hematoma case (Fig. 25) was initially misdiagnosed as an indeterminate bone lesion requiring further workup.
The term “Aunt Minnie” is shorthand for a classic, often, radiological appearance of a pathology. The term was originally used by Dr. Neuhauser (1908–1987), Chief of Radiology at Boston Children’s Hospital [5]. The Aunt Minnie approach was that you would easily recognize your Aunt Minnie in a crowd, just by gestalt. The original meaning has been slightly expanded so that an “Aunt Minnie” now means any classic constellation of findings which should raise a specific diagnosis [6, 7].
In this review we will characterize imaging findings of various abdominal wall and spinal “Aunt Minnies” and will highlight salient teaching pearls to guide the abdominal radiologist reach the most accurate diagnosis (Table 1).
Muscular lesions
Myonecrosis
Myonecrosis, also known as muscle infarction, refers to necrosis of muscle fibers. It is most often a complication of late-stage diabetes; however, it is also associated with rhabdomyolysis, severe ischemia, compartment syndrome, crush injury, sickle-cell crisis, and intra-arterial chemotherapy. Often the radiologist will first suspect this condition based on imaging characteristics [8]. The thigh muscles are most commonly affected, and the patient typically presents with pain and low-grade fever without leukocytosis. Imaging may show peripheral enhancement around non-enhancing areas of muscle, representing necrosis on postcontrast images (Figs. 1 and 2). Typically, there is diffuse increased muscular signal, although less than fluid signal, on T2-weighted (T2W) sequences, representing edema [9]. Although not always seen, foci of enhancement within the affected muscle may be present, termed the “stipple sign [9]” (Fig. 3). This should not be confused for intramuscular abscess, especially in the absence of leukocytosis or other infectious symptoms. Although an intramuscular abscess will also show rim enhancement, it should have fluid signal centrally [9] and will be more focal (Fig. 4) as compared to myonecrosis which typically conforms to the shape of the muscle and the abnormality runs parallel to the muscle fibers.
Myositis
In contradistinction to myonecrosis, myositis refers to inflammation of the muscle fibers. Types of myositis include infectious, inflammatory, drug-related, traumatic, and iatrogenic [10]. In the acute phase, this will classically present as edema with high T2W and STIR signal with diffuse enhancement (Fig. 5), distinguishing it from myonecrosis. In the chronic form, this may be associated with an increased T1-weighted (T1W) signal, representing muscular atrophy and fat deposition.
Iliopsoas bursitis
Although not truly a muscular lesion, it is important to distinguish iliopsoas bursitis from other rim-enhancing lesions described here, such as myonecrosis and abscess. The iliopsoas bursa is a large synovial bursa located between the musculotendinous portion of the iliopsoas muscle and the anterior capsule of the hip [11]. Iliopsoas bursitis refers to inflammation of the bursa and is characterized by distension of the bursa [11]. Imaging findings include a well-defined, thin-walled, cystic mass with a communication to the hip joint which may have peripheral contrast enhancement [12] (Fig. 6).
Rectus abdominis muscle strain
The abdominal wall musculature can undergo tear and strain, either as a result of blunt trauma or abrupt movement such as twisting or a rapid change in position. Rectus abdominis muscle strains are common and debilitating injuries among competitive young athletes, and usually present as abdominal pain. On CT, irregular contour and linear low attenuation of the rectus abdominis muscle is usually observed. MRI images often demonstrate hyperintense signal on fluid-sensitive sequences with intrinsic high signal on (T1W) sequences due to the presence of blood products (Fig. 7) [13, 14].
Nerve related lesions
Schwannoma and neurofibroma
Given the large number of exiting spinal nerves in the abdomen and pelvis, peripheral nerve-sheath tumors are commonly encountered. Schwannomas and neurofibromas can be found anywhere along a peripheral nerve, and these two histologically distinct tumors share many imaging features. These tumors are usually less than 5 cm in diameter and on MRI have slightly greater signal than muscle on T1W images and exhibit high signal on T2W images. The “target sign,” where the center of the tumor is low in signal on T2W images with a peripheral rim of a high signal, is most often seen with neurofibromas (Fig. 8). Histologically, a central fibro-collagenous core and surrounding myxomatous tissue account for this imaging pattern. The target sign may also be seen in schwannomas; however, in these lesions, it is due to a central distribution of the more cellular Antoni type A cells, with a surrounding rim of hypocellular Antoni type B cells. Loss of a previously seen target sign in a peripheral nerve sheath tumor is concerning for malignant transformation. The tumor sometimes appears to have a “tail” on either side, representing the entering and exiting nerve [15, 16]. While these are benign tumors, they may exhibit locoregional mass effect and may show heterogeneous enhancement (Fig. 9).
Perineural (tarlov) cysts
Perineural cysts, eponymously known as Tarlov cysts, in contrast to neurofibromas, are cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) filled cysts of the nerve root sheath in the dorsal root ganglia of the lower spine. They are seen in up to 5% of the general population. They can be sporadic or associated with connective tissue disease. They are usually asymptomatic, but can be associated with back pain [17]. Imaging demonstrates classic findings for the diagnosis, manifesting as simple cystic structures closely related to the lower lumbar and sacral dorsal ganglia and posterior nerve root junctions. Mild locoregional mass effect may be seen with remodeling of adjacent bone and enlargement of neural foramina. On unenhanced CT and MRI, these may mimic neurofibromas, but they will not enhance following intravenous (IV) contrast administration and will follow the CSF signal on all sequences of MRI (Fig. 10).
Filum terminale lipoma
The filum terminale is a fibrous strand of primarily pia mater, which extends from the conus medullaris (usually located at L1) to the periosteum of the coccyx and provides longitudinal support for the distal spinal cord. A filum terminale lipoma, also known as fatty filum terminale, is a common incidental finding in the lumbar spine, present in up to 4–6% of post-mortem exams [18], and is usually of no clinical concern; however, there may be an association with tethered cord syndrome. On CT imaging, a filum terminale lipoma will be seen as a fat density, linear, low-attenuating mass below the level of the conus medullaris (Fig. 11). MRI should be recommended if there are clinical signs of tethered cord. On MRI, the filum terminale lipoma will follow fat signal intensity on all sequences. Associated findings in support of tethered cord syndrome include filum thickening (> 2 mm) and a low-lying conus, at or below the midpoint of L2 [19,20,21].
Subcutaneous lesions
Morel-Lavallée lesion
Morel-Lavallée (ML) lesions are post-traumatic subcutaneous cysts resulting from soft tissue degloving injury that classically occur over the greater trochanter of the femur and are caused by shear injury most commonly seen after tangential trauma, such as from motorcycle accidents. The skin and subcutaneous tissues separate from the underlying deep fascia, and serosanguinous fluid accumulates in the space created between these tissues and the fascia. This fluid collection may resolve spontaneously, or it may persist and become encapsulated with rim calcifications. On CT, one may see a smoothly contoured mass with pseudo-capsule and internal fluid attenuation predominating with fluid–fluid levels, if hemorrhage is present (Fig. 12). Classic MR features of ML lesions are variable in signal intensity, with partial or complete septations, fat globules, and fluid–fluid levels [22]. It is important for the radiologist to differentiate this entity from a simple subcutaneous or intramuscular hematoma, as an ML lesion may require acute to subacute treatment with drainage/debridement and if not treated may result in re-accumulation of fluid, infection, continued expansion, overlying tissue necrosis, or chronic pain, whereas soft tissue hematomas are typically managed conservatively. An ML lesion is located in the deeper subcutaneous tissues, near the deep fascial plane [23].
Sclerosing lipogranuloma
Injection of exogenous oils such as mineral, paraffin, or other foreign bodies commonly elicits a sclerosing lipogranulomatous reaction [24]. Non-contained silicone, often from ruptured implants or injected free-silicone, tends to form granulomas, fibrosis, and will occasionally migrate [25]. On CT, it appears as diffuse thickening of superficial and deep soft tissues infiltrated with multiple locules containing macroscopic fat deposits (Figs. 13 and 14).
Liposuction
Liposuction is one of the most common cosmetic procedures performed internationally for reshaping the body contour [26]. The abdominal wall is made up of multiple layers from superficial to deep, including the skin, subcutaneous adipose tissue, Scarpa fascia, muscles, investing deep fascia, transversalis fascia, and the peritoneum [27]. Suction assisted liposuction involves making a small skin incision, inserting a blunt cannula attached to a vacuum, and using multiple repeated strokes with the cannula to aspirate fat from the deep subcutaneous layer, sometimes with the administration of water or vasoconstrictive substances to minimize blood loss [28, 29]. Expected findings include infiltrative soft tissue or fluid attenuation within the deep subcutaneous fat and possible subcutaneous emphysema. Thin radiating linear lesions perpendicular to the skin and thicker linear lesions parallel to the skin representing cannula insertion tracks are also commonly seen [29, 30]. Complications of liposuction include cellulitis, abscess formation, necrotizing fasciitis, and vascular or lymphatic injury, which may result in hematoma or lymphocele development [31]. Here, we present a case of a 25-year-old female who recently underwent abdominal liposuction to demonstrate normal post-procedural CT findings (Fig. 15) as well as a 33-year-old female with pre- and post-procedural imaging for comparison (Fig. 16).
Transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap
Transplantation of a transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap is a common surgical procedure post-mastectomy. Originally described by Hartrampf et al. [32] in 1982, the technique has evolved to include pedicled, free, and delayed flap reconstructions. The rectus abdominis muscle is supplied by both the superior epigastric artery and the more robust inferior epigastric artery. In a pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction, the superior epigastric arterial supply is utilized, requiring the entire length of the rectus abdominis muscle to be transplanted. The rectus abdominis muscle and associated lower abdominal soft tissues are subcutaneously tunneled into the mastectomy surgical site. A portion of the abdominal epidermis is utilized to create the neobreast skin surface, while the remainder is de-epithelialized [33]. In contradistinction to a pedicled flap, a free TRAM flap reconstruction utilizes the more robust inferior epigastric arterial supply. The inferior epigastric vessels are dissected, transplanted, and re-anastomosed in the chest to the thoracodorsal, subscapular, or internal mammary artery and vein. This approach may be preferred in patients with atherosclerotic vascular risk factors [33]. Since less of the rectus abdominis muscle is harvested in a free flap, there is a decreased risk of associated adnominal wall hernia.
The most common imaging findings include replacement of normal glandular breast tissue with subcutaneous fat, the presence of an atrophied rectus abdominis muscle anterior to the chest wall, the absence of some or all of the rectus abdominis musculature along the anterior abdominal wall, and associated surgical clips, most prominent in the lower anterior abdominal wall [34]. Here, we present a case of a patient with breast cancer who underwent bilateral mastectomies, followed by pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction (Figs. 17 and 18).
Calvarial bone flap
Decompressive craniectomy is a neurosurgical approach to treat uncontrolled elevated intracranial pressure. Surviving patients require a cranioplasty after the acute episode of intracranial swelling has resolved. One approach to cranioplasty is to preserve the resected portion of cranium and reimplant it as an autologous bone flap. The resected bone may be stored in a cryopreservation freezer (ex vivo) or in a subcutaneous pocket within the patient themselves (in vivo) [35]. The most common risks associated with either technique include infection and osseous resorption. Multiple studies have shown no convincing difference in rates of either between in vivo or ex vivo storage of autologous calvarial bone flaps in most patients [36,37,38]; however, one retrospective review found lower rates of infection with in vivo preservation in patients with traumatic brain injury [38]. We present a case of a 50-year-old female with a history of a recent traumatic subdural hematoma status post-decompressive craniectomy at an outside institution who presented with right lower quadrant pain. An osseous structure, corresponding to a removed calvarial fragment seen on head CT, can be seen in the subcutaneous tissues in the right lower abdominal wall with surrounding hematoma and internal foci of gas (Fig. 19).
Subcutaneous panniculitis (erythema nodosum)
Panniculitis is a nonspecific histopathologic term to describe inflammation of adipose tissue. Panniculitis most commonly affects subcutaneous fat; however, intra-abdominal forms such as mesenteric panniculitis are widely recognized. There are many etiologies for panniculitis, including inflammation, infection (including COVID-19 infection), trauma, and malignancy, among others [39, 40]. On CT imaging, increased attenuation and “fat stranding” may be seen within the subcutaneous adipose tissues, consistent with the clinical diagnosis of erythema nodosum (Fig. 20).
Hidradenitis suppurativa
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease involving the folliculopilosebaceous units and apocrine sweat glands and is also known as acne inversa. It has a female predominance and is associated with obesity, smoking, Crohn’s disease, and Dowling Degos disease and may be complicated by chronic sinus and fistula formation, epidural abscess from deep extension, osteomyelitis, and squamous cell carcinoma developing in chronic inflammatory tracts [41,42,43].
The disease typically affects apocrine gland-rich areas of the body, such as the genitofemoral area and axillae [42]. Imaging shows marked thickening of the skin, edema of the subcutaneous tissues, and formation of multiple small subcutaneous abscesses as well as sinus and fistula formation. It has a characteristic distribution, causing severe skin thickening which is typically bilateral and fairly symmetric along the perineum and gluteal folds (Fig. 21) or the axillary folds [44]. By comparison, simple cellulitis tends to have a more diffuse “fat stranding” appearance with more mild skin thickening. The involved areas are typically of soft tissue attenuation on CT, dark on T1, and bright on T2-weighted MR images with peripheral enhancement of subcutaneous abscesses (Fig. 22). MR imaging can be very helpful when HS involves the genitofemoral areas in patients with Crohn’s disease (who have an increased incidence of HS) to determine the cause of a peri-anal fistula, which can occur in both Crohn’s disease and HS. A recent study showed that while some MRI features of anoperineal disease may overlap between Crohn’s disease and HS, a specific diagnosis of HS is possible with a combination of three features: absence of perianal predominance of disease, absence of rectal wall thickening, and bilaterality of features [45].
Congenital and developmental lesions
Hydrocele of canal of nuck
Hydrocele of the canal of Nuck is a rare condition in female children. The processus vaginalis is a normal embryologic structure representing an outpouching of the parietal peritoneum through the inguinal canal into the labia majora, which normally obliterates between the seventh month of gestation and 1 year of age. Failure to close results in a continued outpouching known as the canal of Nuck[46]. This rare entity is associated with prematurity, with an overall incidence of < 1%[47, 48], but occurring in 9–11% of premature infants[49]. Complications include hydrocele and indirect hernia of the bowel or pelvic organs, which may result in incarceration and strangulation of bowel or ovarian torsion within the canal[46]. MRI demonstrates an ovoid fluid-filled structure, typically with high signal intensity on T2W imaging and low to moderate signal on T1W imaging in the inguinal canal (Fig. 23).
Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome
With an incidence of 1 out of 275,000 births, Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome (KTS) is a sporadic, rare, congenital syndrome characterized by port-wine stain (nevus flammeus), vascular malformations (varicosities and hemangiomas), asymmetric appendicular bone, and soft tissue hypertrophy. Only two of the three criteria need to be present to make a diagnosis KTS. The involvement of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems is not uncommon. Routine CT can detect enlargement of the extremity with bone elongation and circumferential soft tissue hypertrophy, subcutaneous varicose veins, phleboliths, and capillary malformation suggesting the diagnosis (Fig. 24). MRI and MR angiography (MRA) are beneficial to evaluate vascular malformation preoperatively [50].
Miscellaneous
Chronic iliac subperiosteal hematoma
Subperiosteal ossified hematomas of the iliac bone have been reported in the orthopedic literature as uncommon post-traumatic lesions that specifically occur in young patients [51]. They are typically caused by vigorous sports activity in adolescence and may be clinically indolent and usually incidentally detected in patients examined for other reasons. These lesions appear on CT as lens shaped lesions on the medial aspect of the iliac bone containing bone marrow with a dense line between the ossified subperiosteal hematoma and the iliac bone marrow called the ‘ghost native cortex’ (Fig. 25). The presence of the ghost native cortex between the native marrow of the iliac bone and the marrow of the ossified subperiosteal hematoma helps distinguish from fibrous dysplasia which can otherwise have a similar appearance [52]. On MRI, it appears as a mildly enhancing T1-low, T2-high signal intensity lesion without abnormal bone marrow edema, periosteal reaction, or perilesional soft tissue edema [51, 53]. This entity should not be mistaken for an aggressive intraosseous lytic lesion and identification of the pathognomonic ‘ghost native cortex’ sign can help avoid additional unnecessary workup.
Conclusion
Evaluation of extra-cavitary soft tissue abnormalities tends to be underemphasized in the interpretation of abdominal and pelvic CT and MR studies. We have presented a broad review of abdominal wall and spinal soft tissue findings encountered in our practice with pearls from the current knowledge about interpretation and management in order to improve awareness of these entities.
References
Nguyen M, Beaulieu C, Weinstein S, Shin LK. The incidental bone lesion on computed tomography: management tips for abdominal radiologists. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42(5):1586-1605.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1040-0
Bernard S, Walker E, Raghavan M. An Approach to the Evaluation of Incidentally Identified Bone Lesions Encountered on Imaging Studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 208(5):960-970.https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.17434
Gaetke-Udager K, Girish G, Kaza RK, Jacobson J, Fessell D, Morag Y, et al. MR imaging of the pelvis: a guide to incidental musculoskeletal findings for abdominal radiologists. Abdom Imaging. 2014; 39(4):776-796.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0108-y
Ballard DH, Mazaheri P, Oppenheimer DC, Lubner MG, Menias CO, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Imaging of Abdominal Wall Masses, Masslike Lesions, and Diffuse Processes. RadioGraphics. 2020; 40(3):684-706.https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020190170
Linton O. Edward B. D. Neuhauser. J Am Coll Radiol. 2011; 8(12):882.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.03.008
Applegate KE, Neuhauser DVB. Whose Aunt Minnie? Radiology. 1999; 211(1):292-292.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap22292
Hall FM, Griscom NT. Gestalt: Radiology's Aunt Minnie. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008; 191(4):1272-1272.https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1330
Baker JC, Demertzis JL, Rhodes NG, Wessell DE, Rubin DA. Diabetic Musculoskeletal Complications and Their Imaging Mimics. RadioGraphics. 2012; 32(7):1959-1974.https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.327125054
Cunningham J, Sharma R, Kirzner A, Hwang S, Lefkowitz R, Greenspan D, et al. Acute myonecrosis on MRI: etiologies in an oncological cohort and assessment of interobserver variability. Skeletal Radiol. 2016; 45(8):1069-1078.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2389-4
Palmer W, Bancroft L, Bonar F, Choi JA, Cotten A, Griffith JF, et al. Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology. Skeletal Radiol. 2020; 49(Suppl 1):1-33.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-020-03465-1
Corvino A, Venetucci P, Caruso M, Tarulli FR, Carpiniello M, Pane F, et al. Iliopsoas bursitis: The role of diagnostic imaging in detection, differential diagnosis and treatment. Radiol Case Rep. 2020; 15(11):2149-2152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2020.08.036
Wunderbaldinger P, Bremer C, Schellenberger E, Cejna M, Turetschek K, Kainberger F. Imaging features of iliopsoas bursitis. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12(2):409-415.https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300101041
Maquirriain J, Ghisi JP, Kokalj AM. Rectus abdominis muscle strains in tennis players. Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41(11):842-848.https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.036129
Matalon SA, Askari R, Gates JD, Patel K, Sodickson AD, Khurana B. Don’t Forget the Abdominal Wall: Imaging Spectrum of Abdominal Wall Injuries after Nonpenetrating Trauma. RadioGraphics. 2017; 37(4):1218-1235.https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160098
Kakkar C, Shetty CM, Koteshwara P, Bajpai S. Telltale signs of peripheral neurogenic tumors on magnetic resonance imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015; 25(4):453-458.https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.169447
Woertler K. Tumors and tumor-like lesions of peripheral nerves. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2010; 14(5):547-558.https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268073
Lucantoni C, Than KD, Wang AC, Valdivia-Valdivia JM, Maher CO, La Marca F, et al. Tarlov cysts: a controversial lesion of the sacral spine. Neurosurg Focus. 2011; 31(6):E14.https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.9.Focus11221
Brown E, Matthes JC, Bazan C, 3rd, Jinkins JR. Prevalence of incidental intraspinal lipoma of the lumbosacral spine as determined by MRI. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(7):833-836.https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199404000-00018
Warder DE, Oakes WJ. Tethered cord syndrome and the conus in a normal position. Neurosurgery. 1993; 33(3):374-378.https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199309000-00004
Emery JL, Lendon RG. Lipomas of the cauda equina and other fatty tumours related to neurospinal dysraphism. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 1969; 20:62-70.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1969.tb09247.x
Selden NR. Minimal tethered cord syndrome: what's necessary to justify a new surgical indication? Neurosurgical Focus FOC. 2007; 23(2):1-5.https://doi.org/10.3171/FOC-07/08/E1
De Coninck T, Vanhoenacker F, Verstraete K. Imaging Features of Morel-Lavallée Lesions. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2017; 101(Suppl 2):15.https://doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.1401
Myrick KM, Davis S. Morel-Lavallee injury a case study. Clinical Case Reports. 2018; 6(6):1033-1039.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1518
Cormio L, Di Fino G, Scavone C, Selvaggio O, Massenio P, Sanguedolce F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of penile paraffinoma: case report. BMC Medical Imaging. 2014; 14(1):39.https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2342-14-39
Caskey CI, Berg WA, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Chang BW, Anderson ND. Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic, and histopathologic findings. Radiographics. 1999; 19 Spec No:S39-51; quiz S261-262.https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.19.suppl_1.g99oc11s39
Lehnhardt M, Homann HH, Daigeler A, Hauser J, Palka P, Steinau HU. Major and lethal complications of liposuction: a review of 72 cases in Germany between 1998 and 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121(6):396e-403e.https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318170817a
Rozen WM, Ashton MW, Taylor GI. Reviewing the vascular supply of the anterior abdominal wall: redefining anatomy for increasingly refined surgery. Clin Anat. 2008; 21(2):89-98.https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20585
Shridharani SM, Broyles JM, Matarasso A. Liposuction devices: technology update. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014; 7:241-251.https://doi.org/10.2147/mder.S47322
Frank SJ, Flusberg M, Friedman S, Swinburne N, Sternschein M, Wolf EL, et al. CT appearance of common cosmetic and reconstructive surgical procedures and their complications. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68(1):e72-78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.10.001
Frank SJ, Flusberg M, Friedman S, Sternschein M, Wolf EL, Stein MW. Aesthetic surgery of the buttocks: imaging appearance. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 43(2):133-139.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1753-x
You JS, Chung YE, Baek SE, Chung SP, Kim MJ. Imaging Findings of Liposuction with an Emphasis on Postsurgical Complications. Korean J Radiol. 2015; 16(6):1197-1206.https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1197
Hartrampf CR, Scheflan M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982; 69(2):216-225.https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198202000-00006
Kanchwala SK, Bucky LP. Optimizing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction. Cancer J. 2008; 14(4):236-240.https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e318180bce5
Dialani V, Lai KC, Slanetz PJ. MR imaging of the reconstructed breast: What the radiologist needs to know. Insights Imaging. 2012; 3(3):201-213.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0150-7
Ernst G, Qeadan F, Carlson AP. Subcutaneous bone flap storage after emergency craniectomy: cost-effectiveness and rate of resorption. Journal of Neurosurgery JNS. 2018; 129(6):1604-1610.https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.6.Jns17943
Corliss B, Gooldy T, Vaziri S, Kubilis P, Murad G, Fargen K. Complications After In Vivo and Ex Vivo Autologous Bone Flap Storage for Cranioplasty: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature. World Neurosurg. 2016; 96:510-515.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.025
Yadla S, Campbell PG, Chitale R, Maltenfort MG, Jabbour P, Sharan AD. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68(4):1124-1129; discussion 1130.https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820a5470
Inamasu J, Kuramae T, Nakatsukasa M. Does difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservation. J Trauma. 2010; 68(1):183-187; discussion 187.https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c45384
Diaz Cascajo C, Borghi S, Weyers W. Panniculitis: definition of terms and diagnostic strategy. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000; 22(6):530-549.https://doi.org/10.1097/00000372-200012000-00009
Requena L. Normal subcutaneous fat, necrosis of adipocytes and classification of the panniculitides. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007; 26(2):66-70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sder.2007.02.001
Poh F, Wong SK. Imaging of hidradenitis suppurativa and its complications. Case Rep Radiol. 2014; 2014:294753.https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/294753
Napolitano M, Megna M, Timoshchuk EA, Patruno C, Balato N, Fabbrocini G, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017; 10:105-115.https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.S111019
Margesson LJ, Danby FW. Hidradenitis suppurativa. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28(7):1013-1027.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2014.07.012
Kelly AM, Cronin P. MRI features of hidradenitis suppurativa and review of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(5):1201-1204.https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.04.1233
Monnier L, Dohan A, Amara N, Zagdanski AM, Drame M, Soyer P, et al. Anoperineal disease in Hidradenitis Suppurativa : MR imaging distinction from perianal Crohn's disease. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(10):4100-4109.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4776-1
Chan D, Kwon JK, Lagomarsino EM, Veltkamp JG, Yang MS, Pfeifer CM. Canal of Nuck hernias. Acta Radiol Open. 2019; 8(12):2058460119889867.https://doi.org/10.1177/2058460119889867
Prodromidou A, Paspala A, Schizas D, Spartalis E, Nastos C, Machairas N. Cyst of the Canal of Nuck in adult females: A case report and systematic review. Biomed Rep. 2020; 12(6):333-338.https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2020.1295
Akkoyun I, Kucukosmanoglu I, Yalinkilinc E. Cyst of the canal of nuck in pediatric patients. North American Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013; 5(6):353-356.https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.114166
Grosfeld JL. Current concepts in inguinal hernia in infants and children. World J Surg. 1989; 13(5):506-515.https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01658863
Cha SH, Romeo MA, Neutze JA. Visceral manifestations of Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome. Radiographics. 2005; 25(6):1694-1697.https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.256055042
Guillin R, Moser T, Koob M, Khoury V, Chapuis M, Ropars M, et al. Subperiosteal hematoma of the iliac bone: imaging features of acute and chronic stages with emphasis on pathophysiology. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41(6):667-675.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1267-3
Jee WH, Choi KH, Choe BY, Park JM, Shinn KS. Fibrous dysplasia: MR imaging characteristics with radiopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167(6):1523-1527.https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956590
Lee JS, FitzGibbon EJ, Chen YR, Kim HJ, Lustig LR, Akintoye SO, et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2.https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-7-s1-s2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no financial or non-financial disclosures.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, R., Vahdat, N., Alshehri, W. et al. Beyond the abdominal and pelvic cavity: abdominal wall and spinal “Aunt Minnies”. Abdom Radiol 48, 1479–1504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03830-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03830-3