Skip to main content
Log in

Is routine imaging necessary prior to percutaneous abscess catheter removal?

  • Special Section: Cross sectional interventions
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Routine management after abscess drainage includes CT or fluoroscopic imaging to assess for residual abscess cavity prior to catheter removal. It is unclear whether this practice is necessary in patients without residual infection signs and symptoms.

Purpose

To evaluate safety of abscess catheter removal without follow-up imaging in patients without residual clinical or laboratory signs of infection and catheter output < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days.

Materials and methods

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant, retrospective study, consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous CT-guided drainage of a single abdominal or pelvic abscess between 01/2015 and 12/2017 in a single tertiary academic institution with or without follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal were included. In our institution, catheters are routinely removed without imaging if there are no clinical (fever, pain) or laboratory (elevated WBC count) signs of infection and catheter output is < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days. Patients’ and abscess’s characteristics, repeat imaging data, and need for re-interventions were obtained through medical records review. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher’s exact test for independent data and Student's t-test for comparison of group means.

Results

310 consecutive patients (age 56 ± 16 years, 48% female) were included in the study. In 265/310 (85%) patients, no routine follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal was obtained. In 2/265 (0.8%, 95% CI 0.02–0.27%) patients without routine pre-removal imaging, repeat abscess drainage was required 6 and 15 days after catheter removal in patient with perforated appendicitis and after laparoscopic renal cyst decortication, respectively. No patients, 0/45 (0%, 95% CI 0–0.07), that underwent routine imaging without clinical or laboratory signs infection needed to undergo a repeat abscess drainage.

Conclusion

There is a low rate (0.8%) of abscess recurrence if percutaneous abscess catheter is removed at the time cessation of drainage without routine imaging in clinically well patient.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HIPAA:

Health insurance portability and accountability act

IRB:

Institutional review board

References

  1. Gervais DA, Ho CH, O’Neill MJ, et al. Recurrent abdominal and pelvic abscesses: incidence, results of repeated percutaneous drainage, and underlying causes in 956 drainages. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(2):463–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gee MS, Kim JY, Gervais DA, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Management of abdominal and pelvic abscesses that persist despite satisfactory percutaneous drainage catheter placement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(3):815–820. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Okita Y, Mohri Y, Kobayashi M, et al. Factors influencing the outcome of image-guided percutaneous drainage of intra-abdominal abscess after gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Today. 2013;43(10):1095–1102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0504-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotman JA, Getrajdman GI, Maybody M, et al. Effect of abdominopelvic abscess drain size on drainage time and probability of occlusion. Am J Surg. 2017;213(4):718–722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Golfieri R, Cappelli A. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous abscess drainage in coloproctology: review of the literature. Tech Coloproctology. 2007;11(3):197–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0354-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kassi F, Dohan A, Soyer P, et al. Predictive factors for failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abscess after abdominal surgery. Am J Surg. 2014;207(6):915–921. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert B, Yzet T, Regimbeau JM. Radiologic drainage of post-operative collections and abscesses. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(3 Suppl):S11-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.05.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benoist S, Panis Y, Pannegeon V, et al. Can failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal abscesses be predicted? Am J Surg. 2002;184(2):148–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00912-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Theisen J, Bartels H, Weiss W, Berger H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Current concepts of percutaneous abscess drainage in postoperative retention. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(2):280–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laganà D, Carrafiello G, Mangini M, et al. Image-guided percutaneous treatment of abdominal-pelvic abscesses: a 5-year experience. Radiol Med (Torino). 2008;113(7):999. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-008-0320-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Durai R, Mownah A, Ng PCH. Use of drains in surgery: a review. J Perioper Pract. 2009;19(6):180–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/175045890901900603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Charles HW. Abscess Drainage. Semin Interv Radiol. 2012;29(4):325–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1330068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McGillen KL, Boos J, Nathavitharana R, et al. Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of microbiologic diagnosis from CT-guided drainage in patients previously treated with empiric antibiotics. Abdom Radiol N Y. 2017;42(1):298–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0833-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. vanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Ferrucci JT. Percutaneous drainage of 250 abdominal abscesses and fluid collections. Part I: Results, failures, and complications. Radiology. Radiological Society of North America; 1984;151(2):337–341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.151.2.6709901.

  15. Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Johnson WC, Birkett DH, Nabseth DC. Percutaneous catheter drainage of abdominal abscesses: a five-year experience. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(12):653–657. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198109173051201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambiase RE, Deyoe L, Cronan JJ, Dorfman GS. Percutaneous drainage of 335 consecutive abscesses: results of primary drainage with 1-year follow-up. Radiology. Radiological Society of North America; 1992;184(1):167–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.184.1.1376932.

  17. Civardi G, Fornari F, Cavanna L, Sbolli G, Di Stasi M, Buscarini L. Ultrasonically guided percutaneous drainage of abdominal fluid collections: a long-term study of its therapeutic efficacy. Gastrointest Radiol. 1990;15(3):245–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01888786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stabile BE, Puccio E, vanSonnenberg E, Neff CC. Preoperative percutaneous drainage of diverticular abscesses. Am J Surg. 1990;159(1):99–104; discussion. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80613−0.

  19. Springer JE, Doumouras AG, Nair S, Eskicioglu C, Forbes S. Does Imaging Before Percutaneous Drain Removal Affect Rates of Intra-abdominal Abscess Recurrence? J Surg Res. 2018;232:408–414. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.062.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gervais DA, Ho C-H, O’Neill MJ, Arellano RS, Hahn PF, Mueller PR. Recurrent Abdominal and Pelvic Abscesses: Incidence, Results of Repeated Percutaneous Drainage, and Underlying Causes in 956 Drainages. Am J Roentgenol. American Roentgen Ray Society; 2004;182(2):463–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820463.

  21. Brac B, Sabbagh C, Robert B, Chivot C, Yzet T, Regimbeau JM. Natural history of percutaneous drainage of postoperative collection following colorectal surgery: in which patients can follow-up imaging be dispensed with before drain removal? Abdom Radiol N Y. 2019;44(3):1135–1140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1811-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, et al. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology. 2011;259(1):231–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga R. Brook.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sari, M.A., Camacho, A., Ahmed, M. et al. Is routine imaging necessary prior to percutaneous abscess catheter removal?. Abdom Radiol 47, 2604–2611 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03460-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03460-1

Keywords

Navigation