Abstract
Background
While ultrasound is often the preferred imaging modality for suspected acute cholecystitis (AC), CT is often the first line study when patients are being evaluated for abdominal pain. The diagnostic value of CT in the setting of AC is controversial, given the prevalent use of additional imaging.
Purpose
To evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) of CT for diagnosing acute cholecystitis (AC) when used as a first line imaging study for evaluating abdominal pain and assess if additional imaging with ultrasound studies provides additional clinically useful information.
Materials and methods
Abnormal gallbladder findings in CT imaging studies were queried in a retrospective study over a 25-month period within a large urban health system. Sonographic (US) studies performed within 72 h of the initial CT were also included. Outcomes were determined by surgical pathology, fluid analysis, and clinical outcomes. Cases were stratified by the interpreting radiologist’s subjective confidence level of diagnosing AC, and the PPVs were compared between cases using CT without US and cases with both CT and US.
Results
Of the 468 CT studies meeting criteria, 192 were read as concerning for AC. PPV of CT was 44.7% without US and 50.5% when US was positive, which amounted to an insignificant gain (p = 0.41). When subdividing by confidence level, high-confidence positive CTs demonstrated no significant difference without ultrasound (80%) compared to with ultrasound (75%). Less confident reads in CT demonstrated potential gain from ultrasound; in the case of a “probable” CT impression, PPV increased from 45% without US to 90% with a high-confidence ultrasound impression.
Conclusion
Based on current practice within a large health system, CT examinations with high suspicion for AC demonstrated little gain from follow-up ultrasound. However, ultrasound may be of benefit when CT interpretations are less confident but still suspicious for AC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gomes CA, Junior CS, Di Saveiro S et al. Acute calculous cholecystitis: Review of current best practices. World J Gastrointest Surg 2017 May 27;9(5):118-126.
Bagla P, Sarria JC, Riall TS. Management of acute cholecystitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2016 Oct;29(5):508-13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/QCO.0000000000000297.
Peterson CM, McNamara MM, Kamel IR, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Right Upper Quadrant Pain. Available at https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69474/Narrative/. Am Coll of Radiology. Accessed 13 January, 2021.
Mou D, Tesfailassie T, Hirji S, Ashley SW. Advances in the management of acute cholecystitis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2019 Feb 19;3(3):247-253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12240.
Loozen CS, Oor JE, van Ramshort B, van Santvoort HC, Boerma D. Conservative treatment of acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Surg Endosc 2017 Feb;31(2):504-515. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5011-x.
Matsui Y, Hirooka S, Kotsuka M, Yamaki S, Kosaka H, Yamamoto T, Satoi S. Prognosis in Patients With Gallbladder Edema Misdiagnosed as Cholecystitis. J Society of Laparosc & Robotic Surgeons 2019. Apr-Jun; 23(2): e2019.00022.
Khan MH, Howard TJ, Fogel EL, Sherman S, McHenry L, Watksins, JL, Canal DF, Lehman GA. Frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2007;65(2):247.
Greenfield NP, Azziz AS, Jung AJ, Yeh BM, Aslam R, Coakley FV. Imaging late complications of cholecystectomy. Clinical Imaging 2012;36(6):763-767.
Fidler K, Paulson EK, Layfield L. CT evaluation of acute cholecystitis: findings and usefulness in diagnosis. Am J of Roentgenology 1996;166:1085-1088.
Paulsen, EK. Acute cholecystitis: CT findings. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI 2000;21(1):56-63.
Kieviet JJ, Leewenburgh MM, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of imaging in acute cholecystitis. Radiology 2012 Sep;265(3):708-20
Hiatt KD, Ou JJ, Childs DD. Role of Ultrasound and CT in the Workup of Right Upper Quadrant Pain in Adults in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Review of More Than 2800 Cases. Am J of Roentgenology 2020;214(6):1305-1310.
Fagenholz PJ, Fuentes E, Kaafarani H, Cropano C, King D, de Moya M, Butler K, Velmahos G, Chang Y, Yeh DD. Computed Tomography Is More Sensitive than Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2015 Oct;16(5):509-12.
Wertz JR, Lopez JM, Olson D, Thompson WM. Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and CT in Evaluating Cholecystitis. Am J of Roentgenology 2018;211: W92-W97
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, D., Appel, S. & Nunes, L. CT findings and outcomes of acute cholecystitis: is additional ultrasound necessary?. Abdom Radiol 46, 5434–5442 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03160-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03160-2