Skip to main content
Log in

Aberrant gastric venous drainage and associated atrophy of hepatic segment II: computed tomography analysis of 2021 patients

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the prevalence and patterns of aberrant gastric venous drainage and associated atrophy of the hepatic segment on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT).

Methods

Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed contrast-enhanced CT images from 2021 patients who underwent cone-beam CT-guided chemoembolization between January 2013 and December 2018. They determined the presence or absence of an aberrant gastric vein(s) and its drainage site by consensus, and qualitatively analyzed the presence or absence of atrophy of segments II or III. In cases of disagreement between the two reviewers regarding the presence of atrophy, quantitative analysis was performed using dedicated software.

Results

A total of 31 aberrant right gastric veins were revealed on CT (1.5%), most of which drained into P2 (n = 8), the S2/3 border zone (n = 8), S2 (n = 6), or S4 (n = 5). An aberrant left gastric vein was observed in 21 (1.0%) patients, and P2 was the most common drainage site (n = 13) in these patients. Atrophy of segment II was more frequently observed among patients with aberrant gastric veins than among those without (26.9% versus 4.1%; p < 0.001). In addition, an aberrant gastric vein draining into P2 was most frequently accompanied by segment II atrophy (47.6%).

Conclusion

Aberrant right and left gastric veins were observed in 1.5% and 1.0% of patients, respectively. Atrophy of segment II was frequently observed in patients with aberrant gastric veins, especially those that drained into P2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deneve E, Caty L, Fontaine C, Guillem P (2003) Simultaneous aberrant left and right gastric veins draining directly into the liver. Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft 185 (3):263-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0940-9602(03)80037-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsui O, Takahashi S, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, Gabata T, Takashima T, Kitagawa K (1994) Pseudolesion in segment IV of the liver at CT during arterial portography: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage. Radiology 193 (1):31-35. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Seong NJ, Chung JW, Kim HC, Park JH, Jae HJ, An SB, Cho BH (2012) Right gastric venous drainage: angiographic analysis in 100 patients. Korean journal of radiology 13 (1):53-60. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Takayasu K, Aoki K, Ichikawa T, Ohmura T, Sekiguchi R, Terauchi T, Takayama T (1990) Aberrant right gastric vein directly communicating with left portal vein system. Incidence and implications. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) 31 (6):575-577

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyaki T, Yamada M, Kumaki K (1987) Aberrant course of the left gastric vein in the human. Possibility of a persistent left portal vein. Acta anatomica 130 (3):275-279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tajima H, Murakami R, Kumazaki T (1992) Aberrant left gastric vein directly draining into left portal venous system. A case report. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) 33 (5):462-463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohashi I, Ina H, Hanafusa K, Yoshida T, Himeno Y, Gomi N, Okada Y, Wakita T, Shibuya H, Ohtani S (1997) Aberrant left gastric vein demonstrated by helical CT. Journal of computer assisted tomography 21 (6):996-1000

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabata T, Matsui O, Kadoya M, Ueda K, Kawamori Y, Yoshikawa J, Takashima T (1997) Aberrant gastric venous drainage in a focal spared area of segment IV in fatty liver: demonstration with color Doppler sonography. Radiology 203 (2):461-463. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, Gabata T, Takahashi S, Ueda K, Kawamori Y, Takashima T, Nakanuma Y (1995) Aberrant gastric venous drainage in cirrhotic livers: imaging findings in focal areas of liver parenchyma. Radiology 197 (2):345-349. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Unal E, Ozmen MN, Akata D, Karcaaltincaba M (2015) Imaging of aberrant left gastric vein and associated pseudolesions of segments II and III of the liver and mimickers. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) 21 (2):105-110. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2014.14360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito K, Fujita T, Shimizu A, Sasaki K, Tanabe M, Matsunaga N (2009) Imaging findings of unusual intra- and extrahepatic portosystemic collaterals. Clinical radiology 64 (2):200-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008.05.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thoreson AA, Harris TS, Cressman EN (2009) Refractory bleeding in a TIPS patient due to an aberrant left gastric vein. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR 20 (7):988-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.03.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bezzi M, Broglia L, Lemos AA, Rossi P (1995) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in portal vein thrombosis: role of the right gastric vein with anomalous insertion. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 18 (2):102-105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, Prasad S, Harris G, Saini S (2004) Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 24 (5):1367-1380. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.245035224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guven K, Acunas B (2004) Multidetector computed tomography angiography of the abdomen. European journal of radiology 52 (1):44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catalano OA, Singh AH, Uppot RN, Hahn PF, Ferrone CR, Sahani DV (2008) Vascular and biliary variants in the liver: implications for liver surgery. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 28 (2):359-378. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.282075099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuasa Y, Okitsu H, Goto M, Kuramoto S, Tomibayashi A, Matsumoto D, Edagawa H, Mori O, Tani R, Akagawa T, Kinoshita M, Akagawa Y, Tani H, Ohnishi N, Shirono R (2016) Three-dimensional CT for preoperative detection of the left gastric artery and left gastric vein in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Asian journal of endoscopic surgery 9 (3):179-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park CJ, Seo N, Hyung WJ, Koom WS, Kim HS, Kim MJ, Lim JS (2018) Prognostic significance of preoperative CT findings in patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy. 13 (8):e0202207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spolverato G, Anders R, Kamel I, Pawlik TM (2014) Segmental atrophy of the liver: an uncommon and often unrecognized pseudotumor. Dig Dis Sci 59 (12):3122-3125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3231-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ham JM (1990) Lobar and segmental atrophy of the liver. World journal of surgery 14 (4):457-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01658667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim RD, Kim JS, Watanabe G, Mohuczy D, Behrns KE (2008) Liver regeneration and the atrophy-hypertrophy complex. Semin Intervent Radiol 25 (2):92-103. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1076679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ishibashi Y, Sato TJ, Hirai I, Murakami G, Hata F, Hirata K (2001) Ramification pattern and topographical relationship between the portal and hepatic veins in the left anatomical lobe of the human liver. Okajimas folia anatomica Japonica 78 (2-3):75-82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mise Y, Satou S, Shindoh J, Conrad C, Aoki T, Hasegawa K, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N (2014) Three-dimensional volumetry in 107 normal livers reveals clinically relevant inter-segment variation in size. HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association 16 (5):439-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Unal E, Karcaaltincaba M (2019) Aberrant left gastric vein is associated with hepatic artery variations. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44 (9):3127-3132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02076-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yoon KH, Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshigawa J, Gabata T, Arai K (1999) Pseudolesion in segments II and III of the liver on CT during arterial portography caused by aberrant right gastric venous drainage. Journal of computer assisted tomography 23 (2):306-309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson RC, Thompson GH, Chezmar JL, Harned RK, 2nd, Fernandez MP (1992) CT during arterial portography: diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 12 (4):705–718; discussion 719–720. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.12.4.1321980

  27. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Takahashi S, Yoshikawa J, Gabata T, Takashima T, Kitagawa K (1995) Focal sparing of segment IV in fatty livers shown by sonography and CT: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage. AJR American journal of roentgenology 164 (5):1137-1140. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Paulson EK, Baker ME, Spritzer CE, Leder RA, Gulliver DJ, Meyers WC (1993) Focal fatty infiltration: a cause of nontumorous defects in the left hepatic lobe during CT arterial portography. Journal of computer assisted tomography 17 (4):590-595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson RC, McDermott VG, Paulson EK (1995) Aberrant venous drainage to the liver: imaging implications. Radiology 197 (2):338-340. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.2.7480673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Singhi AD, Maklouf HR, Mehrotra AK, Goodman ZD, Drebber U, Dienes HP, Torbenson M (2011) Segmental atrophy of the liver: a distinctive pseudotumor of the liver with variable histologic appearances. Am J Surg Pathol 35 (3):364-371. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31820b0603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garg I, Graham RP, VanBuren WM, Goenka AH, Torbenson MS, Venkatesh SK (2017) Hepatic segmental atrophy and nodular elastosis: imaging features. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42 (10):2447-2453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1164-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoshida H, Katayose Y, Rikiyama T, Motoi F, Onogawa T, Egawa S, Unno M (2012) Segmentectomy of the liver. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 19 (1):67-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-011-0448-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ishii H, Kobayashi T, Kudou M, Nishimura M, Toma A, Nakamura K, Mazaki T, Itoh T (2012) Anatomical liver segmentectomy 2 for combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma with tumor thrombus in segment 2 portal branch. World J Surg Oncol 10:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Elsayes KM, Shaaban AM, Rothan SM, Javadi S, Madrazo BL, Castillo RP, Casillas VJ, Menias CO (2017) A Comprehensive Approach to Hepatic Vascular Disease. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 37 (3):813-836. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jhaveri K, Guo L, Guimaraes L, Menezes R, McGilvray I, Cattral M, Grant D (2018) Mapping of hepatic vasculature in potential living liver donors: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging using CAIPIRINHA technique with CT angiography. Abdom Radiol (NY) 43 (7):1682-1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1379-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee MW, Lee JM, Lee JY, Kim SH, Park EA, Han JK, Kim YJ, Shin KS, Suh KS, Choi BI (2006) Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy in living liver donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 24 (5):1081-1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim BR, Lee JM, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Hur BY, Suh KS, Yi NJ, Lee KB, Han JK (2017) Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Liver MR Imaging versus Multidetector CT in the Detection of Dysplastic Nodules and Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Radiology 285 (1):134-146. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Granata V, Fusco R, de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Avallone A, Palaia R, Delrio P, Tatangelo F, Botti G, Grassi R, Izzo F, Petrillo A (2019) Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI versus multidetector CT in the assessment of colorectal liver metastases compared to hepatic resection. BMC Gastroenterol 19 (1):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1036-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Wook Chung.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, T.W., Chung, J.W., Kim, HC. et al. Aberrant gastric venous drainage and associated atrophy of hepatic segment II: computed tomography analysis of 2021 patients. Abdom Radiol 45, 2764–2771 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02563-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02563-x

Keywords

Navigation