Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping of hepatic vasculature in potential living liver donors: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging using CAIPIRINHA technique with CT angiography

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively evaluate gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) technique for mapping hepatic vascular anatomy in potential living liver donors, with CT angiography (CTA) as reference standard.

Methods

82 potential living liver donors who underwent MRA and CTA were enrolled in this HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved study. MRA and CTA images were evaluated by two reviewers in consensus with respect to (1) image quality scores for depiction of the hepatic vessels and (2) accuracy of MRA for determining the hepatic vascular variants with CTA as reference standard. The image quality scores were compared using Fisher’s exact test between MRA and CTA.

Results

The accuracy for determining the hepatic arterial, portal, and hepatic venous variants and segment IV arterial origin was 73, 90, 79, and 55%, respectively, compared to CTA. However, subjective image quality for depiction of hepatic arteries in MRA was significantly lower than CTA (p < 0.001). The portal and hepatic venous image quality was almost equal in both modalities (p = 0.059) except left hepatic vein being depicted better on CT images (p = 0.023).

Conclusion

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRA using CAIPIRINHA technique is feasible for mapping hepatic vasculature in potential living liver donors, with moderate accuracy for arterial variants and good to excellent results for hepatic and portal vein variants, compared with CTA. However, the specific delineation of segment IV arterial origin was possible in just over half of the liver donors with MRA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Settmacher U, Neuhaus P (2003) Innovations in liver surgery through transplantation from living donors. Chirurg 74:536–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-003-0675-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Broering DC, Kim JS, Mueller T, et al. (2004) One hundred thirty-two consecutive pediatric liver transplants without hospital mortality: lessons learned and outlook for the future. Ann Surg 240:1002–1012. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000146148.01586.72

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Schroeder T, Radtke A, Kuehl H, et al. (2006) Evaluation of living liver donors with an all-inclusive 3D multi-detector row CT protocol. Radiology 238:900–910. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2382050133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Artioli D, Tagliabue M, Aseni P, Sironi S, Vanzulli A (2010) Detection of biliary and vascular anatomy in living liver donors: value of gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR and MDCT angiography. Eur J Radiol 76:e1–e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Segedi M, Buczkowski AK, Scudamore CH, et al. (2013) Biliary and vascular anomalies in living liver donors: the role and accuracy of pre-operative radiological mapping. HPB 15:732–739 ((Oxford)). https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Streitparth F, Pech M, Figolska S, et al. (2007) Living related liver transplantation: preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of hepatic vasculature of donor candidates. Acta Radiol 48:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850601045146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee MS, Lee JY, Kim SH, et al. (2011) Gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for biliary and vascular evaluations in preoperative living liver donors: comparison with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie S, Liu C, Yu Z, et al. (2015) One-stop-shop preoperative evaluation for living liver donors with gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: efficiency and additional benefit. Clin Transplant 29:1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jhaveri KS, Guo L, Guimarães LAJR, Roentgenol Am J (2017) Current State-of-the-Art MRI for Comprehensive Evaluation of Potential Living Liver Donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17741.28333540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim JS, Kim MJ, Kim JH, et al. (2005) Preoperative MRI of potential living donor related liver transplantation using a single dose of gadobenate dimeglumine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:424–431. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.2.01850424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. An SK, Lee JM, Suh KS, et al. (2006) Gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced liver MRI as the sole preoperative imaging technique: a prospective study of living liver donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heilmaier C, Sutter R, Lutz AM, et al. (2007) Mapping of hepatic vascular anatomy: dynamic contrast-enhanced parallel MR imaging compared with 64 detector row CT. Radiology 245:872–880. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2453062103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schroeder T, Malagó M, Debatin JF, et al. (2005) “All-in-one” imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl 11:776–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee MW, Lee JM, Lee JY, et al. (2006) Preoperative evaluation of the hepatic vascular anatomy in living liver donors: comparison of CT angiography and MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Riffel P, Attenberger UI, Kannengiesser S, et al. (2013) Highly accelerated T1-weighted abdominal imaging using 2-dimensional controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration: a comparison with generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions parallel imaging. Investig Radiol 48:554–561. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31828654ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu MH, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. (2013) Clinical application of controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in a higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA)-volumetric interpolated breathhold (VIBE) sequence for gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahani D, Mehta A, Blake M, et al. (2004) Preoperative hepatic vascular evaluation with CT and MR angiography: implications for surgery. Radiographics 24:1367–1380. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.245035224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Choti MA, Fishman EK (1995) Variations in the intrahepatic portions of the hepatic and portal veins: findings on helical CT scans during arterial portography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:103–108. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.1.7998521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng YF, Chen CL, Huang TL, et al. (2001) Single imaging modality evaluation of living donors in liver transplantation: magnetic resonance imaging. Transplantation 72:1527–1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee VS, Morgan GR, Teperman LW, et al. (2001) MR imaging as the sole preoperative imaging modality for right hepatectomy: a prospective study of living adult-to-adult liver donor candidates. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.6.1761475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goyen M, Barkhausen J, Debatin JF, et al. (2002) Right-lobe living related liver transplantation: evaluation of a comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging protocol for assessing potential donors. Liver Transpl 8:241–250. https://doi.org/10.1053/jlts.2002.30403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park YS, Lee CH, Kim IS, et al. (2014) Usefulness of controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration in gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging to clarify the hepatic arterial phase. Investig Radiol 49:183–188. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo JL, Lee CH, Park YS, et al. (2016) The short breath-hold technique, controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration, can be the first step to overcoming a degraded hepatic arterial phase in liver magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective randomized control study. Investig Radiol 51:440–446. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haradome H, Grazioli L, Tsunoo M, et al. (2010) Can MR fluoroscopic triggering technique and slowrate injection provide appropriate arterial phase images with reducing artifacts on gadoxetic acid-DTPA (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced hepatic MR imaging? J Magn Reson Imaging 32:334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tanimoto A, Higuchi N, Ueno A (2012) Reduction of ringing artifacts in the arterial phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 11:91–97. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.11.91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Davenport MS, Viglianti BL, Al-Hawary MM, et al. (2013) Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality. Radiology 266(2):452–461. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12120826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cruite I, Schroeder M, Merkle EM, et al. (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:29–41. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Limanond P, Raman SS, Ghobrial RM, et al. (2004) Preoperative imaging in adult-to-adult living related liver transplant donors: what surgeons want to know. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:149–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kartik Jhaveri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jhaveri, K., Guo, L., Guimarães, L. et al. Mapping of hepatic vasculature in potential living liver donors: comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging using CAIPIRINHA technique with CT angiography. Abdom Radiol 43, 1682–1692 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1379-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1379-x

Keywords

Navigation