Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Dr. Kamanahalli’s Letter to the Editor

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Klein MA (2017) Reuse and reduce: abdominal CT, lumbar spine MRI, and a potential 1.2 to 3.4 billion dollars in cost savings. Abdom Radiol. 42(12):2940–2945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamanahalli R (In Press) Letter to the Editor regarding the article entitled “Reuse and reduce: abdominal CT, lumbar spine MRI, and a potential 1.2 to 3.4 billion dollars in cost savings”. Abdom Radiol.

  3. Genders TSS, Spronk S, Stijnen T, Steyerberg EW, Lesaffre E, Hunink MGM (2012) Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology 265(3):910–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Müller D, Bauer JS, Zeile M, Rummeny EJ, Link TM (2008) Significance of sagittal reformations in routine thoracic and abdominal multislice CT studies for detecting osteoporotic fractures and other spine abnormalities. Eur Radiol 18:1696–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point: how little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitchell A. Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klein, M.A. Response to Dr. Kamanahalli’s Letter to the Editor. Abdom Radiol 44, 1957–1958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02027-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02027-x

Navigation