Skip to main content
Log in

Follow-up of acute pyelonephritis: what causes the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging recovery to lag clinical recovery?

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) the evolution and progress to resolution of acute pyelonephritis (APN) foci over a period of 3 months after onset.

Methods

30 women (age 22–51 years) with clinical, laboratory (white blood cell and C-reactive protein), and DW-MRI (4b-values 0, 50, 600, 1000 s/mm2) diagnosis of APN were prospectively enrolled. Two double-blinded radiologists evaluated the number of APN foci, and for each of them dimension (D), absolute diffusion coefficient (ADC), and its ratio R to the ADC of unaffected parenchyma. Signature of radiological recovery was focus no longer visible (DW−) and ADC of its site not inferior to the ADC of the unaffected parenchyma, i.e., R ≥ 0.9. Clinical and DW-MRI follow-ups (FU) were performed at 1 and 3 months.

Results

At the acute stage (t 0), 187 APN foci were found, with ADC0 = 1.3 ± 0.2 × 10−3 mm2/s, R 0 = 0.65 ± 0.12, and D 0 = 14 ± 7.5 mm. By the 1-month FU (t 1), all patients had no symptoms and physiological laboratory values; despite this, only 80 (43%) foci were solved, increasing to 138 (74%) by at the 3-month FU. The ROC curve (AUC ≥ 0.80) identified R 0 ≤ 0.6 and D 0 > 15 mm as forecast of slow radiologic resolution. About 80% of foci unsolved at 1 month but with R 1 ≥ 0.8 and D 1 ≤ 10 mm reached solution at 3 months.

Conclusions

DW-MRI recovery of APN foci does not always coincide with clinical recovery. The evolution of an APN focus is shaped by its initial values R 0 and D 0. About half of the foci still visible at 1 month reached radiological resolution in the two following months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neal DE (2008) Complicated urinary tract infections. Urol Clin North Am 35(1):13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Czaja CA, Scholes D, Hooton TM, Stamm WE (2007) Population-based epidemiologic analysis of acute pyelonephritis. Clin Infect Dis 45(3):273–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Das CJ, Ahmad Z, Sharma S, Gupta AK (2014) Multimodality imaging of renal inflammatory lesions. World J Radiol 6(11):865–873

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 357(22):2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fontanilla T, Minaya J, Cortés C, et al. (2012) Acute complicated pyelonephritis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 37(4):639–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martina MC, Campanino PP, Caraffo F, et al. (2010) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in acute pyelonephritis. Radiol Med 115(2):287–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Piccoli GB, Colla L, Burdese M, et al. (2006) Development of kidney scars after acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis: relationship with clinical, laboratory and imaging data at diagnosis. World J Urol 24(1):66–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Pascale A, Piccoli GB, Priola SM, et al. (2013) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new perspectives in the diagnostic pathway of non-complicated acute pyelonephritis. Eur Radiol 23(11):3077–3086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Piccoli G, Colla L, Maass J, et al. (2005) Acute pyelonephritis: a new approach to an old clinical entity. J Nephrol 18(4):474–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Faletti R, Cassinis MC, Gatti M, et al. (2016) Acute pyelonephritis in transplanted kidneys: can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging be useful for diagnosis and follow-up? Abdom Radiol N Y 41(3):531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faletti R, Cassinis MC, Fonio P, et al. (2013) Diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging in the identification and characterisation of acute pyelonephritis. Eur Radiol 23(12):3501–3508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rathod SB, Kumbhar SS, Nanivadekar A, Aman K (2015) Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in acute pyelonephritis: a prospective study. Acta Radiol 56(2):244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vivier P-H, Sallem A, Beurdeley M, et al. (2014) MRI and suspected acute pyelonephritis in children: comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging with gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imaging. Eur Radiol 24(1):19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aoyagi J, Odaka J, Kuroiwa Y, et al. (2014) Utility of non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to detect acute pyelonephritis. Pediatr Int 56(3):e4–e6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia N Y N 11(2):102–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Gatti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faletti, R., Gatti, M., Bassano, S. et al. Follow-up of acute pyelonephritis: what causes the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging recovery to lag clinical recovery?. Abdom Radiol 43, 639–646 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1242-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1242-0

Keywords

Navigation