Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidetector CT urography in urogenital tuberculosis: use of reformatted images for the assessment of the radiological findings. A pictorial essay

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urogenital tuberculosis (UGTB) is the most common form of extrapulmonary TB and is responsible for a destructive inflammation of the renal parenchyma and urinary tract often leading to the loss of kidney function. For these reasons, the early diagnosis of this disease, once considered disappeared in developed countries, is very important to establish a prompt and efficient treatment. However, the subtle and non-specific symptoms, often represented by recurrent and persistent lower urinary tract symptoms, can confound and delay the diagnosis. Therefore, an adequate and comprehensive imaging study is necessary in patients with persistent urinary tract infections not responding to the antibiotics and can suggest the hypothesis although bacteriological and/or histologic analysis is required for a definitive diagnosis. In the past years, intravenous urography (IVU) has allowed a comprehensive study of the urinary excretory tract, promoting the knowledge of the radiological findings of this disease. Nowadays, computed tomography urography (CTU), with the implementation of multidetector (MD) technology, has replaced IVU in all its indications; the MDCTU improves the assessment of renal and urinary tract lesions using reformatted images [such as multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP)]. Therefore, our paper aims to provide a guide for radiologist for searching the classic signs of UGTB on MDCTU, encouraging the use of the MPR and MIP reformatted images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kulchavenya E (2013) Best practice in the diagnosis and management of urogenital tuberculosis. Ther Adv Urol 5(3):143–151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Daher EF, da Silva GB Jr, Barros EJ (2013) Renal tuberculosis in the modern era. Am J Trop Med Hyg 88(1):54–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Goldman SM, Raval BK, Fishman EK (1997) CT of renal inflammatory disease. RadioGraphics 17:851–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson MS, Puckett ML, Shelly ME (2004) Renal tuberculosis. RadioGraphics 24:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM (2008) Urogenital tuberculosis: update and review of 8961 cases from the world literature. Rev Urol 10(Summer 3):207–217

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang LG, Wu CF, Wong YC, et al. (2003) Imaging findings of urinary tuberculosis on excretory urography and computerized tomography. J Urol 169(2):524–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merchant S, Bharati A, Merchant N (2013) Tuberculosis of the genitourinary system-urinary tract tuberculosis: renal tuberculosis—Part I. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23:46–63

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Merchant S, Bharati A, Merchant N (2013) Tuberculosis of the genitourinary system-urinary tract tuberculosis: renal tuberculosis—Part II. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23:64–77

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung YY, Kim JK, Cho KS (2005) Genitourinary tuberculosis: comprehensive cross-sectional imaging. Am J Roentgenol 184:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dheda K, Booth H, Huggett JF, et al. (2005) Lung remodeling in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 192(7):1201–1209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Craig WD, Wagner BJ, Travis MD (2008) Pyelonephritis: radiologic–pathologic review. RadioGraphics 28:255–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Israel GM, Bosniak MA (2008) Pitfalls in renal mass evaluation and how to avoid them. RadioGraphics 28:1325–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung DC, Kim SH, Jung SI, Hwang SI, Kim SH (2006) Renal papillary necrosis: review and comparison of findings at multi-detector row CT and intravenous urography. RadioGraphics 26(6):1827–1836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Browne RFJ, Zwirewich C, Torregiani WC (2004) Imaging of urinary tract infection in the adult. Eur Radiol 14:E168–E183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S, Shankaregowda SA, Choudhary GR, Singla K (2014) Rare presentation of genitourinary tuberculosis masquerading as renal cell carcinoma: a histopathological surprise. J Clin Imaging Sci 4:26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wong A, Dhingra S, Surabhi VR (2012) AIRP best cases in radiologic–pathologic correlation. Genitourinary tuberculosis. RadioGraphics 32:839–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burrill J, Williams CJ, Bain G, et al. (2007) Tuberculosis: a radiologic review. RadioGraphics 27(5):1255–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harisinghani MG, McLoud TC, Shepard JA, et al. (2000) Tuberculosis from head to toe. RadioGraphics 20(2):449–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Engin G, Acunaş B, Acunaş G, Tunaci M (2000) Imaging of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. RadioGraphics 20:471–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thoumas D, Darmallaicq C, Pfister C, et al. (2002) Imaging characteristics of alkaline-encrusted cystitis and pyelitis. Am J Roentgenol 178:389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caterina Gaudiano.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaudiano, C., Tadolini, M., Busato, F. et al. Multidetector CT urography in urogenital tuberculosis: use of reformatted images for the assessment of the radiological findings. A pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol 42, 2314–2324 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1129-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1129-0

Keywords

Navigation