Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the sonographic properties of drug packets containing narcotic drugs and the diagnostic role of ultrasonography in detecting body packing in comparison with CT.

Methods

Forty-five suspects admitted to our hospital for diagnosis and management were routinely evaluated by non-contrast CT for the presence of drug packets. A single radiologist blind to CT data independently performed the abdominal ultrasonographic scans.

Results

Thirty-five of 45 suspects were carrying packets. In positive cases, two types of packets with different properties were noted. Twenty-eight cases had type 1 packets (solid form drug) and 7 had type 2 packets (liquid form cocaine). The sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of ultrasonography for detecting drug packets were 91%, 70%, 91%, and 70%, respectively. Ultrasonography accurately determined the presence or absence of packs in 39 of 45 suspects.

Conclusion

Ultrasonography was found to have a high sensitivity but a low specificity in suspected cases. A negative ultrasonography cannot rule out the diagnosis of body packing. However, it may be preferred as the initial imaging method or for follow-up of suspected cases as a radiation-free, easy-to-use, and inexpensive technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deitel M, Syed AK (1973) Intestinal obstruction by an unusual foreign body. Can Med Assoc J 109(3):211–212

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hergan K, Kofler K, Oser W (2004) Drug smuggling by body packing: what radiologists should know about it. Eur Radiol 14(4):736–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulakci M, Kalelioglu T, Bulakci BB, Kiris A (2013) Comparison of diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography and X-ray in the detection of body packing. Eur J Radiol 82(8):1248–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Traub SJ, Kohn GL, Hoffman RS, Nelson LS (2003) Pediatric “body packing”. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(2):174–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cordero DR, Medina C, Helfgott A (2006) Cocaine body packing in pregnancy. Ann Emerg Med 48(3):323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger FH, Nieboer KH, Goh GS, Pinto A, Scaglione M (2015) Body packing: a review of general background, clinical and imaging aspects. Radiol Med 120(1):118–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bulakci M, Ozbakir B, Kiris A (2013) Detection of body packing by magnetic resonance imaging: a new diagnostic tool? Abdom Imaging 38(3):436–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rousset P, Chaillot PF, Audureau E, et al. (2015) Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography—a prospective study. Eur Radiol 23(8):2146–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Poletti PA, Canel L, Becker CD, et al. (2012) Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers (“body packing”): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT. Radiology 265(3):772–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hierholzer J, Cordes M, Tantow H, et al. (1995) Drug smuggling by ingested cocaine-filled packages: conventional X-ray and ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 20:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt S, Hugli O, Rizzo E, et al. (2008) Detection of ingested cocaine-filled packets—diagnostic value of unenhanced CT. Eur J Radiol 67(1):133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maurer MH, Niehues SM, Schnapauff D, et al. (2011) Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model. Eur J Radiol 78(2):302–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burillo-Putze G, Becker LT, Rodríguez MG, Torres JS, Nogué S (2012) Liquid cocaine body packers. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 50(6):522–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Bakker JK, Nanayakkara PW, Geeraedts LM Jr, et al. (2012) Body packers: a plea for conservative treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397:125–130

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijer R, Bots ML (2003) Detection of drug containers by ultrasound scanning: an airport screening tool? Eur Radiol 13:1312–1315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veyrie N, Servajean S, Aissat A, et al. (2008) Value of a systematic operative protocol forcocaine body packers. World J Surg 32:1432–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Millet Caddesi, Aksaray, 34096, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ferhat Cengel, Tuba Selcuk, Yildiray Savas, Muhammet Ceyhan & Ayhan Kocak

  2. Department of Radiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mesut Bulakci

  3. Department of Medical Sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Tuba Selcuk

  4. Department of Radiology, Bayrampasa State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Cigdem Ozkara Bilgili

Authors
  1. Ferhat Cengel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mesut Bulakci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tuba Selcuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yildiray Savas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammet Ceyhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ayhan Kocak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Cigdem Ozkara Bilgili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferhat Cengel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cengel, F., Bulakci, M., Selcuk, T. et al. The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study. Abdom Imaging 40, 2143–2151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0430-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation