Skip to main content
Log in

Imaging female infertility

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this pictorial review is to discuss causes of female infertility, in particular, those etiologies in which imaging plays a key role in detection. Included are disorders of cervical, ovarian, fallopian tube, and uterine origin. We also discuss the role of various imaging modalities including hysterosalpingography, pelvic ultrasonography, hysterosonography, and pelvic MR imaging in elucidating the cause of female infertility. Radiologists need to know the conditions to be aware of when these patients are sent for diagnostic imaging, as well as how to direct further management, if necessary, should an abnormality be detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McLaren JF (2012) Infertility evaluation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 39:453–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J (2005) Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23(25):1–160

    Google Scholar 

  3. Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, et al. (2003) MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics 23(6):1401–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Poon WW, McCoshen JA (1985) Variances in mucus architecture as a cause of cervical factor infertility. Fertil Steril 44:361–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suh-Burgmann EJ, Whall-Strojwas D, Chang Y, Hundley D, Goodman AK (2000) Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 96:657–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, et al. (1999) MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy and US. Radiology 210:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thurmond AS (2003) Imaging of female infertility. Radiol Clin North Am 41:757–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krysiewicz S (2003) Infertility in women: diagnostic evaluation with hysterosalpingography and other imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ha HK, Lim GY, Cha ES, et al. (1995) MR imaging of tubo-ovarian abscess. Acta Radiol 36:510–514

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eskenazi B, Warner ML (1997) Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 24:235–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel MD, Feldstein VA, Chen DC, Lipson SD, Filly RA (1999) Endometriomas: diagnostic performance of US. Radiology 210:739–745

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glastonbury CM (2002) The shading sign. Radiology 224:199–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Bancsi LF, et al. (2005) Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril 83:291–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, et al. (2009) The androgen excess and PCOS society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task form report. Fertil Steril 91:456–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matalliotakis IM, Katsikis IK, Panidis DK (2005) Adenomyosis: what is the impact on infertility? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 17:261–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, et al. (2005) Adenomyosis in endometriosis-prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 20:2309–2316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinkeler JA, Woodfield CA, Lazarus E, Hillstrom MM (2009) Female infertility: a systemic approach to radiologic imaging and diagnosis. Radiographics 29:1353–1370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Revel A (2012) Defective endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 97:1028–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC (2008) Asherman syndrome: one century later. Fertil Steril 89:759–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM (2004) Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233:19–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li TC (2008) Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 14:415–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E (1989) Congenital anomalies of the Müllerian system. Fertil Steril 51:747–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P (2001) Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 7:161–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. The American Fertility Society (1988) Classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rolen AC, Choquette AJ, Semmens JP (1966) Rudimentary uterine horn: obstetric and gynecologic implications. Obstet Gynecol 27:806–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarto GE, Simpson JL (1978) Abnormalities of the Müllerian and wolffian duct systems. Birth Defects 14:37–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Olive DL, Henderson DY (1987) Endometriosis and Müllerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 69:412–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Uğur M, Turan C, Mungan T, et al. (1995) Endometriosis in association with Müllerian anomalies. Gynecol Obstet Invest 40:261–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Golan A, Langer R, Wexler S, et al. (1990) Cervical cerclage-its role in the pregnant anomalous uterus. Int J Fertil 35:164–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, et al. (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12:2277–2281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S, et al. (2001) Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol 98:1099–1103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kaufman RH, Adam E, Binder GL, Gerthoffer E (1980) Upper genital tract changes and pregnancy outcome in offspring exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol. Am J Obstet Gynecol 137:299–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufman RH (1982) Structural changes of the genital tract associated with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Obstet Gynecol Ann 11:187–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Verloop J, van Leeuwen FE, Helmerhorst TJ, van Boven HH, Rookus MA (2010) Cancer risk in DES daughters. Cancer Causes Control 21:999–1007

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Buttram VCJr, Reiter RC (1981) Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril 36:433–445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dunnez J, Jadoul P (2002) What are the implications for myomas on fertility? A need for debate? Hum Reprod 17:1424–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Farhi J, Ashkenazi J, Feldberg D, et al. (1995) Effect of uterine leiomyomata on the results of in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 10:2576–2578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Surrey ES, Lietz AK, Schoolcraft WB (2001) Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome. Fertil Steril 75:405–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Daguati R, et al. (2007) Fibroids and female reproduction: a critical analysis of the evidence. Hum Reprod Update 13:465–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kolankaya A, Arici A (2006) Myomas and assisted reproductive technologies: when and how to act? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 33:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Klatsky PC, TranND Caughey AB, Fujimoto VY (2008) Fibroids and reproductive outcomes: a systematic literature review from conception to delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198:357–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, et al. (2005) Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 20:1632–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Mary C. Frates, MD for contributing the sonographic image in Fig. 26.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl A. Sadow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sadow, C.A., Sahni, V.A. Imaging female infertility. Abdom Imaging 39, 92–107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0040-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0040-6

Keywords

Navigation