Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional disorders of the ano-rectal compartment of the pelvic floor: clinical and diagnostic value of dynamic MRI

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The obstructed defecation syndrome is the main functional disorder of the posterior or ano-rectal pelvic floor compartment. Different mechanical and functional rectal disorders may cause this syndrome, including rectocele, rectal invagination, rectal prolapse, and pubo-rectalis muscle dyskinesia. Since pelvic floor muscles and fasciae act as a unique functional entity, dysfunctions of the posterior compartment are usually associated to variable dysfunctions of the anterior and middle urogenital compartments as well. Over 50% of postmenopause women are affected by severe symptoms due to pelvic floor disorders, with frequent need of surgical invasive treatments. Both diagnosis of the specific ano-rectal dysfunction and identification of all possible associated disorders are mandatory for an effective surgical or conservative treatment. Currently, dynamic MRI provides an excellent morphological and functional display of the pelvic floor like no other imaging modality. Pros and cons of posterior pelvic floor MRI, different evaluation techniques, reference lines and grading systems together with the main imaging findings will be discussed and illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, bergstrom JO, et al. (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapsed and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, et al. (2001) Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol; 98

  3. DeLancey JOL (1993) Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 36:897–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DeLancey JO (1994) The anatomy of pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 6:313–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elneil S (2009) Complex pelvic floor failure and associated problems Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 23555–573

  6. Mortele KJ, Fairhurst J (2007) Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: indications, technique and MRI features. Eur J Radiol 61(3):462–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bump RC, Mattiason A, Bo K, et al. (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic floor prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fielding JR (2002) Practical MR imaging of female pelvic floor weakness. RadioGraphics 22:295–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzgerald MP, Weber AM, Howden N, et al. (2007) Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 109:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karasik S, Spettel CM (1997) The role of parity and hysterectomy on the development of pelvic floor abnormalities revealed by defecography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1555–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD (2003) Dynamic evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse by extended proctography. Radiol Clin North Am 41(2):395–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maglinte DDT, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, et al. (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ganeshan A, Anderson EM, Upponi S, et al. (2008) Imaging of obstructed defecation. Clin Radiol 63:18–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram C (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218(621–64):1

    Google Scholar 

  15. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE (1986) Severe chronic constipation of young women: idiopathic slow transit constipation. Gut 27:41–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elshazly WG, ElNekady Hassan H (2010) Role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in management of obstructed defecation case series Intern J Surg 274–282

  17. Bharucha AE (2006) Update of tests of colon and rectal structure function. J Clin Gastroenterol 40:96–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hornback JA, et al. (1992) Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography). Radiology 184:547e51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DDT, Patten BJ, Benson JT (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DDT, Hale DS, Benson JT (2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocoloproctography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maglinte DDT, Bartram C (2007) Dynamic imaging of posterior compartment pelvic floor dysfunction by evacuation proctography: techniques, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol 61:454–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Maglinte DDT, Bartram CI, et al. (2011) Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 258:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goei R, Kemerink G (1990) Radiation dose in defecography. Radiology 176:137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seifert H, Blass G, Leetz HK, et al. (1994) The determination of the ovarian dosage in defecography on a digital C-arm unit. Rofo 161:70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zonca G, De Thomatis A, Marchesini R, et al. (1997) The absorbed dose to the gonads in adult patients undergoing defecographic study by digital or traditional radiographic imaging. Radiol Med 94:520

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bertschinger KM, Hetzer FH, Roos JE, et al. (2001) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor performed with patient sitting in an open-magnet unit versus with patient supine in a closed-magnet unit. Radiology 223(2):501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roos JE, Weishaupt D, Wildermuth S, et al. (2002) Experience of 4 years with open MR defecography: pictorial review of anorectal anatomy and disease. RadioGraphics 22:817–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pannu HK, Kaufman HS, Cundiff GW, et al. (2000) Dynamic MR imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics 20(6):1567–1582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. El Sayed RF, El Mashed S, Farag A (2008) Pelvic floor dysfunction: assessment with combined analysisof static and dynamic MR Imaging findings. Radiology 248:518–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Colaiacomo MC, Masselli G, Polettini E, et al. (2009) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: a pictorial review. Radiographics 29(3):e35 ((Review))

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Woodfield CA, Krishnamoorthy S, Hampton BS (2010) Imaging pelvic floor disorders: trend toward comprehensive MRI. AJR 194:1640–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bolon N, Weishaupt D (2005) Dynamic MR imaging of outlet obstruction. Rom J Gastroenterol 14:293–302

    Google Scholar 

  33. Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, et al. (2011) Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(4):W394–W399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boyadzhyan L, Raman SS, Raz S (2008) Role of static and dynamic mr imagingin surgical pelvic floor dysfunction. RadioGraphics 28:949–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Law JM, Fielding JR (2008) MRI of pelvic floor dysfunctions. Review. AJR 191:S45–S53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lamb GM, de Jode MG, Gould SW, et al. (2000) Gedroyc WM upright dynamic MR defaecating proctography in an open configuration MR system. Br J Radiol 73(866):152–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rentsch M, Paetzel C, Lenhart M, et al. (2001) Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging defecography: a diagnostic alternative in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders in proctology. Dis Colon Rectum 44(7):999–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R, et al. (1999) (1999) Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Gieseke J, Willinek WA, et al. (2008) Dynamic pelvic floor MR imaging at 3 T in patients with clinical signs of urinary incontinence-preliminary results. Eur Radiol 18:2620–2627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Otto SD, Oesterheld A, Ritz JP, et al. (2011) Rectal anatomy after rectopexy: cinedefecography versus MR-defecography. J Surg Res 165:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lienemann A, Fischer T (2003) Functional Imaging of the pelvic floor. Eur J Radiol 47:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Solopova AE, Hetzer FH, Marincek B, et al. (2008) MR defecography: prospective comparison of two rectal enema compositions. AJR 190:118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Flechter JG, Busse RF, Riedered SJ, et al. (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomic and dynamic defects of the pelvic floor in defecatory disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 98:399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, et al. (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. Eur Radiol 7:1309–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Etlik Ö, Arslan H, Odabaşi H, et al. (2005) The role of the MR-fluoroscopy in the diagnosis and staging of the pelvic organ prolapse. Eur J Radiol 53:136–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh K, Reid WMN, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:71–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL (1999) Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 54(454):457

    Google Scholar 

  48. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G, et al. (2000) Dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:661–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Healy JC, Halligan S, Reznek RH, et al. (1999) Dynamic MR imaging compared with evacuation proctography when evaluating anorectal configuration and pelvic floor movement. AJR 1997(169):775–779

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218(3):621–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shorvon PJ, Marshall MM (2005) Evacuation proctography. In: Wexner SD, Zbar AP, Pescatori M (eds) Complex anorectal disorder: investigation and management. Berlin Heideberberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) The anatomic and functional variability of rectoceles in women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10(2):96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA (2001) Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 30:199–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Scott MS, et al. (2005) Rectal intussusception: a study of rectal biomechanicsand visceroperception. Am J Gastroenterol 2005(100):1578–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM, et al. (2004) Open-magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 6(1):45–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Fengler SA, Pearl RK, Prasad ML, et al. (2000) Management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 40:832–834 Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Reuser M. Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 43:205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gousse AE, Barbaric ZL, Safir MH, et al. (2000) Dynamic half Fourier acquisition single shot turbo spin-echo magneticresonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis. J Urol 164:1606–1613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Cappabianca S, Reginelli A, Iacobellis F, et al. (2011) Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J (1966) The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 59:477–482

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Broekhuis SR, Hendrik JCM, Jurgen JF (2010) Perineal descent and patients’ symptoms of anorectal dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 21:721–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Halligan S, Bartram CI, Park HJ, et al. (1995) Proctographic features of anismus. Radiology 197:679–682

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has been written in memory of Professor Irene Fortunee Habib, my friend and teacher.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Maccioni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maccioni, F. Functional disorders of the ano-rectal compartment of the pelvic floor: clinical and diagnostic value of dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 38, 930–951 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9955-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9955-6

Keywords

Navigation