Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fentanyl-augmented MRCP

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 24 February 2011

Abstract

Background

Drugs such as secretin and morphine have been used to augment the visualization of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). This study investigated the effectiveness of intravenous administration of a synthetic opioid, fentanyl, in improving the MRCP image quality.

Methods

Thirty consecutive patients with a provisional diagnosis of benign biliary and/or pancreatic disease underwent MRCP. Coronal single-shot fast spin-echo heavily T2-weighted dynamic MRCP images were generated before and at every minute for 10 min after intravenous administration of fentanyl citrate at a dose of 1.0 μg/kg. Pre- and postinjection images were compared and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.

Results

Qualitatively, visualization of intrahepatic bile ducts, common bile duct, and main pancreatic duct improved after fentanyl injection in five (16%), 11 (37%), and 19 (63%) patients, respectively. The pancreatobiliary junction and common channel were visualized better after fentanyl injection in eight of the 18 patients (44%). Quantitatively, signal intensity and diameters of the intrahepatic ducts, common bile duct, and main pancreatic duct measured at corresponding points on pre- and postinjection images showed an increase above preinjection values in 28 (93%), 27 (90%), and 21 (70%) and in 18 (60%), 26 (86%), and 22 (73%), respectively, and these changes were highly significant at all sites (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intravenous administration of fentanyl before MRCP improves qualitative and quantitative visualization of the ductal system anatomy that may be of value in clinical diagnosis and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991;181:805–808

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, et al. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1997;29:182–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T, et al. Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 1998;206:379–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adamek HE, Albert J, Weitz M, et al. A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 1998;43:680–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 1999;210:605–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OF, et al. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kats J, Kraai M, Dijkstra AJ, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography as a diagnostic tool for common bile duct stones: a comparison with ERCP and clinical follow-up. Dig Surg 2003;20:32–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997;203:435–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva AC, Friese JL, Hara AK, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: improved ductal distention with intravenous morphine administration. Radiographics 2004;24:677–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Radnay PA, Brodman E, Mankikar D, et al. The effect of equi-analgesic doses of fentanyl, morphine, mepridine and pentazocine on common bile duct pressure. Anaesthetist 1980;29:26–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan JH, Tsui EY, Yuen MK, et al. Gadopentate dimeglumine as an oral negative gastrointestinal contrast agent for MRCP. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:405–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S, et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:870–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaudhary A, Negi SS, Puri SK, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in the evaluation of bile duct strictures after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:433–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Irie H, Honda H, Jimi M, et al. Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts. AJR 1998;171:1381–1385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Matos C, Cappeliez O, Winant C, et al. MR imaging of the pancreas: a pictorial tour. Radiographics 2002;22:e2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ly JN, Miller FH. MR imaging of the pancreas: a practical approach. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:1289–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A, et al. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kejriwal R, Liang J, Anderson G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the common bile duct to exclude choledocholithiasis. Aust N Z J Surg 2004;74:619–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma SK, Larson KA, Adler Z, et al. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of suspected choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 2003;17:868–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 2000;20:939–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brice J. Secretin stimulation enhances diagnostic picture of MRCP. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 1999;suppl:IR36–IR37

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Sasaki M, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 2002;222:674–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mariani A, Curioni S, Zanello A, et al. Secretin MRCP and endoscopic pancreatic manometry in the evaluation of sphincter of Oddi function: a comparative pilot study in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:847–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sho M, Nakajima Y, Kanehiro H, et al. A new evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy using secretin magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Am J Surg 1998;176:279–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stoelting RK. Opioid agonists and antagonists. In: Stoelting RK (eds). Pharmacology and physiology in anesthetic practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1999:pp 77–108

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim EE, Pjura G, Lowry P, et al. Morphine- augmented cholescintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. AJR 1986;147:1177–1179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Keslar PJ, Turbiner EH. Hepatobiliary imaging and the use of intravenous morphine. Clin Nucl Med 1987;12:592–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Oates E, Selland DL, Chin CT, et al. Gallbladder non-visualization with pericholecystic rim sign: morphine-augmentation optimizes diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. J Nucl Med 1996;37:267–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutstein HB, Akil H. Opioid analgesics. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE (eds). Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001:pp 595–596

    Google Scholar 

  30. Economou G, Ward-McQuaid JN. A cross-over comparison of the side effect of morphine, pethidine, pentazocine phenazocine on biliary pressure. Gut 1971;12:218–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hosoki T, Hasuike Y, Takeda Y, et al. Visualization of pancreaticobiliary reflux in anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction by secretin-stimulated dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Acta Radiol 2004;45:375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmon DS, Falkenstein DB, Riccobono C, et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Analysis of 300 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 1975;69:303–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiodiagnosis, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, 226014

    P. Nag, S. Kumar & R. K. Gupta

  2. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, 226014

    S. Agarwal, S. Sikora & T. L. Prasad

Authors
  1. S. Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Nag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Sikora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. L. Prasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. K. Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Gupta.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-011-9706-0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, S., Nag, P., Sikora, S. et al. Fentanyl-augmented MRCP. Abdom Imaging 31, 582–587 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0155-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0155-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation