Abstract
Purpose
Although 221Fr and 213Bi have sufficient gamma emission probabilities, quantitative SPECT after [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy remains challenging due to low therapeutic activities. Furthermore, 221Fr and 213Bi may underlie a different pharmacokinetics due to alpha recoil. We conducted a quantitative SPECT study and a urine analysis to investigate the pharmacokinetics of 221Fr and 213Bi and the impact on image-based lesion and kidney dosimetry.
Methods
Five patients (7.7 ± 0.2 MBq [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T) underwent an abdominal SPECT/CT (1 h) at 24 and 48 h (Siemens Symbia T2, high-energy collimator, 440 keV/218 keV (width 20%), 78 keV (width 50%)). Quantitative SPECT was reconstructed using MAP-EM with attenuation and transmission-dependent scatter corrections and resolution modelling. Time-activity curves for kidneys (CT-based) and lesions (80% isocontour 24 h) were fitted mono-exponentially. Urine samples collected along with each SPECT/CT were measured in a gamma counter until secular equilibrium was reached.
Results
Mean kidney and lesion effective half-lives were as follows: 213Bi, 27 ± 6/38 ± 10 h; 221Fr, 24 ± 6/38 ± 11 h; 78 keV, 23 ± 7/39 ± 13 h. The 213Bi-to-221Fr kidney SUV ratio increased by an average of 9% from 24 to 48 h. Urine analysis revealed an increasing 213Bi-to-225Ac ratio (24 h, 0.98 ± 0.15; 48 h, 1.08 ± 0.09). Mean kidney and lesion absorbed doses were 0.17 ± 0.06 and 0.36 ± 0.1 \({{\text{Sv}}}_{{\text{RBE}}=5}\)/MBq using 221Fr and 213Bi SPECT images, compared to 0.16 ± 0.05/0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.36 ± 0.1/0.38 ± 0.1 \({{\text{Sv}}}_{{\text{RBE}}=5}\)/MBq considering either the 221Fr or 213Bi SPECT.
Conclusion
SPECT/CT imaging and urine analysis showed minor differences of up to 10% in the daughter-specific pharmacokinetics. These variances had a minimal impact on the lesion and kidney dosimetry which remained within 8%.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the fourth most common malignancy worldwide [1]. [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy is a promising alternative for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), who have exhausted all the standard treatments, including prior [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. While 177Lu emits electrons with a low linear energy transfer (LET) and a range of millimeters in human tissue, 225Ac emits alpha particles with a high LET and a range of the order of 100 µm. High-LET radiation shows a higher cytotoxicitiy, resulting in a higher probability for both, tumor control but also side effects. A relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of five, referring to a fivefold higher cytotoxicity, is currently assumed for 225Ac compared to 177Lu in most dosimetry studies, although even higher RBE values may be conceivable [2, 10,11,12]. This results in much lower (~ 8 MBq) therapeutic activity used for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy compared to the ~ 7.4 GBq for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy. This, in turn, complicates the post-therapeutic single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging, although the two 225Ac daughter nuclides 221Fr (gamma emission probability of 11.4%) and 213Bi (gamma emission probability of 25.9%) show sufficient gamma emission probabilities [13]. The lack of a well-established post-treatment imaging procedure obstructs the investigation of the patient-specific pharmacokinetics of 225Ac and its subsequent daughters. After the decay of 225Ac, in total, four alpha particles are emitted (5.8 MeV, 6.3 MeV, 7.1 MeV, and either 5.9 MeV with 2.2% probability or 8.4 MeV with 97.8% probability) [14]. In principle, these alpha cascades can deliver a high absorbed dose to the lesions; however, the emission of the first alpha particle releases a recoil energy of 100–200 keV, sufficient to break any chemical bond [14,15,16]. This may cause an additional off-target absorbed dose as unbound daughter nuclides are free to move, unless sufficient internalization and trapping within the tumor cells can be achieved. Thus, the fate of the 225Ac daughter nuclides requires careful consideration as they could exacerbate the dose-limiting toxicities [17, 18]. The post-treatment quantitative SPECT may be used to study the pharmacokinetics of the 225Ac and subsequent daughters. The second daughter of 225Ac, 221Fr, has a short half-life (4.8 min) and thus has limited time to migrate away from its parent. Therefore, 221Fr is likely to experience a PSMA-driven pharmacokinetics, similar to its mother nuclide. The fourth daughter, 213Bi, has a half-life of 45.6 min, which is sufficient to allow for migration away from the 225Ac decay site. Therefore, imaging of 213Bi could provide insights into the extent of the off-target absorbed dose during [225Ac]Ac-PSMA therapy. On the other hand, a very different pharmacokinetics of 221Fr and 213Bi prevents the signal of both photopeaks from being combined for quantitative SPECT reconstruction to improve the count statistics. So far, patients receiving 225Ac-based treatments have often been imaged qualitatively, combining both the 440 and 218 keV peaks or even using three photopeaks by adding the peak around 78 keV [13, 19,20,21,22]. So far, published quantitative studies estimated the [225Ac]Ac-PSMA lesion and kidney absorbed doses based on knowledge of the [177Lu]177Lu-PSMA pharmacokinetics that was adjusted for the physical half-life of 225Ac [2, 10]. Delker et al. [10] also combined this knowledge with a single 213Bi SPECT/CT acquired 24 h post-therapy. However, accounting for a possible daughter migration requires quantitative SPECT imaging of all available photopeaks.
The aim of this study was to perform quantitative SPECT/CT of prostate cancer patients after [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy, exploiting all available photopeaks, to compare the pharmacokinetics of the two 225Ac daughters 213Bi and 221Fr. In addition, the 213Bi-to-225Ac ratio in urine samples was analyzed to provide further validation of the image-based findings. We further compared the quantification of the peak at 78 keV to the results obtained from 221Fr and 213Bi imaging. Finally, RBE-weighted lesion and kidney absorbed doses were derived, considering also a potentially deviating pharmacokinetics between 221Fr and 213Bi.
Methods
Patients and therapy
This study was a retrospective analysis of the first cycle of five patients diagnosed with mCRPC and treated with 7.7 ± 0.2 MBq [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T (Table 1). All patients gave written consent to undergo radioligand therapy (RLT). All data has been irreversibly anonymized before evaluation. The local ethics committee approved the study (project no. 22–0544). Patients were hospitalized for 48 h after injection, as obliged by the German law for radiation protection. Further details on labelling and therapy can be found in the publication by Zacherl et al. [4].
Data acquisition
During their stay in the ward, the patients were scheduled for two post-therapeutic abdominal SPECT/CT scans 24 and 48 h post-injection (p.i.). SPECT/CT acquisition was performed on a dual-headed Symbia T2 SPECT/CT (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a high-energy collimator and a 3/8″ crystal. Sixteen projections per head were obtained with a matrix size of 128 × 128 pixels (4.7952 × 4.7952 mm2) and an acquisition time of 210 s per projection. SPECT/CT imaging used the 440 keV (213Bi) and 218 keV (221Fr) photopeaks of the 225Ac decay chain (width of 20% for both peaks) [10, 13, 18]. In addition, a lower peak at 78 keV (width, 50%) was measured [19,20,21,22]. A low-dose CT scan (110 keV, CareDose, slice thickness 3 mm) was performed along with each SPECT scan. To improve patient comfort, patients were positioned with arms down, whereupon the arms were fixed close to the torso via a cloth belt. To obtain additional knowledge about the excretion of 213Bi compared to 225Ac, two urine samples were collected from all patients right before or right after each SPECT/CT scan.
Quantitative SPECT reconstruction
SPECT images for all photopeaks were reconstructed using an in-house maximum-a-posterioriexpectation-maximization (MAP-EM) algorithm. Attenuation correction was performed based on the low-dose CT, while scatter correction employed a transmission-dependent scatter correction (TDSC) method [23]. Resolution modelling was based on a pre-simulated 2D point-spread-function model [10]. For the 440 keV peak, the 80th iteration was used for the analysis. For the 78 and 218 keV peaks, the 100th iteration was used for the analysis.
To convert measured counts per second and per voxel (cps/voxel) to becquerel per milliliter (Bq/ml), calibration factors were determined for each energy window. This was performed using a cylindrical calibration phantom (diameter of 25.5 cm; total volume of 8.7 l), homogeneously filled with an activity concentration of 524 Bq/ml (total activity of 4.56 MBq). A large volume-of-interest (VOI) was placed in the reconstructed cylinder volume to extract the average counts per pixel. Imaging and reconstruction of the calibration phantom were carried out using the same protocol as used for patient imaging.
SUV analysis and dosimetry
Reconstructed SPECT/CT images were analyzed using PMOD (Version 3.609, PMOD Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). For each of the patients, the kidneys and all of the lesions that were visible in the abdominal region were evaluated (Table 1; no lesions were available in the field of view for patient 1). Before segmentation, all SPECT images were filtered for noise suppression using a Gaussian filter with a full-width-half-maximum of 30 mm. This filter parameter was chosen as it provides the best compromise between signal-to-noise ratio and recovery coefficients in kidneys and lesions, similar to a previous study [10]. Both kidneys were segmented using the CT accompanying each SPECT scan. Lesions were segmented using an isocontour of 80% of maximum tissue intensity on the SPECT acquired at 24 h post-therapy. These VOIs were transferred to the SPECT at 48 h afterwards. In case of misalignment with the SPECT/CT 24 h p.i., VOIs were manually shifted. Lesion segmentation was performed separately for each of the peaks.
Mean standardized uptake values (SUV) in the VOIs were calculated for kidneys and lesions at 24 and 48 h p.i. for the three peaks. The 213Bi and 221Fr SUV were tested for correlation (via Python 3.9 Pearson correlation coefficients). These SUVs were then also compared to the SUV for 78 keV.
The total VOI activities at 24 and 48 h p.i. were then loaded into Spyder (Python 3.9) software, and a conventional mono-exponential model (Eq. 1) was fitted to the data points to generate the time-activity curve (TAC). The mono-exponential model is given by the following:
where \({T}_{1/2}\) is the effective half-life (\({T}_{1/2}=\frac{{\text{ln}}\left(2\right)}{{\lambda }_{{\text{bio}}}+{\lambda }_{{\text{phys}}}}\), where \({\lambda }_{{\text{bio}}}\) and \({\lambda }_{{\text{phys}}}\) are biological and physical decay constants, respectively); \(A(t)\) is the total VOI activity at a given time point \(t\) post-injection. The effective half-life (\({T}_{1/2}\)) and initial activity (\(A\left({t}_{0}\right)\)) were used as the free parameters during the fitting process.
From the fitted model (Eq. 1), the lesion and kidney effective half-lives for 213Bi and 221Fr were determined from the 440 and 218 keV SPECT images, respectively. These effective half-lives were tested for correlation afterwards (via Python 3.9 Pearson correlation coefficients). The lesion and kidney effective half-lives were also derived based on imaging of the 78 keV, and respective values were compared with those obtained for 213Bi and 221Fr. The RBE-weighted absorbed doses of the kidneys and lesions were estimated based on the MIRD formalism [24] with the usage of a RBE of 5 [11]. Kidney and lesion dosimetry accounted for self-irradiation only. The RBE-weighted absorbed doses were calculated using three different methods. For the first two methods, the 440 (213Bi) and 218 (221Fr) keV peaks were used separately. Here, it was assumed that the localization of 225Ac and all subsequent daughters is described by SPECT imaging of either 440 (213Bi) (referred to as method 1 in this paper) or 218 (221Fr) keV peak (referred to as method 2 in this paper), respectively. For the third method (referred to as method 3 in this paper), the RBE-weighted absorbed doses for 225Ac were derived by combining the 213Bi and 221Fr components. The first component is based on the assumption that the localization of 225Ac, 221Fr, and 217At is described by SPECT imaging of the 221Fr photopeak at 218 keV due to the short half-lives of 221Fr and 217At (4.8 min and 32 ms, respectively [13]). More precisely, dosimetry was performed based on the effective half-life as extracted from 221Fr SPECT imaging at 24 and 48 h p.i. and by summing up the energy deposition due to self-irradiation by 225Ac,221Fr, and 217At. For the second component, it was similarly assumed that 213Bi SPECT imaging is representative for 213Bi and all subsequent daughters. S-values were taken from the open-access online resource OpenDose [25]. The SPECT images of the 78 keV peak were not included in the dosimetry analysis.
Additionally, the statistical analysis via Python 3.9 Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was performed to compare the kidney and lesion absorbed doses. For every patient, each kidney was compared with each lesion (a total of 13 kidney-lesion pairs). This method was chosen to provide sufficient data for comparison and to increase statistical power.
Urine analysis
For each of the urine samples, 1 ml was pipetted into a test tube immediately after sample collection and analyzed for at least 6 h in a HIDEX gamma counter (HIDEX, Turku, Finland), until secular equilibrium was reached. Counts were measured in the same photopeaks as for the SPECT acquisitions. For 213Bi, the obtained data points were then fitted by using a model (Eq. 2), which describes the total activity of 213Bi via two components: 213Bi, which is generated by 225Ac decaying in the samples (first term of the equation), and 213Bi activity being already present in the samples at the time of sample collection (second term of the equation):
\(t\) is the time passed after sample collection; \({A}_{{\text{Bi}}}\left(t\right)\) is the total 213Bi activity over time; \({A}_{{\text{Ac}}}\left(0\right)\) and \({A}_{{\text{Bi}}}\left(0\right)\) refer to the 225Ac and 213Bi activity at the time of sample collection (t = 0), and \({\lambda }_{{\text{Bi}}}\) and \({\lambda }_{{\text{Ac}}}\) are the 213Bi and 225Ac physical decay constants, respectively [26]. In this equation, the short-lived daughter nuclides 221Fr and 217At are ignored, assuming that 225Ac decays directly into 213Bi. By fitting the aforementioned model to the data points acquired by the gamma counter measurement, \({A}_{{\text{Ac}}}\left(0\right)\) and \({A}_{{\text{Bi}}}\left(0\right)\) can be derived.
Results
Quantitative SPECT images
Figure 1 shows the post-filtered SPECT/CT images exemplarily for patient 3. In addition, the PET/CT performed 2 weeks prior to treatment is shown as the diagnostic gold standard.
Kidney and lesion SUV
In Fig. 2, the correlation plots for the SUV for 440 keV (213Bi) and 218 keV (221Fr) at 24 and 48 h p.i. are shown for a total of eight kidneys and nine lesions. The left kidney of patients 3 and 5 were excluded from the analysis due to high intestinal uptake at 48 h p.i., which superimposed onto the left kidney. The SUVs show a very strong correlation for both time points and in both, the lesions (24 h, r = 0.93, p-value = 0.0006; 48 h, r = 0.96, p-value < 0.0001) and the kidneys (24 h, r = 0.94, p-value = 0.0004; 48 h, r = 0.99, p-value < 0.0001). Figure 3 shows the kidney and lesion SUV for all three peaks (440 keV, 218 keV, and 78 keV) at 24 and 48 h post-treatment. Further details on the SUV per energy window and time point are found in Table 2. In addition, Table 3 shows the corresponding SUV ratios at 24 and 48 h post-treatment.
Effective half-lives of 213Bi and 221Fr
In Fig. 4, the correlation plots for the kidney (n = 8) and lesion (n = 9) effective half-lives for 440 keV (213Bi) and 218 keV (221Fr) are shown. No correlation (r = 0.091, p-value = 0.82) was found for the lesions, while a very strong correlation (r = 0.96, p-value = 0.00012) was found for the kidneys. It is worth mentioning that for all kidneys, 221Fr showed a shorter effective half-life than 213Bi. The statistical analysis via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed no statistical difference (p-value = 0.69) for the 221Fr and 213Bi lesion effective half-life. For the kidneys, however, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a significant difference (p-value = 0.0078) between 221Fr and 213Bi effective half-lives. Figure 5 visualizes the effective half-lives for both, the kidneys and the lesions for 440 keV, 218 keV, and 78 keV. Further details are found in Table 2.
Kidney and lesion dosimetry
In Fig. 6, the kidney and lesion RBE-weighted absorbed doses per injected activity of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T are presented. The mean RBE-weighted kidney and lesion absorbed doses were 0.17 ± 0.06 and 0.36 ± 0.1 \({{\text{Sv}}}_{{\text{RBE}}=5}\)/MBq, respectively. Even with consideration of a potential daughter mobility, statistical analysis revealed significantly higher RBE-weighted absorbed doses to the lesions compared to the RBE-weighted kidney absorbed dose (p = 0.00024). In Table 4, the RBE-weighted lesion and kidney absorbed doses are shown, considering either the daughter-specific pharmacokinetics (method 3) or either the 221Fr or the 213Bi SPECT only (methods 1 and 2).
Urine data
Figure 7 shows an example of a continuous urine sample measurement (24 h p.i., patient 4). The y-intercepts of the 213Bi and 225Ac activity curves are used to determine the 213Bi and 225Ac urine activity concentrations at the time of sample collection.
Table 5 summarizes the 213Bi and 225Ac urine activity concentrations at approximately 24 and 48 h post-injection. The mean ratio of 213Bi-to-225Ac activities in the urine increased from 0.98 ± 0.15 at 24 h to 1.08 ± 0.09 48 h post-treatment. This indicates an increase of (10 ± 9)% of 213Bi compared to 225Ac activity. The observed increase of the 213Bi-to-221Fr SUV ratio from 24 to 48 h post-injection was found to be (9 ± 8)% (Table 3).
Discussion
This work aimed to perform quantitative post-treatment SPECT/CT of prostate cancer patients, who have undergone [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy, to study and compare the pharmacokinetics of the two SPECT-imageable daughter nuclides 221Fr and 213Bi. Overall, the data suggests that 213Bi, which was found to be accumulating in the urine, shows a longer effective half-life in the kidneys compared to 221Fr and might experience a non-PSMA-driven behavior. Quantitative SPECT imaging for 213Bi and 221Fr further served as a basis for patient-specific dosimetry.
Very strong correlations were observed for the 213Bi and 221Fr kidney effective half-lives and SUVs. The same holds for the lesion SUV. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed statistically significant differences for the 213Bi and 221Fr kidney effective half-lives, while none was observed for the lesion effective half-lives. For the kidneys, this suggests that although the SUVs and effective half-lives for the kidneys are closely correlated for the 213Bi and 221Fr, the absolute rate of excretion of these radionuclides from the patient may differ. This could occur due to the release of unbound and non-internalized 213Bi from the tumor sites, whereupon free 213Bi is known to accumulate in the kidneys [15, 17]. For four out of five patients, the ratio of 213Bi-to-225Ac in the urine clearly increased from 24 up to 48 h post-treatment, which supports the findings from image analysis that unbound 213Bi is present with a non-PSMA driven behavior. Moreover, the average ratio of 213Bi-to-225Ac in the urine increases by about (10 ± 9)% between 24 and 48 h p.i., which is comparable to the (9 ± 8)% increase in the kidney SUV ratio between 213Bi and 221Fr in the same time period as obtained from the SPECT analysis. Therefore, while 221Fr and 217At may be considered PSMA-driven (due to their short half-lives), this assumption is of limited validity for unbound 213Bi and subsequent daughters. Additional validation would be desirable, for example with the help of biokinetic modelling. Furthermore, only five patients were analyzed in this study, which provides limited statistical power, and therefore, further patient data should be collected and analyzed to confirm the results presented in this paper. However, these findings are consistent with the study by Kruijff et al. [15], who injected [225Ac]Ac-polymersomes into mice and found that the kidneys were the primary organ accumulating unbound 213Bi to a similar order of magnitude.
Although no correlation was found for the lesion effective half-lives, the lesion SUVs are very strongly correlated for 213Bi and 221Fr. However, comparing quantitative image results for lesions is particularly challenging, as both, the absolute quantitative error and its associated uncertainty, are known to increase for smaller structures. In this study, we omitted any partial volume effect and recovery corrections, as they are usually based on idealized phantom measurements, neglecting the object-specific conditions such as object shape and foreground-to-background ratio. However, e.g., the potential of AI-based improvement of image resolution could be investigated in future studies [28].
Assessing the mobility of decay daughters via patient imaging is useful for patient-specific dosimetry. With consideration of a daughter mobility (Fig. 6 and Table 4 (method 3)), the RBE-weighted lesion absorbed doses were found to be still significantly higher compared to RBE-weighted kidney absorbed doses, with means of 0.36 and 0.17 \({{\text{Sv}}}_{{\text{RBE}}=5}\)/MBq, respectively. This difference between the lesion and kidney RBE-weighted absorbed doses may even be larger, considering that the recovery coefficients for the lesions are generally smaller than for the kidneys due to the smaller size of the lesions (Table 2) [10]. Using methods 1 and 2 based on either the 221Fr or the 213Bi SPECT only provided similar results to method 3 (differences within 8%; Table 4). Thus, although there are observable differences in the daughter-specific pharmacokinetics, these differences and the impact on patient-specific dosimetry were small for the patient cohort in this study. These findings may leave room for combining the signal from all available energy windows during reconstruction to improve the SPECT count statistics.
It should be mentioned that post-therapeutic imaging was only performed until 48 h post-injections as patients were discharged afterwards. At least three imaging time points would be desirable for a mono-exponential fit function as well as the lesion and kidney dosimetry. However, this option was not available due to the early discharge and the long acquisition time of 1 h that is still needed for 225Ac SPECT imaging. Further research should focus on a reduction of acquisition times in the scope of targeted alpha therapy. This could be achieved by improving both, hardware and software technology. For instance, thicker crystals are highly desirable particularly in the context of imaging of alpha emitters and low therapeutic activities. Further, AI-based techniques as proposed by Leube et al. [29] and Ryden et al. [30] could assist in a further reduction of scanning time. Finally, an RBE of 5 was used for the absorbed dose calculations. A simulation study by Rumiantcev et al. [12] has shown that the RBE may be dependent on the absorbed dose, i.e., the RBE of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T compared to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T is decreasing with increasing absorbed dose. These findings have to be further exploited in in vitro and in vivo experiments.
In a study carried out by Kratochwil et al. [2], dosimetric estimations for 14 prostate cancer patients injected with [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 were performed based on TACs derived from [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 scans that were adjusted for the physical half-life of 225Ac. They estimated the RBE-weighted kidney absorbed dose to be 0.7 \({{\text{Sv}}}_{{\text{RBE}}=5}\)/MBq. This estimate is about four times larger compared to the findings in this study. This difference could arise due to the variations in the patient cohorts, but also due to the differences in imaging and dosimetry methodology. Noise, post-filtering, and the presence of high-energy photons impair image quality and quantification for 225Ac SPECT imaging. Thus, the higher kidney absorbed doses as observed by Kratochwil et al. [2] may be partially attributed to the comparatively better quantification of 177Lu SPECT images. A study performed by Delker et al. [10] investigated eight prostate cancer patients undergoing combined [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy. Similar to the study by Kratochwil et al. [2], [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T effective half-lives were extrapolated from the patient-specific [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T serial SPECT imaging. These 177Lu-based half-lives were then combined with a single post-filtered 213Bi SPECT/CT 24 h post-treatment. This approach resulted in effective half-lives of 33 ± 19 and 61 ± 55 h for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T in kidneys and lesions, respectively, as well as RBE-weighted absorbed doses of 0.28 ± 0.14 and 0.22 ± 0.21 \({{\text{Sv}}}_{{\text{RBE}}=5}\)/MBq. Considering a reported 177Lu-to-225Ac recovery ratio of 2.4 (spherical volume of 200 ml), the kidney dosimetry by Delker et al. [10] and Kratochwil et al. [2] may be regarded as comparable. The RBE-weighted kidney absorbed doses in this work are slightly lower compared to the findings by Delker et al. [10], although both studies include SPECT imaging of the 225Ac daughters. However, in this study, the attempt was to measure effective half-lives based on sequential 225Ac SPECT imaging, instead of using sequential 177Lu imaging as a surrogate. This sequential 225Ac SPECT imaging approach yielded a lower kidney effective half-life (33 ± 19 h vs. 27 ± 6 h), and thus lower RBE-weighted absorbed dose.
The 78 keV peak has shown comparable quantification characteristics compared to the 440 (213Bi) and 218 (221Fr) keV peaks, providing not only valuable qualitative but also quantitative information. Similar to a study by Benabdallah et al. [21], we used a relatively wide energy window for the low-energy peak of the 225Ac spectrum. Such a wide energy spectrum especially at low energies is likely to increase the fraction of scattered counts in the peak energy window, implying the need for robust scatter correction. Due to the latter reason and because window-based scatter correction is particularly challenging in the extreme low-count regime, we decided to use a transmission-dependent scatter correction as proposed by Sohlberg et al. [23], which estimates the number of scattered photons per iteration based on the current image estimate and the patient’s CT.
No statistical difference was observed for the lesion and kidney effective half-lives between neither 78 keV and 440 keV (213Bi) nor 78 keV and 218 keV (221Fr) peaks. The change in SUV ratios between 218 (221Fr) and 78 keV remains within 6% between 24 and 48 h p.i. for lesions and kidneys. The same holds for lesions for 440 (213Bi) and 78 keV. In future studies, the peak at 78 keV could be used to improve the count statistics during reconstruction. Usmani et al. [19], Rasheed et al. [20], and Vatsa et al. [22] already investigated a similar reconstruction approach for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA treatment, so far mainly aiming at a qualitative improvement of post-therapeutic images. However, the results from this analysis suggest also an extension of multi-peak reconstruction for image quantification and dosimetry.
Conclusion
A pharmacokinetic and dosimetry study for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy was performed for the two imageable daughters of 225Ac, 213Bi, and 221Fr. The kidney SUV ratio of 213Bi compared to 221Fr was found to increase by on average (9 ± 8)% from 24 to 48 h p.i., while the corresponding 213Bi-to-225Ac ratio of urine activities increased by (10 ± 9)%. In addition, 221Fr and 213Bi kidney effective half-lives were significantly different. However, the use of the 213Bi or 221Fr post-therapeutic scans resulted in comparable (within 8%) absorbed dose estimates for the kidneys and lesions, compared to a dosimetry approach taking into account the daughter-specific pharmacokinetics. This finding may offer the opportunity to simultaneously image both photopeaks for dosimetry purposes to improve the counting statistics. Quantitative results for the peak at 78 keV are comparable to those obtained for the photopeaks of 213Bi and 221Fr, suggesting that this signal could also be used to improve the signal strength for quantitative 225Ac SPECT imaging.
Data availability
Please contact the corresponding author.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.
Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Bronzel M, Apostolidis C, Weichert W, et al. Targeted alpha-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with (225)Ac-PSMA-617: dosimetry estimate and empiric dose finding. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(10):1624–31.
Sathekge M, Bruchertseifer F, Vorster M, Lawal IO, Knoesen O, Mahapane J, et al. Predictors of overall and disease-free survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving (225)Ac-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):62–9.
Zacherl MJ, Gildehaus FJ, Mittlmeier L, Boning G, Gosewisch A, Wenter V, et al. First clinical results for PSMA-targeted alpha-therapy using (225)Ac-PSMA-I&T in advanced-mCRPC patients. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(5):669–74.
Rosar F, Hau F, Bartholoma M, Maus S, Stemler T, Linxweiler J, et al. Molecular imaging and biochemical response assessment after a single cycle of [(225)Ac]Ac-PSMA-617/[(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 tandem therapy in mCRPC patients who have progressed on [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 monotherapy. Theranostics. 2021;11(9):4050–60.
Delker A, Fendler WP, Kratochwil C, Brunegraf A, Gosewisch A, Gildehaus FJ, et al. Dosimetry for (177)Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617: a new radiopharmaceutical for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(1):42–51.
Tranel J, Palm S, Graves SA, Feng FY, Hope TA. Impact of radiopharmaceutical therapy ((177)Lu, (225)Ac) microdistribution in a cancer-associated fibroblasts model. EJNMMI Phys. 2022;9(1):67.
Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Giesel FL, Weis M, Verburg FA, Mottaghy F, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-targeted alpha-radiation therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(12):1941–4.
Kratochwil C, Bruchertseifer F, Rathke H, Hohenfellner M, Giesel FL, Haberkorn U, et al. Targeted alpha-therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with (225)Ac-PSMA-617: swimmer-plot analysis suggests efficacy regarding duration of tumor control. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(5):795–802.
Delker A, Schleske M, Liubchenko G, Berg I, Zacherl MJ, Brendel M, et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry for combined [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T/[225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy using multi-isotope quantitative SPECT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(5):1280–90.
Sgouros G, Roeske JC, McDevitt MR, Palm S, Allen BJ, Fisher DR, et al. MIRD Pamphlet No. 22 (abridged): radiobiology and dosimetry of alpha-particle emitters for targeted radionuclide therapy. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(2):311–28.
Rumiantcev M, Li WB, Lindner S, Liubchenko G, Resch S, Bartenstein P, et al. Estimation of relative biological effectiveness of (225)Ac compared to (177)Lu during [(225)Ac]Ac-PSMA and [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy using TOPAS/TOPAS-nBio/MEDRAS. EJNMMI Phys. 2023;10(1):53.
Robertson AKH, Ramogida CF, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C, Blinder S, Kunz P, Sossi V, et al. Multi-isotope SPECT imaging of the 225Ac decay chain: feasibility studies. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(11):4406.
Thijssen L, Schaart DR, de Vries D, Morgenstern A, Bruchertseifer F, Denkova AG. Polymersomes as nano-carriers to retain harmful recoil nuclides in alpha radionuclide therapy: a feasibility study. Radiochimica Acta. 2012;100(7):473–82.
Kruijff RM, Raave R, Kip A, Molkenboer-Kuenen J, Morgenstern A, Bruchertseifer F, et al. The in vivo fate of (225)Ac daughter nuclides using polymersomes as a model carrier. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11671.
de Kruijff RM, Drost K, Thijssen L, Morgenstern A, Bruchertseifer F, Lathouwers D, et al. Improved (225)Ac daughter retention in InPO(4) containing polymersomes. Appl Radiat Isot. 2017;128:183–9.
Schwartz J, Jaggi JS, O’Donoghue JA, Ruan S, McDevitt M, Larson SM, et al. Renal uptake of bismuth-213 and its contribution to kidney radiation dose following administration of actinium-225-labeled antibody. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(3):721–33.
Kratochwil C, Giesel FL, Bruchertseifer F, Mier W, Apostolidis C, Boll R, et al. (2)(1)(3)Bi-DOTATOC receptor-targeted alpha-radionuclide therapy induces remission in neuroendocrine tumours refractory to beta radiation: a first-in-human experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(11):2106–19.
Usmani S, Rasheed R, Al kandari F, Marafi F, Naqvi SAR. 225Ac Prostate-specific membrane antigen posttherapy α imaging: comparing 2 and 3 photopeaks. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(5):401–3.
Rasheed R, Usmani S, Naqvi SAR, Alkandari F, Marafi F. Alpha therapy with (225)actinium labeled prostate specific membrane antigen: reporting new photopeak of 78 kilo-electron volts for better image statistics. Indian J Nucl Med. 2019;34(1):76–7.
Benabdallah N, Scheve W, Dunn N, Silvestros D, Schelker P, Abou D, et al. Practical considerations for quantitative clinical SPECT/CT imaging of alpha particle emitting radioisotopes. Theranostics. 2021;11(20):9721–37.
Vatsa R, Sood A, Vadi SK, Das CK, Kaur K, Parmar M, et al. 225Ac-PSMA-617 radioligand posttherapy imaging in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patient using 3 photopeaks. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45(6):437–8.
Sohlberg A, Watabe H, Iida H. Three-dimensional SPECT reconstruction with transmission-dependent scatter correction. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22(7):549–56.
Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Sgouros G, Thomas SR. MIRD pamphlet No. 21: a generalized schema for radiopharmaceutical dosimetry–standardization of nomenclature. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(3):477–84.
Chauvin M, Borys D, Botta F, Bzowski P, Dabin J, Denis-Bacelar AM, et al. OpenDose: open-access resource for nuclear medicine dosimetry. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(10):1514–9.
Wang G, de Kruijff RM, Rol A, Thijssen L, Mendes E, Morgenstern A, et al. Retention studies of recoiling daughter nuclides of 225Ac in polymer vesicles. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;85:45–53.
Tichacek CJ, Budzevich MM, Wadas TJ, Morse DL, Moros EG. A Monte Carlo method for determining the response relationship between two commonly used detectors to indirectly measure alpha particle radiation activity. Molecules. 2019;24(18):3397.
Li Z, Fessler JA, Mikell JK, Wilderman SJ, Dewaraja YK. DblurDoseNet: a deep residual learning network for voxel radionuclide dosimetry compensating for single-photon emission computerized tomography imaging resolution. Med Phys. 2022;49(2):1216–30.
Leube J, Gustafsson J, Lassmann M, Salas-Ramirez M, Tran-Gia J. Analysis of a deep learning-based method for generation of SPECT projections based on a large Monte Carlo simulated dataset. EJNMMI Phys. 2022;9(1):47.
Ryden T, Van Essen M, Marin I, Svensson J, Bernhardt P. Deep-learning generation of synthetic intermediate projections improves (177)Lu SPECT images reconstructed with sparsely acquired projections. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(4):528–35.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Grigory Liubchenko is funded and Astrid Delker is partially funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (funding number: 02NUK065C). Mikhail Rumiantcev is funded via Graduate School 2274 “Advanced Medical Physics for image-guided cancer therapy.” Matthias Brendel was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (EXC 2145 SyNergy – ID 390857198).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study concept and design. FJG was responsible for radiopharmaceutical production. GL, GB, MR, SR, SZ, and AD were responsible for data analysis. MZ, LU, PB, and MB contributed to the study concept and provided clinical advice. GL wrote the first draft of the manuscript. GB, MZ, MR, SR, LU, SZ, and AD contributed and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of LMU Munich (project no. 22–0544).
Consent to participate
Written consent to participate is not required as this study is based on retrospective and irreversibly anonymized data.
Consent for publication
Not required.
Competing interests
Matthias Brendel received speaker honoraria from Roche, GE Healthcare, and Life Molecular Imaging and is an advisor of Life Molecular Imaging. Matthias Brendel is a member of the Neuroimaging Committee of the EANM.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liubchenko, G., Böning, G., Zacherl, M. et al. Image-based dosimetry for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-I&T therapy and the effect of daughter-specific pharmacokinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51, 2504–2514 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06681-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06681-2