Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Mental disorder is a complex class of diseases characterized by abnormalities in perception, thought, emotion, or behavior activities. According to the 2022 World’s Mental Health report [1], nearly one billion people around the world, including millions of children and young people, suffer from a mental health condition. Mental disorders bring a huge burden to society and remained among the top ten leading causes of burden worldwide reported by the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) 2019 [2]. Both genetics and social environment are influence factors for increasing prevalence of mental disorders. With the development of society and its various impacts, the spectrum of mental disorders is also dynamically changing, and the incidence of anxiety and depression disorders is significantly increased with more than 25% during the first year of COVID-19 pandemic [3].
So far, no biomarkers have been proved useful and valid enough to change the clinical practice of mental disorders excluding dementia. The diagnosis of mental disorders still relies on the symptomatic judgment by psychiatrists. External descriptive evaluations are mainly used, and underlining biological markers are lacking or difficult to detect in clinical practice. There is still a gap between clinical manifestations and molecular mechanisms. The key to the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders is understanding the molecular pathological mechanism caused by the genetic, developmental, and environmental factors. Only pathological-based precise classification can achieve precise diagnoses and management of mental disorders. Therefore, we should establish non-invasive and real-time brain detection methods to build the bridge between the neuropathological features and clinical phenotype of mental disorders.
Currently, it is considered that the pathology of mental disorders mainly involves changes of brain structure and dysfunctions of neurotransmitter pathway or neural circuit. It is appealing to apply molecular imaging in mental disorders and drive psychiatry toward a management era. As early in 1882, Italian scientist Angelo Mosso has developed the first technique, known as “human circulation balance,” to measure the redistribution of blood in emotional and intellectual activity [4]. In 1918, by injecting filtered air into lateral ventricles, X-ray was used to image ventricular system [5]. Despite the crudity of equipment and methods, these studies represent the earliest exploration of techniques with potential for evaluating mental disorders. Later, a series of imaging modalities have been developed rapidly, by which structural and functional changes of mental disorders can be visualized more sensitively and precisely in vivo. With high-field-strength techniques, as well as advanced scan sequences and analysis methods, the applications of structural and functional MRI have been attracted much attention and widely used to explore the pathological and intervention targets of mental disorders. Many abnormalities have been reported in different mental disorders; some of them were considered illness-specific [6,7,8] and provide potential brain-circuit-based intervention targets [9].
Apart from the structural and functional characteristics, another noted trend in this field is the exploration of cellular/molecular alterations. For this aspect, nuclear imaging technology especially positron emission tomography (PET) is undoubtedly one of the most important imaging approaches. Based on the principle of molecular recognition and radionuclide tracing, PET is powerful to identify alterations including but not limited to metabolism, transmitter, receptor, and brain network [10, 11]. PET molecular imaging approaches provide a great opportunity to bring the mental disorders from an era of descriptive classification into a visible and measurable era. To date, a great number of radiotracers have been developed, making PET a potential tool to visualize, characterize, and quantify pathophysiological changes of mental disorders at different stages (especially for the early and ultra-early stage) in a multi-perspective mode [12,13,14].
Along with the development of molecular tracer technology, the application of PET imaging has been involved in the clinical research of mental disorders by evaluating brain metabolic functions, assessing the expression of neuroreceptors and neurotransmitters, and measuring neuroinflammation. Wherein, brain metabolic functions are associated with activities of neurons and demonstrate specific spatio-temporal patterns. Early in the 1990s, radiotracers H215O PET and [18F]-FDG PET were separately used to detect regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and regional cerebral glucose metabolism rate (CMRglu) in psychiatric disorders and have yielded some important findings [15]. The alterations of regional brain glucose metabolism are also associated with treatment response in mental disorders. [18F]-FDG PET indicated that reduced glucose metabolism in the right posterior insula was associated with decreased depression scores in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with regular psychotherapy [16]. For MDD patients with high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment, high [18F]-FDG glucose metabolism of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) was correlated with promised treatment response [17]. Neuroreceptors and neurotransporters changes in neurotransmitter pathways are an important hypothesis in the pathogenesis of mental disorders. PET molecular imaging has the unique advantages to in vivo assess the status of synapses, neuroreceptors, and transporters, such as dopamine, serotonin, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) systems. [11C]-UCB-J and [18F]-UCB-J have been developed to investigate the synaptic density in human beings [18]. By using [11C]-UCB-J, Sophie et al. revealed that lower synaptic density was correlated with altered networks and symptoms of patients with depression [19]. Various PET radiotracers from dopamine synthesis, release, synaptic dopamine level to D2/3 receptors, and dopamine transporter availability were used in mental disorders. Differences in mean and variability of dopaminergic indices were found in patients with schizophrenia [20]. [18F]-DOPA indicated that dopamine dysregulation in striatal was associated with pathology of schizophrenia [21]. Besides, Anne et al. revealed that striatal decarboxylation rate at baseline measured by [18F]-DOPA could predict psychotic symptoms and treatment response in antipsychotic-naïve schizophrenia [22]. Similarly, 5-HT receptor and transporter studies were carried out in various mental disorders using different PET radiotracers, and different patterns of 5-HT receptor and transporter dysfunction were found in neuropsychiatric disorders [23]. GABA receptor-induced signaling was also involved in the pathophysiology of mental disorders. [11C]-Ro154513 revealed GABA-A receptor expressed less in the hippocampus of patients with schizophrenia [24]. These PET radiotracers provide tools to investigate in-depth alterations of mental disorders. More recently, the role of neuroinflammation is considered important in mental disorders. It is exciting that several PET radiotracers such as [11C]-PK11195, [18F]-DPA-714, and [11C]-PBR28 were available to determine neuroinflammation in mental disorders. Studies from four different centers revealed that 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) binding in the anterior cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex was increased by 15–67% and 25–35%, respectively [25]. Increased TSPO in untreated patients with MDD was associated with effective treatment response of celecoxib [26]. In addition, PET imaging has also been used in the development of psychotropic drugs for a long time, for example, titrating the therapeutic dose of psychotropic drugs by receptor or transporter occupancy [27], exploring the mechanism of action of unclear chemical substances by detecting their different receptor bindings [28], and predicting the treatment response. In general, PET molecular imaging could reveal the molecular alterations of mental disorders from different perspectives, followed by guiding precise diagnosis and management in mental disorders.
Although nuclear molecular imaging has made great progress, given that mental disorders are clinically heterogeneous and neuropathology inconsistent, wider and deeper research of pathological features of mental disorders are needed. Herein, we propose the concept of nuclear psychiatric imaging which expects to achieve a true transformation from traditional manifestation-based diagnosis to transpathology-based diagnosis in mental disorders (Fig. 1). To overcome these challenges, the application of PET imaging in mental disorders needs to be expanded from the following three aspects: First, explore more specific molecular targets of mental disorders and develop more specific nuclear medicine molecular tracers. For example, neuroinflammation is a multifaceted physiological and pathophysiological response to brain injury and mental disorders [25]. Development of radiotracers for TSPO and other inflammatory targets for PET imaging of neuroinflammation is at a particularly promising stage. The endocannabinoid system (ECS) has received increasing attention due to its involvement in many different functional processes in the brain, including the regulation of emotion, motivation, and cognition [29, 30]. Development of PET radiotracers for ECS targets (e.g., receptors, ligands, synthesizing, and degrading enzymes) is also a promising research field that will lay the foundation for future research of diseases and the drugs related to the ECS. Second, optimizing, developing, and integrating novel imaging approaches. Utilizing single- or even multi-tracer PET fusion with computed tomography (CT), MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), or electroencephalogram (EEG) can offer enhanced benefits and compensate for the disadvantages of each imaging system compared to using a single modality [31]. Third, exploration of new analytical methods. Algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) will facilitate the reconstruction of images, capturing subtle changes and analyzing information. With AI-based image reconstruction or enhancement methods, scanning times can be reduced while maintaining or improving quantification accuracy and enabling attenuation corrections. AI-based big data analytics can also be used to select the most promising leads to design appropriate treatments for the target of a disease [32, 33].
In summary, mental disorders remain a major challenge facing the health system worldwide, due to the insufficient knowledge on the pathogenetic mechanisms as well as lack of biomarkers. The past few decades have witnessed great progress in the field of medical imaging, especially for the MRI and PET. Because of the unique advantage of molecular recognition and ultra-high sensitivity, applications of nuclear molecular imaging have gained much attention in mental disorders. To date, a roster of imaging approaches and analysis methods have been established to assess various characteristics of mental disorders in vivo, including metabolism, neurotransmitter, enzyme, receptor, transporter, and brain network. The nuclear psychiatric imaging has the great potential to promote the development of scientific research and clinical practice for mental disorders. In this regard, a close collaboration is required between researchers and clinicians in nuclear medicine and psychiatry, with the common goal of improving the management of patients with mental disorders.
References
World mental health report: transforming mental health for all. Executive summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 1GO.
Collaborators GBDMD. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):137–50.
Collaborators C-MD. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021;398(10312):1700–12.
Sandrone S, Bacigaluppi M, Galloni MR, Cappa SF, Moro A, Catani M, Filippi M, Monti MM, Perani D, Martino G. Weighing brain activity with the balance: Angelo Mosso’s original manuscripts come to light. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 2):621–33.
Lutters B, Koehler PJ. Cerebral pneumography and the 20th century localization of brain tumours. Brain. 2018;141(3):927–33.
Redlich R, Almeida JJ, Grotegerd D, Opel N, Kugel H, Heindel W, Arolt V, Phillips ML, Dannlowski U. Brain morphometric biomarkers distinguishing unipolar and bipolar depression. A voxel-based morphometry-pattern classification approach. JAMA. Psychiatry. 2014;71(11):1222–30.
Opel N, Goltermann J, Hermesdorf M, Berger K, Baune BT, Dannlowski U. Cross-disorder analysis of brain structural abnormalities in six major psychiatric disorders: a secondary analysis of mega- and meta-analytical findings from the ENIGMA Consortium. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;88(9):678–86.
Taschereau-Dumouchel V, Cushing CA, Lau H. Real-time functional MRI in the treatment of mental health disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2022;18:125–54.
Scangos KW, State MW, Miller AH, Baker JT, Williams LM. New and emerging approaches to treat psychiatric disorders. Nat Med. 2023;29(2):317–33.
Zhong Y, Jin C, Zhang X, Zhou R, Dou X, Wang J, Tian M, Zhang H. Aging imaging: the future demand of health management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(13):3820–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06377-z.
Zhang X, Jiang H, Wu S, Wang J, Zhou R, He X, Qian S, Zhao S, Zhang H, Civelek AC, et al. Positron emission tomography molecular imaging for phenotyping and management of lymphoma. Phenomics. 2022;2(2):102–18.
Li Y, Zhang T, Feng J, Qian S, Wu S, Zhou R, Wang J, Sa G, Wang X, Li L, et al. Processing speed dysfunction is associated with functional corticostriatal circuit alterations in childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes: a PET and fMRI study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(9):3186–96.
Cervenka S, Frick A, Boden R, Lubberink M. Application of positron emission tomography in psychiatry-methodological developments and future directions. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):248.
Tian M, He X, Jin C, He X, Wu S, Zhou R, Zhang X, Zhang K, Gu W, Wang J, et al. Transpathology: molecular imaging-based pathology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(8):2338–50.
Chen Q, Liu W, Li H, Zhang H, Tian M. Molecular imaging in patients with mood disorders: a review of PET findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(7):1367–80.
Roffman JL, Witte JM, Tanner AS, Ghaznavi S, Abernethy RS, Crain LD, Giulino PU, Lable I, Levy RA, Dougherty DD, et al. Neural predictors of successful brief psychodynamic psychotherapy for persistent depression. Psychotherap Psychosomatics. 2014;83(6):364–70.
Baeken C, Marinazzo D, Everaert H, Wu G-R, Van Hove C, Audenaert K, Goethals I, De Vos F, Peremans K, De Raedt R. The impact of accelerated HF-rTMS on the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in refractory unipolar major depression: insights from 18FDG PET brain imaging. Brain Stimulation. 2015;8(4):808–15.
Li S, Cai Z, Zhang W, Holden D, Lin S-f, Finnema SJ, Shirali A, Ropchan J, Carre S, Mercier J, et al. Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of [18F]UCB-J for PET imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A). European J Nuclear Med Mole Imag. 2019;46(9):1952–65.
Holmes SE, Scheinost D, Finnema SJ, Naganawa M, Davis MT, DellaGioia N, Nabulsi N, Matuskey D, Angarita GA, Pietrzak RH, et al. Lower synaptic density is associated with depression severity and network alterations. Nature Commun. 2019;10(1):1529.
Brugger SP, Angelescu I, Abi-Dargham A, Mizrahi R, Shahrezaei V, Howes OD. Heterogeneity of striatal dopamine function in schizophrenia: meta-analysis of variance. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87(3):215–24.
D’Ambrosio E, Jauhar S, Kim S, Veronese M, Rogdaki M, Pepper F, Bonoldi I, Kotoula V, Kempton MJ, Turkheimer F, et al. The relationship between grey matter volume and striatal dopamine function in psychosis: a multimodal 18F-DOPA PET and voxel-based morphometry study. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021;26(4):1332–45.
Sigvard AK, Nielsen MØ, Gjedde A, Bojesen KB, Fuglø D, Tangmose K, Kumakura Y, Heltø K, Ebdrup BH, Jensen LT, et al. Dopaminergic activity in antipsychotic-naïve patients assessed with positron emission tomography before and after partial dopamine d2 receptor agonist treatment: association with psychotic symptoms and treatment response. Biolog Psychiatry. 2022;91(2):236–45.
Nikolaus S, Muller HW, Hautzel H. Different patterns of 5-HT receptor and transporter dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders--a comparative analysis of in vivo imaging findings. Rev Neurosci. 2016;27(1):27–59.
Marques TR, Ashok AH, Angelescu I, Borgan F, Myers J, Lingford-Hughes A, Nutt DJ, Veronese M, Turkheimer FE, Howes OD. GABA-A receptor differences in schizophrenia: a positron emission tomography study using [11C]Ro154513. Molecular Psychiatry. 2021;26(6):2616–25.
Meyer JH, Cervenka S, Kim MJ, Kreisl WC, Henter ID, Innis RB. Neuroinflammation in psychiatric disorders: PET imaging and promising new targets. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(12):1064–74.
Attwells S, Setiawan E, Rusjan PM, Xu C, Hutton C, Rafiei D, Varughese B, Kahn A, Kish SJ, Vasdev N, et al. Translocator protein distribution volume predicts reduction of symptoms during open-label trial of celecoxib in major depressive disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2020;88(8):649–56.
Takano A, Suzuki K, Kosaka J, Ota M, Nozaki S, Ikoma Y, Tanada S, Suhara T. A dose-finding study of duloxetine based on serotonin transporter occupancy. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006;185(3):395–9.
Mamo D, Graff A, Mizrahi R, Shammi CM, Romeyer F, Kapur S. Differential effects of aripiprazole on D(2), 5-HT(2), and 5-HT(1A) receptor occupancy in patients with schizophrenia: a triple tracer PET study. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(9):1411–7.
Tian M, Civelek AC, Carrio I, Watanabe Y, Kang KW, Murakami K, Garibotto V, Prior JO, Barthel H, Zhou R, et al. International consensus on the use of tau PET imaging agent (18)F-flortaucipir in Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(3):895–904.
Navarrete F, Garcia-Gutierrez MS, Jurado-Barba R, Rubio G, Gasparyan A, Austrich-Olivares A, Manzanares J. Endocannabinoid system components as potential biomarkers in psychiatry. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:315.
Chen ZY, Wang YX, Lin Y, Zhang JS, Yang F, Zhou QL, Liao YY. Advance of molecular imaging technology and targeted imaging agent in imaging and therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:819324.
Zhang X, Zhong Y, Jin C, Hu D, Tian M, Zhang H. Medical image Generative pre-trained transformer (MI-GPT): future direction for precision medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06450-7.
Saboury B, Bradshaw T, Boellaard R, Buvat I, Dutta J, Hatt M, Jha AK, Li Q, Liu C, McMeekin H, et al. Artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine: opportunities, challenges, and responsibilities toward a trustworthy ecosystem. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(2):188–96.
Funding
This editorial was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFE0108300, 2021YFA1101700, 2022YFE0118000, 2022YFC2009900), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030049, 82302262, 82372013), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the manuscript writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Q., Zhong, Y., Jin, C. et al. Nuclear psychiatric imaging: the trend of precise diagnosis for mental disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 51, 1002–1006 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06519-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06519-3