Skip to main content

PET imaging of reactive astrocytes in neurological disorders

Abstract

The reactive astrocytes manifest molecular, structural, and functional remodeling in injury, infection, or diseases of the CNS, which play a critical role in the pathological mechanism of neurological diseases. A growing need exists for dependable approach to better characterize the activation of astrocyte in vivo. As an advanced molecular imaging technology, positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential for visualizing biological activities at the cellular levels. In the review, we summarized the PET visualization strategies for reactive astrocytes and discussed the applications of astrocyte PET imaging in neurological diseases. Future studies are needed to pay more attention to the development of specific imaging agents for astrocytes and further improve our exploration of reactive astrocytes in various diseases.

Introduction

Astrocytes are the most abundant type of glial cells in the brain. The astrocytes are responsible for many basic functions in the central nervous system (CNS). For example, they can provide essential metabolic support for neurons and other cell types, regulate synaptic plasticity, participate in the composition of blood–brain barrier (BBB), and maintain the extracellular ion balance [1]. In recent years, increasing studies have paid attention to the role of astrocytes other than their basal functions, such as participating significantly in the hyperactivity [2] and contributing importantly to remote memory formation [3]. In neurological disorders, the astrocytes undergo significant morphological and molecular phenotypic changes, the most widely characterized of which are cellular hypertrophy and upregulation of the intermediate filament protein GFAP. The hallmark signal of astrocyte reactivity appeared in the early stage of age-related cognitive decline [4]. Unique features of reactive astrocytes are reported in neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s diseases [5], amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [6], Parkinson’s disease [7], and multiple sclerosis [8]. Thus, there is an urgent need for in vivo visualization strategies for astrocyte activation in various diseases.

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a non-invasive technique that allows the visualization of biologically critical processes at the molecular level in vivo [9]. Therefore, PET has been increasingly applied in neuroimaging research [10, 11]. Utilization of this advanced imaging modality allows for better understand pathological mechanism of astrocytes in neurological diseases, thereby hopefully developing novel strategies for related diseases. Regardless of the fact that imaging of reactive astrocytes is still a young field and in need for development of suitable imaging ligands, some potential radiotracers are still worth our attention.

In the current review, we retrospectively searched the original articles on PET imaging of astrocytes published up to October 2021. The search strategy was to use the following search terms in PubMed: “reactive astrocyte(s),” “positron emission tomography,” “monoamine oxidases-B,” “neurological disorders,” “Alzheimer’s disease,” “Parkinson’s disease,” “Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,” “Multiple sclerosis” alone and in combination. Only original full papers published in English in international journals with an impact factor were considered. Studies related to the activation of astrocytes, PET imaging agents for astrocytes, and their applications were eligible for inclusion. Each article retrieved was subsequently carefully screened based on the relevance of the abstract, and the reference lists of each study were examined for further relevant publications; 94 literatures ultimately considered relevant were included. Here, we briefly introduced the developments of reactive astrocytes, as well as potential targets for PET tracers to bind, and the application of astrocyte PET imaging in neurological diseases. We also discussed the limitations and challenges for imaging astrocytes in order to promote the development of glial pathology in neurological disease.

Reactive astrocyte

Reactive astrocyte was first described in the 1970s after discovery of the intermediate filament protein GFAP [12]. Escartin et al. redefined the concept of reactive astrocytes in the latest review [13], and they suggested that the reactive astrocytes are an umbrella term for astrocytes comprising multiple states. Reactive astrocytes refer to the astrocytes undergo remodeling in response to pathology, which involves a series of changes from transcriptome to pathology, eventually leading to the imbalance and disturbances of neural homeostasis. Therefore, reactive astrocytes refer to the astrocytes in pathological state, excluding the plasticity regulation of physiological astrocytes.

GFAP served as the most widely used marker of reactive astrocytes, whose significance has also been questioned. The extent of GFAP upregulation in reactive astrocytes generally correlates with the severity of injury, but the correlation is not always proportional, perhaps due to regional differences in astrocytes, including differences in basal GFAP content [14, 15]. The astrocytes in some specific regions, such as the hippocampus, are more GFAP abundant than those in cortex, thalamus, and striatum of the healthy mouse brain. However, it does not mean that astrocytes in the hippocampus are more reactive, but rather regionally heterogeneous. Besides, the expression of GFAP would naturally change in response to physiological activities [16, 17]. Thus, although the protein expression of GFAP is commonly used to evaluate the reactivity of astrocytes in injury and disease, better astrocyte markers are still needed. Other astrocyte markers such as aldolase-C (ALDOC), glutamine synthetase (GS), and aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 L1 (ALDH1L1) should be used together to correctly estimate the astrocytes. However, immunohistochemical staining for these cytosolic enzymes still fail to reveal detailed processes.

Meanwhile, transcriptomics provides more marker genes to rigorously identify reactive astrocytes. The gene analysis of reactive astrocytes in mice found that neuroinflammation and ischemia induced two distinct types of astrocytes, termed “A1” and “A2” [18]. A1 neuroinflammatory astrocytes upregulate genes that have previously been proved to be synaptic destructive (such as complement cascade genes), suggesting that A1s may have a “harmful” function. Comparatively, ischemia-induced A2 astrocytes upregulate neurotrophic factors which can promote neuronal growth and development, suggesting that A2s may have “beneficial” functions. Subsequent studies appeared to confirm this hypothesis. For example, RNA sequencing of astrocytes found that senescent astrocytes present a reactive phenotype of neuroinflammatory A1-like reactive astrocytes [19]. Moreover, the type A1 astrocytes had activation of NF-κB/C3/C3aR signaling pathway which may contribute to synaptic dysfunction in AD [20], while the formation of A2 astrocytes scar contributes to CNS axon regeneration [21]. Afterwards, some studies tend to use A1- and A2-specific markers (such as C3 and S100a10) to label the phenotype of astrocytes [22,23,24]. However, the simple dichotomy may also not reflect the heterogeneity of astrocytes in the brain [25,26,27]. Hasel et al. used a multimodal approach including RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, gene map, and dataset integration to profile the response of astrocytes to inflammatory [28]. It is found that different subsets of astrocytes have spatial, temporal, gender, and subtype-specific responses to inflammation, which provides an important reference for the evolution of heterogeneous responses of astrocytes. Consequently, future studies need to cautiously explain the response between different subsets of astrocytes in different diseases, rather than regard the change of astrocytes as a unitary and stable process.

PET tracers for reactive astrocytes

As pharmaceutical work begins to focus on astrocyte-specific targets, some neuroimaging tools are increasingly needed to visually assess and monitor astrocyte activation in vivo, so as to determine the promising responder to cell-specific drugs and carry out corresponding clinical transformation [29]. The development of PET tracers for astrocytes makes the visualization of reactive astrocytes possible. PET tracer binding sites for astrocytes are shown in Fig. 1. In the section, we will introduce PET radiotracers that have been developed for astrocyte.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustration of tracer bind sites on astrocyte

MAOB-based radiotracer

Monoamine oxidases (MAO), first discovered in the liver by Mary Bernheim [30], have two subtypes, MAO-A and MAO-B. MAO-B is the main subtype in the human brain, accounting for about 70% of the total brain MAO activity [31, 32]. MAO-B, a major enzyme that metabolizes dopamine and histamine, is highly expressed in the outer mitochondrial membrane of astrocytes in the human brain, which is considered one of the PET imaging markers of astrocytes. So far, many different radiotracers have been developed for imaging MAO-B in the reactive astrocytes.

Irreversible inhibitors

The first MAO-B radiotracer to be used for PET imaging in human was 11C-L-deprenyl [33]. Stereoselectivity of MAO-B for 11C-L-deprenyl was demonstrated by comparison of brain uptake and retention of the 11C-labeled inactive (D-) and active (L-) enantiomers. The study showed in the brain region rich in MAO-B, the inactive enantiomers were cleared rapidly and the active enantiomers were retained [34]. Therefore, new strategies are needed to improve the pharmacokinetics of imaging agents. In order to slow down the capture rate, deuterated analogues were prepared by using the kinetic isotope effect (KIE). To that end, deuterium-labeled isotopologues 11C-deuterium-L-deprenyl (11C-DED) has been successfully applied to human PET research [33]. 11C-DED has also been widely used and applied to examine the changes of MAO-B in neurodegenerative diseases.

Irreversible inhibitors have great limitations in clinical applications due to the properties of irreversible binding, which include (i) the quantification of binding difficult because of rapid occurrence of irreversible binding and (ii) the formation of impermeable radioactive drugs which may be harmful to the brain. Since these limitations not only confuse image analysis, but also affect clinical transformation to a certain extent, other types of imaging agents, such as reversibly bound imaging agents, have also begun to be prepared and developed.

Reversible inhibitors

11C-SL25.1188, a reversible imaging agent used in the human brain, shows favorable characteristics in preclinical studies of MAO-B imaging of non-human primate (NHP) brain [35]. In the development of synthesizing this reversible inhibitor, the difficulty is to overcome the technical challenge of 11C-CoCl2 preparation. Due to the strict requirements of experimental environment and technology, it can only be synthesized in a few laboratories in the world. Obviously, the clinical application of reversible imaging agents was greatly limited. In order to overcome this limitation, some scientists directly carry out intramolecular cyclization from 11C-CO2 through automatic one-pot procedure, which avoids the use of CoCl2 and optimizes the synthesis of reversible imaging agents. Reversible imaging agents have distinct advantages in comparison with irreversible imaging agents. Higher brain uptake and lower metabolic rate greatly improve the quality of PET imaging, and the reversible combination also ensures the biosafety of agents. In the research of the human brain, dynamic modeling using high-resolution PET showed the high uptake of 11C-SL25.1188, which was significantly correlated with MAO-B levels of postmortem measurement in the brain [33]. Thus, 11C-SL25.1188 have great prospects for radioactive tracing of MAO-B in neurological studies.

However, the short half-life of 11C limits the clinical application of 11C-labled imaging agent due to the requirement of on-site cyclotron. Therefore, 18F-labeled imaging agent has been developed for MAO-B imaging because of its longer half-life [36, 37]. Sangram Nag et al. have made many efforts to the development of 18F-labeled MAO-B radioligand for years. They developed three new fluorine-18 analogues of L-deprenyl in the early years [38]. Later, they synthesized 18F-fluorodeprenyl-D2 which has faster kinetics and higher sensitivity than 11C-D2-deprenyl [36]. Besides, 18F-THK-5351 was originally designed to detect neurofibrillary tangles in vivo, and was found to bind MAO-B with high affinity [39,40,41,42]. The non-selective binding of THK-5351 to MAO-B and tau limits its clinical utility as a biomarker. In recent study, 18F-SMBT-1 was successfully developed through lead optimization from first-generation tau PET tracer 18F-THK-5351 [37]. In vitro autoradiography of 18F-SMBT-1 using human brain tissues, SMBT-1 showed the highest affinity for MAO-B and an excellent binding selectivity for MAO-B over MAO-A, amyloid, and tau aggregates. Because of excellent reversible binding characteristics, 18F-SMBT-1 was allowed to perform repeated PET scans in the same subject, which would be helpful for longitudinal quantification of astrogliosis. Therefore, 18F-SMBT-1 may be a promising candidate as a selective and reversible imaging tracer for MAO-B.

Non-MAOB-based radiotracer

Imidazoline2 binding sites (I2BS) are another reliable marker to specifically visualize astrocyte activation in the human brain under physiological and pathological conditions. I2BS is mainly expressed in the outer mitochondrial membrane of astrocytes, but much less in neurons [43]. Importantly, changes in I2BS are associated with increased astrocyte activation in a series of diseases [44]. Tyacke et al. have synthetized a new PET-tracer called 11C-BU99008, specifically targeting I2BS [45]. A recent study has shown that 11C-BU99008 could detect I2BS expressed by reactive astrocytes with fine selectivity and specificity, and visualize reactive astrogliosis in postmortem AD brains [46], hence be a potential clinical astrocytic PET tracer to further understand the role of reactive astrocyte in AD.

In addition, the application of PET tracers targeting TSPO in astrocytes is quite limited, such as 11C-PK11195 and 18F-DPA-714. Previous studies considered TSPO as a marker of microglia, but in recent years, more and more research have focused on the cell source of TSPO. Significantly, a study of the cellular origin of TSPO signaling in AD found that the early signal of TSPO came from astrocytes, while in the later stage, it was mainly microglia [47]. The results indicated that the interpretation of TSPO imaging depends on pathological stage, and emphasizes the special role of astrocytes. In another study on the source of TSPO cells, the researchers found that in neurotoxicant-induced animal model of demyelination, TSPO signal was initially provided by microglia, while in a later stage (such as 6 weeks later), the signal source of TSPO was mainly from astrocytes [48]. These studies remind us that the signal source of TSPO is not only composed of microglia, but also astrocytes. With the understanding of disease pathology, according to the different stages of disease development, TSPO may provide us with some astrocyte information [49].

PET imaging of reactive astrocytes in neurological diseases

A large number of studies have noticed that the pathological changes of astrocyte may be an important link in the pathogenic cascade of neurological diseases. There is no doubt that the visualization of astrocytes by PET imaging can improve our better understanding of glial pathological changes. Here, we introduced four diseases with astrocyte PET imaging applications, and discussed the significance of corresponding PET signal changes. In addition, some neurological disorders related to astrocyte pathology but without specific PET research are also mentioned in the last part.

Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with gradually cognitive decline [50]. In addition to the well-known neurofibrillary tangles and Aβ deposition, glial activation and neuroinflammation also drive the progression of AD [4, 51, 52]. However, most PET imaging studies of neuroinflammation have focused on microglia, and there are few PET tracers of reactive astrocytes [53, 54]. The 11C-deuterium-L-deprenyl (11C-DED) has been widely used to detect activated astrocytes in patients with AD, and it can simultaneously measure cerebral perfusion and astrocytes in a single PET scan, thereby providing both functional and pathological information [55]. In a study using 11C-DED for PET imaging, the cerebellar gray matter was selected as a reference, and the 11C-DED data of healthy people (n = 14), MCI patients (n = 8), and AD patients (n = 7) were dynamically analyzed. The results showed that increased 11C-DED uptake occurs early in the development of AD, especially in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) 11C-PIB+ patients’ brains [56]. The same results were observed in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease (ADAD). Compared with the imaging results of 18F-FDG and 11C-PIB, 11C-DED images showed a prominent increase in MAO-B in the early stage of clinical symptom onset (Fig. 2), which strengthens the possibility the activation of astrocytes may be an early driving force of Alzheimer’s disease pathology [50]. In PIB+ MCI patients, the parahippocampal astrocytosis showed by PET was associated with decreased GM density measured by MRI [57], which may suggest that the increase of parahippocampal astrocytes may affect the loss of gray matter cells in patients with prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. However, in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, the increase of astrocytes is less related to the loss of brain cells, but more related to the amyloid process. Subsequent preclinical studies demonstrated that compared with the APPswe mice at 8–15 months and 18–24 months, the binding of 11C-DED in cortex and hippocampus of 6-month-old APPswe mice was twice as much as the former two. Longitudinally, 11C-DED binding decreased with age in APPswe mice, but did not change significantly in WT mice. Notably, immunostaining results showed scarce diffuse Aβ42 deposits in the cortex and hippocampus of 6-month-old APPswe mice, whereas obvious increases were observed in 18—to 24-month-old APPswe mice, which may indicate that astrocytosis occurs before the deposition of Aβ plaques [58]. In addition, the PET study using imidazole receptor imaging agents showed that an increase in 11C-BU99008 uptake in cognitively impaired (CI) patients compared with healthy controls (HC) [59], and the autoradiography showed that 3H-BU99008 was colocalized with GFAP staining, which confirmed the results of in vivo PET imaging. These findings are consistent with the results of postmortem [60] and preclinical studies [61]. MAO-B off target binding brought 18F-THK5351 into disrepute in the past few years. 18F-THK5351, initially considered as a tau imaging agent, was later found to have a certain non-specific binding with MAO-B. With the development of glial pathology, 18F-THK5351 provides great value for the diagnosis of AD and the classification of MCI because of which can simultaneously evaluate the pathological progress of tau and reactive astrocytes [62]. The information provided by PET imaging seems to be consistent with the discovery of other liquid biomarkers of reactive astrocytes in AD. For example, many recent studies have confirmed that the level of GFAP in plasma and CSF increases in the preclinical and symptomatic stages of AD [63,64,65,66]. In addition, CSF YKL-40, as a biomarker of reactive astrocyte subsets, also increased in preclinical AD patients [67, 68]. In general, these studies have proved astrocyte activation is an early pathological event in the development of AD. Future studies could combine specific astrocyte PET imaging with liquid biomarker data to better explain a series of behaviors of astrocytes in AD.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Progression of PET biomarkers in ADAD mutation carriers. Compared with five age-matched non-carriers, each pair of columns represents a single mutation carrier. Each pair of rows represents a different PET biomarker. The scale from left to right indicates the approximate time (in years) that clinical symptoms are expected to appear. (Reprint permission was obtained from reference [50])

Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common dyskinesia disorder. The pathological features of PD mainly include loss of substantia nigra striatum and accumulation of α-synuclein [69]. With astroglia α-synuclein-positive cytoplasmic accumulations have been shown post-mortem in patients with PD, increasing evidences suggest that reactive astrocytes may take part in the pathophysiology of PD [70, 71]. 11C-BU99008 PET can indirectly evaluate the activation of astrocytes by measuring the expression of I2BS [72, 73]. A study using 11C-BU99008 PET molecular imaging showed increased expression of I2BS in the cortex and brain stem in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Compared with the healthy control group, 11C-BU99008 VT in the brain stem of patients with early Parkinson’s disease increased by about 52%. Conversely, in patients with moderate and advanced Parkinson’s disease, the expression of I2BS decreased in the cortex and subcortical regions (Fig. 3), reflecting the loss of astrocyte function as the disease progressed [7]. Nevertheless, the reports on astrogliosis in Parkinson’s disease are conflicting. With MAO-B be used as a biochemical imaging marker for astrocyte activation in the human brain, a post-mortem study on parkinsonian dopamine deficiency disorders showed both astrocyte markers (GFAP, vimentin, Hsp27) and MAO-B levels were increased and significantly correlated in the putamen of patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA); the same results were observed in the substantia nigra of patients with progressive superanuclear palsy (PSP). However, in the substantia nigra of patients with PD, the levels of MAO-B were normal [74, 75]. Findings from a study using 18F-THK5351 imaging in parkinsonian syndromes are consistent with previous postmortem studies [76], which implies that the application of MAO-B-targeted PET imaging in Parkinson’s disease requires a more cautious interpretation. Taken together, correct diagnosis remains a significant clinical challenge due to overlapping signs and symptoms of Parkinson’s syndrome. In combination with biomarkers related to pathological changes and clinical phenotypes, PET imaging of reactive astrocytes is a limited but promising way to evaluate disease progression and drug treatment efficacy.

Fig. 3
figure 3

11C-BU99008 standardized uptake value. Compared with the healthy control (A ; 65-year-old male), early Parkinson’s disease patients (B; 60-year-old female; disease duration 2 years) demonstrated more 11C-BU99008 uptake, which represented increased I2BS expression, whereas moderate/advanced Parkinson’s disease patients (C; 63-year-old male; disease duration 16 years) showed a global loss of it. (Reprint permission was obtained from reference [7])

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the third largest neurodegenerative disease after AD and PD, is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by death of motor neurons in the cerebral cortex and/or brainstem and spinal cord [77]. Increasing evidences suggested that non-neuronal cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of ALS, especially astrocytes in glial cells [77, 78]. Reactive astrocytes have been described in postmortem central nervous system tissues of patients with ALS [79,80,81]. The transcriptional profile of astrocytes in ALS was changed [82] and reactive astrocytes in ALS display diminished intron retention [6]. The recent study has shown that reactive astrocyte activator knockout can slow down the disease progression of ALS mouse model [22].

PET molecular imaging evidence showed that 11C-DED the binding rate increased in pons and white matter in ALS patients [83] (Fig. 4). In this study, seven patients with ALS were included and their clinical characteristics were summarized and seven healthy subjects were included as controls. All subjects were studied with 11C-DED. The results showed that in addition to the increased combination of white matter and pons, the SUV in the parietal cortex (3.5 ± 0.45) and temporal cortex (3.7 ± 0.32) of patients with ALS was significantly lower than that in the control group (parietal cortex: 4.2 ± 0.38; temporal cortex: 4.2 ± 0.28), which may reflect the decrease of cerebral blood flow in these regions in ALS patients. The increase of white matter binding rate is consistent with other neuropathological evidences [84], but the increase of pontine binding rate may need to be explained more carefully in the absence of other evidence. The high background activity of MAO-B and the small sample size of this study limit the correlation analysis between its imaging manifestations and clinical symptoms. Two of the patients who subsequently underwent the second PET imaging had the same imaging findings as the previous one, but their clinical progress deteriorated, which is a frustrating fact that inhibited the enthusiasm of 11C-DED as an alternative marker. Using the reference value of cerebellum for standardization, 18F-THK5351 PET scanned images showed increased uptake of medial motor cortex and prefrontal lobe in two different phenotypes of ALS patients. The imaging lesions were consistent with their respective neurological manifestations, but the case lacked specific quantitative analysis and other related evidences [85]. Therefore, the application of astrocyte PET imaging in ALS is still relatively limited and requires more comprehensive exploration.

Fig. 4
figure 4

11C-DED PET parametric images of ALS patient and healthy control. Compared with the healthy control, the uptake rates of pons and white matter in ALS patients were significantly increased. (Reprint permission was obtained from reference [83])

Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS, is the most common disabling neurologic disease of young people [86]. According to the clinical characteristics, MS is divided into three different courses: relapsing–remitting (RR), secondary progressive (SP), and primary progressive (PP). The most common is relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), which is characterized by spontaneous regression of neurological dysfunction [87]. Astrocyte reactivity plays an important role in the pathological process of MS, which widely exists from the early stage of lesion formation to the late chronic stage [88]. In multiple sclerosis, astrocytes show a highly reactive phenotype with large cell bodies and processes; they also recruit lymphocytes, cause immune activation, and promote the development of acute lesions. In addition, the foot process of astrocytes is destroyed, which leads to the damage and dysfunction of blood–brain barrier. As the disease turns chronic, the GFAP filaments of astrocytes become accumulated and participate in the formation of glial scar in the later stage of astrocytes [89]. One strategy for visualization of astrocytes is 18F-THK5351 PET imaging. With the superimposition of the 18F-THK5351 image on the fluid attenuation inversion recovery, one study confirmed that the lesions accumulated by 18F-THK5351 structurally correspond to multiple sclerosis plaques [39]. Another strategy for astrocyte imaging is to measure 11C-acetate, which is mainly absorbed and metabolized in brain astrocytes [90, 91]. In the previous study, 11C-acetate PET was used to study the imaging of MS patients; 6 RRMS patients in remission and 6 healthy controls were recruited. The average SUV in each subject’s bilateral thalami was used as a reference to calculate the relative standardized uptake value (SUVt) [92]. The results showed that the average SUV of MS patients was higher than that of healthy subjects in all evaluation regions, especially in the parietal lobe, occipital, and insular regions. The main drawback of this study is that it only includes the analysis of PET static data. Another method using kinetic parameters was used for the determination of 11C-acetate, which used k2 value (total clearance of acetate metabolism in the brain) to reflect the metabolic rate of acetate in astrocytes [93]. The results showed that the white matter/gray matter ratio k2 in MS patients was significantly higher than that in normal subjects (Fig. 5), and the most obvious change in k2 occurred in neuronal fiber bundles, which means that astrocytes near myelin sheath or axon are mainly activated in MS. However, there are only 8 patients in this study and they are not homogeneous. It is impossible to determine the effect of disease subtypes on astrocyte metabolism, and the contribution from other non-astrocytes in k2 remains to be clarified. Therefore, further research is still needed to improve the accuracy of measurement. Nevertheless, there are few studies on astrocyte imaging and further neuroimaging studies are needed to visually explore the role of astrocytes in MS.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Anatomically normalized group mean images of 1-C-11 acetate in the MS and NC groups. k1 (a ) represents influx of acetate; k2 (b) represents clearance of total radioactive molecules generated from acetate metabolism in the brain; Vt (c) represents radioactivity distribution volume; FA (d) represents the fractional anisotropy. (Reprint permission was obtained from reference [93

Other neurological disorders

The proliferation of glial cells after cerebral ischemia leads to neuroinflammation and further injury and neuronal death. It is noteworthy that the expression of astrocytes is different from that in the neurodegenerative diseases mentioned above. In the neuroinflammation caused by cerebral ischemic stroke, the activation of microglia and the infiltration of macrophages first appeared, and then caused the response of astrocytes [94]. The reactive astrocytes are observed in the surrounding area of infarction. In addition to releasing some proinflammatory factors, astrocytes can also form glial scars to limit the spread of inflammation [95]. The molecular basis of astrocytes between harmful and beneficial needs more evidence to be analyzed. Transcriptomic evidences supported the importance of astrocyte in neuroprotection after stroke. Rakers et al. identified the differential expression of 1003 genes and 38 transcription factors after experimental ischemic stroke [96]. The results showed that the upregulation of A2 neuroprotective gene was more advantageous than that of A1 gene. This also confirms the conclusion of a previous study [97]. The extensive application of TSPO-PET in neuroinflammatory imaging provides evidences for the role of astrocytes in cerebral ischemia [48]. Some studies suggest that the cell source of TSPO signal after injury comes from microglia at early stage (2w), and later (6w) from astrocytes [98, 99]. The conclusion refers to the results of immunostaining, but the argument is not sufficient. The application of more specific imaging agents targeting astrocytes can obviously provide more explanations for reactive astrocytes in ischemic injury, but the current research is rarely focused on this aspect.

About 80% of optic neuromyelitis is closely related to the autoantibody of astrocyte aquaporin-4 (AQP4) [100]. In AQP4-IgG-positive optic neuromyelitis, the loss and dysfunction of astrocytes lead to the secondary loss of oligodendrocytes and neurons [101]. In the relevant case reports, more cases used 18F-FDG-PET to represent the astrocyte injury and hypermetabolic state of the disease [102, 103], which is not specific enough to reflect the pathological characteristics. The same examples, such as autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy [104] and Alexandria disease [105], are caused by astrocyte changes. The application of PET molecular imaging targeting astrocyte-specific proteins can greatly improve our knowledge of progress in these diseases.

Conclusions and future directions

PET imaging of astrocytes has contributed to our better understanding of their pathological evolution in disease and to the development of astrocyte-related intervention strategies. Evidences from PET imaging indicated the activation of astrocytes appears at an early stage in AD. While in PD, PET imaging of activated astrocytes needs to select more suitable targets rather than MAO-B. In ALS and MS, the regions with abnormal PET signal correlated with features of the diseases, which may suggest that astrocyte PET imaging is a promising technique but requires further exploration.

PET imaging of reactive astrocytes is still in an immature stage. Firstly, the multitude of complex subtypes of astrocytes dictates the need for multiple molecular imaging markers such as enzymes, receptors, or metabolic markers to delineate their specific states, and the development of ligand imaging agents for these targets is now still very limited. Moreover, the specificity remains to be improved for imaging agents that have been applied to astrocyte imaging, and current applications need to incorporate more additional data to better interpret imaging signals. Besides, the choice of reference region in astrocyte imaging was not fixed and tended to select the brain region with the least difference from healthy controls in these studies (Table 1), which may consider that the affected brain regions of astrocyte activation have different distributions in different diseases. Hence, the imaging of astrocytes needs to be combined with the clinical diagnosis to determine suitable reference region.

Table 1 Reference regions of different radiotracers for astrocyte imaging

A key step forward in the field would be the development of imaging agents that specifically target astrocyte subpopulations. These ideal candidate agents should have characteristics of relatively long half-life, eminent binding specificity, and high affinity, the most promising of which are screened and applied in patients’ cohorts with different stages of neurological disorders. Use this as a foundation, future studies will enable real-time longitudinal detection of astrocyte pathological progression in various diseases, thereby facilitating our better understanding of the sequence and time of astrocyte pathology in neurological diseases, and contributing to developing successful intervention strategies for the regulation of astrocytes.

References

  1. 1.

    Verkhratsky A, Nedergaard M. Physiology of astroglia. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(1):239–389. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00042.2016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nagai J, Rajbhandari AK, Gangwani MR, Hachisuka A, Coppola G, Masmanidis SC, et al. Hyperactivity with disrupted attention by activation of an astrocyte synaptogenic cue. Cell. 2019;177(5):1280-92 e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kol A, Adamsky A, Groysman M, Kreisel T, London M, Goshen I. Astrocytes contribute to remote memory formation by modulating hippocampal-cortical communication during learning. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(10):1229–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0679-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Price BR, Johnson LA, Norris CM. Reactive astrocytes: the nexus of pathological and clinical hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;68: 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101335.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lopes CR, Cunha RA, Agostinho P. Astrocytes and adenosine A receptors: active players in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:666710. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.666710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ziff OJ, Taha DM, Crerar H, Clarke BE, Chakrabarti AM, Kelly G, et al. Reactive astrocytes in ALS display diminished intron retention. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(6):3168–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wilson H, Dervenoulas G, Pagano G, Tyacke RJ, Polychronis S, Myers J, et al. Imidazoline 2 binding sites reflecting astroglia pathology in Parkinson’s disease: an in vivo11C-BU99008 PET study. Brain. 2019;142(10):3116–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Schirmer L, Velmeshev D, Holmqvist S, Kaufmann M, Werneburg S, Jung D, et al. Neuronal vulnerability and multilineage diversity in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2019;573(7772):75–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1404-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tian M, He X, Jin C, He X, Wu S, Zhou R, et al. Transpathology: molecular imaging-based pathology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(8):2338–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05234-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang K, Mizuma H, Zhang X, Takahashi K, Jin C, Song F, et al. PET imaging of neural activity, beta-amyloid, and tau in normal brain aging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(12):3859–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05230-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hansson O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2021;27(6):954–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01382-x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Eng LF, Vanderhaeghen JJ, Bignami A, Gerstl B. An acidic protein isolated from fibrous astrocytes. Brain Res. 1971;28(2):351–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Escartin C, Galea E, Lakatos A, O’Callaghan JP, Petzold GC, Serrano-Pozo A, et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(3):312–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00783-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Escartin C, Guillemaud O, Carrillo-de Sauvage M-A. Questions and (some) answers on reactive astrocytes. Glia. 2019;67(12):2221–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ben Haim L, Rowitch DH. Functional diversity of astrocytes in neural circuit regulation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.159.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rodríguez JJ, Terzieva S, Olabarria M, Lanza RG, Verkhratsky A. Enriched environment and physical activity reverse astrogliodegeneration in the hippocampus of AD transgenic mice. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e678. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2013.194.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gerics B, Szalay F, Hajós F. Glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus: circadian changes and their seasonal dependence. J Anat. 2006;209(2):231–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zamanian JL, Xu L, Foo LC, Nouri N, Zhou L, Giffard RG, et al. Genomic analysis of reactive astrogliosis. J Neurosci. 2012;32(18):6391–410. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6221-11.2012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Clarke LE, Liddelow SA, Chakraborty C, Munch AE, Heiman M, Barres BA. Normal aging induces A1-like astrocyte reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(8):E1896–905. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800165115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lian H, Yang L, Cole A, Sun L, Chiang AC, Fowler SW, et al. NFkappaB-activated astroglial release of complement C3 compromises neuronal morphology and function associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2015;85(1):101–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Anderson MA, Burda JE, Ren Y, Ao Y, O’Shea TM, Kawaguchi R, et al. Astrocyte scar formation aids central nervous system axon regeneration. Nature. 2016;532(7598):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17623.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Guttenplan KA, Weigel MK, Adler DI, Couthouis J, Liddelow SA, Gitler AD, et al. Knockout of reactive astrocyte activating factors slows disease progression in an ALS mouse model. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3753. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17514-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shao L, Jiang GT, Yang XL, Zeng ML, Cheng JJ, Kong S, et al. Silencing of circIgf1r plays a protective role in neuronal injury via regulating astrocyte polarization during epilepsy. FASEB J. 2021;35(2):e21330. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202001737RR.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    King A, Szekely B, Calapkulu E, Ali H, Rios F, Jones S, et al. The increased densities, but different distributions, of both C3 and S100A10 immunopositive astrocyte-like cells in Alzheimer’s disease brains suggest possible roles for both A1 and A2 astrocytes in the disease pathogenesis. Brain Sci. 2020;10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10080503.

  25. 25.

    Acioglu C, Li L, Elkabes S. Contribution of astrocytes to neuropathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res. 2021;1758:147291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147291.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kwon HS, Koh SH. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: the roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl Neurodegener. 2020;9(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-020-00221-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Reid JK, Kuipers HF. She doesn’t even go here: the role of inflammatory astrocytes in CNS disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:704884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2021.704884.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hasel P, Rose IVL, Sadick JS, Kim RD, Liddelow SA. Neuroinflammatory astrocyte subtypes in the mouse brain. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(10):1475–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00905-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cavaliere C, Tramontano L, Fiorenza D, Alfano V, Aiello M, Salvatore M. Gliosis and neurodegenerative diseases: the role of PET and MR imaging. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:75. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2020.00075.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Slotkin TA. Mary Bernheim and the discovery of monoamine oxidase. Brain Res Bull. 1999;50(5–6):373.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Manzoor S, Hoda N. A comprehensive review of monoamine oxidase inhibitors as anti-Alzheimer’s disease agents: a review. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;206:112787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112787.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang CC, Billett E, Borchert A, Kuhn H, Ufer C. Monoamine oxidases in development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(4):599–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1065-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fowler JS, Logan J, Shumay E, Alia-Klein N, Wang GJ, Volkow ND. Monoamine oxidase: radiotracer chemistry and human studies. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2015;58(3):51–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlcr.3247.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Narayanaswami V, Drake LR, Brooks AF, Meyer JH, Houle S, Kilbourn MR, et al. Classics in neuroimaging: development of PET tracers for imaging monoamine oxidases. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10(4):1867–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00081.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Saba W, Valette H, Peyronneau M-A, Bramoullé Y, Coulon C, Curet O, et al. [(11)C]SL25.1188, a new reversible radioligand to study the monoamine oxidase type B with PET: preclinical characterisation in nonhuman primate. Synapse. 2010;64(1):61–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20703.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nag S, Fazio P, Lehmann L, Kettschau G, Heinrich T, Thiele A, et al. In vivo and in vitro characterization of a novel MAO-B inhibitor radioligand, 18F-labeled deuterated fluorodeprenyl. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(2):315–20. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161083.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Harada R, Hayakawa Y, Ezura M, Lerdsirisuk P, Du Y, Ishikawa Y, et al. (18)F-SMBT-1: a selective and reversible PET tracer for monoamine oxidase-B imaging. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(2):253–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.244400.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nag S, Lehmann L, Heinrich T, Thiele A, Kettschau G, Nakao R, et al. Synthesis of three novel fluorine-18 labeled analogues of L-deprenyl for positron emission tomography (PET) studies of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B). J Med Chem. 2011;54(20):7023–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm200710b.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ishibashi K, Miura Y, Hirata K, Toyohara J, Ishii K. 18F-THK5351 PET can identify astrogliosis in multiple sclerosis plaques. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45(2):e98–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Takami Y, Yamamoto Y, Norikane T, Mitamura K, Hatakeyama T, Nishiyama Y. 18F-THK5351 PET can identify lesions of acute traumatic brain injury. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45(11):e491–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Harada R, Ishiki A, Kai H, Sato N, Furukawa K, Furumoto S, et al. Correlations of (18)F-THK5351 PET with postmortem burden of tau and astrogliosis in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(4):671–4. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.197426.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Murugan NA, Chiotis K, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Lemoine L, Agren H, Nordberg A. Cross-interaction of tau PET tracers with monoamine oxidase B: evidence from in silico modelling and in vivo imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(6):1369–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04305-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li JX. Imidazoline I2 receptors: an update. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;178:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.03.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Matthews PM, Datta G. Positron-emission tomography molecular imaging of glia and myelin in drug discovery for multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015;10(5):557–70. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032240.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kealey S, Turner EM, Husbands SM, Salinas CA, Jakobsen S, Tyacke RJ, et al. Imaging imidazoline-I2 binding sites in porcine brain using 11C-BU99008. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(1):139–44. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.112.108258.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kumar A, Koistinen NA, Malarte ML, Nennesmo I, Ingelsson M, Ghetti B, et al. Astroglial tracer BU99008 detects multiple binding sites in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Mol Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01101-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tournier BB, Tsartsalis S, Ceyzeriat K, Fraser BH, Gregoire MC, Kovari E, et al. Astrocytic TSPO upregulation appears before microglial TSPO in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77(3):1043–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200136.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Guilarte TR. TSPO in diverse CNS pathologies and psychiatric disease: a critical review and a way forward. Pharmacol Ther. 2019;194:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.09.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Boche D, Gerhard A, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Faculty M. Prospects and challenges of imaging neuroinflammation beyond TSPO in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(13):2831–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04462-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Scholl M, Carter SF, Westman E, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Almkvist O, Thordardottir S, et al. Early astrocytosis in autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease measured in vivo by multi-tracer positron emission tomography. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16404. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16404.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Rodriguez-Arellano JJ, Parpura V, Zorec R, Verkhratsky A. Astrocytes in physiological aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience. 2016;323:170–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.01.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Smit T, Deshayes NAC, Borchelt DR, Kamphuis W, Middeldorp J, Hol EM. Reactive astrocytes as treatment targets in Alzheimer’s disease-systematic review of studies using the APPswePS1dE9 mouse model. Glia. 2021;69(8):1852–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Kreisl WC, Kim M-J, Coughlin JM, Henter ID, Owen DR, Innis RB. PET imaging of neuroinflammation in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(11):940–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30346-x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Vilaplana E, Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Ferreira D, Montal V, Almkvist O, Wall A, et al. Cortical microstructural correlates of astrocytosis in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2020;94(19):e2026–36. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009405.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Carter SF, Chiotis K, Saint-Aubert L, Leuzy A, Scholl M, et al. Comparison of early-phase 11C-deuterium-l-deprenyl and 11C-Pittsburgh compound B PET for assessing brain perfusion in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(7):1071–7. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.168732.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Carter SF, Scholl M, Almkvist O, Wall A, Engler H, Langstrom B, et al. Evidence for astrocytosis in prodromal Alzheimer disease provided by 11C-deuterium-L-deprenyl: a multitracer PET paradigm combining 11C-Pittsburgh compound B and 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.087031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Choo IL, Carter SF, Scholl ML, Nordberg A. Astrocytosis measured by (1)(1)C-deprenyl PET correlates with decrease in gray matter density in the parahippocampus of prodromal Alzheimer’s patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(11):2120–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2859-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Rodriguez-Vieitez E, Ni R, Gulyas B, Toth M, Haggkvist J, Halldin C, et al. Astrocytosis precedes amyloid plaque deposition in Alzheimer APPswe transgenic mouse brain: a correlative positron emission tomography and in vitro imaging study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(7):1119–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3047-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Calsolaro V, Matthews PM, Donat CK, Livingston NR, Femminella GD, Guedes SS, et al. Astrocyte reactivity with late-onset cognitive impairment assessed in vivo using (11)C-BU99008 PET and its relationship with amyloid load. Mol Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01193-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Nagele RG, D’Andrea MR, Lee H, Venkataraman V, Wang H-Y. Astrocytes accumulate A beta 42 and give rise to astrocytic amyloid plaques in Alzheimer disease brains. Brain Res. 2003;971(2):197–209.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Olabarria M, Noristani HN, Verkhratsky A, Rodríguez JJ. Concomitant astroglial atrophy and astrogliosis in a triple transgenic animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Glia. 2010;58(7):831–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lee HJ, Lee EC, Seo S, Ko KP, Kang JM, Kim WR, et al. Identification of heterogeneous subtypes of mild cognitive impairment using cluster analyses based on PET imaging of Tau and astrogliosis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:615467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.615467.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Verberk IMW, Thijssen E, Koelewijn J, Mauroo K, Vanbrabant J, de Wilde A, et al. Combination of plasma amyloid beta(1–42/1-40) and glial fibrillary acidic protein strongly associates with cerebral amyloid pathology. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00682-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Benedet AL, Mila-Aloma M, Vrillon A, Ashton NJ, Pascoal TA, Lussier F, et al. Differences between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein levels across the Alzheimer disease continuum. JAMA Neurol. 2021;18:e213671. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Pereira JB, Janelidze S, Smith R, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Palmqvist S, Teunissen CE, et al. Plasma GFAP is an early marker of amyloid-beta but not tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2021;14:awab223. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Verberk IMW, Slot RE, Verfaillie SCJ, Heijst H, Prins ND, van Berckel BNM, et al. Plasma amyloid as prescreener for the earliest Alzheimer pathological changes. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(5):648–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25334.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Alcolea D, Martínez-Lage P, Sánchez-Juan P, Olazarán J, Antúnez C, Izagirre A, et al. Amyloid precursor protein metabolism and inflammation markers in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2015;85(7):626–33. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001859.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Mila-Aloma M, Salvado G, Gispert JD, Vilor-Tejedor N, Grau-Rivera O, Sala-Vila A, et al. Amyloid beta, tau, synaptic, neurodegeneration, and glial biomarkers in the preclinical stage of the Alzheimer’s continuum. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(10):1358–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Aarsland D, Batzu L, Halliday GM, Geurtsen GJ, Ballard C, Ray Chaudhuri K, et al. Parkinson disease-associated cognitive impairment. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00280-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Halliday GM, Stevens CH. Glia: initiators and progressors of pathology in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2011;26(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23455.

  71. 71.

    di Domenico A, Carola G, Calatayud C, Pons-Espinal M, Muñoz JP, Richaud-Patin Y, et al. Patient-specific iPSC-derived astrocytes contribute to non-cell-autonomous neurodegeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Stem Cell Rep. 2019;12(2):213–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.12.011.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Parker CA, Nabulsi N, Holden D, Lin S-f, Cass T, Labaree D, et al. Evaluation of 11C-BU99008, a PET ligand for the imidazoline2 binding sites in rhesus brain. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(5):838–44. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.131854.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Tyacke RJ, Myers JFM, Venkataraman A, Mick I, Turton S, Passchier J, et al. Evaluation of C-BU99008, a PET ligand for the imidazoline binding site in human brain. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(10):1597–602. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.208009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Tong J, Rathitharan G, Meyer JH, Furukawa Y, Ang L-C, Boileau I, et al. Brain monoamine oxidase B and A in human parkinsonian dopamine deficiency disorders. Brain. 2017;140(9):2460–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Tong J, Ang LC, Williams B, Furukawa Y, Fitzmaurice P, Guttman M, et al. Low levels of astroglial markers in Parkinson’s disease: relationship to alpha-synuclein accumulation. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;82:243–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2015.06.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Schonecker S, Brendel M, Palleis C, Beyer L, Hoglinger GU, Schuh E, et al. PET imaging of astrogliosis and tau facilitates diagnosis of Parkinsonian syndromes. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00249.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Van Harten ACM, Phatnani H, Przedborski S. Non-cell-autonomous pathogenic mechanisms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Trends Neurosci. 2021;44(8):658–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2021.04.008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Vahsen BF, Gray E, Thompson AG, Ansorge O, Anthony DC, Cowley SA, et al. Non-neuronal cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - from pathogenesis to biomarkers. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(6):333–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00487-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Tam OH, Rozhkov NV, Shaw R, Kim D, Hubbard I, Fennessey S, et al. Postmortem cortex samples identify distinct molecular subtypes of ALS: retrotransposon activation, oxidative stress, and activated glia. Cell Rep. 2019;29(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.066.

  80. 80.

    Schiffer D, Cordera S, Cavalla P, Migheli A. Reactive astrogliosis of the spinal cord in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 1996;139 Suppl:27–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nagy D, Kato T, Kushner PD. Reactive astrocytes are widespread in the cortical gray matter of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurosci Res. 1994;38(3):336–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Vargas MR, Pehar M, Díaz-Amarilla PJ, Beckman JS, Barbeito L. Transcriptional profile of primary astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutant SOD1. J Neurosci Res. 2008;86(16):3515–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.21797.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Johansson A, Engler H, Blomquist G, Scott B, Wall A, Aquilonius S-M, et al. Evidence for astrocytosis in ALS demonstrated by [11C](l)-deprenyl-D2 PET. J Neurol Sci. 2007;255(1–2):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.057.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Kushner PD, Stephenson DT, Wright S. Reactive astrogliosis is widespread in the subcortical white matter of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1991;50(3):263–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Higashihara M, Ishibashi K, Tokumaru AM, Iwata A, Ishii K. 18F-THK5351 PET can identify core lesions in different amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotypes. Clin Nucl Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Frohman EM, Racke MK, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis–the plaque and its pathogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(9):942–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Makhani N, Tremlett H. The multiple sclerosis prodrome. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(8):515–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00519-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Brosnan CF, Raine CS. The astrocyte in multiple sclerosis revisited. Glia. 2013;61(4):453–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.22443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Brambilla R. The contribution of astrocytes to the neuroinflammatory response in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;137(5):757–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-019-01980-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Bodini B, Tonietto M, Airas L, Stankoff B. Positron emission tomography in multiple sclerosis - straight to the target. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17(11):663–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00537-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Waniewski RA, Martin DL. Preferential utilization of acetate by astrocytes is attributable to transport. J Neurosci. 1998;18(14):5225–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Takata K, Kato H, Shimosegawa E, Okuno T, Koda T, Sugimoto T, et al. 11C-acetate PET imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111598.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Kato H, Okuno T, Isohashi K, Koda T, Shimizu M, Mochizuki H, et al. Astrocyte metabolism in multiple sclerosis investigated by 1-C-11 acetate PET. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41(2):369–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20911469.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Ardaya M, Joya A, Padro D, Plaza-Garcia S, Gomez-Vallejo V, Sanchez M, et al. In vivo PET imaging of gliogenesis after cerebral ischemia in rats. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00793.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Choudhury GR, Ding S. Reactive astrocytes and therapeutic potential in focal ischemic stroke. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;85:234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2015.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Rakers C, Schleif M, Blank N, Matuskova H, Ulas T, Handler K, et al. Stroke target identification guided by astrocyte transcriptome analysis. Glia. 2019;67(4):619–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature. 2017;541(7638):481–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21029.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Chen M-K, Guilarte TR. Imaging the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor response in central nervous system demyelination and remyelination. Toxicol Sci. 2006;91(2):532–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Chen M-K, Guilarte TR. Translocator protein 18 kDa (TSPO): molecular sensor of brain injury and repair. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;118(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.12.004.

  100. 100.

    Jarius S, Paul F, Weinshenker BG, Levy M, Kim HJ, Wildemann B. Neuromyelitis optica. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):85. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-0214-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101

    Guo Y, Lennon VA, Parisi JE, Popescu B, Vasquez C, Pittock SJ, et al. Spectrum of sublytic astrocytopathy in neuromyelitis optica. Brain. 2021;30:awab394. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Higashiyama A, Komori T, Inada Y, Nishizawa M, Nakajima H, Narumi Y. Diffuse (18)F-FDG uptake throughout the spinal cord in the acute phase of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorder. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(9):1609–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3735-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Lopez-Mora DA, Flotats A, Fernandez A, Sizova M, Camacho V, Carrio I. Striking neurologic 18F-FDG PET/CT pattern in Devic’s disease (neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47(2):511–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04549-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Kimura A, Takekoshi A, Yoshikura N, Hayashi Y, Shimohata T. Clinical characteristics of autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy. J Neuroimmunol. 2019;332:91–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.04.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Sosunov A, Olabarria M, Goldman JE. Alexander disease: an astrocytopathy that produces a leukodystrophy. Brain Pathol. 2018;28(3):388–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is sponsored by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFE0108300, 2016YFA0100900), National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81725009), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (81761148029, 21788102, 32027802, and 82030049).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mei Tian or Hong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any study with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurology

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Jiang, H., Qin, X. et al. PET imaging of reactive astrocytes in neurological disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05640-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05640-5

Keywords

  • Positron emission tomography (PET)
  • Reactive astrocytes
  • Monoamine oxidases-B (MAO-B)
  • Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
  • Parkinson’s disease (PD)
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
  • Multiple sclerosis (MS)