Abstract
Acute calcific periarthritis (ACP) is a self-limiting, monoarticular, peri-articular process of dystrophic mineral deposition and adjacent inflammation. Patients present with a sudden onset of pain, localised swelling, erythema, tenderness and restricted range of motion. Symptoms reduce in severity within 4–7 days and self resolve in 3–4 weeks. ACP is commonly misdiagnosed, in particular, as infective or inflammatory pathologies such as septic arthritis and gout. This condition has specific imaging findings which allows differentiation from other disorders when combined with the clinical presentation. Prompt diagnosis results in appropriate management and reduces the likelihood of unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acute calcific periarthritis (ACP) is a self-limiting, monoarticular, peri-articular process of dystrophic mineral deposition which was first described in 1870 by Duplay [1]. The majority of cases involve the shoulder [2, 3]. Less commonly, there may be involvement of the hip, knee, ankle, foot, elbow, wrist and fingers [1, 3,4,5]. As the name suggests, mineral deposition is most prevalent in a periarticular location; however, deposits within a bursa, at tendon insertions or at fascial attachments distant to the joint may also occur [6]. A history of trauma is elicited in one third of patients with acute calcific periarthritis [7]. Repetitive microtrauma in the hand (especially in manual workers) and the feet (due to footwear) is also postulated as a possible cause of ACP [8]. The true prevalence of this condition is unknown due to the self-limiting course of the condition [9].
Acute calcific periarthritis affects both males and females over a broad age range, with an average age of 45 years [7]. Some authors note that ACP involving distal articulations (elbow, wrist, hand and great toe) demonstrates a higher proportion of pre- and perimenopausal women [5, 9,10,11].
Due to the clinical presentation, a high proportion of cases of ACP are misdiagnosed. Rates of misdiagnosis range from 58 to 70% [9, 12, 13]. This may result in unnecessary diagnostic and management procedures, inappropriate drug therapy (particularly antibiotics) and hospital admission [9, 13]. An association between ACP and systemic diseases, such as hypothyroidism, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, gout and pseudogout, has been reported [14]. The objective of this article is to present the imaging findings of ACP using multiple modalities and examples from a variety of upper and lower limb joints and to discuss and differentiate ACP from other pathologies, in particular, acute septic arthritis.
Clinical presentation, course and management
Clinically, patients present with pain, localised swelling, erythema, tenderness and restricted range of motion [10, 15, 16]. Even without treatment, the majority of patients report a reduction in symptoms within 4–7 days after the acute onset of pain and resolution in 3–4 weeks [4, 17]. Relapse of acute calcific periarthritis is uncommon [4, 13]. Few multifocal, recurrent and familial cases have been previously reported [10, 18].
Management may include local anaesthetic or corticosteroid injection, oral NSAIDs and/or use of a resting splint [8,9,10, 12, 19, 20]. These measures are aimed at providing both symptomatic relief and reducing the clinical course of the disease.
Pathophysiology
The aetiology and pathophysiology of acute calcific periarthritis remain uncertain [21, 22]. Local hypoxia in critical areas of the tendon, ligament or capsule, due to poor blood flow induced by mechanical, metabolic or other factors, is postulated as the cause of calcium deposition [23].
The evolution of acute calcific periarthritis has been divided into four phases [24]. The precalcific phase (phase 1) is characterised by metaplasia of collagen fibres of the tendon into fibrocartilage. In the formative phase (phase 2), formation of calcified appetite crystals occurs which is mediated by chondrocytes. In the resorptive phase (phase 3), the accumulation of leukocytes, lymphocytes and giant cells results in formation of a calcium granuloma. The post calcific phase (phase 4) is characterised by formation of new capillaries and collagen fibres [24].
Rupture of calcific deposits and extension into an adjacent soft tissue space or bursa result in an acute crystal-induced inflammatory response, which heralds the onset of clinical symptoms [9]. Macrophages mediated by the inflammatory response then eliminate the deposits within the involved tissue via phagocytosis. On resolution, the capsule, ligament or tendon has returned to a normal structure [9, 24].
Pathological examination demonstrates deposition of calcific material into psammoma-like bodies, which is surrounded by extensive inflammatory cells, in particular, neutrophils [25, 26]. The composition of the calcific deposits on electron microscopy is controversial [15]. Previously, studies have reported the deposits to consist of calcium hydroxyapatite; hence, the term hydroxyapatite deposition disease has been used to describe the underlying disease process of calcific periarthritis and calcific tendonitis [13, 27,28,29,30]. More recent studies by Hamada and colleagues, however, have demonstrated calcium appetite [21, 22].
Chung et al. (2004) describe four macroscopic phases of calcium deposition and corresponding symptomatology. In the first phase, the calcium is contained within the tendon. Patients in phase one are asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic [31]. In the second (or mechanical) phase, there is an increase in the size of the deposit, which results in elevation of the floor of the subacromial bursa. Mass effect on the bursa may result in pain and bursitis. Deposits may extrude into the bursa (sub-bursal rupture) or complete intrabursal rupture. In phase three, there is an adhesive periarthritis and/or an adhesive bursitis. In the fourth phase (intraosseous loculation), deposits may erode into the adjacent bone at the insertion of the involved tendon or joint capsule, due to osteoclastic activity, which is postulated to be secondary to a combination of mechanical pressure and local active hyperemia [31]. Bone erosions commonly contain histiocytic infiltrate [15]. In a study by the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, cortical erosion and extension into the intramedullary bone were demonstrated in 78% and 36% of patients respectively [32]. It is postulated that mineral particles may migrate into the marrow space even in the absence of a cortical breech, via transcortical vascular pores [15].
Imaging findings
On radiographs, deposits of ACP are distinct, homogeneous, peri-articular densities, with no evidence of ossification (i.e. no internal trabeculae or definable cortex) that are localised to the site of symptomatology [12, 18, 33] (Fig. 1). Periarticular calcification may be located within the joint capsule or within adjacent tendons/peritendinous tissues and ligaments [34,35,36,37,38] (Fig. 2). There is significant variability in the size of the calcification which does not correlate with the severity of symptoms [33].
Over time, the mineralisation changes in morphology and configuration becomes less well defined and may fragment [33] (Fig. 3). Deposits usually resolve or markedly decrease within 2–3 weeks [9, 10] (Fig. 4). In some instances, calcifications may remain visible for months. Although not common, bone marrow edema may be evident in the presence of peri-articular calcification [31]. Periarticular calcific deposits may be missed or misinterpreted as accessory ossicles or avulsion fractures, particularly in the fingers and feet [15]. Acute calcific tendonitis of longus colli is a rare form of acute calcific periarthritis demonstrating prevertebral soft tissue swelling and calcification at the level of the atlanto-axial joint.
On ultrasound, the periarticular calcific deposits may be visible. Color Doppler may demonstrate adjacent capsular and pericapsular hyperemia (Fig. 5).
On magnetic resonance imaging, calcifications are invariably low signal intensity on all pulse sequences. Two authors [22, 28] have reported cases of calcified deposits which were hyperintense on T2-weighted sequences. Vinson postulated that this appearance in ACP is due to the liquid nature of the deposit [39]. In acute presentations, soft tissue edema is present adjacent to the calcific deposits, which, in most circumstances, correlates with the patient’s symptoms. Peri-articular calcific deposits without adjacent soft tissue edema may also occur. Review and correlation with radiographs are essential. Calcification, particularly when small, is more conspicuous on radiographs. Small calcific deposits may be easily missed on MRI without a corresponding radiograph.
The edema may be capsular or pericapsular, bursal, ligamentous/peri-ligamentous or peritendinous [31] (Figs. 6, 7 and 8). Associated bone marrow edema, cortical erosion and intra-osseous extension are uncommon (Fig. 9). Bone scan may demonstrate uptake corresponding to the site of calcific deposits [8, 12]. Occasionally, capsular and pericapsular calcific deposits may be multi-focal (Fig. 10). CT or ultrasound may be used to perform imaging-guided injections of corticosteroid and anaesthesia (Fig. 11).
Differential diagnoses
Acute calcific periarthritis has a high rate of misdiagnosis as it may clinically mimic other pathology [13]. The most commonly misdiagnoses include infective and inflammatory processes, arthropathies or less likely neoplasia [4, 15].
Acute infection may be excluded based on the imaging findings. In most circumstances, calcification such as occurring in ACP is not present in acute infection, unless there is pre-existing calcification secondary to superimposed chronic renal disease or crystalline arthropathy. Soft tissue calcification is a late manifestation of infection which may be visualised weeks to months after onset [40]. Although superimposed infection has been reported in the setting of acute calcific periarthritis, this is rare [4].
The monoarticular nature of acute calcific periarthritis and that it does not involve the joint proper may assist in differentiating this entity from other inflammatory and erosive arthropathies. Crystal arthropathies such as gout and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystal deposition disease may also be differentiated radiologically from acute calcific periarthritis. Similar to infection, calcification is present in the intermediate and late stages of chronic gout as a tophus. Tophi however are associated with a soft tissue mass. Also pathognomonic for gout are juxta-cortical “punched out” erosions with sclerotic margins. These erosions may also have an overhanging edge of cortex [41]. Gout tends to have and asymmetric polyarticular distribution [41]. In many circumstances, patients who present with an acute attack of gout will have a pre-existing diagnosis of gout and will report a history of recurrent exacerbations.
CPPD is estimated to afflict 5% of the population and may present with acute exacerbations and similar appearing calcifications within the soft tissues [41]. Chondrocalcinosis, which is the deposition of CPPD crystals into fibrous or hyaline cartilage is not exclusive to CPPD, however, is not present in ACP [341]. Calcifications associated with CPPD arthropathy are reported to be more linear or elongated than those seen in ACP and hydroxyapatite deposition disease [18]. Crystal deposition may also be present in ligaments, tendons and bursae.
Other radiographic findings which may be seen in CPPD include a bilateral distribution, uniform joint space loss, subchondral new bone formation and intra-osseous cysts which may be more prominent than those associated with osteoarthritis [41].
Many of the systemic arthritides (such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriatic arthritis) may also be associated with calcifications [41]. In each of these pathologies, the calcifications tend to be multiple. Additional findings in SLE include juxta-articular osteoporosis, subluxations/dislocations and osteonecrosis. In psoriatic arthritis, there is a bilateral asymmetrical distribution, with joint space loss, bone proliferation and erosions (“pencil in cup”). The most commonly involved joints in order of frequency are the hands, feet, sacroiliac joints and spine, whereas the most commonly involved joint in ACP is the shoulder [41].
Metastatic calcification and collagen vascular disease (such as scleroderma) may mimic the calcifications of ACP; however, the clinical presentation in these conditions differs to that of ACP [31]. Metastatic periarticular calcifications may be due to end-stage renal disease, hypoparathyroidism, tumoral calcinosis, vitamin D intoxication and sarcoidosis [39]. A cortex and internal trabeculation, characteristics of heterotopic ossification, are not present in ACP [23, 39]. Metabolic disease such as hypophosphatasia has been reported as an uncommon cause of ACP.
Limitations
Histopathological correlation for the cases presented in this article has not been obtained. Each case was diagnosed with acute calcific periarthritis after consensus with the reporting musculoskeletal radiologist and the referring physician and subsequent clinical follow-up.
Conclusion
Acute calcific periarthritis is an uncommon but important diagnosis. Greater awareness of the clinical presentation and radiological findings will result in prompt diagnosis and management and more rapid resolution. This will also reduce further unnecessary investigations, potential biopsy and inappropriate management.
References
Sandstrom C. Peritendintis calcarea. A common disease of middle life: its diagnosis, pathology and treatment. AJR. 1938;40:1–21.
Kim JK, Park ES. Acute calcium deposits in the hand and wrist; comparison of acute calcium peritendinitis and acute calcium periarthritis. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2014;39(4):436–9.
Fam A, Rubenstein J. Hydroxyapatite pseudopodagra. A syndrome of young women. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 1989;32(6):741–747.
Johnson G, Guly H. Acute calcific periarthritis outside the shoulder: a frequently misdiagnosed condition. Emerg Med J. 1994;11(3):198–200.
Swannell AJ, Underwood FA, Dixon AS. Periarticular calcific deposits mimicking acute arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1970;29(4):380.
Bosworth BM. Calcium deposits in the shoulder and subacromial bursitis: a survey of 12,122 shoulders. J Am Med Assoc. 1941;116(22):2477–82.
Carroll RE, Sinton W, Garcia A. Acute calcium deposits in the hand. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157(5):422–6.
Lee KB, Song KJ, Kwak HS, Lee SY. Acute calcific periarthritis of proximal inter-phalangeal joint in a professional golfer’s hand. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19(6):904–6.
Yosipovitch G, Yosipovitch Z. Acute calcific periarthritis of the hand and elbows in women. A study and review of the literature. The Journal of rheumatology. 1993 Sep 1;20(9):1533–8.
McCarthy GM, Carrera GF, Ryan LM. Acute calcific periarthritis of the finger joints: a syndrome of women. J Rheumatol. 1993;20(6):1077–80.
Arandas F, Santos F, de Souza S, Farias S, de Moura T, de Moura C. Acute calcific periarthritis of the hand. JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2005;11(4):223–224.
Moyer RA, Bush DC, Harrington TM. Acute calcific tendinitis of the hand and wrist: a report of 12 cases and a review of the literature. J Rheumatol. 1989;16(2):198–202.
Doumas C, Vazirani RM, Clifford PD, Owens P. Acute calcific periarthritis of the hand and wrist: a series and review of the literature. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14(4):199–203.
Kim KC, Kim JC, Jeong JY, Jeon OJ, Joo YM, Lee SJ. The relationship between shoulder periarthritis and NIDDM. J Korean Diabet Assoc. 1991;15:263–5.
Lehmer LM, Ragsdale BD. Calcific periarthritis: more than a shoulder problem: a series of fifteen cases. JBJS. 2012 Nov 7;94(21):e157.
Resnick D. 1988. Calcium hydroxyapatite crystal deposition disease. Diagnosis of bone and joint disease, 2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 425–430.
Thompson GR, Ting YM, Riggs GA, Fenn ME, Denning RM. Calcific tendinitis and soft-tissue calcification resembling gout. JAMA. 1968;203(7):464–72.
Hayes CW, Rosental DI, Plata MJ, et al. Calcific tendinitis in unusual sites associated with cortical bone erosion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:967–70.
Dilley DF, Tonkin MA. Acute calcific tendinitis in the hand and wrist. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1991;16(2):215–6.
Mercer NS, Newman JH, Watt I. Acute calcific periarthritis in a child. J Hand Surg Br. 1984;9(3):351–2.
Hamada J, Ono WA, Tamai KA, Saotome KO, Hoshino TA. Analysis of calcium deposits in calcific periarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(4):809–13.
Hamada JI, Tamai K, Ono W, Saotome K. Does the nature of deposited basic calcium phosphate crystals determine clinical course in calcific periarthritis of the shoulder? J Rheumatol. 2006;33(2):326–32.
Friedman S, Margau R, Friedman L. Acute calcific periarthritis of the thumb: correlated sonographic and radiographic findings. Radiology Case Reports. 2018;13(1):205–7.
Uhthoff HK, Sarkar K, Maynard JA. Calcifying tendinitis: a new concept of its pathogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;118:164–8 (PMID: 954272).
Gravanis MB, Gaffney EF. Idiopathic calcifying tenosynovitis. Histopathologic features and possible pathogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983;7:357–61.
Metha JA, Bignold LP, Pope RO. Intraarticular rupture of digital tenosynovial calcification: an unusual case of acute arthritis of the finger. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:1643–4.
Gärtner J, Daculsi G. Analysis of calcific deposits in calcifying tendinitis. Clin Orthop. 1990;254:111–20.
Boskey AL, Bullough PG, Vigorita V, et al. Calcium-acid phospholipid phosphate complexes in human hydroxyapatite-containing pathologic deposits. Am J Pathol. 1988;133:22–9.
Ralph Schumacher H, Miller JL, Ludivico C, Jessar RA. Erosive arthritis associated with apatite crystal deposition. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 1981;24(1):31–7.
Dieppe PA, Crocker PR, Huskisson EC, Willoughby DA. Apatite deposition disease: a new arthropathy. The Lancet. 1976;307(7954):266–9.
Chung CB, Gentili A, Chew FS. Calcific tendinosis and periarthritis: classic magnetic resonance imaging appearance and associated findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28(3):390–6.
Flemming DJ, Murphey MD, Shekitka KM, Temple HT, Jelinek JJ, Kransdorf MJ. Osseous involvement in calcific tendinitis: a retrospective review of 50 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(4):965–72.
Selby CL. Acute calcific tendinitis of the hand: an infrequently recognized and frequently misdiagnosed form of periarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:337–40.
Muschol M, Muller I, Petersen W, Hassenpflug J. Symptomatic calcification of the medial collateral ligament of the knee joint: a report about five cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13(7):598–602.
Mansfield HL, Trezies A. Calcific tendonitis of the medial collateral ligament. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(7):543.
Song K, Dong J, Zhang Y, et al. Arthroscopic management of calcific tendonitis of the medial collateral ligament. Knee. 2013;20(1):63–5.
Chang WC, Huang GS, Lee CH, Kao HW, Chen CY. Calcification of medial collateral ligament of the knee: an uncommon cause of medial knee pain. J Clin Rheumatol. 2006;12(4):204–5.
Anderson SE, Bosshard C, Steinbach LS, Ballmer FT. MR imaging of calcification of the lateral collateral ligament of the knee: a rare abnormality and a cause of lateral knee pain. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181(1):199–202.
Vinson EN, Desai SV, Reddy S, Goldner RD. AJR teaching file: periarticular calcifications in two patients with acute hand pain. AJR. 2010;195:S76–9 (PMID: 21098165).
Shirtliff ME, Mader JT. Acute septic arthritis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:527–44.
Brower A, Flemming D. Arthritis in black and white. Amsterdam: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dimmick, S., Hayter, C. & Linklater, J. Acute calcific periarthritis—a commonly misdiagnosed pathology. Skeletal Radiol 51, 1553–1561 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04006-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04006-8