Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do Patients Really Have Pain with Quadriceps Fat Pad Edema?

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the appropriate MRI criteria for the radiological diagnosis of significant quadriceps fat pad edema, to investigate the relationship between these criteria and anterior knee pain, and to evaluate possible structural and positional factors in the etiology.

Material and Methods

In this retrospective case–control study, individuals with and without quadriceps fat pad edema in the knee MRIs taken between May 2016 and December 2018 were determined as the case and control groups, respectively, in a ratio of 1:1. The MRI criteria for significant quadriceps fat pad edema were set as 10 mm and above the anterior–posterior diameter of the quadriceps fat pad, posterior convexity, and an increased signal in the fat-suppressed proton density sequence. The groups were compared for anterior knee pain, pain characteristics, working positions (sitting and standing), and MRI findings of structural factors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 108 individuals were evaluated. Anterior knee pain was more common in the case group (49/54, p < 0.001) and was highly correlated with signs of quadriceps fat pad edema (R = -0,657). Frequent pain at night (18/54, p = 0.013), increased pain when walking upstairs (40/54, p = 0.003), knees are flexed (43/54, p < 0.001), and decreased pain when knees are extended (42/54, p < 0.001) were significantly high in the case group. No significant differences were observed in working position and structural factors.

Conclusion

Quadriceps fat pad edema is significantly associated with anterior knee pain and certain specific pain characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dixit S, DiFiori JP, Burton M, Mines B. Management of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75(2):194–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McConnell J. The physical therapist’s approach to patellofemoral disorders. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21(3):363–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Green ST. Patellofemoral syndrome. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2005;9(1):16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crossley KM, Callaghan MJ, van Linschoten R. Patellofemoral pain. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(4):247–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schweitzer ME, Falk A, Pathria M, Brahme S, Hodler J, Resnick D. MR imaging of the knee: can changes in the intracapsular fat pads be used as a sign of synovial proliferation in the presence of an effusion? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(4):823–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB. Quadriceps fat pad edema: significance on magnetic resonance images of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35(5):269–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roth C, Jacobson J, Jamadar D, Caoili E, Morag Y, Housner J. Quadriceps fat pad signal intensity and enlargement on MRI: prevalence and associated findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(6):1383–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kucukciloglu Y, Tuncyurek O. Anterior Knee Pain and Oedema-Like Changes of The Suprapatellar Fat Pad: Correlation of The Symptoms with MRI Findings. Current Medical Imaging. 2021;17(11):1350–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Polit, Denise F, Beck CT. Nursing research: Principles and methods: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.

  10. Dejour D, Le Coultre B. Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2007;15(1):39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiberg G. Roentgenographs and Anatomic Studies on the Femoropatellar Joint: With Special Reference to Chondromalacia Patellae. Acta Orthop Scand. 1941;12(1–4):319–410.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jungius KP, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Koch P, Pfirrmann CW. Cartilaginous defects of the femorotibial joint: accuracy of coronal short inversion time inversion-recovery MR sequence. Radiology. 2006;240(2):482–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsavalas N, Karantanas AH. Suprapatellar fat-pad mass effect: MRI findings and correlation with anterior knee pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):W291-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Staeubli HU, Bollmann C, Kreutz R, Becker W, Rauschning W. Quantification of intact quadriceps tendon, quadriceps tendon insertion, and suprapatellar fat pad: MR arthrography, anatomy, and cryosections in the sagittal plane. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(3):691–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merve Şam Özdemir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Şam Özdemir, M., Ekin, E.E., Sari, K. et al. Do Patients Really Have Pain with Quadriceps Fat Pad Edema?. Skeletal Radiol 51, 1425–1432 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03980-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03980-9

Keywords

Navigation